Better Bond ETF: Fidelity's FIGB vs. iShares' IEI

Source The Motley Fool

Key Points

  • Fidelity Investment Grade Bond ETF charges a higher expense ratio but delivers a modestly higher yield than iShares 3-7 Year Treasury Bond ETF.

  • FIGB includes a broader mix of investment-grade bonds, resulting in slightly higher risk and a deeper historical drawdown.

  • IEI focuses solely on intermediate Treasuries, while FIGB holds more securities and allocates significantly to cash and other high-grade sectors.

  • 10 stocks we like better than Fidelity Merrimack Street Trust - Fidelity Investment Grade Bond ETF ›

The Fidelity Investment Grade Bond ETF (NYSEMKT:FIGB) offers broader bond exposure and a higher yield than iShares 3-7 Year Treasury Bond ETF (NASDAQ:IEI), but comes with a higher fee, more volatility, and a deeper historical drawdown.

Both funds target high-quality U.S. bonds, but IEI zeroes in on intermediate-term Treasuries, while FIGB takes a wider approach by including various investment-grade sectors and a notable cash allocation. This comparison looks at cost, returns, risk, and portfolio makeup to help investors weigh which ETF may better fit their needs.

Snapshot (cost & size)

MetricIEIFIGB
IssuerISharesFidelity
Expense ratio0.15%0.36%
1-yr return (as of 2026-04-09)4.3%5.9%
Dividend yield3.6%4.1%
Beta0.691.02
AUM$18.7 billion$450.9 million

Beta measures price volatility relative to the S&P 500; beta is calculated from five-year monthly returns. The 1-yr return represents total return over the trailing 12 months.

IEI is more affordable on fees, charging 0.15% annually, while FIGB costs 0.36%. FIGB compensates with a slightly higher yield, offering a 4.1% payout compared to IEI's 3.6%.

Performance & risk comparison

MetricIEIFIGB
Max drawdown (5 y)-13.88%-18.06%
Growth of $1,000 over 5 years$1,025$1,026

What's inside

FIGB takes a diversified approach with 180 holdings spanning U.S. investment-grade bond sectors. Its largest positions include the Fidelity Cash Central Fund (11.94%), U.S. Treasury bonds 4.75% (3.95%), and U.S. Treasury notes 4.25% (3.87%). The fund has a 5.1-year track record, and there are no leverage, ESG, or currency hedging quirks noted.

IEI, on the other hand, is strictly focused on intermediate U.S. Treasury bonds, with 83 holdings in U.S. Treasury Notes with various maturities. This pure-Treasury approach results in lower risk and less yield, but also less exposure to other bond sectors or cash. Neither fund tracks an explicit index or features notable structural twists.

For more guidance on ETF investing, check out the full guide at this link.

What this means for investors

In comparing the Fidelity Investment Grade Bond ETF (FIGB) and iShares 3-7 Year Treasury Bond ETF (IEI), the choice comes down to whether you prioritize higher income and broader diversification or maximum safety and lower costs.

FIGB is far more expensive with a 0.36% expense ratio, but it delivers a greater dividend yield, broader diversification thanks to its wider range of bonds, and a higher one-year return. It’s also an actively-managed fund aiming to outperform the broader investment-grade bond market, which contributes to its higher cost.

IEI is passively-managed, but that keeps its cost lower than FIGB. Because it focuses on U.S. Treasuries, IEI delivers maximum safety with regards to capital preservation and volatility, as demonstrated by its lower beta. The fund also sports a far larger AUM of $18.7 billion, providing much greater level of liquidity.

FIGB is for investors who seeks a higher income payout and is comfortable with more volatility and higher fees. IEI is for the conservative investor who prioritizes capital preservation, liquidity, and lower costs.

Should you buy stock in Fidelity Merrimack Street Trust - Fidelity Investment Grade Bond ETF right now?

Before you buy stock in Fidelity Merrimack Street Trust - Fidelity Investment Grade Bond ETF, consider this:

The Motley Fool Stock Advisor analyst team just identified what they believe are the 10 best stocks for investors to buy now… and Fidelity Merrimack Street Trust - Fidelity Investment Grade Bond ETF wasn’t one of them. The 10 stocks that made the cut could produce monster returns in the coming years.

Consider when Netflix made this list on December 17, 2004... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you’d have $555,526!* Or when Nvidia made this list on April 15, 2005... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you’d have $1,156,403!*

Now, it’s worth noting Stock Advisor’s total average return is 968% — a market-crushing outperformance compared to 191% for the S&P 500. Don't miss the latest top 10 list, available with Stock Advisor, and join an investing community built by individual investors for individual investors.

See the 10 stocks »

*Stock Advisor returns as of April 12, 2026.

Robert Izquierdo has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.

