Mega-bank Wells Fargo reported its first-quarter results on Tuesday morning.
Although broadly better year-over-year, too many of its fiscal metrics fell short of expectations.
Still, the setback is a buying opportunity for long-term investors. Analysts may have been expecting too much in the current economic environment.
Before their budding recovery effort had a chance of taking hold, shares of Wells Fargo (NYSE: WFC) were upended today. As of 12:30 p.m. ET Tuesday, in fact, this bank's stock is down 5%, seemingly moving back toward the multi-month low made in mid-March.
The culprit? Its first-quarter numbers. Although revenue and profits were both up year over year, several of the bank's other fiscal metrics fell short of expectations.
Will AI create the world's first trillionaire? Our team just released a report on the one little-known company, called an "Indispensable Monopoly" providing the critical technology Nvidia and Intel both need. Continue »
Mega-bank Wells Fargo turned revenue of more than $21.4 billion into net income of nearly $5.3 billion for the three months ending in March, up from year-earlier comparisons of $20.1 billion and $4.9 billion (respectively). And, per-share earnings improved from $1.39 to $1.60. Net interest income improved from $11.5 billion to $12.1 billion as well.
Image source: Getty Images.
The company's top line, however, also fell short of analysts' estimates of nearly $21.8 billion, while net interest income -- arguably the most-watched metric for this past quarter -- missed expectations of $12.3 billion. Investment banking fees, expenses, and the credit quality of its loan portfolio each also disappointed, even if only slightly.
In the aggregate, investors simply saw too many red flags.
The market's bearish knee-jerk reaction is understandable. Investors were expecting more following last year's removal of a regulatory cap on the bank's total assets. Wells Fargo is indeed getting bigger, but not necessarily getting better. Even if much of the blame for today's disappointment goes to the unexpectedly difficult economic backdrop, it's disappointing nonetheless.
Tuesday's stumble, however, is still more of an opportunity to step into the stock than an omen of what to expect for the foreseeable future. Analysts' expectations were arguably unfairly high given the current environment. The analyst community is apt to adjust its future expectations accordingly.
In the meantime, don't look past the simple fact that Wells Fargo still produced solid sales and earnings growth during Q1 ... growth that's likely to at least meet adjusted expectations going forward. The stock's forward-looking dividend yield of 2.3% isn't too shabby either.
Before you buy stock in Wells Fargo, consider this:
The Motley Fool Stock Advisor analyst team just identified what they believe are the 10 best stocks for investors to buy now… and Wells Fargo wasn’t one of them. The 10 stocks that made the cut could produce monster returns in the coming years.
Consider when Netflix made this list on December 17, 2004... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you’d have $556,335!* Or when Nvidia made this list on April 15, 2005... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you’d have $1,160,572!*
Now, it’s worth noting Stock Advisor’s total average return is 975% — a market-crushing outperformance compared to 193% for the S&P 500. Don't miss the latest top 10 list, available with Stock Advisor, and join an investing community built by individual investors for individual investors.
See the 10 stocks »
*Stock Advisor returns as of April 14, 2026.
Wells Fargo is an advertising partner of Motley Fool Money. James Brumley has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.