Palantir vs. Snowflake: The AI Sell-Off Is Exposing a Critical Difference for 2027

Source The Motley Fool

Key Points

  • Despite strong revenue growth, Snowflake has yet to achieve consistent profitability.

  • Palantir's latest quarterly revenue surged 96%, reinforcing its exceptional growth and established profitability.

  • While operating in overlapping markets, Palantir and Snowflake have significantly different valuation profiles.

  • Motley Fool Issues Rare "Total Conviction" Buy Alert ›

The artificial intelligence (AI) boom has fueled remarkable growth across the technology sector, but the recent sell-off has Wall Street reconsidering how much that growth is worth. For investors looking toward 2027, the pullback presents an opportunity to reassess two leading enterprise AI players: Palantir Technologies (NASDAQ:PLTR) and Snowflake (NYSE:SNOW).

Both of these companies are benefiting from growing AI adoption, but their distinct business models, financial performance, and valuations present nuanced investment opportunities.

The case for Palantir Technologies

Palantir develops software platforms that help government agencies and businesses integrate complex datasets, improve decision-making, and deploy artificial intelligence. Its Gotham, Foundry, and Artificial Intelligence Platform (AIP) products serve customers ranging from the U.S. military to commercial enterprises.

In fiscal 2025, Palantir generated $4.5 billion in revenue, an increase of 56% year over year. Net income reached approximately $1.6 billion, representing a profit margin of 36.5%. More recent results demonstrate accelerating growth. In the third quarter of 2026, revenue surged 96% to $2.3 billion, while U.S. commercial revenue climbed 148%. Notably, U.S. commercial revenue surpassed U.S. government revenue for the first time, highlighting the company's expanding presence in the private sector.

At the end of 2025, the company carried virtually no debt, with a current ratio of approximately 7.1x. Free cash flow reached $2.1 billion during the year, providing substantial flexibility to fund continued expansion. However, stock-based compensation totaled approximately $684 million, representing 32% of operating cash flow, which could introduce potential shareholder dilution despite the company's strong cash generation.

The case for Snowflake

Snowflake operates a cloud-based data platform that enables businesses to store, manage, and analyze information across multiple cloud environments. Its consumption-based pricing model allows customers to pay for the computing resources they use, while partnerships with Amazon (NASDAQ:AMZN), Microsoft (NASDAQ:MSFT), and Alphabet (NASDAQ:GOOGL) (NASDAQ:GOOG) support its global reach. As businesses increasingly incorporate artificial intelligence into their operations, Snowflake's platform plays an important role in making enterprise data accessible for AI applications.

In fiscal 2026, Snowflake generated approximately $4.7 billion in revenue, an increase of 29% year over year. Still, it was unable to turn a profit and reported a net loss of $1.3 billion, representing a negative profit margin of roughly 28%. However, more recent results demonstrate continued growth. In the second quarter of fiscal 2027, revenue increased 35% to $1.55 billion, while product revenue climbed 37%.

At the end of fiscal 2026, its debt-to-equity ratio stood near 1.2x, while its current ratio was approximately 1.3x. The company generated $1.1 billion in free cash flow, but stock-based compensation totaled $1.6 billion, exceeding operating cash flow.

Risk profile comparison

One of the key risks for Palantir comes from its reliance on large government and enterprise contracts, where lengthy sales cycles and customer concentration can create revenue uncertainty. In addition, its involvement in sensitive defense and surveillance operations also introduces regulatory and reputational risks.

Top risks for Snowflake include intense competition and a consumption-based revenue model that makes growth sensitive to customer spending. Not to mention, ever-growing cybersecurity threats introduce operational and regulatory risks.

Valuation comparison

Snowflake offers a lower P/S ratio, measuring price against sales over the past twelve months, while Palantir is cheaper relative to future earnings estimates via its Forward P/E.

MetricPalantir TechnologiesSnowflake
Forward P/E103.3x131.0x
P/S ratio54.5x18.9x

Valuation metrics include sourcing from Financial Modeling Prep (FMP) and may differ from other data providers.

Which stock would I buy for 2027?

From a valuation standpoint, neither stock is cheap. Palantir trades at 103 times forward earnings, while Snowflake commands an even higher multiple of 131 times. Snowflake is considerably cheaper on a price-to-sales basis, at 18.9 times sales compared with Palantir's 54.5 times, but its continued losses and path toward sustained GAAP profitability are less certain.

The key difference is that Palantir has demonstrated a stronger ability to turn growing AI adoption into profits. Its latest quarterly revenue surged 96%, driven by accelerating commercial demand, while its strong balance sheet and minimal debt provide considerable financial flexibility.

Looking ahead to 2027, Palantir is my preferred buy, although its valuation gives me pause. Investors are paying a substantial premium for future growth, leaving little room for disappointment if the company falls short of expectations. Ultimately, both stocks carry lofty valuations, and the recent sell-off doesn't automatically make either a bargain.

Should you buy stock in Palantir Technologies right now?

