SpaceX's grand vision to put humans on other planets and build data centers in space could appeal to growth investors.
Value investors will likely be put off by its lack of profits and untested technology.
Space Exploration Technologies' (NASDAQ: SPCX) initial public offering (IPO) last week didn't just break records; it blew them out of the water. SpaceX's $75 billion raise was almost triple that of Saudi Aramco's previous IPO record. SpaceX soared almost 20% on its first day of trading from the pre-IPO price, taking the company's market cap past $2 trillion and making it one of the 10 largest publicly traded U.S. companies.
That's all exciting, but neither the hype nor the size of its IPO is a good reason on its own to buy SpaceX. You might buy shares if you think founder and CEO Elon Musk can deliver an interplanetary reality. Or you might think SpaceX is overvalued and decide to pass or wait for the company to deliver more concrete results.
Will AI create the world's first trillionaire? Our team just released a report on the one little-known company, called an "Indispensable Monopoly" providing the critical technology Nvidia and Intel both need. Continue »
Image source: Getty Images.
SpaceX is a three-in-one company with a big vision, combining space, artificial intelligence (AI), and satellite communications. It estimates a $28.5 trillion total addressable market for its space-enabled solutions, and some growth investors want a piece of a future where people can live on the moon.
Not only does SpaceX offer a bite of the space economy, but the company could also disrupt the booming AI infrastructure market by building solar-powered data centers in space. Then there's the so-called "Musk effect," whereby swathes of loyal fans believe in his ability to deliver against all odds.
Others point to SpaceX's achievements and innovations, such as revolutionizing rocket launches, creating a 9,000-strong Starlink satellite network that provides broadband internet worldwide, and developing Starship, an enormous reusable rocket that will be able to carry people, equipment, and satellites into space.
Risk is the biggest reason for passing on SpaceX. The company plans to spend huge sums on untested projects that may not even be possible. On top of which, a valuation of over $2 trillion for a company that didn't turn a profit last year seems extreme, even when you consider the untapped potential of space exploration.
In addition to technological risks, SpaceX's reliance on U.S. government contracts, which accounted for around 20% of its 2025 revenue, also makes it vulnerable to changes in policy or administrations. Then there's Musk himself: Not only is he a controversial figure, but the company's structure also gives him control of over 80% of votes, meaning shareholders will have little say in how the company is run.
Finally, many traditional valuation methods are difficult to apply to SpaceX because of its out-of-this-world proposals and lack of profits. However, its price-to-sales ratio is a whopping 117 as I write this, meaning that investors are paying over $117 for each $1 of revenue. For context, SpaceX competitors also have high P/S ratios; Rocket Lab's is 84, reflecting the high-risk, cash-intensive nature of the sector.
Ignore the size of SpaceX's IPO and instead think about how it might fit in your portfolio. If you are a growth investor willing to hold a risky stock for 20 years or more, there could be logic to allocating a small percentage of your portfolio to SpaceX. It will likely be a volatile ride, but it could eventually pay off.
However, SpaceX will have limited appeal to value investors. The hype, governance issues, and high level of risk certainly make me uneasy. Ultimately, its IPO prospectus reads more like Captain Jean-Luc Picard's Star Trek opening, and I'm not convinced that it can deliver the "next paradigm shift for humanity."
Before you buy stock in Space Exploration Technologies, consider this:
The Motley Fool Stock Advisor analyst team just identified what they believe are the 10 best stocks for investors to buy now… and Space Exploration Technologies wasn’t one of them. The 10 stocks that made the cut could produce monster returns in the coming years.
Consider when Netflix made this list on December 17, 2004... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you’d have $424,531!* Or when Nvidia made this list on April 15, 2005... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you’d have $1,273,016!*
Now, it’s worth noting Stock Advisor’s total average return is 940% — a market-crushing outperformance compared to 209% for the S&P 500. Don't miss the latest top 10 list, available with Stock Advisor, and join an investing community built by individual investors for individual investors.
See the 10 stocks »
*Stock Advisor returns as of June 17, 2026.
Emma Newbery has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool has positions in and recommends Rocket Lab. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.