MLPX vs. EMLP: Does Active Management in Energy Infrastructure Justify the Extra Fee Cost?

Source The Motley Fool

Key Points

  • Global X - MLP & Energy Infrastructure ETF offers a significantly lower expense ratio and a higher distribution yield than the First Trust North American Energy Infrastructure Fund.

  • First Trust North American Energy Infrastructure Fund provides broader sector diversification by splitting its portfolio between energy and utilities.

  • Global X - MLP & Energy Infrastructure ETF has delivered higher total returns over the last five years but experiences more significant peak-to-trough drawdowns.

  • 10 stocks we like better than Global X Funds - Global X Mlp & Energy Infrastructure ETF ›

Global X - MLP & Energy Infrastructure ETF (NYSEMKT:MLPX) offers a lower-cost, high-yield path to energy infrastructure, while First Trust North American Energy Infrastructure Fund (NYSEMKT:EMLP) provides an actively managed, diversified utility-heavy alternative.

Investors looking for exposure to the North American energy infrastructure sector generally weigh the merits of pure-play pipeline funds against more diversified portfolios. While both ETFs target companies that move and store fuel, their underlying investment strategies result in notably different risk-return profiles. This comparison evaluates how a passive, low-cost index tracker measures up against a more broadly diversified, actively managed fund that incorporates utility companies.

Snapshot (cost & size)

MetricMLPXEMLP
IssuerGlobal XFirst Trust
Expense ratio0.45%0.95%
1-yr return (as of June 3, 2026)22.90%18.80%
Dividend yield4.20%2.80%
Beta0.580.56
AUM~$3.5 billion~$4.0 billion

Beta measures price volatility relative to the S&P 500; beta is calculated from five-year monthly returns. The 1-yr return represents total return over the trailing 12 months. Dividend yield is the trailing-12-month distribution yield.

The Global X fund is the more affordable choice, sporting an expense ratio of 0.45% compared to 0.95% for the First Trust fund. This cost advantage is paired with a higher distribution yield, as the Global X fund provided a 4.20% yield versus the 2.80% offered by its competitor as of June 3, 2026. For income-focused investors, this spread may represent a significant difference in annual cash flow.

Performance & risk comparison

MetricMLPXEMLP
Max drawdown (5 yr)(19.70%)(14.60%)
Growth of $1,000 over 5 years (total return)$2,583.00$2,053.00

What's inside

The First Trust North American Energy Infrastructure Fund (NYSEMKT:EMLP) is an actively managed fund with 65 holdings that incorporates an ESG screen into its selection process. Its sector allocation is split between energy at 48% and utilities at 47%, with a 4% weighting in industrials. Its largest positions include Energy Transfer (NYSE:ET) at 7.51%, Enterprise Products Partners (NYSE:EPD) at 7.24%, and MPLX LP (NYSE:MPLX) at 4.14%. It was launched in 2012 and has paid $1.20 per share over the trailing 12 months.

The Global X - MLP & Energy Infrastructure ETF (NYSEMKT:MLPX) tracks the Solactive MLP & Energy Infrastructure Index and holds 29 securities. This fund is heavily concentrated in energy at 99%, with negligible exposure to utilities. Its top holdings include Enbridge (NYSE:ENB) at 9.29%, TC Energy Corp (NYSE:TRP) at 9.26%, and The Williams Companies (NYSE:WMB) at 8.51%. It was launched in 2013 and has a trailing-12-month dividend of $3.04 per share, though it does not utilize an ESG screen.

For more guidance on ETF investing, check out the full guide at this link.

What this means for investors

Energy infrastructure has been one of the quieter success stories of the past few years. Pipelines, storage terminals, and transmission networks generate steady, contract-based cash flows that hold up well regardless of where oil and gas prices move. This makes them attractive to income-focused investors who want energy exposure without the volatility of commodity prices themselves.

MLPX is the more passive and efficient of these two funds, tracking a broad index of energy infrastructure companies at a reasonable cost for the category. EMLP takes an active approach, blending traditional energy infrastructure with a substantial allocation to electric utilities, a combination that aims for smoother, more defensive returns. Unfortunately, it has historically underperformed its benchmark while charging more than twice what MLPX does.

