2 Unstoppable Quantum Computing Stocks to Buy Hand Over Fist Before the Next Rally

Source The Motley Fool

Key Points

  • IonQ reported second-quarter revenue growth of 287% and completed its acquisition of SkyWater Technology, which gives it greater control over chip manufacturing.

  • Rigetti’s second-quarter revenue grew 185% from a small base, and its chiplet design combines smaller processors into a larger system.

  • Both stocks trade at steep valuations and carry execution risk, with IonQ at about 42 times sales and Rigetti at about 278 times sales.

  • 10 stocks we like better than IonQ ›

Quantum computing is moving closer to mainstream adoption, creating exciting opportunities for investors. With that, IonQ (NYSE: IONQ) and Rigetti Computing (NASDAQ: RGTI) are two promising companies making strides in quantum computing. And looking ahead, if adoption accelerates, both stocks could be well-positioned for the next major rally.

Inside a quantum computer.

Image source: Getty Images.

Missed Nvidia in 2009? This Rare Signal Is Flashing Again. In 2009, a "Double Down" signal flashed for a little-known chipmaker called Nvidia. For the first time in years, that same "Total Conviction" signal is flashing for a company 1/100th the size of Nvidia. Continue »

Let's start by looking at what IonQ is building.

How IonQ's end-to-end quantum platform could benefit from adoption

IonQ is building a comprehensive platform that spans quantum computers, networking, and cybersecurity. That broader strategy could give it several ways to benefit as quantum technology moves closer to commercial adoption.

One of IonQ's biggest advantages is its trapped-ion approach, which is said to deliver highly accurate quantum operations. That matters because the company is working to develop more powerful and reliable quantum computers, thereby enhancing the performance and scalability of its systems.

The company's recent technical milestones are also encouraging.

IonQ demonstrated the industry's first end-to-end real-time quantum error decoder, which could make larger quantum systems more reliable. The company also demonstrated a quantum memory-enhanced interconnect, which is an important step toward connecting separate quantum processors.

IonQ is also strengthening its manufacturing capabilities. As an example, it completed its acquisition of SkyWater Technology, a U.S.-based semiconductor foundry. This gives the company greater control over the hardware manufacturing process, helping it improve production, develop specialized chips, and scale its technology more efficiently.

The commercial opportunity is also gaining traction. IonQ reported strong revenue growth in its second quarter, supported by demand across its broader quantum platform. In fact, revenue climbed 287% year over year in a record quarter.

On top of that, its partnerships with organizations like Nvidia, Sandia National Laboratories, and Anduril highlight its role in other industries, including artificial intelligence (AI), scientific research, and national security.

But of course, IonQ remains a speculative investment at this stage, as quantum computing has yet to achieve widespread commercial adoption. The company also faces many technical and execution challenges before it can become profitable. Valuation is also a concern, with the stock trading at about 42 times its price-to-sales (P/S) ratio.

Aside from IonQ, another company is taking a different approach to scaling quantum systems.

Rigetti's chiplet design could offer a practical path to scaling quantum systems

Unlike IonQ, Rigetti uses superconducting qubits, which run using electrical circuits cooled to extremely low temperatures. One of the biggest advantages of this approach is its fast gate speeds, which allow quantum operations to run much faster. The company believes its technology can provide a practical path toward building more powerful quantum systems.

Its chiplet strategy is also a key advantage. Instead of relying on a single massive chip, Rigetti combines smaller processor units into a larger system, and the company has already demonstrated this approach with its Cepheus-1-108Q system.

Meanwhile, Rigetti has also been fulfilling orders for on-premises quantum systems, including its Novera-based machines and the 108-qubit system program for India's Center for Development of Advanced Computing. These deployments matter because they give universities and research institutions direct access to quantum hardware.

And the initiatives seem to be working. Rigetti's second-quarter revenue, for example, grew 185% year over year, though from a small base, all while Rigetti works to build a more commercially scalable business.

More recently, however, Rigetti established a dedicated systems delivery organization and appointed new leadership to oversee operations and technology development.

Still, the company faces meaningful risks in its operations. Rigetti remains an early-stage business with limited commercial revenue, significant operating losses, and a long development path. The stock also trades at about 278 times its P/S ratio, so if future growth doesn't exceed investor expectations, Rigetti could see steep losses.

But despite the risks, can IonQ and Rigetti still deliver massive upside?

Which quantum stock fits which type of investor?

IonQ and Rigetti offer two ways to invest in the quantum computing race.

