Image source: The Motley Fool.
Thursday, Oct. 29, 2026
Need a quote from a Motley Fool analyst? Email pr@fool.com
Wabash National Corporation (NYSE:WNC) reported third-quarter results and pulled forward labor and production readiness expenses to prepare for an expected 2027 dry van market recovery. Management reported that significant backlog growth and increasing material margins support an improved financial outlook entering the next fiscal year. While the company identified strong demand in its trailer segment, it indicated that the truck body market remains in a downturn that lags behind the broader industry recovery. The company secured additional liquidity during the quarter to fund expected working capital requirements for increased production lines.
Brent Yeagy: Good afternoon, everyone, and thank you for joining us today. I would like to start, as always, with safety, because it is fundamental to how we operate Wabash. We saw continued improvement in total recordable injury rates with metrics tracking 26% favorable to the prior quarter, and 42% favorable to the prior year. Q3 marks our fifth consecutive quarter of improvement. Meaningful progress is continuing, even as working hours and the number of new hires increase. This is evidence that the proactive work we undertook over the past several years to reduce workplace hazards, as well as recently strengthening our onboarding processes ahead of increased dry van production, is working.
We have maintained a steadfast focus on safety while preparing the organization for higher production, and we are seeing the benefit, not only in safety performance, but in overall ramp execution. Moving on to third quarter results, financials represent another step forward in what continues to be a transition year for Wabash. Revenue for the quarter was over $476 million, with non-GAAP adjusted EPS of -$0.63. More importantly, beneath these results, we have explicit and material evidence of demonstrated customer demand.
That gives us confidence that the conditions required for a broader recovery are solidly in place. as a direct result of customer order activity at scale, we aggressively pulled forward capacity addition actions into Q3, actions previously slated for Q1 and Q2 of 2027, to increase dry van output in direct response to that customer demand. 2026 has been a transition year. Since late June, we have quickly moved from managing through a very difficult demand environment, having a liquidity preservation posture, and a cost minimization mindset, to fully mobilizing Wabash for a dry van cycle recovery. Our teams have been doing exactly that.
This ranges from the convertible debt acquired last quarter to ensure we have the net working capital availability, to operational actions, including securing strong long-term agreements with critical suppliers, and then adding people and shifts to support the dry van volume we see ahead in 2027. I want to reiterate and make one important point about Q3 and the remainder of 2026. Our confidence in 2027 has increased. We have elected to incur certain costs in 2026 that otherwise would have occurred in early 2027. These include primarily labor and other production readiness costs associated with preparing our operations for improved demand.
Simply put, the required investments that advance the overall ability of Wabash to generate more profitable conversion of higher levels of demand sooner than later. Investments we are happy to have been able to make. That distinction is important. These expenditures affect the timing of earnings, and they also reflect increased confidence in their underlying view of the dry van market. We are making deliberate decisions today because our confidence in the opportunity ahead has strengthened through direct evidence called orders. As a result of absorbing these costs now, our positive EBITDA projections for late 2026 no longer are correct.
We will now have a rapid sequential improvement through 2027, reaching a level of quarterly profitability by Q2, consistent with our annualized EBITDA run rate between $150 million and $170 million, instead of being in the second half of the year as previously assumed. That is despite assuming the truck body market remains depressed for longer, as we do not yet see meaningful green shoots in that segment. At the same time, we remain disciplined. This is not indiscriminate spending ahead of a hoped-for recovery. We have spent the last several quarters taking structural costs out of the business and improving the flexibility of our manufacturing footprint.
Those actions were designed to preserve our ability to scale efficiently as demand improves, consistent with how we had framed our cost structure and capacity entering into this recovery. On a more constructive view of demand and our outlook entering into 2027 compared with prior quarters, it has been driven by both market leading indicators and momentum within our backlog. We continue to see progress across freight indicators that ultimately support equipment demand. Improving spot and rejection rates, carrier profitability, and fleet sentiment, alongside an aging equipment base and deferred replacement cycle are contributing to a more robust setup. That does not mean we expect a straight line recovery.
