Constellation, Vistra, and GE Vernova Ranked From Worst to First for the AI Power Boom

Source The Motley Fool

Key Points

  • Constellation Energy and Vistra both generate and sell electricity on the open market.

  • AI Power demand is a huge tailwind for both Constellation and Vistra.

  • GE Vernova sells turbines that will be needed to generate the electricity AI uses.

  • 10 stocks we like better than Vistra ›

Constellation Energy (NASDAQ: CEG) and Vistra (NYSE: VST) are both benefiting from artificial intelligence (AI) power demand. Both have large power supply contracts with technology companies building AI data centers. One big difference between the two is scale, which may give Constellation Energy the edge for more conservative types.

GE Vernova (NYSE: GEV) sells the turbines utilities use to generate power, with a huge $176 billion backlog. It is the most growth-oriented choice here, which will likely give it the edge for some investors. Here's where these three AI power plays sit from an investor's standpoint.

Missed AI’s "Act 1"? Act 2 Could Be 15x Bigger. Most investors think they missed the AI boat because they didn't buy Nvidia in 2005. But according to our analysts, we’re only at the end of "Act 1"—the R&D phase. "Act 2" is the global rollout. Continue »

Glowing power lines.

Image source: Getty Images.

Supplying AI with power

The big story for Constellation and Vistra is the growth in electricity demand. Between 2005 and 2025, electricity demand grew 10%. Between 2025 and 2045, demand is expected to grow 60%. That's a step change driven by new technologies like artificial intelligence. The International Energy Agency expects AI power demand to grow four times faster than all other power demand over the next decade.

Constellation and Vistra are independent power producers, selling electricity outside of the regulatory framework. That means they sell power at market rates, which will let them benefit if demand drives prices higher. And they are both selling power directly to the technology companies building the AI backbone. Moreover, their stocks have similar valuations, with both sporting price-to-earnings ratios of around 24x.

The big differences between the two come down to scale, generation, and dividend growth. More conservative investors will probably be better served going with Constellation, which is nearly twice as large, is the largest nuclear power plant operator in the United States, and offers a faster-growing dividend. Their yields are similar, at around 0.6%, just like their valuations, but Constellation Energy's more rapid dividend growth will be very attractive to income-oriented investors, as it can turn that miserly yield into a much larger income stream over time.

That said, if you prefer more growth-oriented investments, Vistra could be the better option. The problem is that it is expensive to build scale in the utility sector, noting that Vistra's debt-to-equity ratio is a lofty 3.6x compared to Constellation's 0.8x. (For reference, GE Vernova's ratio is an even lower 0.25x.) Utility businesses often operate with material leverage, but if you are risk-averse, Constellation will probably still be the better choice.

Supplying the power suppliers

GE Vernova is another option for growth-oriented investors that may be more appealing. Formerly part of the old General Electric, GE Vernova makes power turbines, including both wind and natural-gas turbines. It essentially sells these vital parts to companies such as Constellation and Vistra, among others. Demand has been strong, with GE Vernova's backlog totaling $176 billion at the end of the second quarter of 2026.

That suggests years of growth ahead for GE Vernova, and it doesn't require a bet on a single power producer. GE Vernova can sell to any company. The stock's valuation, meanwhile, is roughly similar to that of Constellation and Vistra, with a P/E ratio of around 24x. GE Vernova has a fairly short history as a stand-alone business, but it is a well-respected and established company within the power industry. If growth is what you are after, it probably beats out Vistra.

Vistra is the odd man out

More conservative investors will probably be best served by Constellation Energy because of its scale, reliable nuclear power portfolio, and faster-growing dividend. Growth investors will likely be more appreciative of GE Vernova's massive backlog and its ability to sell to any power company looking to meet AI demand growth. That leaves Vistra somewhere in the middle, with a relatively high debt-to-equity ratio hinting that its risk/reward profile may not be as attractive as the other two options here.

Should you buy stock in Vistra right now?

Before you buy stock in Vistra, consider this:

The Motley Fool Stock Advisor analyst team just identified what they believe are the 10 best stocks for investors to buy now… and Vistra wasn’t one of them. The 10 stocks that made the cut could produce monster returns in the coming years.

