I'd Put $10,000 Into These 3 Vanguard Funds and Not Touch It for 20 Years

Source The Motley Fool

Key Points

  • Combined, the three funds charge roughly $3 in yearly fees for each $10,000 invested.

  • The dividend fund returned around 21% over the 12 months through August, edging its two siblings.

  • The growth fund has the best 10-year record of the three at almost 18% a year.

  • 10 stocks we like better than Vanguard S&P 500 ETF ›

The S&P 500 (SNPINDEX:^GSPC) is roughly 1% below its record close as I write, and that sort of backdrop can make investing fresh money uncomfortable. No one wants to buy near a peak.

But over a 20-year horizon, I'd say the bigger mistake is usually never investing the money at all. If I were putting $10,000 to work with no plans to touch it for two decades, I'd split it among three Vanguard index funds: one that holds the S&P 500, one that tilts toward dividend payers, and one that leans into growth stocks. All told, their fees would run about $3 a year on the full position.

Missed Nvidia in 2009? This Rare Signal Is Flashing Again. In 2009, a "Double Down" signal flashed for a little-known chipmaker called Nvidia. For the first time in years, that same "Total Conviction" signal is flashing for a company 1/100th the size of Nvidia. Continue »

Here's a closer look at each fund -- and how I'd divide the money.

Two hands arranging the colorful segments of a pie chart over a stock chart background.

Image source: Getty Images.

1. Vanguard S&P 500 ETF

The core holding is the Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (NYSEMKT:VOO). The fund owned 505 stocks as of Aug. 31, and it charges an expense ratio of 0.03%, so nearly all of the index's return reaches the investor.

Shares of the fund cost around $708 as of this writing, just under their own high.

The fund has averaged roughly 15% annually over the past decade. And it gained around 20% in the year through August. No one should bank on that pace continuing for another 20 years.

In other words, don't buy this fund to beat anything. Its job is to deliver the market's return, whatever that ends up being, and to do it for almost nothing. Warren Buffett has made the same case. The instructions he has described for his estate call for 90% of the cash he leaves his wife to go into a low-cost S&P 500 index fund, and he suggested Vanguard's.

2. Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF

For the income tilt, I'd choose the Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (NYSEMKT:VYM). The fund follows the FTSE High Dividend Yield Index, a group of higher-yielding U.S. stocks that leans heavily toward value stocks. It recently owned 603 of them, costs 0.04%, and had a yield of around 2.2% at the end of August -- more than twice the S&P 500 fund's roughly 1%.

Granted, dividend funds are normally seen as the slow siblings, and for long periods this one has been. It returned around 12% per year in the last decade, far below the S&P 500 fund's 15%. But leadership rotates. Showing how fast the order can flip, the dividend fund returned around 21% for the 12 months through August, edging the S&P 500 fund and easily topping the growth fund.

That's just the job I'd hire it to do. It holds hundreds of established dividend payers that can lead when the market's growth stocks cool off.

3. Vanguard Morningstar Growth ETF

The third leg is the Vanguard Morningstar Growth ETF (NYSEMKT:VUG), known until late July as the Vanguard Growth ETF. (Vanguard renamed the fund after Morningstar bought CRSP, the index provider behind it. The strategy didn't change.)

The fund owns only 147 large-cap growth stocks, and like the S&P 500 fund, it costs 0.03%.

Its record is the best of the three -- an average annual return of almost 18% over the last decade. Still, the 12 months through August showed the other side of that concentration. The fund returned roughly 16% (the lowest of the three) while dividend payers led the market instead.

Concentrated growth is what gives the fund its long-term record, and it's also why I wouldn't make it the whole portfolio.

How would I split the money?

I'd put $5,000 into the S&P 500 fund and $2,500 into each of the other two. Half the money just takes whatever the market gives. The rest tilts a quarter toward income and a quarter toward growth, so the portfolio always holds some of what's working without me guessing which style leads next. Growth could stay ahead for another decade, or the dividend payers might take another turn leading, like they did for much of the last year. But I wouldn't have to get either right.

The 20-year part of the plan arguably counts as much as the funds. Even at 7% a year, well below what these funds returned in the last decade, $10,000 compounds to almost $39,000 over 20 years.

Sure, a two-decade hold will include bear markets, and all three funds would probably drop together in them. The plan doesn't depend on avoiding those stretches, though. It depends on not selling during them.

And at about $3 a year in combined fees, almost everything the three funds earn over those two decades stays with the investor.

Should you buy stock in Vanguard S&P 500 ETF right now?

Before you buy stock in Vanguard S&P 500 ETF, consider this:

The Motley Fool Stock Advisor analyst team just identified what they believe are the 10 best stocks for investors to buy now… and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF wasn’t one of them. The 10 stocks that made the cut could produce monster returns in the coming years.

