Better AI Stock: SpaceX or Nvidia?

Source The Motley Fool

Key Points

  • Nvidia's growth and profit margin are unparalleled.

  • SpaceX has a lot of success already priced into its stock.

  • 10 stocks we like better than Nvidia ›

In the AI realm, many businesses are seeing rapid growth. Two of the fastest-growing are Nvidia (NASDAQ: NVDA) and Space Exploration Technologies (NASDAQ: SPCX). These two aren't competitors in the AI race, as SpaceX is a fairly large client of Nvidia's.

Which one of these two makes for the better AI investment moving forward? Let's take a look.

Missed AI’s "Act 1"? Act 2 Could Be 15x Bigger. Most investors think they missed the AI boat because they didn't buy Nvidia in 2005. But according to our analysts, we’re only at the end of "Act 1"—the R&D phase. "Act 2" is the global rollout. Continue »

Two people in suits, looking at a tablet.

Image source: Getty Images.

SpaceX is a major player in the AI realm

SpaceX may not seem like an AI investment, but I think it certainly should be categorized like one. During the second quarter, SpaceX spent $15.8 billion in capital expenditures on its AI division, increasing the amount of computing power available for xAI, Musk's AI company that was acquired shortly before going public. During Q2, its AI division increased its revenue at an impressive 213% pace, to $2.56 billion.

While AI isn't SpaceX's largest division, it's not far behind Connectivity, which generated $4.29 billion in revenue during Q2. It won't take too many more quarters before AI surpasses Connectivity in revenue generation, and I won't be surprised if that happens over the next year as AI becomes more widespread.

SpaceX is clearly an AI investment and belongs in the conversation about top AI businesses, especially with that rapid growth rate. But is it a better buy than Nvidia, which is often regarded as the leader of AI investing?

Nvidia makes computing units known as graphics processing units (GPUs) that excel in a wide variety of tasks. They are the industry standard in AI computing, and nearly every company involved in AI deploys Nvidia GPUs in some capacity. SpaceX is planning on exclusively deploying Nvidia hardware going forward, and Elon Musk had this to say about its relationship:

And going forward, we've decided to build exclusively on NVIDIA because we think the Vera Rubin architecture is the best architecture. We think it's the best AI computer, and we greatly value our close cooperation and partnership on many levels with NVIDIA. So, we're exclusive to NVIDIA.

It doesn't get any more definitive than that, and it shows that Nvidia is still at the top of the AI food chain, even with potential competitors rising around it.

None of the rising competition has derailed Nvidia, as it has delivered impressive revenue growth in recent quarters. During Q2, its revenue increased an impressive 106% year over year, beating SpaceX's companywide growth figure of 92%. However, what's notable here is the size difference between these two.

Nvidia's Q2 revenue totaled $96 billion. SpaceX's totaled $7.8 billion. There's an incredible size difference, but how does that translate to future returns?

Profits are more important than revenue in the long run

Investors focus more on profits at the end of the day, and there are few companies more profitable than Nvidia. It delivered a 62% profit margin during Q2. SpaceX was unprofitable in Q2, but projects to achieve a 45% profit margin once the business is fully mature.

So, even if SpaceX could snap its fingers and be fully profitable tomorrow, it would produce less profit per dollar of revenue than Nvidia. As a result, we can use their revenue totals as a direct comparison to see which stock has the most upside ahead.

Nvidia's revenue figure is over 12 times larger than SpaceX's. So, with the two having similar profit margin goals, it should be expected that Nvidia is 12 times larger than SpaceX, but that's not the case. Nvidia has a market cap of $5.4 trillion, while SpaceX trades for just shy of $2 trillion. That tells me that SpaceX is incredibly overvalued and could have issues providing strong returns because it needs to grow into its valuation. Meanwhile, Nvidia is still growing at a rapid pace and has plenty of growth left in the tank due to the strength of the AI build-out.

As a result, I think Nvidia is the better buy of the two.

Should you buy stock in Nvidia right now?

Before you buy stock in Nvidia, consider this:

The Motley Fool Stock Advisor analyst team just identified what they believe are the 10 best stocks for investors to buy now… and Nvidia wasn’t one of them. The 10 stocks that made the cut could produce monster returns in the coming years.

Consider when Netflix made this list on December 17, 2004... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you’d have $383,680!* Or when Nvidia made this list on April 15, 2005... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you’d have $1,382,954!*

Now, it’s worth noting Stock Advisor’s total average return is 937% — a market-crushing outperformance compared to 214% for the S&P 500. Don't miss the latest top 10 list, available with Stock Advisor, and join an investing community built by individual investors for individual investors.

See the 10 stocks »

*Stock Advisor returns as of September 28, 2026.

Keithen Drury has positions in Nvidia. The Motley Fool has positions in and recommends Nvidia. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.