Consider when Netflix made this list on December 17, 2004... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you’d have $355,124!* Or when Nvidia made this list on April 15, 2005... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you’d have $1,296,254!*

Now, it’s worth noting Stock Advisor’s total average return is 901% — a market-crushing outperformance compared to 210% for the S&P 500. Don't miss the latest top 10 list, available with Stock Advisor, and join an investing community built by individual investors for individual investors.

See the 10 stocks »

*Stock Advisor returns as of October 24, 2026.

Reuben Gregg Brewer has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool has positions in and recommends Constellation Energy, GE Vernova, and Vistra. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.

Disclaimer: For information purposes only. Past performance is not indicative of future results.
placeholder
The Fed will sit still on October 28 — but 100 of 100 economists now expect a December hikeA Reuters poll run October 16-20 found 94 of 100 economists expecting the Fed to hold at 3.75-4.00% on October 28 — and all 100 expecting a hike in December, against less than half a month earlier. The market is close to the same price, with CME FedWatch at roughly 17% for October and 82.8% for December. With the Fed in blackout since October 17, here are the five dates that decide the rest of the year, what each one is priced for, and the two directions each can take.
Author  Irene Q.
Oct 22, Thu
A Reuters poll run October 16-20 found 94 of 100 economists expecting the Fed to hold at 3.75-4.00% on October 28 — and all 100 expecting a hike in December, against less than half a month earlier. The market is close to the same price, with CME FedWatch at roughly 17% for October and 82.8% for December. With the Fed in blackout since October 17, here are the five dates that decide the rest of the year, what each one is priced for, and the two directions each can take.
placeholder
Gold falls to two‑month low below $4,050 as oil spikesGold price (XAU/USD) falls to the lowest in more than two months near $4,025 during the early Asian session on Friday. The precious metal faces some selling pressure as escalating tensions in the Middle East send oil surging ahead of a Federal Reserve (Fed) policy meeting.
Author  FXStreet
Oct 23, Fri
Gold price (XAU/USD) falls to the lowest in more than two months near $4,025 during the early Asian session on Friday. The precious metal faces some selling pressure as escalating tensions in the Middle East send oil surging ahead of a Federal Reserve (Fed) policy meeting.
placeholder
Gold Price Analysis Today | Forex Gold Analysis | XAU/USD Analysis - October 23, 2026Get the latest gold price analysis, forex gold insights, and XAU/USD analysis for October 23, 2026. Read on for the details.
Author  Mitrade
Oct 23, Fri
Get the latest gold price analysis, forex gold insights, and XAU/USD analysis for October 23, 2026. Read on for the details.
placeholder
Nasdaq closes at 26,008.86 — 8.9 points above 26,000, and the credit market never blinkedThe Nasdaq Composite fell 2.60% to 26,008.86 on October 22, its worst session since June, as Meta sank 6.98% on 2026 capex guidance of $135–145 billion. But the equal-weight S&P 500 rose 0.73%, high-yield credit was flat and 10-year yields fell 20 basis points. This was an AI de-rating, not a risk-off event — here is the transmission chain, the 29,000 / 28,200 levels and what would prove it wrong.
Author  Irene Q.
Oct 23, Fri
The Nasdaq Composite fell 2.60% to 26,008.86 on October 22, its worst session since June, as Meta sank 6.98% on 2026 capex guidance of $135–145 billion. But the equal-weight S&P 500 rose 0.73%, high-yield credit was flat and 10-year yields fell 20 basis points. This was an AI de-rating, not a risk-off event — here is the transmission chain, the 29,000 / 28,200 levels and what would prove it wrong.
placeholder
Brent tops $113 on Saudi supply risk — but the diesel line in the EIA report is the tellBrent's December contract settled at $113.17 on October 22, up 4.00% and the highest close since May 4, after Saudi Arabia restricted refined-product shipments. The same session's EIA report showed crude stocks down 3.06 million barrels and gasoline down 2.95 million — but distillates built 1.68 million. That single line decides whether $113 holds: here are the data, the 108.8 / 114.0 / 119.3 levels and the two scenarios.
Author  Irene Q.
Oct 23, Fri
Brent's December contract settled at $113.17 on October 22, up 4.00% and the highest close since May 4, after Saudi Arabia restricted refined-product shipments. The same session's EIA report showed crude stocks down 3.06 million barrels and gasoline down 2.95 million — but distillates built 1.68 million. That single line decides whether $113 holds: here are the data, the 108.8 / 114.0 / 119.3 levels and the two scenarios.
goTop
quote