SpaceX's second-quarter revenue rose 92% year over year to $7.8 billion in its first report as a public company.
Musk said the internal target for $1 trillion in annual revenue has moved up a year, to 2030.
Reaching that figure from a $100 billion year-end revenue run rate would require about 78% compound annual growth for four years.
SpaceX (NASDAQ: SPCX) held its first earnings call as a public company on Tuesday, and CEO Elon Musk used it to make an already ambitious goal more ambitious.
The company's internal target for reaching $1 trillion in annual revenue, he said, has moved up a year, from 2031 to 2030. And he put what he called a "non-zero chance" on getting there in 2029.
Missed Nvidia in 2009? This Rare Signal Is Flashing Again. In 2009, a "Double Down" signal flashed for a little-known chipmaker called Nvidia. For the first time in years, that same "Total Conviction" signal is flashing for a company 1/100th the size of Nvidia. Continue »
That is a striking thing to say about a company that produced $7.8 billion of revenue in the quarter it was reporting. It was a strong quarter, to be sure. Revenue grew 92% year over year, and the rocket and satellite company's net loss narrowed to $541 million from $1.0 billion a year earlier.
A target, of course, isn't guidance. But I think this one is specific enough to check against the company's own numbers. So, what growth rate does $1 trillion by 2030 actually require?
Elon Musk. Image source: The White House.
The second quarter gave the bulls plenty to work with. All three segments grew, led by the artificial intelligence (AI) business, where revenue rose 247% year over year to $2.6 billion on new cloud computing agreements -- the company signed $14.1 billion of contracted cloud sales during the quarter alone. The connectivity segment, home of the Starlink satellite internet service, grew revenue 66% year over year to $4.3 billion and stayed the company's profit center, with operating income climbing 79% to $1.7 billion. Even the space segment, the launch business itself, grew 29% year over year to $962 million.
Starlink ended the second quarter with 12 million subscribers, double the year-ago count and up 1.7 million in three months.
Average Starlink revenue per user, though, was $66 per month, down from $85 a year earlier. Subscriber growth is outrunning pricing, not riding it.
The spending is enormous, too. Capital expenditures totaled $18.4 billion in the quarter (nearly double the prior quarter, and about 6.5 times the year-ago level), with $15.8 billion of that going to AI infrastructure.
The company can afford it, for now. "We ended the second quarter with $100 billion of cash, cash equivalents, and marketable securities, and $47.5 billion in backlog," chief financial officer Bret Johnsen said in the commentary accompanying the second-quarter release, adding that the balance sheet gives the company capacity to keep investing in Starship, Starlink satellites, and its AI platform.
Over the past 12 months, SpaceX generated about $23 billion of revenue. A $1 trillion year in 2030 is about 43 times that figure.
The friendlier starting point is the one management offered. Johnsen said on the call that the company is on pace to reach $100 billion in annualized revenue run-rate by the end of this year.
Take that at face value, and $1 trillion of annual revenue in 2030 still means growing roughly tenfold in about four years. That works out to about 78% compounded annually.
Compare that with what the business is doing today. The company grew 92% in the second quarter, so the required rate is arguably not absurd on its face. But the segment carrying most of the revenue, Starlink's connectivity business, grew 66%.
The only piece growing faster than the target requires is AI. And that growth is running on $15.8 billion of quarterly capital spending against $2.6 billion of segment revenue, with the segment posting a $1.3 billion operating loss.
Zoom out, and growth rates tend to fall as companies get bigger. SpaceX would need the opposite. It would have to hold a near-80% pace through 2030, while its largest segment grows more slowly than that and its average Starlink customer pays less than a year ago.
Sure, the bull case has hard dollars behind it. The backlog is contracted money, the cloud agreements are signed, and Musk said Starlink could deliver a majority of the world's internet within a decade. If Starship cuts launch costs, the ceiling is hard to estimate.
However, a ceiling isn't a schedule. I think the moved-up date is a stretch goal for Musk's own teams more than a forecast for shareholders. The target only holds if that pace holds companywide -- carried by the one segment that spends far more than it takes in.
I'd watch one number instead: whether annualized revenue run-rate actually approaches $100 billion by year-end, as Johnsen says it should. Hit that, and the 2030 conversation gets more interesting.
Before you buy stock in Space Exploration Technologies, consider this:
The Motley Fool Stock Advisor analyst team just identified what they believe are the 10 best stocks for investors to buy now… and Space Exploration Technologies wasn’t one of them. The 10 stocks that made the cut could produce monster returns in the coming years.
Consider when Netflix made this list on December 17, 2004... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you’d have $400,155!* Or when Nvidia made this list on April 15, 2005... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you’d have $1,345,502!*
Now, it’s worth noting Stock Advisor’s total average return is 955% — a market-crushing outperformance compared to 214% for the S&P 500. Don't miss the latest top 10 list, available with Stock Advisor, and join an investing community built by individual investors for individual investors.
See the 10 stocks »
*Stock Advisor returns as of August 6, 2026.
Daniel Sparks and his clients do not have positions in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.