Choosing an International ETF: The Case For the Developed Market Favorite vs. the Low-Cost Emerging Challenger

Source The Motley Fool

Key Points

  • Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF offers a lower expense ratio and a higher dividend yield than iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets ETF.

  • iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets ETF delivered higher total returns over the last 12 months but has experienced a steeper maximum drawdown over five years.

  • The Vanguard fund focuses on established international economies like Europe and Japan, while the iShares fund provides exposure to developing markets.

  • Motley Fool Issues Rare "Total Conviction" Buy Alert ›

Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF (NYSEMKT:VEA) and iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets ETF (NYSEMKT:IEMG) offer distinct ways to diversify a portfolio beyond U.S. borders with low-cost, broad-market strategies.

While both funds target international equities, they focus on different economic tiers. The Vanguard fund invests in established markets such as Canada, Europe, and the Pacific region. In contrast, the iShares fund tracks developing economies, which can offer higher growth potential alongside higher geopolitical and currency risks.

Snapshot (cost & size)

MetricIEMGVEA
IssueriSharesVanguard
Share price$81.40 (as of 2026-10-09)$70.35 (as of 2026-10-09)
Expense ratio0.09%0.03%
1-yr return (as of 2026-10-09)25.3%19.7%
Dividend yield2.2%2.4%
Beta0.760.85
AUM$160.2B$323.8B

Beta measures price volatility relative to the S&P 500; beta is calculated from monthly returns over the available fund history (up to five years). The 1-yr return represents total return over the trailing 12 months. Dividend yield is the trailing-12-month distribution yield.

The Vanguard fund is more affordable with an expense ratio of 0.03%, compared to 0.09% for the iShares fund. It also offers a higher payout, with a yield gap of +0.20 ppt over its counterpart.

Performance & risk comparison

MetricIEMGVEA
Max drawdown (5 yr)(32.7%)(29.3%)
Growth of $1,000 over 5 years (total return)$1,510$1,624

What's inside

Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF provides exposure to financial services (24%), industrials (18%), and technology (16%). It holds 3,873 stocks, and its largest positions include Samsung Electronics Co Ltd at 2.61%, SK Hynix Inc at 2.01%, and ASML Holding NV at 1.96%. The fund was launched in 2007. Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF has paid $1.70 per share over the trailing 12 months, which, on its recent ~$70.35 share price, works out to a 2.4% yield.

iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets ETF leans more heavily into technology at 42%, followed by financial services at 18% and consumer cyclical at 8%. It holds 2,862 stocks, and its top holdings include Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing at 14.01%, Samsung Electronics Ltd at 6.50%, and SK Hynix at 4.93%. This fund was launched in 2012. iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets ETF has paid $1.80 per share over the trailing 12 months, which, on its recent ~$81.40 share price, works out to a 2.2% yield.

For more guidance on ETF investing, check out the full guide at this link.

Which looks like the better buy

When comparing the Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF (VEA) and the iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets ETF (IEMG), investors should consider several key factors. Let's see what they tell us about each fund.

First, we should examine each fund's strategy. VEA is a massive fund, holding nearly 4,000 stocks across dozens of countries. Its largest countries of allocation are Japan (21%), Canada (11%), and the United Kingdom (10%). IEMG, on the other hand, holds around 3,000 stocks. Its largest countries of allocation are Taiwan (29%), South Korea (19%), and China (17%). In short, VEA is a bit more geographically diverse, while IEMG tilts heavily toward East Asia.

Two other important factors are historical performance and income potential. Over the last five years, VEA has delivered a better total return. VEA has generated a total return of 57%, equating to a compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of 9.5%. IEMG, meanwhile, has delivered a total return of 45%, with a CAGR of 7.7%. As for income, VEA has a dividend yield of 2.4%, while IEMG's is 2.2%, giving VEA another slight advantage.

One final factor to weigh is cost. Here, VEA has an advantage, albeit a modest one. VEA's expense ratio is 0.03% -- near the bottom of what investors can hope to pay. IEMG's expense ratio is 0.09% -- still very affordable, but not as low as VEA's. For context, a person investing $10,000 in each fund should expect to pay $3 per year for their VEA shares and $9 per year for their IEMG shares.

