CAVA vs. Hershey: Which Stock Is a Better Buy for 2027?

Source The Motley Fool

Key Points

  • CAVA continues to expand its footprint as a dominant leader in the Mediterranean fast-casual category.

  • Hershey provides a more stable investment profile with massive scale and high free cash flow generation.

  • Which consumer focused stock is the better choice for your long term portfolio?

  • Motley Fool Issues Rare "Total Conviction" Buy Alert ›

Choosing between high-growth expansion and established market dominance is a classic investor dilemma. CAVA Group (NYSE:CAVA) and Hershey (NYSE:HSY) offer two very different ways to play the changing consumer landscape heading into 2027.

CAVA focuses on the rapid expansion of its Mediterranean restaurant brand, while Hershey maintains its position as a global leader in the snacking and confection industry. Comparing these two companies helps you decide whether to prioritize aggressive top-line growth or the safety of a defensive staple.

The case for CAVA

CAVA Group operates a Mediterranean fast-casual restaurant brand that offers bowls, pitas, and salads. Its direct-to-consumer model primarily focuses on its physical locations across 29 states, where it serves a diverse guest base. The company also sells its branded dips and dressings through grocery channels and maintains relationships with over 50 growers and ranchers for its ingredients.

In FY 2025, revenue reached nearly $1.2 billion, which was a growth of approximately 22.4% over the prior fiscal year. The company reported a net income of roughly $63.7 million, showing it is currently profitable as it expands. However, the net margin decreased to approximately 5.4%, as the business invested heavily in its infrastructure and new store openings.

As of its December 2025 balance sheet, CAVA carries a debt-to-equity ratio of approximately 0.6x. This metric compares total debt to shareholder equity, and a lower number typically indicates a more stable financial structure. The current ratio, which measures assets available to cover short-term debts, is roughly 2.7x. Free cash flow, or cash from operations minus capital expenditures, was nearly $26.1 million in FY 2025.

The case for Hershey

The Hershey Company is a giant in the snacking industry, known for its chocolate, confectionery, and salty snack brands. In its latest annual report filed for FY 2025, the company noted that it sells products in approximately 65 countries. It distributes these goods through wholesale distributors and retail stocks like Walmart (NASDAQ:WMT), though one customer, McLane Company, Inc., accounts for roughly 27% of its sales, and customer concentration like this adds a layer of risk to the business.

In FY 2025, Hershey generated nearly $11.7 billion in revenue, showing a growth rate of approximately 4.4%. The company reported a net income of close to $883.3 million for the year. While revenue increased, the net margin dropped to roughly 7.6% for the period, which is a significant change from the much higher margins the company achieved in previous years.

As of its December 2025 balance sheet, Hershey has a debt-to-equity ratio of approximately 1.2x. Its current ratio, which shows if a company can pay its short-term bills with current assets, is roughly 1.2x. The company remains highly generative, producing around $1.8 billion in free cash flow, which represents cash from operations minus capital expenditures, during the fiscal year.

Risk profile comparison

CAVA faces intense competition in both the restaurant and food manufacturing sectors. The company must scale its digital infrastructure and manage new restaurant openings effectively to keep growing. It also relies on third-party suppliers, which means any issues with food safety or ingredient availability could impact the brand.

Hershey operates in a competitive global snacking market where raw material price volatility, specifically for cocoa, is a major concern. The company must successfully integrate new acquisitions like LesserEvil while maintaining its reputation for product quality. Additionally, cybersecurity threats and complex system implementations pose operational risks to its global business.

Valuation comparison

Hershey is cheaper as its Forward P/E on earnings estimates and its P/S ratio on sales over the past twelve months are much lower.

MetricCAVAHershey
Forward P/E115.4x20.1x
P/S ratio4.9x2.9x

Valuation metrics include sourcing from Financial Modeling Prep (FMP) and may differ from other data providers.

Which stock would I buy for 2027?

CAVA is my pick, and the case starts with how much room it has to grow. Revenue rose 22% in Q3 as it opened new restaurants and reached 500 locations. It also has no debt and plenty of cash to keep expanding.

In its Q3 2026 results reported on Nov. 4, CAVA came in slightly below Wall Street's forecasts, and the stock sank as growth at existing restaurants cooled sharply from the previous quarter. Produce worries and higher gas prices weighed on traffic, but management raised its full-year outlook for sales at existing restaurants, and its newer locations are exceeding expectations. If you're a patient investor, that pullback may be a chance to buy a growing business at a lower price.

To be fair to Hershey, it beat earnings estimates again in Q3 and raised its profit outlook. It also pays a dividend. But cheaper ingredients and tariff refunds boosted its profit, and it sold fewer products as prices rose. What's more, its share of the U.S. candy market has slipped this year.

For long-term investors seeking a business still in its expansion phase, CAVA offers compelling upside as it grows its store footprint. That long runway for growth is why it's my pick.

Should you buy stock in Cava Group right now?

Before you buy stock in Cava Group, consider this:

The Motley Fool Stock Advisor analyst team just identified what they believe are the 10 best stocks for investors to buy now… and Cava Group wasn’t one of them. The 10 stocks that made the cut could produce monster returns in the coming years.

