Image source: The Motley Fool.
Nov. 4, 2026
Need a quote from a Motley Fool analyst? Email pr@fool.com
Postal Realty Trust, Inc. (NYSE:PSTL) reported a period of growth characterized by record acquisition volume and an upgraded investment grade credit rating. Management reported that improved access to capital facilitated the acquisition of properties in high-value markets such as Greenwich and Brooklyn while maintaining a conservative leverage profile. The company stated that its acquisition strategy continues to focus on properties with embedded growth through lease mark-to-market opportunities and annual rent escalators. Additionally, the company is prioritizing the use of technology to enhance operational efficiency as it scales its portfolio of assets leased to the United States Postal Service.
Operator: Greetings. And welcome to the Postal Realty Trust Third Quarter 2026 Earnings Conference Call. At this time, all participants are in a listen-only mode. A question-and-answer session will follow the prepared remarks. As a reminder, this conference is being recorded. I would now like to turn the conference over to your host, Mr. Jordan Cooperstein, Senior Vice President of Finance and Capital Markets. Welcome, Jordan.
Jordan Cooperstein: Thank you, and good morning, everyone. On the call today, we have Andrew Spodek, Chief Executive Officer Stephen Bakke, Chief Financial Officer Jeremy Garber, President and Matthew H. Brandwein, Chief Accounting Officer. Please note the company may use forward looking statements on this conference call. Which are statements that are not historical facts and are considered forward looking. These forward looking statements are intended to be covered by the safe harbor provisions for forward looking statements contained in the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 2000.
Actual results may differ materially from those described in the forward looking statements and will be affected by a variety of risks and factors that are beyond the company's control including, but not limited to, those contained in the company's latest 10 k and 10 Q and its other regulatory filings with the SEC, The company does not assume and specifically the disclaims any obligation to update any forward looking statements whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise.
Additionally, on this conference call, the company may refer to certain non GAAP financial and operating measures such as funds from operations, adjusted funds from operations, adjusted EBITDA, annualized adjusted EBITDA, run rate adjusted EBITDA, net debt, pro forma net debt, occupancy, net operating income, same store cash NOI, and same store cash revenue. You can find definitions and to the extent available tabular reconciliations of these and other non GAAP financial measures to the most directly comparable GAAP measures in the company's earnings release and supplemental materials available on the company's Investor Relations website. With that, I will now turn the call over to Andrew Spodek, Chief Executive Officer of Postal Realty Trust.
Andrew Spodek: Thank you, Jordan, and good morning, everyone. Thanks for joining us today. The third quarter marked another strong period of execution for Postal Realty. We delivered 9.1% AFFO per share growth compared to the same quarter last year. And raised our guidance for the third time this year to a midpoint of $1.43 per share. We acquired $82 million of postal properties, and are increasing our guidance to a $185 to $200 million at a low 7% weighted average cap rate for 2026. And we accomplished all of this while bringing leverage down to 3.5x pro forma net debt to run rate adjusted EBITDA and achieving a BBB rating from Fitch.
To recap our acquisition strategy, we target properties that are day-1 accretive with embedded growth potential. We underwrite not just with the next quarter or year in mind, but looking multiple years to the future. The internal growth opportunity distinguishes us. I want to share a few figures that illustrate what this looks like. We acquired over 800 properties from 2020 to 2022 totaling north of $370 million at a blended cap rate of 7.1%. Since we have owned these properties, we have driven the cash yield of approximately 200 basis points higher than where we acquired the properties by marking leases to market, creating operating efficiencies, and adding 3% annual escalators in new leases. Every acquisition is different.
The timing of lease rolls and the gap between current and market rents will vary. But across this large sample size, the results clearly show the NOI growth that the machine we have built has delivered. On past earnings calls, we have stated that a better cost of capital will allow us to pursue a broader universe of properties with strong growth potential. Our third quarter results are an excellent illustration of what we can achieve with improved access to well priced capital. We invested in high quality postal real estate portfolios and individual assets in a wide range of markets. From small towns to larger cities. Notable locations this quarter include a 33 thousand-square-foot property in Sheepshead Bay, Brooklyn.
