20 Years of S&P 500 History Show: This Simple Strategy Is Only 8.3% Less Than "Perfect"

Source The Motley Fool

Key Points

  • Stock market volatility can make people feel tempted to time the market by waiting for a better time to invest.

  • Schwab research into 20 years of S&P 500 returns found that just investing as soon as possible each year (time in the market) delivered total returns that were only 8.3% lower than perfect market timing (which is impossible).

  • The Vanguard S&P 500 ETF has delivered about 13.8% annualized returns in the past five years, even after overcoming a -18% total return in 2022.

  • These 10 stocks could mint the next wave of millionaires ›

The stock market has been wobbling a bit in October. Although the S&P 500 index (SNPINDEX: ^GSPC) hit a new all-time high on Oct. 6, it had declined by about 2% as of this writing. Some investors worry that major tech companies are spending too heavily on the build-out of artificial intelligence (AI), and that future AI tools and products won't recoup those hundreds of billions of dollars of capital expenditures (capex). Rising bond yields have also recently sent warning signals about high inflation and government debt. Is now still a good time to invest in stocks?

During times of high uncertainty and volatility in the stock market, it's easy for investors to lose confidence. Sometimes people get tempted to try timing the market. They say to themselves, "I'm going to stop putting money into stocks -- for now. I'm going to wait until the stock market goes down by another 5% or 10%. Then I'll buy back into the market and watch my investments go up!"

Missed Nvidia in 2009? This Rare Signal Is Flashing Again. In 2009, a "Double Down" signal flashed for a little-known chipmaker called Nvidia. For the first time in years, that same "Total Conviction" signal is flashing for a company 1/100th the size of Nvidia. Continue »

Here's the problem with this kind of thinking: It's impossible. There's no such thing as "waiting for the right time" to invest. That's because no one knows the future. The stock market can go down and keep going down. Or it can bounce back from a downturn and skyrocket to new highs. All these market moves happen faster than you can decide that "now is the best time" to put money into the S&P 500 again.

Schwab research found something notable: Time in the market (just investing as soon as you can, as soon as you have cash available to deploy) is almost as good as perfectly timing the market (which is impossible). Let's look at why investing in the S&P 500 early and often is almost as good as the impossibly perfect standard of "choosing the right time" to invest.

A confident investor takes notes while looking at a laptop screen.

Image source: Getty Images.

Schwab research: Perfect timing outperformed time in the market by only 8.3%

Schwab's research team analyzed historical S&P 500 returns over 20 years (from 2005 to 2024) to determine which investment strategy yielded the best returns.

They calculated how much an investor could have earned by investing $2,000 per year for 20 years with "perfect market timing" (buying $2,000 worth of S&P 500 shares on the day of each year when the S&P 500 reached its lowest closing level that year). They compared this result with an example investor who invested $2,000 per year for 20 years for maximum time in the market (buying $2,000 worth of S&P 500 shares on the first trading day of each year).

The example investor with "perfect timing" (investing $2,000 at annual S&P 500 lows for 20 years) had a balance of $186,077 after 20 years.

The example investor with the most time in the market (investing $2,000 on the first trading day of the year for 20 years) had a balance of $170,555 after 20 years. That's only 8.3% less than the investor with perfect timing.

It's no surprise that perfect market timing did better. But perfect market timing doesn't exist. Here's what might be the most important finding from this study: Just by investing the same amount of money in the S&P 500 every year, as early as possible, an investor could have earned returns that were only 8.3% less than perfection.

How to invest for the future with time in the market

How should you invest, now that you know this amazing fact? Here's the thing to keep in mind: The S&P 500 tends to go up in the long run. On any given day, it might go down by 1% or more. In any given year, it might enter a correction (a 10% decline or more) or a bear market (a 20% decline or more). Sometimes the S&P 500 goes sideways and stays mostly flat for years at a time. Sometimes it has a dreaded "lost decade" when investors see barely any growth.

But over the past 98 years, since 1928, the S&P 500 has delivered annualized returns of 9.98%. That's an impressive sign for long-term investors. Over the past 16 years, the Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (NYSEMKT: VOO) has delivered an annualized return of 14.94%. In the past five years, it's delivered annualized returns of about 13.8%, even after absorbing an 18.15% negative total return during the bear market of 2022.

If you're worried that now is the "wrong time" to buy stocks with S&P 500 ETFs or other low-cost index funds -- don't be. If you're in it for the long haul, if you can keep calm and hold onto your investments, there's almost never a bad time to buy a diversified portfolio of stocks.

The stock market -- in the long run, for patient, confident investors -- tends to be a winning proposition. Don't try to time the market. Just keep investing on a regular, consistent basis, and let the power of the stock market build a prosperous future for you.

Missed AI’s "Act 1"? Act 2 Could Be 14x Bigger

Most investors think they missed the AI boat because they didn't buy Nvidia in 2005.