Consider when Netflix made this list on December 17, 2004... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you’d have $383,680!* Or when Nvidia made this list on April 15, 2005... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you’d have $1,382,954!*

Now, it’s worth noting Stock Advisor’s total average return is 937% — a market-crushing outperformance compared to 214% for the S&P 500. Don't miss the latest top 10 list, available with Stock Advisor, and join an investing community built by individual investors for individual investors.

See the 10 stocks »

*Stock Advisor returns as of September 26, 2026.

Daniel Sparks and his clients do not have positions in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool has positions in and recommends Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF, Vanguard Morningstar Growth ETF, and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.

Disclaimer: For information purposes only. Past performance is not indicative of future results.
placeholder
Gold ends three-week slide at the $4,400 line — eight straight days of ETF inflows vs a 5% 10-year and a 100 dollarSpot gold closed Friday at $4,378.39, up 0.84% on the day and about 0.8% for the week — its first weekly gain in four weeks — with the intraday high of $4,399.67 leaving it 33 cents shy of the $4,400 line. Gold ETFs have now logged eight straight sessions of inflows, but with the 10-year back above 5% and the dollar index near 100, here is what decides whether this is a reversal or a bounce.
Author  Suzie
Sep 20, Sun
Spot gold closed Friday at $4,378.39, up 0.84% on the day and about 0.8% for the week — its first weekly gain in four weeks — with the intraday high of $4,399.67 leaving it 33 cents shy of the $4,400 line. Gold ETFs have now logged eight straight sessions of inflows, but with the 10-year back above 5% and the dollar index near 100, here is what decides whether this is a reversal or a bounce.
placeholder
October hike odds climb toward 60% as Goldman and BofA both flip — what Warsh's "dose of accommodation" really changedRate futures now price roughly 55% to 62% for a 25bp hike at the October 27-28 FOMC, up from about 30% before Chair Warsh's post-meeting framing that the Fed is merely "removing some accommodation." Goldman Sachs has added an October hike to its forecast and Bank of America now sees moves in both October and December. Here is the repricing, the language behind it, and the two data points that decide it.
Author  Irene Q.
Sep 23, Wed
Rate futures now price roughly 55% to 62% for a 25bp hike at the October 27-28 FOMC, up from about 30% before Chair Warsh's post-meeting framing that the Fed is merely "removing some accommodation." Goldman Sachs has added an October hike to its forecast and Bank of America now sees moves in both October and December. Here is the repricing, the language behind it, and the two data points that decide it.
placeholder
US input costs rose at the fastest pace in four years — the September flash PMI beat is an inflation story, not a growth storyUS September flash PMIs came in far above expectations, with the composite at 58.4, a five-year high. But the detail that moved markets was input cost inflation at its fastest since October 2022, driven by fuel, transport and supply shortages. Brent is back above $100 and the 10-year Treasury yield has hit its highest since 2007.
Author  Suzie
Sep 24, Thu
US September flash PMIs came in far above expectations, with the composite at 58.4, a five-year high. But the detail that moved markets was input cost inflation at its fastest since October 2022, driven by fuel, transport and supply shortages. Brent is back above $100 and the 10-year Treasury yield has hit its highest since 2007.
placeholder
Brent edges toward $99 as Trump rejects Iran's Hormuz proposal — why the war-risk premium won't rebuildBrent crude rose 0.92% to $98.51 and WTI gained 1.15% to $93.51 after President Trump rejected Iran's seven-day proposal to reopen the Strait of Hormuz. But both benchmarks remain about 12% below their early-September highs, because supply never actually stopped. Hormuz flows ran at 33.7 million barrels this week, in line with the prior week, and Saudi Arabia's East-West pipeline restarted on September 22.
Author  Suzie
19 hours ago
Brent crude rose 0.92% to $98.51 and WTI gained 1.15% to $93.51 after President Trump rejected Iran's seven-day proposal to reopen the Strait of Hormuz. But both benchmarks remain about 12% below their early-September highs, because supply never actually stopped. Hormuz flows ran at 33.7 million barrels this week, in line with the prior week, and Saudi Arabia's East-West pipeline restarted on September 22.
placeholder
Four jobs reports in five days: what JOLTS, ADP, claims and the September payrolls mean for the October Fed decisionThe US labour market faces its densest data week of the month. JOLTS job openings land Tuesday (7.2 million expected), ADP on Wednesday (70,000 expected), initial claims on Thursday and the September non-farm payrolls on Friday (100,000 expected, down from 162,000). Markets price a 64%-70% chance of another quarter-point Fed hike on October 28. The dollar index sits at 100.77 and the S&P 500 at 7,729.8.
Author  Mitrade
18 hours ago
The US labour market faces its densest data week of the month. JOLTS job openings land Tuesday (7.2 million expected), ADP on Wednesday (70,000 expected), initial claims on Thursday and the September non-farm payrolls on Friday (100,000 expected, down from 162,000). Markets price a 64%-70% chance of another quarter-point Fed hike on October 28. The dollar index sits at 100.77 and the S&P 500 at 7,729.8.
goTop
quote