Monster Beverage vs. On Holding: Which Is the Better Growth Stock?

Source The Motley Fool

Key Points

  • Monster Beverage maintains dominance in the energy drink market through its global distribution partnership with Coca-Cola.

  • On Holding continues to deliver explosive revenue growth as it scales its premium performance footwear and apparel brands globally.

  • Which consumer-focused stock is the better choice for your investment portfolio before the start of 2027?

  • Motley Fool Issues Rare "Total Conviction" Buy Alert ›

Choosing between high-growth sportswear and a steady beverage giant requires balancing risk and reward. Should you add Monster Beverage (NASDAQ:MNST) or On Holding (NYSE:ONON) to your portfolio?

Monster dominates the energy drink aisle with its massive distribution network and high profitability. On Holding is disrupting the footwear industry with premium technology and rapid global expansion. We compare these two diverse consumer giants to see which could fit your investment style best.

The case for Monster Beverage

According to its latest annual report, Monster Beverage is a leader among beverage stocks, developing energy drinks across the world. It primarily reaches consumers through a Coca-Cola (NYSE:KO) distribution system, and customer concentration like this adds a layer of risk to the business. The company also sells products through major retail channels like Walmart (NASDAQ:WMT) and Amazon (NASDAQ:AMZN), ensuring its drinks are available across all major shopping platforms.

In FY 2025, revenue reached nearly $8.3 billion, representing growth of approximately 10.7% compared to the previous year. This growth was accompanied by net income of close to $1.9 billion, resulting in a healthy net margin of roughly 23%.

The case for On Holding AG

Switzerland-based On Holding is a premium sportswear company that has carved out a significant niche in the performance footwear market. Its products, known for their distinctive cushioning technology, cater to runners and athletes who prioritize both style and performance. The company distributes its footwear and apparel through a balanced mix of wholesale partners and a rapidly growing direct-to-consumer channel.

In FY 2025, revenue reached approximately $3.6 billion, which represents a robust 30% increase over the prior year. Despite this rapid top-line expansion, the company reported a net income of roughly $246 million. The company has been tapping into aggressive reinvestment in marketing and expanding its physical store footprint, which can weigh on its profitability and margins.

Risk profile comparison

Monster Beverage faces significant risks related to its revenue concentration, as it relies heavily on the distribution network provided by its partners. Competition in the energy drink space remains intense, with pressure coming from established rivals like Red Bull and PepsiCo (NASDAQ:PEP). Furthermore, evolving regulations regarding caffeine content and potential excise taxes on sugary drinks pose a threat to future sales growth.

On Holding operates in the highly fickle world of athletic fashion, where brand cachet can shift quickly and consumer tastes are difficult to predict. It competes with massive global brands that have significantly larger marketing budgets and more established supply chains. Additionally, as a Swiss company with significant international sales, it is subject to currency fluctuations that can impact reported earnings when translated.

Valuation comparison

On Holding looks cheaper, as its forward price-to-earnings (P/E) and price-to-sales (P/S) ratio are relatively low.

MetricMonster BeverageOn Holding AG
Forward P/E34.8x17.4x
P/S ratio9.7x5.2x

Which stock would I buy?

While in different industries, this represents an interesting battle between two growth stocks. That said, I would rather own Monster Beverage as a long-term investment. Both operate in competitive spaces, but fashion is a much more difficult industry to stay ahead of, as consumer tastes are constantly changing. For Monster, while it also needs to innovate, it's much easier to keep its current customer base happy and build a loyal following. Also, the beverage maker benefits from the ability to sell its products daily. In contrast, an individual customer may purchase footwear and apparel from On Holding only once or twice per year.

We'll get a look at some fresh data in Monster's upcoming earnings report for the third quarter of 2026, but in the second quarter, it showed solid increases in sales and net income; sales climbed 20.2% from the prior-year period to $2.5 billion, and net income increased 19.6% to $584.5 million. It's also quickly expanding its international presence, creating new revenue opportunities. The dollar amount of sales increased by 34.6% in the second quarter of 2026, accounting for 46% of the company's total sales. And despite all the market turbulence in 2026, the Monster stock price is up 17.8% compared to the S&P 500's 12.9% return over the same period. In comparison, On Holding's shares are down 30.5%. Monster is proving to be the better investment in 2026, and I foresee that continuing into 2027.

Should you buy stock in Monster Beverage right now?

Before you buy stock in Monster Beverage, consider this:

The Motley Fool Stock Advisor analyst team just identified what they believe are the 10 best stocks for investors to buy now… and Monster Beverage wasn’t one of them. The 10 stocks that made the cut could produce monster returns in the coming years.