With an expanding technology stack and growing commercial adoption, both companies could be poised for the industry's next growth phase. If they execute on their roadmaps and benefit from accelerating demand, their stocks could still have plenty of upside.

IonQ looks like the more conservative of the two, with a broader platform and lower valuation. Rigetti is the higher-risk, higher-reward pick, given its early stage and steep valuation.

Should you buy stock in IonQ right now?

Before you buy stock in IonQ, consider this:

The Motley Fool Stock Advisor analyst team just identified what they believe are the 10 best stocks for investors to buy now… and IonQ wasn’t one of them. The 10 stocks that made the cut could produce monster returns in the coming years.

Consider when Netflix made this list on December 17, 2004... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you’d have $334,793!* Or when Nvidia made this list on April 15, 2005... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you’d have $1,257,420!*

Now, it’s worth noting Stock Advisor’s total average return is 874% — a market-crushing outperformance compared to 209% for the S&P 500. Don't miss the latest top 10 list, available with Stock Advisor, and join an investing community built by individual investors for individual investors.

See the 10 stocks »

*Stock Advisor returns as of November 3, 2026.

Rick Orford has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool has positions in and recommends Hewlett Packard Enterprise, IonQ, and Nvidia. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.

Disclaimer: For information purposes only. Past performance is not indicative of future results.
placeholder
Gold rebounds to $3,946 off $3,870 as oil does the Fed's work — but the ETF bid is still missingGold closed at $3,946, up 1.84% from a one-year low of $3,870.25, as Brent's 7.6% slide cut December hike odds to 77%. ETF holdings are still shrinking — a short-covering bounce, not new money.
Author  Irene Q.
Nov 03, Tue
Gold closed at $3,946, up 1.84% from a one-year low of $3,870.25, as Brent's 7.6% slide cut December hike odds to 77%. ETF holdings are still shrinking — a short-covering bounce, not new money.
placeholder
TradingKey Daily Market Brief: Nasdaq Falls Over 5%, AI Stocks Plunge as Nvidia Drops Over 9%, Micron Falls Over 17%, SanDisk Drops Over 22% During the Asian trading session on November 6, the three major U.S. stock indices tumbled across the board overnight as the sell-off across the AI data center suppl
Author  TradingKey
Yesterday 01: 41
During the Asian trading session on November 6, the three major U.S. stock indices tumbled across the board overnight as the sell-off across the AI data center suppl
placeholder
Gold Price Analysis Today | Forex Gold Analysis | XAU/USD Analysis - November 6, 2026Get the latest gold price analysis, forex gold insights, and XAU/USD analysis for November 6, 2026. Read on for the details.
Author  Mitrade
Yesterday 01: 36
Get the latest gold price analysis, forex gold insights, and XAU/USD analysis for November 6, 2026. Read on for the details.
placeholder
Gold's $250 week runs into the last payrolls before DecemberSpot gold traded at $4,080.79 after a roughly 6% weekly rally from the Oct 30 low of $3,869.85, touching $4,146.63 on Nov 5. Three bids are stacked into the move: real-rate relief, record official-sector buying, and a geopolitical premium. Tonight's October payrolls (+65K consensus, 4.2% unemployment) decide which bid survives, with $4,000 and $4,200 as the two lines.
Author  Irene Q.
Yesterday 03: 03
Spot gold traded at $4,080.79 after a roughly 6% weekly rally from the Oct 30 low of $3,869.85, touching $4,146.63 on Nov 5. Three bids are stacked into the move: real-rate relief, record official-sector buying, and a geopolitical premium. Tonight's October payrolls (+65K consensus, 4.2% unemployment) decide which bid survives, with $4,000 and $4,200 as the two lines.
placeholder
Micron's $4.5 billion Taiwan fab won't make a chip until 2028 — the market sold it as a 2026 problemMicron fell 17.46% to $656.39 after Bloomberg reported construction at its $4.5 billion Taoyuan Fab 11E had all but halted over a labor dispute. The plant was not due online until 2028, so no 2026 output is lost. With FY27 EPS consensus near $160 and 2027 HBM sold out, the selloff is a peak-cycle multiple reset, not a demand collapse — and $650 is the line that separates the two.
Author  Irene Q.
Yesterday 03: 28
Micron fell 17.46% to $656.39 after Bloomberg reported construction at its $4.5 billion Taoyuan Fab 11E had all but halted over a labor dispute. The plant was not due online until 2028, so no 2026 output is lost. With FY27 EPS consensus near $160 and 2027 HBM sold out, the selloff is a peak-cycle multiple reset, not a demand collapse — and $650 is the line that separates the two.
goTop
quote