A Tale of Two Energy ETFs: How EMLP and TAN Are Worlds Apart

Source The Motley Fool

Key Points

  • First Trust North American Energy Infrastructure Fund provides a much larger assets under management (AUM) and a significantly lower beta than Invesco Solar ETF.

  • Invesco Solar ETF is relatively more affordable with a 0.7% expense ratio but has experienced higher volatility and deeper historical drawdowns.

  • The First Trust fund features an ESG screen and focuses on infrastructure like pipelines, while the Invesco fund is a pure-play solar energy index tracker.

  • 10 stocks we like better than First Trust Exchange-Traded Fund IV - First Trust North American Energy Infrastructure Fund ›

First Trust North American Energy Infrastructure Fund (NYSEMKT:EMLP) provides diversified exposure to utilities and pipelines with relatively low volatility, whereas Invesco Solar ETF (NYSEMKT:TAN) offers a concentrated, more volatile bet on the global solar energy sector.

Sustainable energy investing often follows two distinct paths: narrow thematic focus or broad infrastructure stability. This comparison explores how a concentrated solar strategy contrasts with a diversified approach to energy assets, highlighting the differences in volatility and total return potential between these two popular investment vehicles.

Snapshot (cost & size)

MetricTANEMLP
IssuerInvescoFirst Trust
Share price$41.07 (as of 2026-10-23)$43.83 (as of 2026-10-23)
Expense ratio0.7%0.95%
1-yr return (as of 2026-10-23)(11.7%)18.7%
Dividend yieldn/a2.8%
Beta1.340.56
AUM$0.9 billion$4.2 billion

Beta measures price volatility relative to the S&P 500; beta is calculated from monthly returns over the available fund history (up to five years). The 1-yr return represents total return over the trailing 12 months. Dividend yield is the trailing-12-month distribution yield.

Cost-conscious investors will find the Invesco fund more affordable with its 0.7% expense ratio compared to the 0.95% charged by the First Trust fund. These fees reflect the differing management styles and indexing strategies used by each respective issuer.

Performance & risk comparison

MetricTANEMLP
Max drawdown (5 yr)(74.0%)(14.6%)
Growth of $1,000 over 5 years (total return)$467.0$2,041.0

What's inside

First Trust North American Energy Infrastructure Fund concentrates primarily on Utilities (49%) and Energy (47%), with a 4% allocation to Industrials. Its portfolio is non-diversified and contains 59 holdings filtered through an Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) screen. It focuses on the infrastructure required to transport and generate energy across North America, such as pipelines and renewable production. Its largest positions include Enterprise Products Partners (NYSE:EPD) at 8.56%, Energy Transfer at 7.33%, and MPLX (NYSE:MPLX) at 4.32%. This fund was launched in 2012.

Invesco Solar ETF offers a tighter thematic focus, with 56% of its portfolio in Energy and 32% in Utilities. It tracks the MAC Global Solar Energy Index and holds a more concentrated basket of 36 stocks. The fund mandates that at least 90% of its capital remains in solar industry equities, including ordinary shares and depositary receipts. Its largest positions include Nextpower (NASDAQ:NXT) at 10.85%, First Solar (NASDAQ:FSLR) at 9.38%, and Enlight Renewable Energy at 8.39%. This fund was launched in 2008.

For more guidance on ETF investing, check out the full guide at this link.

Which looks like the better buy

When comparing the First Trust North American Energy Infrastructure Fund (EMLP) and the Invesco Solar ETF (TAN), investors should consider several key factors. Let's see what they tell us about each fund.

First, we should examine each fund's strategy. EMLP is an energy ETF focused on midstream energy stocks and utilities. It holds about 60 stocks. TAN, on the other hand, holds about 30 stocks. Its focus is on companies specializing in solar equipment, manufacturing, and generation.

Two other important factors are historical performance and income potential. Examining the two funds' historical performance reveals a massive gap. Over the last five years, EMLP has generated a total return of 111%, equating to a 16.1% CAGR. TAN, by contrast, has delivered a total return of -58%, with a -16% CAGR. As for income, TAN has not paid a dividend since 2024, while EMLP has a dividend yield of 2.8%.

One final factor to weigh is cost. In truth, both funds are relatively costly. EMLP has an annual expense ratio of 0.95%, while TAN's is 0.70%. For context, the average expense ratio for the ETF universe is around 0.45%.

