Which Financial ETF is the Better Fit? Invesco KBW Bank ETF (KBWB) or iShares Regional Banks ETF (IAT)

Source The Motley Fool

Key Points

  • Invesco KBW Bank ETF offers a slightly lower expense ratio and significantly higher assets under management than iShares U.S. Regional Banks ETF.

  • iShares U.S. Regional Banks ETF focuses exclusively on regional institutions, while Invesco KBW Bank ETF includes money center banks and thrifts.

  • Both funds concentrate entirely on the financial services sector, but iShares U.S. Regional Banks ETF currently provides a higher trailing dividend yield.

  • 10 stocks we like better than Invesco Exchange-Traded Fund Trust II - Invesco Kbw Bank ETF ›

Invesco KBW Bank ETF (NASDAQ:KBWB) provides diversified exposure across national and regional banks, whereas iShares U.S. Regional Banks ETF (NYSEMKT:IAT) focuses exclusively on the regional banking sector.

Investors seeking exposure to the financial sector often choose between broad-based banking funds and those targeting specific niches. This comparison examines two popular options that differ in concentration and in the specific types of banking institutions included in their respective portfolios.

Snapshot (cost & size)

MetricIATKBWB
IssueriSharesInvesco
Share price$57.49 (as of 2026-10-05)$87.56 (as of 2026-10-05)
Expense ratio0.37%0.35%
1-yr return (as of 2026-10-05)13.1%15.6%
Dividend yield2.9%2.1%
Beta0.921.05
AUM$0.6 billion$6.2 billion

Beta measures price volatility relative to the S&P 500; beta is calculated from monthly returns over the available fund history (up to five years). The 1-yr return represents total return over the trailing 12 months. Dividend yield is the trailing-12-month distribution yield.

Invesco KBW Bank ETF is slightly more affordable with a 0.35% expense ratio. However, investors looking for income may prefer the iShares U.S. Regional Banks ETF, which currently offers a higher payout than its competitor.

Performance & risk comparison

MetricIATKBWB
Max drawdown (5 yr)(55.6%)(49.3%)
Growth of $1,000 over 5 years (total return)$1,083$1,453

What's inside

Invesco KBW Bank ETF focuses on the financial services sector (100%) and tracks 26 holdings. Its largest positions include JPMorgan Chase & Co (NYSE:JPM) at 8.10%, Wells Fargo & Co (NYSE:WFC) at 8.08%, and Morgan Stanley (NYSE:MS) at 7.74%. It was launched in 2011. Invesco KBW Bank ETF has paid $1.87 per share over the trailing 12 months, which, on its recent ~$87.6 share price, works out to a 2.1% yield.

iShares U.S. Regional Banks ETF also focuses on financial services (100%) but contains 30 holdings specifically in the regional bank sub-sector. Its largest positions include U.S. Bancorp (NYSE:USB) at 15.01%, PNC Financial Services Group (NYSE:PNC) at 14.77%, and Truist Financial (NYSE:TFC) at 9.51%. It was launched in 2006. iShares U.S. Regional Banks ETF has paid $1.64 per share over the trailing 12 months, which, on its recent ~$57.5 share price, works out to a 2.9% yield.

For more guidance on ETF investing, check out the full guide at this link.

Which looks like the better buy

To compare the Invesco KBW Bank ETF (KBWB) and the iShares U.S. Regional Banks ETF (IAT), investors should consider a few key factors. Let's have a look at them and see what that tells us about each fund.


To begin, there are differences in allocations between the two funds. KBWB focuses on major money-center banks and very large regional banks. IAT, by contrast, holds only shares of U.S. regional banks. What's more, the size of the funds themselves varies. KBWB has around $6.2 billion in AUM, while IAT has about $0.6 billion in AUM. While both funds exhibit decent liquidity, some investors may find it marginally easier to transact in KBWB shares given its greater AUM.

Two other important factors are historical performance and income potential. As for performance, KBWB has come out ahead over the last five years. Since 2021, KBWB has generated a total return of 43%, equating to a compound annual growth rate of 7.4%. IAT, meanwhile, has delivered a total return of 6%, with a CAGR of 1.3%. Both funds have underperformed the S&P 500 over this period. Turning to income potential, IAT does offer the more compelling choice for income-oriented investors, with a dividend yield of 2.9% versus 2.1% for KBWB.

One final factor to weigh is cost. Here, the gap is narrow. KBWB is slightly lower, with an expense ratio of 0.35%, while IAT has 0.38%.


In summary, even though IAT and KBWB are both financial sector ETFs, they differ in several key respects. KBWB leads on several important factors, such as cost and historical performance, while IAT has an edge on income potential. Nonetheless, some investors may favor KBWB overall, with its mix of large, money-center bank stocks and larger regional banks. However, for those seeking to own only regional banks, IAT is a fund to consider.

Should you buy stock in Invesco Exchange-Traded Fund Trust II - Invesco Kbw Bank ETF right now?