What it does mean is that the balance of evidence is moving earlier, at scale, and in the right direction. Just prior to quarter end, we released evidence of our improving backlog, which stood at over 12,000 dry van trailers for 2027. That pace did not let up. It took off. That number was almost 16,000 units by the end of the quarter. By mid-October, it was almost 20,000 units, with more orders in the process of closing. Across the organization, our total backlog has reached $1.3 billion by mid-October, and with more 2027 demand to play out. Early movers remain steadfast in their buying decisions and continue to become more constructive.
Improving freight economics combined with significant replacement needs are bringing equipment decisions forward at an increasing pace. Customers continue to place significant value on their long-standing relationships with Wabash, and those conversations increasingly point toward a more consistent replacement cadence and additional catch-up demand over the coming years, even without a traditional demand-driven recovery. At the same time, a number of customers remain early in their budget and planning cycles, giving us further confidence in the opportunity for order activity to build over the coming months. While still relatively early in the 2027 sales cycle, historical order patterns would suggest that we are on track for a dry van volume in the 35,000-38,000 range at Wabash.
That would align with our expected market size in the initial replacement cycle phase and our targeted market share percentage in the ±25% range. The current pace of backlog intake would suggest a higher volume case in the low 40,000 unit range. While we are not modeling this level of demand, we feel the effective capacity we are adding in Q3 and Q4 of 2026 would enable our execution of that possibility. Critically, forward-looking pricing remains constructive, giving Wabash the opportunity to convert that demand into progressively higher levels of unit profitability. Our announcement prior to the quarter end referenced weighted average 2027 material margin exceeding Q2 of 2026 by 500 basis points.
Our backlog portfolio now averages over 600 basis points in excess of Q2 2026, highlighting how improving freight economics and carrier profitability are supporting pricing that is better aligned with our actual cost base. Our proactive and thoughtful approach at this market inflection, coupled with strong supplier partnerships and an ability to expand our hourly workforce, provide high confidence in Wabash's ability to win the early and mid-innings of the new cycle we are in. Further enabled by executing aggressively to meet our customer needs with highly effective trailer capacity, thus giving Wabash the ability to fully capitalize on demand momentum.
Trade is another important part of the bridge between the environment we operated through and the one we see developing. We have previously discussed the impact of Section 232 and antidumping and countervailing duty actions. We believe these measures can favorably change industry dynamics into 2027. This is consistent with our prior framing of trade actions as helping level the competitive playing field and support pricing discipline following years of oversupply. Recently, on the 25th of September, the United States International Trade Commission made their final affirmative determinations that imports of van type trailers and sub assemblies from China materially injure the U.S. industry. The antidumping rate is almost 130%, while the countervailing duty rate is almost 135%.
Stacking with the 25% associated with Section 232 tariffs result in an effective rate of approximately 290%. Meanwhile, Canada and Mexico preliminary affirmative determinations and are posting cash deposits today at the preliminary rates, with a combined antidumping countervailing duty rate of approximately 10.2% being applied to the competitor, Hyundai. Final commerce decisions are expected by mid-December and final International Trade Committee votes by early 2027. Again, stacking the 25% associated with Section 232 tariffs result in an effective rate of approximately 35%. Our view is simple. Wabash should compete at a level playing field. We have an extensive U.S. manufacturing footprint, a highly capable workforce, and substantial installed capacity.
We believe an environment which all participants compete under fair trade conditions is good for our customers, good for American manufacturing and good for Wabash. Importantly, we already have the physical capacity to participate in an improving dry van market. Our south plant expanded our scalable dry van capability by approximately 10,000 units compared with prior up cycles, giving us the ability to respond without requiring another major capital investment. Now turning to the fourth quarter. We expect Q4 revenue to be between $420 million and $450 million. Adjusted operating margin of -8% to -5%, and adjusted EPS of -$0.75 to -$0.55. Embedded in that outlook is labor and production readiness expense deliberately pulled from 2027.
During Q3, we increased our dry van hourly workforce by 15% and will continue to add shifts during the fourth quarter that were originally planned for the first quarter of 2027. Effectively, by the end of the year, all second shift production will be turned on. Of course, some of the inefficiencies are expected to lag into Q1 of 2027. While we continue to monitor demand, we maintain a high degree of confidence that we can meet high-side demand beyond our current projections within 2027 without adding a third shift. That leaves us exceptionally well positioned to respond to incremental demand opportunities.