25 thousand-square-feet at a facility in Saint Paul, Minnesota, and a 2.8-acre property in the central business district of Greenwich, Connecticut. Our blended cash cap rate for the quarter was 6.9%. A healthy spread to our cost of capital, and we are excited about the NOI growth we expect to achieve. Cost of capital dictates the opportunities we pursue. This discipline is reflected in the wider acquisition guidance range this quarter, and it is in line with our history of being highly responsive to the capital markets environment.
I have never been more confident in our ability to deliver continued earnings growth given our robust acquisition pipeline, over $340 million of liquidity including unsettled forwards, and a cost of capital we can deploy accretively. With that, I will turn it over to Stephen.
Stephen Bakke: Thank you, Andrew. We have talked in prior quarters about our AFFO growth building blocks. And today, each of those building blocks is contributing meaningfully. First, we are retaining more cash after dividend payments than ever before as a public company. Which we are utilizing to either pay down debt or acquire properties. Second, the day 1 accretion we generate from external growth is substantial. Coming in at approximately 90 basis points the third quarter. Lastly, same store NOI growth is healthy. And we are on track to achieve the midpoint of our 6% to 7% same store cash NOI growth guidance this year.
In the third quarter, we drove a higher acquisition volume at a slightly lower blended cap rate because of the substantial earnings growth we can derive from feeding our machine. For illustrative purposes, each $50 million of incremental acquisition volume adds $1 million of net operating income in a scenario where we expand acquisition yield by an additional 200 basis points after purchase. Shifting to third quarter results, yesterday, we reported AFFO per share of $0.36. This is in line with the second quarter due predominantly to operating expense seasonality and onetime expenses in the quarter. it is a $0.03 per share increase from the same quarter last year as we benefited from predominantly internal growth and acquisition accretion.
Note that in last year's third quarter, we earned approximately $5 million more from onetime lump sum payments. Turning to our balance sheet. This quarter, we further fortified our capital position. Even while closing on a record volume of acquisitions. During and subsequent to the quarter, we raised $117 million via the ATM, of which $83 million of net proceeds remain unsettled. Additionally, we issued $7 million of OP units as part of property acquisitions. We added a summary of equity raising activity thus far this year on page 9 of our supplementals. As discussed last quarter, we rehabbed and expanded our credit facilities in July.
As part of the recast, in addition to increasing our capacity by $60 million we added an investment grade pricing grid that offers more favorable pricing upon achievement of an investment grade rating which we secured in August. Looking at our balance sheet structure, after equity settled in the third quarter, our net debt to run rate adjusted EBITDA stood at 4.4 times. Inclusive of unsettled forward equity raised through October, pro forma net debt to run rate adjusted EBITDA of 3.5x. Even with no significant debt maturities until 2028, we remain focused on adding duration and further staggering our maturities to buttress our financial position. Combined with the US Postal Service's strong tenancy, this gives us significant strategic optionality.
Lastly, on the balance sheet front, in late October, we purchased $20 million of forward starting swaps to begin proactively derisking a portion of our interest rate exposure related to an upcoming debt transaction. Now on guidance. We are raising our AFFO per share range by $0.01 to $1.42 to $1.44 per share. Representing 8.3% growth at the midpoint for the year. The increase is driven by higher acquisition volume and improved borrowing costs. Underlying assumptions include fourth quarter recurring capital expenditures in the range of $250 thousand to $350 thousand. Full year 2026 cash G&A expense is expected to land at or slightly below the midpoint of our $11.5 million to $12.5 million guidance range.
Note that in the third quarter, G&A included approximately $250 thousand of expenses related to our credit rating, credit facility recast, and acquisitions which will not repeat in the fourth quarter. Scaling relative to our G&A is 1 of our top priorities as a company. Our G&A ratio has improved each year since our IPO. And looking forward, we are excited about opportunities to empower the existing team here to cover more ground by applying AI and process automation tools across a variety of accounting, acquisition, and operations workflows. Lastly, our board of directors has approved a quarterly dividend of $0.245 per share representing a 1% increase from last year.
Our dividend payout ratio for the third quarter is approximately 68%. Our dividend yield as of yesterday was 4.5%. With that, I will turn it over to Jeremy.