Disclaimer: For information purposes only. Past performance is not indicative of future results.
placeholder
Gold ends three-week slide at the $4,400 line — eight straight days of ETF inflows vs a 5% 10-year and a 100 dollarSpot gold closed Friday at $4,378.39, up 0.84% on the day and about 0.8% for the week — its first weekly gain in four weeks — with the intraday high of $4,399.67 leaving it 33 cents shy of the $4,400 line. Gold ETFs have now logged eight straight sessions of inflows, but with the 10-year back above 5% and the dollar index near 100, here is what decides whether this is a reversal or a bounce.
Author  Suzie
Sep 20, Sun
Spot gold closed Friday at $4,378.39, up 0.84% on the day and about 0.8% for the week — its first weekly gain in four weeks — with the intraday high of $4,399.67 leaving it 33 cents shy of the $4,400 line. Gold ETFs have now logged eight straight sessions of inflows, but with the 10-year back above 5% and the dollar index near 100, here is what decides whether this is a reversal or a bounce.
placeholder
October hike odds climb toward 60% as Goldman and BofA both flip — what Warsh's "dose of accommodation" really changedRate futures now price roughly 55% to 62% for a 25bp hike at the October 27-28 FOMC, up from about 30% before Chair Warsh's post-meeting framing that the Fed is merely "removing some accommodation." Goldman Sachs has added an October hike to its forecast and Bank of America now sees moves in both October and December. Here is the repricing, the language behind it, and the two data points that decide it.
Author  Irene Q.
Sep 23, Wed
Rate futures now price roughly 55% to 62% for a 25bp hike at the October 27-28 FOMC, up from about 30% before Chair Warsh's post-meeting framing that the Fed is merely "removing some accommodation." Goldman Sachs has added an October hike to its forecast and Bank of America now sees moves in both October and December. Here is the repricing, the language behind it, and the two data points that decide it.
placeholder
Four jobs reports in five days: what JOLTS, ADP, claims and the September payrolls mean for the October Fed decisionThe US labour market faces its densest data week of the month. JOLTS job openings land Tuesday (7.2 million expected), ADP on Wednesday (70,000 expected), initial claims on Thursday and the September non-farm payrolls on Friday (100,000 expected, down from 162,000). Markets price a 64%-70% chance of another quarter-point Fed hike on October 28. The dollar index sits at 100.77 and the S&P 500 at 7,729.8.
Author  Mitrade
Yesterday 06: 33
The US labour market faces its densest data week of the month. JOLTS job openings land Tuesday (7.2 million expected), ADP on Wednesday (70,000 expected), initial claims on Thursday and the September non-farm payrolls on Friday (100,000 expected, down from 162,000). Markets price a 64%-70% chance of another quarter-point Fed hike on October 28. The dollar index sits at 100.77 and the S&P 500 at 7,729.8.
placeholder
Nvidia's $150 billion buyback landed — and the AI sector fell anyway. That's the signal worth tradingNvidia closed up 1.68% at $228.86 on 28 September after announcing a $150 billion share repurchase authorisation, the largest single corporate buyback on record, while the rest of the AI complex sold off: AMD -3.6%, Micron -2.6%, Meta -4.8% and the Philadelphia Semiconductor Index -1.61%. The divergence is not noise. Capital is rotating toward cash-flow certainty, not abandoning the AI theme. With Micron reporting after the close on 30 September, here is what the split means.
Author  Irene Q.
8 hours ago
Nvidia closed up 1.68% at $228.86 on 28 September after announcing a $150 billion share repurchase authorisation, the largest single corporate buyback on record, while the rest of the AI complex sold off: AMD -3.6%, Micron -2.6%, Meta -4.8% and the Philadelphia Semiconductor Index -1.61%. The divergence is not noise. Capital is rotating toward cash-flow certainty, not abandoning the AI theme. With Micron reporting after the close on 30 September, here is what the split means.
placeholder
The 30-year Treasury just hit a 22-year high — and the bond market is not pricing the Fed, it is pricing the deficitThe 30-year Treasury yield closed at 5.56% on 28 September, the highest since June 2004, while the 10-year reached 5.24% and the 20-year 5.60%. The curve has steepened roughly 30bp in eight sessions even as October hike odds sit at 70.3%. That gap is the story: the long end is repricing fiscal and inflation risk, not policy. With PCE on Wednesday and payrolls on Friday, here is what the long end is really saying.
Author  Irene Q.
8 hours ago
The 30-year Treasury yield closed at 5.56% on 28 September, the highest since June 2004, while the 10-year reached 5.24% and the 20-year 5.60%. The curve has steepened roughly 30bp in eight sessions even as October hike odds sit at 70.3%. That gap is the story: the long end is repricing fiscal and inflation risk, not policy. With PCE on Wednesday and payrolls on Friday, here is what the long end is really saying.
goTop
quote