But according to our analysts, we’re only at the end of "Act 1"—the R&D phase. "Act 2" is the global rollout, a massive technology build-out that Google’s CEO says could be more profound than fire or electricity.

While everyone watches the chip designers, one "backbone" company provides the critical technology that Nvidia and AMD literally cannot function without. We’ve detailed this under-the-radar player in our new AI Playbook.

Continue »

Ben Gran has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool has positions in and recommends Vanguard S&P 500 ETF. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.

Disclaimer: For information purposes only. Past performance is not indicative of future results.
placeholder
Tesla jumps 5% as Barclays puts a $450 target on the SpaceX merger — the chart was already pointing to 431Tesla closed at $391.62 on October 26, up 5.21%, after Barclays upgraded the stock to Overweight and lifted its target to $450 from $370, citing a sharp inflection in Robotaxi miles and a potential SpaceX merger. The move also completed a double bottom at $345.88 and $349.33, with a neckline at $388.56 and a measured target of $431.24. Here is what the upgrade actually says, why the chart and the analyst now point the same way, and what would break the target.
Author  Irene Q.
Oct 27, Tue
Tesla closed at $391.62 on October 26, up 5.21%, after Barclays upgraded the stock to Overweight and lifted its target to $450 from $370, citing a sharp inflection in Robotaxi miles and a potential SpaceX merger. The move also completed a double bottom at $345.88 and $349.33, with a neckline at $388.56 and a measured target of $431.24. Here is what the upgrade actually says, why the chart and the analyst now point the same way, and what would break the target.
placeholder
Anthropic files for a $2 trillion IPO — the $80.7 billion loss is the decoy, the $450 billion compute bill is the riskAnthropic publicly filed its S-1 on October 26, revealing $16.29 billion of first-half revenue (+1,304% year over year) and a $80.7 billion net loss — of which $72.4 billion is a non-cash convertible-note charge. The real number is the $450 billion of signed, mostly non-cancelable compute commitments. Here is what the filing says, why NVDA, ARM and MU are the tradeable read-through, and the conditions that decide whether the AI trade passes its first public valuation test.
Author  Irene Q.
Oct 27, Tue
Anthropic publicly filed its S-1 on October 26, revealing $16.29 billion of first-half revenue (+1,304% year over year) and a $80.7 billion net loss — of which $72.4 billion is a non-cash convertible-note charge. The real number is the $450 billion of signed, mostly non-cancelable compute commitments. Here is what the filing says, why NVDA, ARM and MU are the tradeable read-through, and the conditions that decide whether the AI trade passes its first public valuation test.
placeholder
Brent's $115 front month sits $4.6 above January — the $14 spread to WTI is the supply-risk premiumDecember Brent trades at $115.29 while January is $110.71, a $4.58 backwardation. The December Brent-WTI spread is $14.2, versus a $3-5 normal. That gap, not the headline, is where the Middle East supply risk is priced. Here is what the curve says, why the December contract's expiry on October 30 will mechanically cut the headline by $4.6, and the 108.81 neckline that decides the next move.
Author  Irene Q.
Oct 28, Wed
December Brent trades at $115.29 while January is $110.71, a $4.58 backwardation. The December Brent-WTI spread is $14.2, versus a $3-5 normal. That gap, not the headline, is where the Middle East supply risk is priced. Here is what the curve says, why the December contract's expiry on October 30 will mechanically cut the headline by $4.6, and the 108.81 neckline that decides the next move.
placeholder
Gold Price Analysis Today | Forex Gold Analysis | XAU/USD Analysis - October 29, 2026Get the latest gold price analysis, forex gold insights, and XAU/USD analysis for October 29, 2026. Read on for the details.
Author  Mitrade
Yesterday 02: 06
Get the latest gold price analysis, forex gold insights, and XAU/USD analysis for October 29, 2026. Read on for the details.
placeholder
The Fed held at 3.75%–4.00% — and two officials voted to hike. December is now 85% pricedThe FOMC held by a 10–2 vote, with Governor Cook and Cleveland Fed President Hammack dissenting for a 25bp hike. Chair Warsh offered no forward guidance and no dot plot, the 2-year yield fell 8bp to 4.70%, and the dollar slipped to 101.84 even as markets moved December hike odds to 85%–87%. Tonight's Q3 GDP and September core PCE are the next referee.
Author  Irene Q.
Yesterday 02: 55
The FOMC held by a 10–2 vote, with Governor Cook and Cleveland Fed President Hammack dissenting for a 25bp hike. Chair Warsh offered no forward guidance and no dot plot, the 2-year yield fell 8bp to 4.70%, and the dollar slipped to 101.84 even as markets moved December hike odds to 85%–87%. Tonight's Q3 GDP and September core PCE are the next referee.
goTop
quote