Jeremy Garber: Thank you, Stephen. The third quarter was another quarter of strong operating results. Our portfolio remained 99.8% occupied, and our historical lease retention rate held at 99.6%. A reflection of the stable, predictable cash flows our business generates. Our leasing activity this quarter further reinforces that stability. With 26 leases behind us, execution of the 27 leases with the postal service is underway. As I noted last quarter, as in prior years, the 2027 new leases will include 3% annual rent escalations and the vast majority will have 10 year terms. Excluding leases subject to existing renewal options. Finally, we are in conversation with the postal service on 28 expirations.
Keeping us on track toward achieving our shared goal of fully executing new leases before the current leases expire. With this quarter's leasing progress, 60% of our leases include annual rent escalations, 55% of leases contain 10 year terms, and our weighted average lease term stood at 6.4 years at quarter end inclusive of executed and agreed upon leases through 2027. Given our visibility into upcoming lease renewals, we are reaffirming our 2027 same-store cash revenue growth of 6.5%. Now to acquisitions. During the quarter, we acquired 145 properties for $82 million at a weighted average cash cap rate of 6.9%. Expanding our footprint by 388 thousand square feet.
By property type that included 130 thousand square feet from 101 last-mile post offices, and 258 thousand square feet from 44 flex properties Through the first 9 months of the year, we acquired 243 properties for approximately $162 million at a weighted average cash cap rate of 7.1%. With that, we will end our prepared remarks. Operator, please open the line for questions.
Operator: Thank you. We will now be conducting a question-and-answer session If you would like to ask a question, please press 1 on your telephone keypad. A confirmation tone will indicate your line is in the question queue. You may press 2 if you would like to remove your question from the queue. For participants using speaker equipment, it may be necessary to pick up your handset before pressing the star keys. 1 moment please while we poll for questions. Our first question comes from John Kim with BMO Capital Markets. Please go ahead.
John Kim: Thank you. On the acquisitions you made this quarter at 6.9% yield, much of that was driven by the assets you acquired in Greenwich and Brooklyn? And can you talk about the upside potential that you see maybe provide us stabilized yield once you get the mark to market and the change in escalators.
Andrew Spodek: Thanks for the question, John. So the cap rate for this quarter was driven not just by properties that we highlighted in the script, but some other properties that we believe have real embedded growth, over the next couple of years. What we illustrated for the first time is that we are trying to show people what the results of not just the day 1 accretion and not just the efficiencies and synergies we are getting from operating, but also what we are gaining from marking these leases to market, getting those 3% escalators. And we are hopeful that what we have been able to do in the past will be able to do in the future.
Operator: Our next question comes from Greg McGinniss with Scotiabank. Please go ahead.
Greg McGinniss: Hey, good morning. The revised acquisition guidance implies just around $30 million of acquisitions in Q4 following a record Q3. Given your liquidity, is this conservatism, lumpy transaction timing, or just reflective of the change in your current cost of capital? And then how should we kind of think about that going forward into 2027 as well?
Andrew Spodek: So, Greg, I appreciate the question. it is a combination of all those things and more. From what we have tried to illustrate to everybody, over the years and what we have actually been showing is that our cost and our access to capital needs to tie out with our pipeline. And when all those 3 things align, we are able to achieve what we are able to do this past quarter. Our conservatism or our estimate which is a wider range of our acquisitions for Q4, is based on not knowing what all those things are going to tie out to for the fourth quarter, especially given the fall volatility in the market today.
And so as we are able to access a good cost of capital and as we are able to buy properties that we believe not just have day 1 accretion, but have some better growth, we will be able to execute on that. And we hope and plan to continue to do so.
Stephen Bakke: And, Greg, this is Stephen. Just adding to-- to Andrew's point, with our cost of capital today in the mid-6% range, we are fortunate to have a healthy amount of day 1 accretion based on the pipeline of acquisitions we see today. So if our cost of capital holds, we can lean into that as Andrew mentioned.
Greg McGinniss: Okay. Thank you. And can I follow-up on those lower cap acquisitions from this quarter? Am I hearing you right that you are saying you think there is more internal growth for those lower cap acquisitions than what you have been acquiring in the 7.1% to 7.9% range? And even in I think, like, the illustrative example in the presentation was based on-- even if it was the same, greater acquisition volume does lead to greater growth. But curious if you are actually seeing more growth from the lower cap assets.
