Fluor builds nuclear power plants and owns a majority stake in modular reactor builder NuScale.
Most of Fluor's market capitalization, in fact, is backed by its ownership stake in NuScale.
Much of the rest of Fluor's current market capitalization is backed by cold, hard cash.
Powered up by a series of four executive orders signed by President Donald Trump in May, nuclear power stocks are red hot right now (in a good way) -- but not all nuclear stocks are created equal.
Take Nano Nuclear Energy, NuScale Power, and Oklo, for example -- three start-up companies looking to develop a new generation of smaller-than-ordinary nuclear power plants. All three have outperformed the broader S&P 500 over the past year, from Nano with its 23% gain to NuScale, up 250%, and Oklo up 590%.
Where to invest $1,000 right now? Our analyst team just revealed what they believe are the 10 best stocks to buy right now. Learn More »
Investors clearly like the idea of the smaller, cheaper, safer nuclear reactors these companies all promise to produce. Yet none of the three is anywhere near profitability, and according to analysts polled by S&P Global Market Intelligence, none of them is expected to even begin earning profits before 2030 at the earliest.
But there is one nuclear stock that's already earning profits: Fluor (NYSE: FLR). What's more, it also happens to be the majority owner of one of these very high-profile small modular reactor companies.
Image source: Getty Images.
According to S&P Global data, Fluor owns nearly 57% of NuScale. What's more, with NuScale currently valued at $5.1 billion -- and with an implied market capitalization of $10.8 billion -- Fluor's 57% interest in the company accounts for $6.1 billion of Fluor's own market capitalization.
Put another way, if you subtract out the value of Fluor's interest in NuScale from Fluor's own $8.5 billion market capitalization, investors are valuing Fluor-ex-NuScale at only $2.4 billion. This fact alone suggests that buying shares of Fluor could be a smart way to invest in NuScale -- but that's not all.
Fluor, it turns out, is that rare heavy industry company with more cash than debt on its balance sheet -- $1.4 billion worth of cash, in fact. Subtract that cash from the $2.4 billion, and Fluor-ex-NuScale, ex-net cash, ends up being valued by investors at just $1 billion.
That's less than the net profit Fluor earned over the last 12 months: $1.8 billion. And buying a non-NuScale business at effectively just half its annual profit sounds like a very smart way to invest $1,000 or so.
I know, I know. That sounds too good to be true, and when something sounds too good to be true, it probably is. Deep values like this just shouldn't be the kind of thing that Wall Street analysts fail to notice, so there's probably a catch.
And what might the catch be? Well, first and most obviously, NuScale might be really, really overvalued, such that Fluor's ownership stake in NuScale isn't worth as much as it appears to be. In fact, the $6.1 billion that it makes up of Fluor's market cap today could evaporate overnight if investors lose faith in NuScale.
I personally consider this a very real risk, because -- as I pointed out up above -- NuScale isn't a profitable company, and much of its high valuation can be attributed to momentum investors driving the stock higher on irrational exuberance.
A second risk investors should bear in mind is that Fluor's $1.8 billion in trailing-12-month profits is unusual for the company, and largely a result of the company's ownership stake in NuScale, the dramatic increase in NuScale's market cap, and of Fluor's "deconsolidation and subsequent remeasurement of Fluor's investment in NuScale" late last year.
It's not a sustainable increase in annual earnings, and not something you should expect to repeat. Indeed, this year analysts polled by S&P Global forecast Fluor's net income will be only $60 million.
That being said, most analysts who follow Fluor stock do expect the company to be solidly profitable over the next few years. Maybe not $1.8 billion-a-year profitable, but consensus forecasts assembled by S&P Global Market Intelligence, for example, have Fluor earning $470 million in 2026, nearly $530 million in 2027, and $638 million in 2028.
That's about a 17% annualized earnings growth rate for a stock that costs only 17 or 18 times 2026 earnings -- or only about 2 times earnings ex-NuScale, and ex-net cash. Fluor stock looks to me like a bargain hiding in plain sight.
Before you buy stock in Fluor, consider this:
The Motley Fool Stock Advisor analyst team just identified what they believe are the 10 best stocks for investors to buy now… and Fluor wasn’t one of them. The 10 stocks that made the cut could produce monster returns in the coming years.
Consider when Netflix made this list on December 17, 2004... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you’d have $699,558!* Or when Nvidia made this list on April 15, 2005... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you’d have $976,677!*
Now, it’s worth noting Stock Advisor’s total average return is 1,060% — a market-crushing outperformance compared to 180% for the S&P 500. Don’t miss out on the latest top 10 list, available when you join Stock Advisor.
See the 10 stocks »
*Stock Advisor returns as of June 30, 2025
Rich Smith has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool recommends NuScale Power. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.