In summary, EMLP and TAN are both energy ETFs; however, they differ in many key respects, with historical performance being the starkest contrast. Therefore, many investors facing a head-to-head choice between these two ETFs will favor EMLP given that it has simply performed far better than TAN over the last five years. EMLP also boasts a significant dividend, which will appeal to income-oriented investors.

Should you buy stock in First Trust Exchange-Traded Fund IV - First Trust North American Energy Infrastructure Fund right now?

Before you buy stock in First Trust Exchange-Traded Fund IV - First Trust North American Energy Infrastructure Fund, consider this:

The Motley Fool Stock Advisor analyst team just identified what they believe are the 10 best stocks for investors to buy now… and First Trust Exchange-Traded Fund IV - First Trust North American Energy Infrastructure Fund wasn’t one of them. The 10 stocks that made the cut could produce monster returns in the coming years.

Consider when Netflix made this list on December 17, 2004... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you’d have $334,631!* Or when Nvidia made this list on April 15, 2005... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you’d have $1,312,844!*

Now, it’s worth noting Stock Advisor’s total average return is 893% — a market-crushing outperformance compared to 213% for the S&P 500. Don't miss the latest top 10 list, available with Stock Advisor, and join an investing community built by individual investors for individual investors.

See the 10 stocks »

*Stock Advisor returns as of October 30, 2026.

Jake Lerch has positions in Enterprise Products Partners. The Motley Fool has positions in and recommends First Solar and Nextpower. The Motley Fool recommends Enterprise Products Partners. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.

Disclaimer: For information purposes only. Past performance is not indicative of future results.
placeholder
Nearly Half of $6 Billion Stolen in Binance Hack Frozen as BNB Rebounds Past $700, Targeting $800Binance Narrowly Intercepts $3 Billion; BNB Makes Strong V-Shaped Rebound Past $700, Targeting $800 in the Short Term.On October 30, impacted by a black swan event of a hacker attack, Bin
Author  TradingKey
Oct 30, Fri
Binance Narrowly Intercepts $3 Billion; BNB Makes Strong V-Shaped Rebound Past $700, Targeting $800 in the Short Term.On October 30, impacted by a black swan event of a hacker attack, Bin
placeholder
US GDP grew 3.4% and core PCE held at 3.1% — December is now a hike trade, not a cut tradeUS Q3 GDP rose 3.4%, above the 3.1% estimate, while September headline PCE hit 3.6% and core held at 3.1%. December hike odds are near 90%; inventories, AI capex and energy explain why.
Author  Irene Q.
Oct 30, Fri
US Q3 GDP rose 3.4%, above the 3.1% estimate, while September headline PCE hit 3.6% and core held at 3.1%. December hike odds are near 90%; inventories, AI capex and energy explain why.
placeholder
Nasdaq futures fall 500 points as Amazon and Intel expose the demand side of the AI tradeNasdaq-100 futures fell 500 points after Alphabet -12.6%, Amazon -8% and Intel -23%. Capex is not the problem: Amazon's holiday guide and Intel's weak Q4 guidance show demand is.
Author  Irene Q.
Oct 30, Fri
Nasdaq-100 futures fell 500 points after Alphabet -12.6%, Amazon -8% and Intel -23%. Capex is not the problem: Amazon's holiday guide and Intel's weak Q4 guidance show demand is.
placeholder
Gold Price Analysis Today | Forex Gold Analysis | XAU/USD Analysis - October 30, 2026Get the latest gold price analysis, forex gold insights, and XAU/USD analysis for October 30, 2026. Read on for the details.
Author  Mitrade
Oct 30, Fri
Get the latest gold price analysis, forex gold insights, and XAU/USD analysis for October 30, 2026. Read on for the details.
placeholder
US September PCE Inflation Rises to 3.6%, Gold Drops Below $4,000, Bitcoin Falls Below $77,000On October 30, gold (XAUUSD) and Bitcoin (BTC) continued to face pressure. U.S. September PCE inflation data showed year-over-year increases in both headline and core inflation. Coupled w
Author  TradingKey
Oct 30, Fri
On October 30, gold (XAUUSD) and Bitcoin (BTC) continued to face pressure. U.S. September PCE inflation data showed year-over-year increases in both headline and core inflation. Coupled w
goTop
quote