Andrew Spodek: So that is a very good question. You know, we look at and acquire a wide range of assets throughout this entire country. And so each asset and each acquisition really speaks for itself. When we see greater embedded growth or graded potential for that embedded growth, then we are able to buy things at a lower cap rate because we see that what the stabilized yield is going to achieve. But every deal really has to speak first. Itself, and we believe that the acquisitions we bought this quarter are really going to achieve the growth that we are trying to are really trying to accomplish. Thank you.
Operator: Thank you. Our next question comes from Anthony Paolone with JPMorgan Chase and Co. Please go ahead.
Nahom Tesfazghi: Good morning, guys. You have a Nahom on for Tony this morning. Maybe on the portfolio you guys purchased outside of the ROFO, I guess since Postal already manage these properties, how should we think about the embedded mark to market or at least term upside compared to traditional assets that you guys buy that you will bring into your system and you will get some expansion on?
Jeremy Garber: Yeah. I mean, this is a great example of long-term relationships and life events and how those play into our acquisition strategy. So this is a partner that I have been chasing for over 10 years. And, made annual visits to him. And he experienced a life event in the past year. And came to us, and we moved forward with our acquisition team on underwriting these assets. These are great assets, assets we know, very typical of the type of assets we buy, growth profile, very similar. There are some assets here in this portfolio that have experienced our new lease form. Because as managers of these assets, they get the benefit of the proprietary lease that we have.
But yeah, this was modeled the way every other deal is modeled. As Andrew described, we are trying to achieve day 1 accretion. And acquire assets that have embedded growth.
Nahom Tesfazghi: Got it. Thanks. And maybe as a follow-up sticking on the transaction market. I think on prior calls, guys have mentioned that mom and pop sellers in the market are not necessarily solving for a cap rate or an IRR. Could you walk us through maybe what they are actually optimizing for and how that maybe shapes your approach to sourcing and pricing?
Andrew Spodek: it is really a very difficult thing to just given the amount of volume of not just deals, but owners and sellers that we are dealing with talking to, and tran. Transacting with on a daily basis. And there does not necessarily have to be a significant theme amongst them. The-- if I had to give you some commonality, it is something along the lines of what Jeremy is saying, which is, you know, the average owner is in their 60s to 80s.
The average owner is on their building more than 50 years, and so life events are thought of life events or estate planning or liquidity or things like that people consider at that stage of life is probably most of the larger percentage of transactions that come to us. But you also have to understand that 75% of our deal flow is actually off market. And so these are these are people that we have been talking to over long periods of time, like Jeremy was doing or you know, like the-- the transaction in Greenwich, I have been working on that deal for probably 30 years.
The Brooklyn transaction is not an owner that I was dealing with for a long time, but came through a relationship. Right? These are off market deals that people are not really explaining to you specifically why they are transacting, but if I had to put a theme on it, I would say life events and age Our next question comes from Jonathan Petersen with Jefferies.
Operator: Please go ahead.
Matt Roberts: This is Matthew on for John. Curious to hear more on AI usage as a company, especially with regards to acquisitions. And then second, how is the company thinking about future dividend growth now that AFFO growth has accelerated?
Stephen Bakke: Great question. Great question. Hey, this is Stephen. As it relates to AI, there are a lot of ways that we are deploying it across the platform. What we found so far is rather than any grand solutions, we can plug AI into existing processes and increase efficiency and allow the team to take on more. As it relates to acquisitions, you know, we have a variety of due diligence items and checklists that we put together or gathering data vetting data, checking data, and AI can help increase the speed and efficiency with which we do that. And help us, you know, like the current quarter acquire almost double the typical quarter. Without adding any additional personnel.
As it relates to the dividend, I will start by saying it is a board decision. But there are a few overlays that we look at the dividend recommendation through. The first is our capital strength. And the credit we get with various constituents on the lending side for having a low payout ratio, 70% or lower, feels to us like an appropriate number to keep a strong financial position. The second piece is the retained cash flow. By retaining more cash flow and reinvesting in the business, while the dividend is lower today, the deployment of that cash flow can accelerate our AFFO growth and ultimately lead, we believe, to higher dividends in the future.