If demand were to warrant either a full or partial third shift layer of dry van capacity, that will add additional cost pressures and margin headwinds in the short term. I want to spend a moment framing what this means for 2027 because we recognize investors are beginning to build next year's models. We are not providing formal 2027 guidance today. We are, however, increasing confidence that 2027 should represent a meaningful improvement in Wabash's financial performance. The recovery will not be uniform across the portfolio. In dry vans, we see improving demand conditions, significant deferred replacement needs, a more constructive regulatory and trade backdrop, and ample Wabash capacity to participate as the market strengthens. Truck body is different.
That business entered the downturn later, and we expect its recovery to remain meaningfully behind dry vans. The beginning stages of cycle recovery, we believe, are roughly six to nine months behind dry vans, with a slower recovery dependent upon broader macro conditions. Therefore, as we think about 2027, we are encouraged by stronger year-on-year improvement in dry vans while recognizing a considerably more measured assumption for truck body. Parts & Services are expected to maintain a 5%-10% top-line growth trajectory and see strong incrementals as 2026 startup costs dissipate, resulting in mid-teen EBIT% performance returning.
That is intentionally a directional framework rather than formal guidance, but we want to give investors sufficient information to build their models without drawing the wrong conclusions from either Q4 revenue or margins. Before I turn the call over, I want to close where I always believe we should, with our people. The last several years have demanded a great deal from the Wabash team. Managing through an extended freight downturn requires discipline, flexibility, and at times, difficult decisions. At the same time, preparing for recovery requires a different mindset. It requires us to look beyond today's production schedule and prepare the business for tomorrow's opportunity. Our people have done both.
They have worked to reduce waste, improve safety, protect quality, serve customers, and make Wabash stronger while volumes have been under pressure. Our continued emphasis on safety, quality, and customer support has deliberately remained protected even while other costs have been reduced. As we enter the final quarter of 2026, I am increasingly optimistic about where the industry is headed and about Wabash's position within it. 2026 has been about taking the actions necessary to create that readiness. Increasingly, our focus is turning to how we will convert that preparation into performance in 2027 and beyond. I want to thank every Wabash employee for their continued commitment to each other, to our customers, and to our purpose.
With that, I'll turn it over to Pat.
Pat Keslin: Thanks, Brent. I'll begin with a review of our third quarter results. For the third quarter of 2026, consolidated revenue was over $476 million, exceeding expectations communicated in the second quarter earnings call. During the quarter, we shipped 9,563 new trailers and 1,685 truck bodies. We are encouraged by the higher volumes, particularly in our core dry van product line. The financial outlook is improving, though near-term results reflect the operational readiness costs Brent discussed. Truck body volumes improved from the prior quarter but remain at historically low levels. Customer mix and manufacturing inefficiencies, compounded by those low volumes, continued to challenge financial performance during the quarter.
Adjusted non-GAAP gross margin was 3.2% of sales, and adjusted non-GAAP operating margin was -5.7% of sales. Adjusted non-GAAP EBITDA for the quarter was -$10.4 million, or -2.2% of sales. Adjusted non-GAAP net income attributable to common shareholders was -$26 million, or -$0.63 per diluted share. GAAP EPS of -$0.51 per diluted share includes the sale of the Goshen, Indiana manufacturing facility for gross proceeds approximating $17.8 million and recognition of an approximately $7.5 million gain. EPS came in below our guided range, primarily reflecting the factors referenced above, which we expect to be short-term in nature and, in the case of dry van, expedite our projected sequential profitability projections going forward.
Turning to segment performance, Transportation Solutions generated $408 million in revenue and reported an operating loss of $14.4 million on a non-GAAP basis. Transportation Solutions maintained positive gross margin during the quarter, building on the progress we saw last quarter as improved volumes continued to support better leverage of our cost base. We continue to expect sequential improvement as pricing adjusts to offset cost pressures. Parts & Services delivered $69 million in revenue and $5.6 million of operating income on a non-GAAP basis. Parts & Services continued to build momentum, with revenue increasing 9% sequentially and 14% year-over-year.