Disclaimer: For information purposes only. Past performance is not indicative of future results.
placeholder
Bitcoin CME gaps at $35,000, $27,000 and $21,000, which one gets filled first?Prioritize filling the $27,000 gap and even try higher.
Author  FXStreet
Aug 22, 2023
Prioritize filling the $27,000 gap and even try higher.
placeholder
Pinduoduo Earnings Incoming: Morgan Stanley Sees Long-Term Profit Potential​Insights – On November 21, Chinese e-commerce giant Pinduoduo (PDD) will release its Q3 2024 earnings.
Author  Mitrade
Nov 20, 2024
​Insights – On November 21, Chinese e-commerce giant Pinduoduo (PDD) will release its Q3 2024 earnings.
placeholder
Elon Musk’s xAI and Neuralink Launch New Funding Rounds​Billionaire Elon Musk recently raised funds for his two high-profile tech companies, xAI and Neuralink.
Author  Insights
Jun 03, 2025
​Billionaire Elon Musk recently raised funds for his two high-profile tech companies, xAI and Neuralink.
placeholder
Bitcoin briefly loses 2025 gains as crypto plunges over the weekend.Bitcoin experienced a sharp decline this weekend, briefly erasing its 2025 gains and dipping below its year-opening value of $93,507. The cryptocurrency fell to a low of $93,029 on Sunday, representing a 25% drop from its all-time high in October. Although it has rebounded slightly to around $94,209, the pressures on the market remain significant. The downturn occurred despite the reopening of the U.S. government on Thursday, which many had hoped would provide essential support for crypto markets. This year initially appeared promising for cryptocurrencies, particularly after the inauguration of President Donald Trump, who has established the most pro-crypto administration thus far. However, ongoing political tensions—including Trump's tariff strategies and the recent government shutdown, lasting a historic 43 days—have contributed to several rapid price pullbacks for Bitcoin throughout the year. Market dynamics are also being influenced by Bitcoin whales—investors holding large amounts of Bitcoin—who have been offloading portions of their assets, consequently stalling price rallies even as positive regulatory developments emerge. Despite these sell-offs, analysts from Glassnode argue that this behavior aligns with typical patterns seen among long-term investors during the concluding stages of bull markets, suggesting it is not indicative of a mass exodus. Notably, Bitcoin is not alone in its struggles, as Ethereum and Solana have also recorded declines of 7.95% and 28.3%, respectively, since the start of the year, while numerous altcoins have faced even steeper losses. Looking ahead, questions linger regarding the viability of the four-year cycle thesis, particularly given the increasing institutional support and regulatory frameworks now in place in the crypto landscape. Matt Hougan, chief investment officer at Bitwise, remains optimistic, suggesting a potential Bitcoin resurgence in 2026 driven by the “debasement trade” thesis and a broader trend toward increased adoption of stablecoins, tokenization, and decentralized finance. Hougan emphasized the soundness of the underlying fundamentals, pointing to a positive outlook for the sector in the longer term.
Author  Mitrade
Nov 17, 2025
Bitcoin experienced a sharp decline this weekend, briefly erasing its 2025 gains and dipping below its year-opening value of $93,507. The cryptocurrency fell to a low of $93,029 on Sunday, representing a 25% drop from its all-time high in October. Although it has rebounded slightly to around $94,209, the pressures on the market remain significant. The downturn occurred despite the reopening of the U.S. government on Thursday, which many had hoped would provide essential support for crypto markets. This year initially appeared promising for cryptocurrencies, particularly after the inauguration of President Donald Trump, who has established the most pro-crypto administration thus far. However, ongoing political tensions—including Trump's tariff strategies and the recent government shutdown, lasting a historic 43 days—have contributed to several rapid price pullbacks for Bitcoin throughout the year. Market dynamics are also being influenced by Bitcoin whales—investors holding large amounts of Bitcoin—who have been offloading portions of their assets, consequently stalling price rallies even as positive regulatory developments emerge. Despite these sell-offs, analysts from Glassnode argue that this behavior aligns with typical patterns seen among long-term investors during the concluding stages of bull markets, suggesting it is not indicative of a mass exodus. Notably, Bitcoin is not alone in its struggles, as Ethereum and Solana have also recorded declines of 7.95% and 28.3%, respectively, since the start of the year, while numerous altcoins have faced even steeper losses. Looking ahead, questions linger regarding the viability of the four-year cycle thesis, particularly given the increasing institutional support and regulatory frameworks now in place in the crypto landscape. Matt Hougan, chief investment officer at Bitwise, remains optimistic, suggesting a potential Bitcoin resurgence in 2026 driven by the “debasement trade” thesis and a broader trend toward increased adoption of stablecoins, tokenization, and decentralized finance. Hougan emphasized the soundness of the underlying fundamentals, pointing to a positive outlook for the sector in the longer term.
placeholder
WTI holds steady above $92.00 as Strait of Hormuz remains closed; bulls seem hesitant West Texas Intermediate (WTI) – the benchmark US Crude Oil price – trades with a mild positive bias during the Asian session on Friday, though it lacks bullish conviction amid hopes of Iran ceasefire stabilizing.
Author  FXStreet
Apr 10, Fri
West Texas Intermediate (WTI) – the benchmark US Crude Oil price – trades with a mild positive bias during the Asian session on Friday, though it lacks bullish conviction amid hopes of Iran ceasefire stabilizing.
goTop
quote