So that is really what excites and motivates us is that long term growth. And the last piece on the dividend is maintaining our REIT compliance. So we have to pay out 95% of our net income. As we have grown our cash flows. We have gotten closer and closer to that point where we are paying out close to the minimum that we can pay out to maintain REIT compliance. So I think that will be an up pressure on our dividend over time. To the extent our cash flow continues to grow.
Operator: Once again, if you would like to ask a question, please press 1 on your telephone keypad. Our next question comes from John Kim with BMO Capital Markets. Please go ahead.
John Kim: Thanks for taking my follow-up. Looking at the USPS latest quarterly results, they had a 6% increase in revenue, but another quarter of losses, $2.5 billion this quarter. And the postmaster general warned of a severe liquidity crisis. Which I know they have used that language or similar language in the past. But I guess my question is really, has negotiations changed at all because of their situation do you think the USPS is more likely to sell assets within its own portfolio to the market to help address this.
Andrew Spodek: I appreciate the question. So I guess there are a couple of questions within your questions. So negotiations, number 1, have not changed. Number 2 is we have to keep in mind that, like we said before, the leasing of the entire postal network is only 1.5% of the postal services operating and it is the backbone of their entire delivery and operational business. What they need to deliver to the 170 million delivery points that they do 6 to 7 days a week. That is their business that is what they do when they need these buildings. In order to accomplish that.
In terms of them selling assets, I am obviously biased, but I would argue you are right and that they should sell them. I cannot tell you that they are actually going to do it or this is going to motivate them. But if it does, we are sitting here ready, willing, and able to buy them. So I guess time will tell. But I think the Postal Service is actually more focused on the operations. And trying to serve the American people the way that they always have.
John Kim: And can you remind USPS typically sells? Annually?
Andrew Spodek: I am sorry. You broke up. I did not hear that. Can you say that again?
John Kim: Can you remind us their track record of dispositions or selling assets?
Andrew Spodek: So they do not really have much of a track record. In the past, they did sell properties that, and they did do a sale leaseback on a portion of the property, but they did not typically dispose of properties that they wanted to maintain a tenancy in. A significant portion of the property. This is not something that they historically, did on a proactive basis. Okay. Thank you.
Operator: We have reached the end of our question-and-answer session. I would now like to turn the floor back over to Andrew Spodek for closing comments.
Andrew Spodek: We have made tremendous progress year to date. Growing this highly scalable platform. Backed by our growing rent stream from a tenant who pays 100% of the rent 100% of the time. I have never been more confident in our ability to consolidate the postal real estate market given our access to capital, robust pipeline, and the strength of our team. We look forward to meeting at upcoming conferences and updating you on our progress next quarter. Thank you again for joining us today.
Operator: We have reached the end of today's teleconference. You may disconnect your lines at this time. Thank you for your participation.
Before you buy stock in Postal Realty Trust, consider this:
The Motley Fool Stock Advisor analyst team just identified what they believe are the 10 best stocks for investors to buy now… and Postal Realty Trust wasn’t one of them. The 10 stocks that made the cut could produce monster returns in the coming years.
Consider when Netflix made this list on December 17, 2004... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you’d have $342,020!* Or when Nvidia made this list on April 15, 2005... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you’d have $1,270,017!*
Now, it’s worth noting Stock Advisor’s total average return is 885% — a market-crushing outperformance compared to 208% for the S&P 500. Don't miss the latest top 10 list, available with Stock Advisor, and join an investing community built by individual investors for individual investors.
See the 10 stocks »
*Stock Advisor returns as of November 4, 2026.
This article is a transcript of this conference call produced for The Motley Fool. While we strive for our Foolish Best, there may be errors, omissions, or inaccuracies in this transcript. Parts of this article were created using Large Language Models (LLMs) based on The Motley Fool's insights and investing approach. It has been reviewed by our AI quality control systems. Since LLMs cannot (currently) own stocks, it has no positions in any of the stocks mentioned. As with all our articles, The Motley Fool does not assume any responsibility for your use of this content, and we strongly encourage you to do your own research, including listening to the call yourself and reading the company's SEC filings. Please see our Terms and Conditions for additional details, including our Obligatory Capitalized Disclaimers of Liability.
The Motley Fool has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.