While profitability remains below our expectations, upfit margins continue to reflect the start-up costs associated with integrating our new 2026 upfit sites into their respective markets. As these start-up pressures normalize, we expect the growing revenue base to translate into meaningful incremental profitability. Segment performance has stabilized, and we have a strong base from which to grow. That includes continued establishment of the upfit facilities in their local markets and an expanding presence in the aftermarket parts segment, which should also benefit alongside a recovery in dry vans. During the quarter, we delivered on our promise to renew our asset-based loan, the details of which were shared in August.
Looking ahead, our focus turns to our high-yield bonds, which we intend to address well ahead of becoming current in October of 2027. We are actively engaged with our banking partners and evaluating the options available to us with a focus on achieving the most economically attractive outcome for Wabash. We will provide additional updates as appropriate. As of September 30th, total liquidity, including cash and available borrowings, was $277 million, up 44% versus the prior quarter, benefiting from execution of the convertible debt in July and sale of our Goshen manufacturing facility in August.
The convertible debt allowed us to pay down our asset-based loan, which currently has a zero balance and is ready to be deployed to support net working capital requirements associated with the production ramp. Our disciplined approach to capital management and the actions taken to increase liquidity position Wabash uniquely well to prepare for the market recovery and support our customers as demand improves. In regard to cash flow, operating cash flow for the quarter was -$37 million, resulting in free cash flow of -$41 million. This reflects the start of our planned working capital ramp ahead of higher dry van production levels.
We expect that investment to continue as volumes scale into 2027, supported by the liquidity secured through our July convertible issuance. During the third quarter, we invested approximately $3.5 million in traditional capital expenditures and returned $3.3 million to shareholders through our quarterly dividend. Looking ahead to the fourth quarter, we expect revenue in the range of $420 million-$450 million, and an operating margin of between -8% and -5%. Adjusted earnings per share are expected to be in the range of -$0.75 to -$0.55. The guidance reflects seasonally lower revenues expected in the fourth quarter, with improved price offsetting leverage loss and continued operational readiness expenditures.
The 200-300 basis point improvement in dry van material margin percentage discussed on our last earnings call remains on track for the fourth quarter. Together with significant backlog growth, this reflects continued sequential improvement in underlying profitability as we prepare to leverage higher volumes across our second shift operations. Capital expenditures remain under close control. We commit to appropriately funding the organization and are in a strong position to fund net working capital requirements, having previously invested the necessary capital into capacity. Having made the decision to pull forward ramp costs, we now anticipate negative EBITDA in the fourth quarter, but strong incrementals exceeding 20% moving into the first quarter.
This performance is expected to mark a meaningful step closer to break-even operating income ahead of further favorable incrementals moving into the second quarter and beyond. As the volume and pricing that Brent described really takes shape, and quarter two becomes the new performance floor. In summary, the third quarter reflected a critical step forward. The rapid progression of the dry van unit backlog, supported by accretive material margin through price, provided strong validation of the signals we were seeing in the market. We read those signs and accelerated the activities required to position Wabash to meet the needs of our customers.
The organization is fully supporting those onboarding activities, and our operations teams are excited to ramp multiple production lines across incremental shifts. Wabash is ready ahead of the competition and is set to capture share and recover profitability in 2027. I'll now turn the call back to the operator and will open it up for questions.
Operator: We will now begin the question-and-answer session. If you would like to ask a question, please press star one to raise your hand. To withdraw your question, press star one again. We ask that you pick up your handset when asking a question to allow for optimum sound quality. If you are muted locally, please remember to unmute your device. Please stand by while we compile the Q&A roster. Your first question is from the line of Michael Shlisky with D.A. Davidson & Co. Your line is now open. Please go ahead.
Michael Shlisky: Hello. Thanks for taking my questions here. I guess I wanted to start out with more of a broader marketing view based on the orders we've seen so far and chatter from customers. Do you still think that, or do you think that 2027, the industry volumes are going to be roughly in line with an average replacement year? I guess I'm curious, given what we've seen the last two or three years here, is that probably too low? There will still be more. If that's what ends up happening, there will still be more to go in like 2028.