In summary, VEA and IEMG are both international ETFs, but their differing strategies lead to major contrasts in their geographic allocation. VEA targets a broad international footprint, while IEMG is mainly focused on East Asian stocks. VEA has a lower expense ratio, although IEMG is far from expensive overall. All in all, some investors will likely select VEA given its combination of higher historical returns, lower expense ratio, and higher dividend yield. However, those investors seeking greater exposure to East Asian stocks may still want to consider IEMG, given its strategy and its reasonable fees.

Should you buy stock in Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF right now?

Before you buy stock in Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF, consider this:

The Motley Fool Stock Advisor analyst team just identified what they believe are the 10 best stocks for investors to buy now… and Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF wasn’t one of them. The 10 stocks that made the cut could produce monster returns in the coming years.

Consider when Netflix made this list on December 17, 2004... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you’d have $380,579!* Or when Nvidia made this list on April 15, 2005... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you’d have $1,359,789!*

Now, it’s worth noting Stock Advisor’s total average return is 934% — a market-crushing outperformance compared to 213% for the S&P 500. Don't miss the latest top 10 list, available with Stock Advisor, and join an investing community built by individual investors for individual investors.

See the 10 stocks »

*Stock Advisor returns as of October 15, 2026.

Jake Lerch has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool has positions in and recommends ASML, Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing, and Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.

Disclaimer: For information purposes only. Past performance is not indicative of future results.
placeholder
US September PPI Preview: Will Inflation Surprise Again? US Stocks, Dollar and Gold Face Key Test On October 15, US Eastern Time, the U.S. is set to release the September Producer Price Index (PPI). The September CPI released this Wednesday was notably higher than market expectations,
Author  TradingKey
9 hours ago
On October 15, US Eastern Time, the U.S. is set to release the September Producer Price Index (PPI). The September CPI released this Wednesday was notably higher than market expectations,
placeholder
Gold Price Analysis Today | Forex Gold Analysis | XAU/USD Analysis - October 15, 2026Get the latest gold price analysis, forex gold insights, and XAU/USD analysis for October 15, 2026. Read on for the details.
Author  Mitrade
11 hours ago
Get the latest gold price analysis, forex gold insights, and XAU/USD analysis for October 15, 2026. Read on for the details.
placeholder
Gold defends $4,100 as BofA targets a break below $4,000 — why the Middle East bid is missingSpot gold flushed to $4,099.89, a whisker above October's $4,090 low, then rebounded to close at $4,138.25 (+0.82%) — even as US CPI ran hot. Bank of America sees gold below $4,000 within three months, citing shrinking demand and official-sector selling. Here are the levels, the drivers and what would flip the script.
Author  Irene Q.
11 hours ago
Spot gold flushed to $4,099.89, a whisker above October's $4,090 low, then rebounded to close at $4,138.25 (+0.82%) — even as US CPI ran hot. Bank of America sees gold below $4,000 within three months, citing shrinking demand and official-sector selling. Here are the levels, the drivers and what would flip the script.
placeholder
US September CPI recap: inflation hits 3.7% as core runs hot — is an October Fed hike back on the table?September CPI landed hot: headline 3.7% y/y, core 2.6% y/y and 0.3% m/m. October hike odds jumped from ~22% to ~37% — yet the dollar faded to 101.74, gold closed higher and the S&P 500 fell 1.11%. Here is the full repricing, the levels and what to watch next.
Author  Irene Q.
12 hours ago
September CPI landed hot: headline 3.7% y/y, core 2.6% y/y and 0.3% m/m. October hike odds jumped from ~22% to ~37% — yet the dollar faded to 101.74, gold closed higher and the S&P 500 fell 1.11%. Here is the full repricing, the levels and what to watch next.
placeholder
Today’s Market Recap: September CPI Beat Ignites Rate-Hike Concerns; U.S. Stocks Fall Broadly, Oracle Drops Over 8%, SK Hynix Slips More Than 6%On October 14, Eastern Time, U.S. September CPI data came in higher than market expectations, fueling expectations of a Fed rate hike in October and dampening mar
Author  TradingKey
17 hours ago
On October 14, Eastern Time, U.S. September CPI data came in higher than market expectations, fueling expectations of a Fed rate hike in October and dampening mar
goTop
quote