Before you buy stock in Invesco Exchange-Traded Fund Trust II - Invesco Kbw Bank ETF, consider this:

The Motley Fool Stock Advisor analyst team just identified what they believe are the 10 best stocks for investors to buy now… and Invesco Exchange-Traded Fund Trust II - Invesco Kbw Bank ETF wasn’t one of them. The 10 stocks that made the cut could produce monster returns in the coming years.

Consider when Netflix made this list on December 17, 2004... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you’d have $385,972!* Or when Nvidia made this list on April 15, 2005... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you’d have $1,416,196!*

Now, it’s worth noting Stock Advisor’s total average return is 951% — a market-crushing outperformance compared to 214% for the S&P 500. Don't miss the latest top 10 list, available with Stock Advisor, and join an investing community built by individual investors for individual investors.

See the 10 stocks »

*Stock Advisor returns as of October 9, 2026.

Wells Fargo is an advertising partner of Motley Fool Money. JPMorgan Chase is an advertising partner of Motley Fool Money. Jake Lerch has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool has positions in and recommends JPMorgan Chase, Truist Financial, and U.S. Bancorp. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.

Disclaimer: For information purposes only. Past performance is not indicative of future results.
placeholder
October hike odds climb toward 60% as Goldman and BofA both flip — what Warsh's "dose of accommodation" really changedRate futures now price roughly 55% to 62% for a 25bp hike at the October 27-28 FOMC, up from about 30% before Chair Warsh's post-meeting framing that the Fed is merely "removing some accommodation." Goldman Sachs has added an October hike to its forecast and Bank of America now sees moves in both October and December. Here is the repricing, the language behind it, and the two data points that decide it.
Author  Irene Q.
Sep 23, Wed
Rate futures now price roughly 55% to 62% for a 25bp hike at the October 27-28 FOMC, up from about 30% before Chair Warsh's post-meeting framing that the Fed is merely "removing some accommodation." Goldman Sachs has added an October hike to its forecast and Bank of America now sees moves in both October and December. Here is the repricing, the language behind it, and the two data points that decide it.
placeholder
Hurricane Isaias has shut in a quarter of Gulf oil output — can WTI clear $92 before Thursday's EIA report?WTI trades at $90.80 after rebounding roughly 3% from Wednesday's $87.96 low as Hurricane Isaias — the Atlantic season's first — forces producers to shut in about 25% of US Gulf of Mexico output. Brent holds at $103.41. The first official read on the disruption arrives with the EIA weekly petroleum report on Thursday 15 October — here are the key levels and both scenarios.
Author  Irene Q.
Oct 09, Fri
WTI trades at $90.80 after rebounding roughly 3% from Wednesday's $87.96 low as Hurricane Isaias — the Atlantic season's first — forces producers to shut in about 25% of US Gulf of Mexico output. Brent holds at $103.41. The first official read on the disruption arrives with the EIA weekly petroleum report on Thursday 15 October — here are the key levels and both scenarios.
placeholder
US September CPI preview: inflation set to hit 3.7% — will the Fed hike in December?US September CPI lands Wednesday with headline inflation seen at 3.7% y/y and core at 0.2% m/m. December hike odds sit near 70% — here are the scenarios, the calendar and the key levels.
Author  Irene Q.
Oct 10, Sat
US September CPI lands Wednesday with headline inflation seen at 3.7% y/y and core at 0.2% m/m. December hike odds sit near 70% — here are the scenarios, the calendar and the key levels.
placeholder
Gold posts first weekly gain in three weeks — can $4,200 hold through CPI?Spot gold closed at $4,194.645, up 1.47% — its first weekly gain in three weeks — and COMEX futures settled back above $4,200 at $4,220.30. Here are the drivers, the levels and the scenarios into Wednesday's CPI.
Author  Irene Q.
Oct 10, Sat
Spot gold closed at $4,194.645, up 1.47% — its first weekly gain in three weeks — and COMEX futures settled back above $4,200 at $4,220.30. Here are the drivers, the levels and the scenarios into Wednesday's CPI.
placeholder
Brent swings $105.63 to $102.33 as Gulf risk meets an 'energy ceasefire' — can $100 hold into CPI?Brent spiked to $105.63 in Asian trade on fresh Middle East supply incidents, then reversed to $102.33 after the US announced a Russia-Ukraine 'energy ceasefire' and 300,000+ tonnes of Russian diesel headed to global markets; WTI fell through $90. Here are the drivers, the levels and the scenarios into Wednesday's US CPI.
Author  Irene Q.
23 hours ago
Brent spiked to $105.63 in Asian trade on fresh Middle East supply incidents, then reversed to $102.33 after the US announced a Russia-Ukraine 'energy ceasefire' and 300,000+ tonnes of Russian diesel headed to global markets; WTI fell through $90. Here are the drivers, the levels and the scenarios into Wednesday's US CPI.
goTop
quote