Consider when Netflix made this list on December 17, 2004... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you’d have $348,060!* Or when Nvidia made this list on April 15, 2005... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you’d have $1,067,492!*

Now, it’s worth noting Stock Advisor’s total average return is 849% — a market-crushing outperformance compared to 210% for the S&P 500. Don't miss the latest top 10 list, available with Stock Advisor, and join an investing community built by individual investors for individual investors.

See the 10 stocks »

*Stock Advisor returns as of November 12, 2026.

Sara Appino has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool has positions in and recommends Cava Group, Hershey, and Walmart. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.

Disclaimer: For information purposes only. Past performance is not indicative of future results.
placeholder
Gold Price Analysis Today | Forex Gold Analysis | XAU/USD Analysis - November 11, 2026Get the latest gold price analysis, forex gold insights, and XAU/USD analysis for November 11, 2026. Read on for the details.
Author  Mitrade
Nov 11, Wed
Get the latest gold price analysis, forex gold insights, and XAU/USD analysis for November 11, 2026. Read on for the details.
placeholder
Nvidia slid 7.7% after hours while AMD and Broadcom rose — the AI trade changed hands, it didn't breakNvidia closed Wednesday at 173.73, up 2.87%, then fell as much as 8.1% to 159.44 after reports that its board was preparing for a possible leadership change. The same session, the Philadelphia Semiconductor Index rose 5.7% with all 30 components higher, CoreWeave jumped 24.7% on 168% revenue growth, and Micron added 11.9%. If AI demand were being repriced, AMD and Broadcom would not be bid. This is a governance discount on one name, and 204.54 — the 200-day average — is the level that settles it.
Author  Irene Q.
Nov 12, Thu
Nvidia closed Wednesday at 173.73, up 2.87%, then fell as much as 8.1% to 159.44 after reports that its board was preparing for a possible leadership change. The same session, the Philadelphia Semiconductor Index rose 5.7% with all 30 components higher, CoreWeave jumped 24.7% on 168% revenue growth, and Micron added 11.9%. If AI demand were being repriced, AMD and Broadcom would not be bid. This is a governance discount on one name, and 204.54 — the 200-day average — is the level that settles it.
placeholder
US October PPI Preview: Fed Rate Hike Expectations Rise, PPI May Be Key Variable; How Will US Stocks, Dollar, and Gold Move?On Friday (Nov. 13) Eastern Time, the U.S. will release the October Producer Price Index (PPI). Following the October CPI once again exceeding expectations, the market will look to the PP
Author  TradingKey
Nov 12, Thu
On Friday (Nov. 13) Eastern Time, the U.S. will release the October Producer Price Index (PPI). Following the October CPI once again exceeding expectations, the market will look to the PP
placeholder
Gold hit a one-year low while central banks bought 321 tonnes — the sellers were never the ones you thinkSpot gold closed at 3,876 on Thursday, down 2.8% and its lowest close in more than a year, with an intraday low near 3,852. The dollar is at a 19-month high of 103.21 and the 10-year yield is at 5.10%, so the price move is easy to explain. What is harder to explain is who sold: central banks bought 321 tonnes in Q3, the PBoC added for a 24th straight month, ETF holdings are near a record 4,256 tonnes, and roughly 95% of the futures selling came from non-reportable and sovereign-type accounts rather than hedge funds. This piece separates the two books that have to balance.
Author  Irene Q.
23 hours ago
Spot gold closed at 3,876 on Thursday, down 2.8% and its lowest close in more than a year, with an intraday low near 3,852. The dollar is at a 19-month high of 103.21 and the 10-year yield is at 5.10%, so the price move is easy to explain. What is harder to explain is who sold: central banks bought 321 tonnes in Q3, the PBoC added for a 24th straight month, ETF holdings are near a record 4,256 tonnes, and roughly 95% of the futures selling came from non-reportable and sovereign-type accounts rather than hedge funds. This piece separates the two books that have to balance.
placeholder
Brent rose 3.3% and US crude stocks built 4.66 million barrels in the same weekBrent January settled at 95.82, up 3.3%, and WTI at 88.74, up 2.55%, after the US signalled it would not pursue a deal with Iran and attacks on Gulf shipping continued. In the same week, EIA data showed US crude inventories rising 4.657 million barrels against expectations of a 1.1 million draw, with gasoline up another 1.799 million. OPEC output also rebounded 1.96 million barrels a day to 27.16 million in October, led by Saudi Arabia at 10.56 million. This piece separates the geopolitical premium from the physical balance and lays out where each side of the trade is anchored.
Author  Irene Q.
23 hours ago
Brent January settled at 95.82, up 3.3%, and WTI at 88.74, up 2.55%, after the US signalled it would not pursue a deal with Iran and attacks on Gulf shipping continued. In the same week, EIA data showed US crude inventories rising 4.657 million barrels against expectations of a 1.1 million draw, with gasoline up another 1.799 million. OPEC output also rebounded 1.96 million barrels a day to 27.16 million in October, led by Saudi Arabia at 10.56 million. This piece separates the geopolitical premium from the physical balance and lays out where each side of the trade is anchored.
goTop
quote