Nvidia urges Washington to keep AI open as Huang calms investors

Source Cryptopolitan

Nvidia’s Jensen Huang told Washington to keep AI open and told Wall Street the boom is far from over. All while running the most indispensable company in AI.

Jensen Huang made his first post ever on X on July 24. He used it to back a letter called “Open Weights and American AI Leadership,” which asks Washington to leave freely downloadable AI models alone. By the following afternoon, the number of companies backing that letter had gone from 25 to 50.

OpenAI, Google, AMD, Cisco, Cloudflare, GitHub, Block and Ollama are also on the list. However, two major companies are missing: Anthropic and Amazon.

Why Anthropic skip Jensen Huang’s open AI letter?

The letter went out with 25 backers initially. When Huang’s post got 11 million views, new signatures came in. This is why two copies of the letter showed different counts on the same afternoon.

Still, the two missing names are the most telling part of the list. Amazon is Anthropic’s biggest financial backer, and Anthropic runs on Amazon’s own Trainium chips, among other hardware. Anthropic recently moved into the top spot in enterprise AI.

Google, which has also put money into Anthropic, signed anyway, which makes the Amazon connection the more specific one. Neither company has said why it stayed off the list. The explanations range from straightforward business logic. Anthropic sells closed, frontier-level access. Anthropic has made a safety argument publicly for years, which is that once model weights are released, there is no pulling them back.

As previously reported by Cryptopolitan, Anthropic has been running its own parallel lobbying operation in Washington, spending $1.97 million in Q2 2026 alone, which makes its absence from the letter a position, not an oversight.

Nvidia’s open AI message comes with a catch

While the letter says that keeping AI models open is necessary for keeping any one company from having to rule, Nvidia shows a contradiction. The company controls CUDA which is the software needed to run AI on Nvidia chips. It is deeply embedded, widely depended on, and not open.

The same week Huang was rallying the industry around open access, he sat down with Axios cofounder Mike Allen and made a different kind of case. This one aimed at investors who are growing nervous about how much money is being spent on AI infrastructure.

Chip stocks have pulled back sharply in recent weeks, even as chipmakers reported strong earnings and kept running short on supply. The worry is simple: the big cloud and tech companies are spending hundreds of billions of dollars a year building out AI, and that spending is no longer coming purely from their own cash. Alphabet slipped into negative cash flow. Tech giants have started borrowing to keep up.

As tech giants borrow to fund AI, Huang tells investors not to worry

Huang was asked directly whether the sector is heading for a bust. “No, not for a while,” he said. When Allen followed up with “so this time is different?” Huang agreed with the framing.

“This time is different because this is not demand-driven,” Huang said. “This is industrially driven, meaning the fundamental technology of computers is changing.”

That phrase carries a long history. “This time is different” was used to explain why the dot-com boom would keep going. It did not. The line is now treated as a warning sign when it turns up in bullish forecasts, a bit like a general declaring victory too early.

Huang is not oblivious to that. He acknowledged the bubble will eventually pop. He argues that it is not close, because the buildout is still in its early stages. He also made a case for why the supply squeeze on chips, land, power and construction labor is actually helpful. It slows things down enough to prevent supply from outrunning demand too quickly.

“We basically are constrained in every single direction, in every single way,” he said. “That constraint is good. That constraint is what holds the system back.”

He pointed to companies like Anthropic as evidence that AI is already generating real profit, particularly as businesses find practical uses for AI agents.

Don’t just read crypto news. Understand it. Subscribe to our newsletter. It's free.

Disclaimer: For information purposes only. Past performance is not indicative of future results.
placeholder
Anthropic files for a $2 trillion IPO — the $80.7 billion loss is the decoy, the $450 billion compute bill is the riskAnthropic publicly filed its S-1 on October 26, revealing $16.29 billion of first-half revenue (+1,304% year over year) and a $80.7 billion net loss — of which $72.4 billion is a non-cash convertible-note charge. The real number is the $450 billion of signed, mostly non-cancelable compute commitments. Here is what the filing says, why NVDA, ARM and MU are the tradeable read-through, and the conditions that decide whether the AI trade passes its first public valuation test.
Author  Irene Q.
Oct 27, Tue
Anthropic publicly filed its S-1 on October 26, revealing $16.29 billion of first-half revenue (+1,304% year over year) and a $80.7 billion net loss — of which $72.4 billion is a non-cash convertible-note charge. The real number is the $450 billion of signed, mostly non-cancelable compute commitments. Here is what the filing says, why NVDA, ARM and MU are the tradeable read-through, and the conditions that decide whether the AI trade passes its first public valuation test.
placeholder
Brent's $115 front month sits $4.6 above January — the $14 spread to WTI is the supply-risk premiumDecember Brent trades at $115.29 while January is $110.71, a $4.58 backwardation. The December Brent-WTI spread is $14.2, versus a $3-5 normal. That gap, not the headline, is where the Middle East supply risk is priced. Here is what the curve says, why the December contract's expiry on October 30 will mechanically cut the headline by $4.6, and the 108.81 neckline that decides the next move.
Author  Irene Q.
Oct 28, Wed
December Brent trades at $115.29 while January is $110.71, a $4.58 backwardation. The December Brent-WTI spread is $14.2, versus a $3-5 normal. That gap, not the headline, is where the Middle East supply risk is priced. Here is what the curve says, why the December contract's expiry on October 30 will mechanically cut the headline by $4.6, and the 108.81 neckline that decides the next move.
placeholder
Gold Price Analysis Today | Forex Gold Analysis | XAU/USD Analysis - October 29, 2026Get the latest gold price analysis, forex gold insights, and XAU/USD analysis for October 29, 2026. Read on for the details.
Author  Mitrade
Oct 29, Thu
Get the latest gold price analysis, forex gold insights, and XAU/USD analysis for October 29, 2026. Read on for the details.
placeholder
Gold Price Analysis Today | Forex Gold Analysis | XAU/USD Analysis - October 30, 2026Get the latest gold price analysis, forex gold insights, and XAU/USD analysis for October 30, 2026. Read on for the details.
Author  Mitrade
Yesterday 02: 21
Get the latest gold price analysis, forex gold insights, and XAU/USD analysis for October 30, 2026. Read on for the details.
placeholder
US GDP grew 3.4% and core PCE held at 3.1% — December is now a hike trade, not a cut tradeUS Q3 GDP rose 3.4%, above the 3.1% estimate, while September headline PCE hit 3.6% and core held at 3.1%. December hike odds are near 90%; inventories, AI capex and energy explain why.
Author  Irene Q.
Yesterday 07: 12
US Q3 GDP rose 3.4%, above the 3.1% estimate, while September headline PCE hit 3.6% and core held at 3.1%. December hike odds are near 90%; inventories, AI capex and energy explain why.
goTop
quote