Oracle has excellent exposure to the generative AI opportunity, but its stock price performance has lagged that of its peers.
Its $300 million OpenAI deal is an opportunity, but it carries meaningful risks, too.
On the surface, Oracle (NYSE: ORCL) is the type of company you would expect to benefit tremendously from the generative artificial intelligence (AI) boom. It provides the computing power and data storage vital for running and training these complex algorithms. But while its stock captured some gains early in the AI era, it has more recently lagged behind other AI infrastructure stocks.
Oracle's shares are up by a relatively modest 69% over the last five years, well behind chipmakers such as Nvidia and Micron Technology, which have soared by 885% and 1,212%, respectively, in the same time frame. Let's discuss the pros and cons of Oracle, and attempt to predict what a $1,000 position could be worth by the end of the decade.
Missed AI’s "Act 1"? Act 2 Could Be 15x Bigger. Most investors think they missed the AI boat because they didn't buy Nvidia in 2005. But according to our analysts, we’re only at the end of "Act 1"—the R&D phase. "Act 2" is the global rollout. Continue »
Like the leadership teams at many tech giants, Oracle's management recognized the long-term potential of the generative AI boom fairly early in the trend. They quickly moved to position the company on the pick-and-shovel side of the opportunity, providing cloud services and data center capacity to companies that were working to create and market consumer-facing large language models (LLMs). That push into the cloud infrastructure segment was underpinned by a substantial reorganization of Oracle's corporate structure.
This year, the company has already laid off 21,000 employees. That number is expected to rise with a $700 million addition to its restructuring plan (which is now worth $2.8 billion); much of the new spending is earmarked for severance payments and other exit expenses.
Investors usually like layoffs because, even though they can spike a company's spending in the short term, they often lead to long-term increases in margins and cash flow. However, instead of rerouting the money that it is cutting from employee compensation to immediately shareholder-friendly ends such as stock buybacks and dividends, Oracle is plowing those funds into another huge expansion of its AI data center capacity.
In its fiscal 2026, which ended May 31, the company spent a whopping $55.7 billion on capital expenditures. Those outlays are expected to land between $90 billion and $95 billion in its fiscal 2027. Many investors are nervous because it is unclear whether all this spending will actually pay off over the long term.
On some level, the widespread pessimism about Oracle's AI infrastructure push looks unfair. After all, it certainly isn't the only tech giant pouring money into AI-related capex. Analysts at Goldman Sachs expect total AI spending worldwide to exceed $1 trillion in 2026. Hyperscaler Amazon alone projects that it will spend as much as $220 billion on it this year, making Oracle's capex budget look conservative by comparison.
That said, there are some big reasons why the market seems to be treating Oracle with more skepticism. Unlike Amazon and other diversified tech giants, Oracle doesn't have a large number of mature, profitable businesses to fall back on if its big AI push doesn't work.
Image source: Getty Images.
Furthermore, Oracle's AI business is highly concentrated on one client, OpenAI, because of a $300 billion cloud computing deal the companies signed in 2025. Oracle has contracted to provide the ChatGPT maker with massive amounts of cloud computing capacity in return for a substantial recurring revenue stream. This makes many investors nervous because Oracle will have to spend tens of billions of dollars up front to make itself capable of upholding its end of the bargain, while still facing the risk that OpenAI may not be able to pay for all the compute it has reserved.
To be clear, OpenAI is still a hugely successful company with an estimated private valuation of $852 billion. However, it faces significant challenges with cash burn and competition from rivals like Anthropic, which means its long-term success is far from guaranteed.
Oracle remains a relatively high-risk way for investors to bet on the generative AI megatrend. While the company has a big opportunity to rise alongside industry leaders like OpenAI, the value of its potential will be overshadowed by the huge up-front spending requirements of building out data centers and the substantial risk of downside if its partners (OpenAI in particular) don't perform as expected.
The ongoing uncertainty and lack of an outstanding bull thesis suggest that over the next several years, Oracle stock is likely to perform in line with the market's historical averages, delivering annual returns of around 10%. That would turn a $1,000 position into around $1,464 by 2030, and there will probably be substantial volatility along the way.
Before you buy stock in Oracle, consider this:
The Motley Fool Stock Advisor analyst team just identified what they believe are the 10 best stocks for investors to buy now… and Oracle wasn’t one of them. The 10 stocks that made the cut could produce monster returns in the coming years.
Consider when Netflix made this list on December 17, 2004... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you’d have $433,160!* Or when Nvidia made this list on April 15, 2005... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you’d have $1,296,254!*
Now, it’s worth noting Stock Advisor’s total average return is 949% — a market-crushing outperformance compared to 212% for the S&P 500. Don't miss the latest top 10 list, available with Stock Advisor, and join an investing community built by individual investors for individual investors.
See the 10 stocks »
*Stock Advisor returns as of September 16, 2026.
Will Ebiefung has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool has positions in and recommends Amazon, Goldman Sachs Group, Micron Technology, Nvidia, and Oracle. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.