Before you buy stock in Palantir Technologies, consider this:

The Motley Fool Stock Advisor analyst team just identified what they believe are the 10 best stocks for investors to buy now… and Palantir Technologies wasn’t one of them. The 10 stocks that made the cut could produce monster returns in the coming years.

Consider when Netflix made this list on December 17, 2004... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you’d have $341,966!* Or when Nvidia made this list on April 15, 2005... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you’d have $1,146,819!*

Now, it’s worth noting Stock Advisor’s total average return is 852% — a market-crushing outperformance compared to 203% for the S&P 500. Don't miss the latest top 10 list, available with Stock Advisor, and join an investing community built by individual investors for individual investors.

See the 10 stocks »

*Stock Advisor returns as of November 8, 2026.

RJ Fulton has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool has positions in and recommends Alphabet, Amazon, Microsoft, Palantir Technologies, and Snowflake. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.

Disclaimer: For information purposes only. Past performance is not indicative of future results.
placeholder
Ethereum Drops Below $2,000 After Plunging Over 20% in a Month as Odds of $1,500 Retest SurgeEthereum Plunges Over 20% in a Month, Risking a Retest of $1,500 After Losing the $2,000 Defense Line.On November 13, Ethereum (ETH) plunged more than 5%, officially falling below the key
Author  TradingKey
Nov 13, Fri
Ethereum Plunges Over 20% in a Month, Risking a Retest of $1,500 After Losing the $2,000 Defense Line.On November 13, Ethereum (ETH) plunged more than 5%, officially falling below the key
placeholder
Gold Price Forecast: Gold Tumbles Below $3,900 as Trump Says No Need for Iran Deal; Can October PPI Spur a Rebound? As of the Asian session on Friday (November 13), gold prices (XAUUSD) rebounded intraday following Thursday's sharp decline, trading near $3,910. Previously, gold tumbled 2.76% on Thursda
Author  TradingKey
Nov 13, Fri
As of the Asian session on Friday (November 13), gold prices (XAUUSD) rebounded intraday following Thursday's sharp decline, trading near $3,910. Previously, gold tumbled 2.76% on Thursda
placeholder
Brent rose 3.3% and US crude stocks built 4.66 million barrels in the same weekBrent January settled at 95.82, up 3.3%, and WTI at 88.74, up 2.55%, after the US signalled it would not pursue a deal with Iran and attacks on Gulf shipping continued. In the same week, EIA data showed US crude inventories rising 4.657 million barrels against expectations of a 1.1 million draw, with gasoline up another 1.799 million. OPEC output also rebounded 1.96 million barrels a day to 27.16 million in October, led by Saudi Arabia at 10.56 million. This piece separates the geopolitical premium from the physical balance and lays out where each side of the trade is anchored.
Author  Irene Q.
Nov 13, Fri
Brent January settled at 95.82, up 3.3%, and WTI at 88.74, up 2.55%, after the US signalled it would not pursue a deal with Iran and attacks on Gulf shipping continued. In the same week, EIA data showed US crude inventories rising 4.657 million barrels against expectations of a 1.1 million draw, with gasoline up another 1.799 million. OPEC output also rebounded 1.96 million barrels a day to 27.16 million in October, led by Saudi Arabia at 10.56 million. This piece separates the geopolitical premium from the physical balance and lays out where each side of the trade is anchored.
placeholder
Gold hit a one-year low while central banks bought 321 tonnes — the sellers were never the ones you thinkSpot gold closed at 3,876 on Thursday, down 2.8% and its lowest close in more than a year, with an intraday low near 3,852. The dollar is at a 19-month high of 103.21 and the 10-year yield is at 5.10%, so the price move is easy to explain. What is harder to explain is who sold: central banks bought 321 tonnes in Q3, the PBoC added for a 24th straight month, ETF holdings are near a record 4,256 tonnes, and roughly 95% of the futures selling came from non-reportable and sovereign-type accounts rather than hedge funds. This piece separates the two books that have to balance.
Author  Irene Q.
Nov 13, Fri
Spot gold closed at 3,876 on Thursday, down 2.8% and its lowest close in more than a year, with an intraday low near 3,852. The dollar is at a 19-month high of 103.21 and the 10-year yield is at 5.10%, so the price move is easy to explain. What is harder to explain is who sold: central banks bought 321 tonnes in Q3, the PBoC added for a 24th straight month, ETF holdings are near a record 4,256 tonnes, and roughly 95% of the futures selling came from non-reportable and sovereign-type accounts rather than hedge funds. This piece separates the two books that have to balance.
placeholder
Today’s Market Recap: Nvidia Drops Over 4% After Jensen Huang Resigns, AMD and Broadcom Both Rise Over 5% On November 12, the three major U.S. stock indices closed slightly lower. Nvidia announced that Jensen Huang had stepped down immediately as CEO and director, draggi
Author  TradingKey
Nov 13, Fri
On November 12, the three major U.S. stock indices closed slightly lower. Nvidia announced that Jensen Huang had stepped down immediately as CEO and director, draggi
goTop
quote