That fee gap is the most important number in this comparison. Active management in a predictable, income-oriented category faces a high bar to justify its cost. MLPX's higher yield, lower fee, and straightforward passive approach have made it the more rewarding choice for long-term investors. EMLP appeals to those who want a more conservative blend of energy and utility income in a single actively managed fund.

Should you buy stock in Global X Funds - Global X Mlp & Energy Infrastructure ETF right now?

Before you buy stock in Global X Funds - Global X Mlp & Energy Infrastructure ETF, consider this:

The Motley Fool Stock Advisor analyst team just identified what they believe are the 10 best stocks for investors to buy now… and Global X Funds - Global X Mlp & Energy Infrastructure ETF wasn’t one of them. The 10 stocks that made the cut could produce monster returns in the coming years.

Consider when Netflix made this list on December 17, 2004... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you’d have $443,191!* Or when Nvidia made this list on April 15, 2005... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you’d have $1,258,838!*

Now, it’s worth noting Stock Advisor’s total average return is 941% — a market-crushing outperformance compared to 206% for the S&P 500. Don't miss the latest top 10 list, available with Stock Advisor, and join an investing community built by individual investors for individual investors.

See the 10 stocks »

*Stock Advisor returns as of June 7, 2026.

Sara Appino has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool has positions in and recommends Enbridge. The Motley Fool recommends Enterprise Products Partners and Tc Energy. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.

Disclaimer: For information purposes only. Past performance is not indicative of future results.
placeholder
Bulls Rout. Bitcoin Slumps Over 16% in a Week to Hit Bottom, Cryptocurrency Market Faces "Serial Liquidations"During the Asian trading session on June 5, Bitcoin extended its recent slump, falling more than 3.5% within 24 hours. It briefly broke below $62,000, hitting a low of $61,100, bringing i
Author  TradingKey
Jun 05, Fri
During the Asian trading session on June 5, Bitcoin extended its recent slump, falling more than 3.5% within 24 hours. It briefly broke below $62,000, hitting a low of $61,100, bringing i
placeholder
Gold declines below $4,500 on stalled US-Iran ceasefire talks, US NFP data loomsGold price (XAU/USD) edges lower to near $4,470 during the early Asian session on Friday. The precious metal remains volatile amid ongoing geopolitical turmoil. Traders will closely monitor the developments surrounding the US-Iran peace deal and the US May employment report later on Friday. 
Author  FXStreet
Jun 05, Fri
Gold price (XAU/USD) edges lower to near $4,470 during the early Asian session on Friday. The precious metal remains volatile amid ongoing geopolitical turmoil. Traders will closely monitor the developments surrounding the US-Iran peace deal and the US May employment report later on Friday. 
placeholder
Bitcoin Suffers Year’s Strongest Waterfall-Style Decline. Will It Next Drop to the $60,000 Mark?During the Asian trading session on June 4, Bitcoin continued its multi-day slump, briefly dropping below the $62,000 mark to $61,338. As of press time, Bitcoin was trading at $63,844, wi
Author  TradingKey
Jun 04, Thu
During the Asian trading session on June 4, Bitcoin continued its multi-day slump, briefly dropping below the $62,000 mark to $61,338. As of press time, Bitcoin was trading at $63,844, wi
placeholder
Bitcoin drops below $65K amid reinforced bear market signalsBitcoin (BTC) dipped further below $65,000 on Wednesday, with onchain data from Glassnode signaling a market firmly in a bear phase. The decline has pushed prices back into a key valuation range between the Realized Price and the True Market Mean.
Author  FXStreet
Jun 04, Thu
Bitcoin (BTC) dipped further below $65,000 on Wednesday, with onchain data from Glassnode signaling a market firmly in a bear phase. The decline has pushed prices back into a key valuation range between the Realized Price and the True Market Mean.
placeholder
Forex Today: US Dollar stays resilient ahead of key US dataHere is what you need to know on Wednesday, June 3:
Author  FXStreet
Jun 03, Wed
Here is what you need to know on Wednesday, June 3:
goTop
quote