Oil Market’s Harrowing 24 Hours, Stagflation Shadows Loom Again, How Middle East Geopolitical War Rattles Global Capital?

TradingKey - This has been absolutely the most surreal 24 hours for the crude oil ( USOIL) market in recent decades.

Rob Thummel, a portfolio manager at energy investment firm Tortoise Capital with 30 years of industry experience, described the extreme volatility in the oil market as something he has "never seen in his career."

On March 9, the situation in the Middle East suddenly escalated as the U.S.-Israel-Iran conflict continued to intensify, forcing crude oil production disruptions in several countries. A series of negative developments instantly ignited the crude oil market, causing WTI crude oil futures to surge 31% in the short term, reaching a high of the $120 per barrel mark.

The chain reaction of skyrocketing oil prices quickly transmitted to global financial markets, with stocks suffering heavy losses, U.S. Treasury yields spiking, and panic sweeping the globe.

However, the reversal in the narrative came faster than expected. Oil prices, which had previously soared, plunged, with WTI crude quickly retreating from a high of $120 per barrel to around $85; the magnitude of the single-day oscillation set a new record for intraday reversals in recent years.

This energy market storm, triggered by geopolitical conflict, has also shown global investors the extreme volatility of the crude oil market.

Oil Price Fluctuations Spark Stagflation Concerns

Although market sentiment has stabilized briefly, some analysts remain cautious about the outlook for oil prices, even comparing the current situation to the stagflation era of the 1970s.

Jim Ritterbusch, president of oil consultancy Ritterbusch & Associates, believes the current extreme volatility in the market may actually mean that this round of oil price gains is not yet over.

Petrobras CEO Magda Chambriard pointed out that the energy market fell into "complete madness" after the blockade of the Strait of Hormuz, and that production cuts in some high-output oil fields along the Persian Gulf coast could cause supply issues to persist longer—because it is easy to stop production at an oil field, but resuming it is often fraught with difficulties.

Deutsche Bank ( DB) Head of Research Jim Reid stated in a recent research report that the current trend in global energy markets bears a "striking similarity" to the macro trajectory before the second oil crisis of the 1970s—it has been exactly 4 to 5 years since the first round of global hyperinflation in 2021-2022, and Iran has once again become the shared geopolitical epicenter of both crises.

Even more alarming is that the speed of the current rise in oil prices has significantly outpaced that of the past: within the last 6 days, oil prices surged by about 44%, with the gain at extreme highs reaching 65%, whereas during the 1979 oil price spike, the most intense monthly gain was only 22%.

However, Deutsche Bank also emphasized that current macro fundamentals have key differences from those of the 1970s, and the economy will not easily fall into a stagflation nightmare.

First, current inflation expectations are well-anchored, and even after the inflation surge of 2022-23, long-term inflation expectations remain unusually stable; second, the energy intensity of the current economy is significantly lower, and the degree of unionization and wage indexation in the labor market is far lower than in the past, greatly reducing the risk of repeating the 1970s wage-price spiral.

Asset Allocation Logic Under the Iran Situation

In response to the current complex geopolitical situation, Bank of America ( BAC) Chief Investment Strategist Michael Hartnett provided clear asset allocation guidance in the latest "Flow Show" report.

He believes that if the Iran situation cools, investors should sell crude oil at the $90 per barrel level, sell the dollar when the DXY is higher than 100, and buy 30-year U.S. Treasuries at the 5% yield level, while risk assets are expected to bottom out in March.

He also emphasized that this type of "short war" will reactivate the long logic for assets that benefit from inflationary booms, with commodities and emerging market small-cap stocks benefiting as the dollar bear market resumes.

However, Hartnett remains cautious about a comprehensive market rebound, noting that for new stock market highs to appear, three conditions must be met: sufficient accumulation of short positions, a panic shift at the policy level, and a reversal of peak liquidity expectations. But for now, none of these three conditions have matured, and the S&P 500 has not yet experienced sufficient price clearing (such as falling below 6,600 points), with overall market positioning still leaning toward the long side.

If the Iran situation continues to escalate, the logic of asset allocation will undergo a fundamental reversal. In an escalation scenario, the United States will intervene fully to ensure oil supply security and support the energy needed for AI infrastructure; the beneficiary assets will switch to crude oil, the dollar, U.S. tech stocks, and the global defense sector, with the cost borne by oil-importing countries such as South Korea, Japan, and Europe.

Hartnett specifically noted that in this scenario, the greatest risk lies in Japanese and European bank stocks, which were previously seen as the core beneficiary sectors of this rally.