Consider when Netflix made this list on December 17, 2004... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you’d have $337,166!* Or when Nvidia made this list on April 15, 2005... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you’d have $1,339,143!*

Now, it’s worth noting Stock Advisor’s total average return is 904% — a market-crushing outperformance compared to 213% for the S&P 500. Don't miss the latest top 10 list, available with Stock Advisor, and join an investing community built by individual investors for individual investors.

See the 10 stocks »

*Stock Advisor returns as of October 28, 2026.

Jack Delaney has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool has positions in and recommends Amazon, Monster Beverage, On Holding, and Walmart. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.

Disclaimer: For information purposes only. Past performance is not indicative of future results.
placeholder
The Fed will sit still on October 28 — but 100 of 100 economists now expect a December hikeA Reuters poll run October 16-20 found 94 of 100 economists expecting the Fed to hold at 3.75-4.00% on October 28 — and all 100 expecting a hike in December, against less than half a month earlier. The market is close to the same price, with CME FedWatch at roughly 17% for October and 82.8% for December. With the Fed in blackout since October 17, here are the five dates that decide the rest of the year, what each one is priced for, and the two directions each can take.
Author  Irene Q.
Oct 22, Thu
A Reuters poll run October 16-20 found 94 of 100 economists expecting the Fed to hold at 3.75-4.00% on October 28 — and all 100 expecting a hike in December, against less than half a month earlier. The market is close to the same price, with CME FedWatch at roughly 17% for October and 82.8% for December. With the Fed in blackout since October 17, here are the five dates that decide the rest of the year, what each one is priced for, and the two directions each can take.
placeholder
Big Tech's $800 billion AI bill faces its first real test — free cash flow is the judgeAlphabet and Microsoft report after the close on October 28, Amazon on October 29, with hyperscaler AI capex running near $800 billion a year. Meta's negative free cash flow and 9.40% drop on October 22 was the warning; this week's prints decide whether cloud growth and backlog can pay for the buildout. Here are the consensus numbers, the free-cash-flow table and the two-sided test.
Author  Irene Q.
Oct 26, Mon
Alphabet and Microsoft report after the close on October 28, Amazon on October 29, with hyperscaler AI capex running near $800 billion a year. Meta's negative free cash flow and 9.40% drop on October 22 was the warning; this week's prints decide whether cloud growth and backlog can pay for the buildout. Here are the consensus numbers, the free-cash-flow table and the two-sided test.
placeholder
Anthropic files for a $2 trillion IPO — the $80.7 billion loss is the decoy, the $450 billion compute bill is the riskAnthropic publicly filed its S-1 on October 26, revealing $16.29 billion of first-half revenue (+1,304% year over year) and a $80.7 billion net loss — of which $72.4 billion is a non-cash convertible-note charge. The real number is the $450 billion of signed, mostly non-cancelable compute commitments. Here is what the filing says, why NVDA, ARM and MU are the tradeable read-through, and the conditions that decide whether the AI trade passes its first public valuation test.
Author  Irene Q.
Oct 27, Tue
Anthropic publicly filed its S-1 on October 26, revealing $16.29 billion of first-half revenue (+1,304% year over year) and a $80.7 billion net loss — of which $72.4 billion is a non-cash convertible-note charge. The real number is the $450 billion of signed, mostly non-cancelable compute commitments. Here is what the filing says, why NVDA, ARM and MU are the tradeable read-through, and the conditions that decide whether the AI trade passes its first public valuation test.
placeholder
Fed October Rate Decision Preview: Rate Hike Pause Has Become Consensus, How Will US Stocks, Dollar, and Gold React?The Federal Reserve will announce its October interest rate decision at 14:00 Eastern Time on October 28, and Fed Chair Warsh will hold a press conference at 14:30. Markets currently wide
Author  TradingKey
Oct 27, Tue
The Federal Reserve will announce its October interest rate decision at 14:00 Eastern Time on October 28, and Fed Chair Warsh will hold a press conference at 14:30. Markets currently wide
placeholder
Brent's $115 front month sits $4.6 above January — the $14 spread to WTI is the supply-risk premiumDecember Brent trades at $115.29 while January is $110.71, a $4.58 backwardation. The December Brent-WTI spread is $14.2, versus a $3-5 normal. That gap, not the headline, is where the Middle East supply risk is priced. Here is what the curve says, why the December contract's expiry on October 30 will mechanically cut the headline by $4.6, and the 108.81 neckline that decides the next move.
Author  Irene Q.
22 hours ago
December Brent trades at $115.29 while January is $110.71, a $4.58 backwardation. The December Brent-WTI spread is $14.2, versus a $3-5 normal. That gap, not the headline, is where the Middle East supply risk is priced. Here is what the curve says, why the December contract's expiry on October 30 will mechanically cut the headline by $4.6, and the 108.81 neckline that decides the next move.
goTop
quote