Brent Yeagy: Yeah, Mike, this is Brent. I'll take that one. I think with the activity that we're seeing right now are extremely supportive of what I would call a baseline replacement in 2027. That's about as far as I'm willing to go right at this moment. I'm going to peg that at approximately 135,000-140,000 dry van units. I think when you look at the potential upside in 2027, maybe in the second half of that year, I think you are starting to.
As robust as it's coming in and what we're hearing from customers, you at least have to pay attention that their desire to make up for the 100,000 units that weren't purchased over the last three years may come to bear. That's factoring into how we think about the capacity that we're bringing online today earlier than later. I think that speaks very well for what 2028 can be, where if you think about 140,000 baseline replacement going into 2028, anywhere from 30,000-40,000 units of incremental demand to just catch up, partially, with that decrement in replacement that occurred in the previous three years.
I think it's starting to frame that 165,000-175,000 units is a real possibility when you stare at 2028, and we think about our capacity in that way.
Michael Shlisky: Got it. To follow up there, Brent, your comments earlier were about 35,000-38,000 would be the range of dry vans. I wanted to get a little bit more of a broad view, because you do have other products, right? You have tanks and—
Brent Yeagy: Sure.
Michael Shlisky: —other areas that you have a good presence in?
Brent Yeagy: Yeah.
Michael Shlisky: Do you think that you can be above overall, above 40,000 next year? I'm sorry.
Brent Yeagy: Oh, yeah. When you think about Wabash, we'll be north of 40,000 units, when you take tank and platform into consideration from a total unit volume perspective. Somewhere in the range of 41,000-42,000 in total trailers is a base number that we're shooting for from a capacity add. The upside to that would be that incremental dry van volume that I'm referencing.
Michael Shlisky: Got it. That helps tremendously. Then commenting on some of the orders that you've received in the near term versus the industry, do you think that you've been able to outperform on market share the last few months, either based on, one, just selling products that you've got, or the fact that there's been some tariffs based on competition, and they might not be able to have great pricing or great visibility at the current time? Just any comments on whether you're outperforming would be tremendous. Thank you.
Brent Yeagy: I think without taking any causal factor into account, we have absolutely outperformed on market share, really since the opening of our order book in the June/July timeframe. I think that's absolutely factored into our need to pull capacity forward. I'm not going to go as far and say that holds throughout the rest of the sales cycle as we try to look at the effective use of capacity coupled with pricing. But we've actually came out of the chute pretty well. Coupled with the pricing that we have gotten is a very advantageous place to be, not something I've exactly seen before, with this level of demand increase, with this level of pricing increase. Is that because of trade?
Possibly. I also think it's because Wabash is adding capacity earlier and more effectively than the competition. I think our customers, after their last three years, are wanting to go where they know they can execute their recovery. I think we're benefiting from that. In a world of uncertainty, Wabash is a good place to go to make sure that if you're a customer, that your recovery is sound.
Michael Shlisky: Okay. Maybe one last one from me on the margin side for 2027. I do know that you pointed to hitting a certain run rate starting in the second quarter for your EBITDA, and you mentioned the six points of material margin. But I am just curious, just to summarize what you said earlier, it sounds like you've pulled a lot of the costs you were thinking about doing in 1Q into 3Q and 4Q so you can start off on the right foot next year. But what can you tell us about your costs are concerned, beyond materials, so things like labor and absorption.
Do you think you can return to, if you're at a year of more normalized trailer demand, I know we're having to pull from truck bodies here, but do you feel like you can maybe return to a more normal level of EBITDA in 2027 as well?
Pat Keslin: Yeah. This is Pat. I think that's going to be a question of the timing in 2027. While true that we did pull forward incremental costs into the back half of 2026, we are still going to be ramping throughout 2027. We still would expect some of that inefficiency to flow into most likely the first half of 2027. But then we could see a scenario in the back half of 2027 where we get back to those historical margin run rates.
Michael Shlisky: Got it. Well, thanks so much. I'll pass along.
Brent Yeagy: Thanks, Mike.
Operator: Your next question is from the line of Jeff Kauffman with Citizens Bank. Your line is now open. Please go ahead.
Jeff Kauffman: Hey, everybody. Well, thank you for that explanation of the differential in the fourth quarter and the pull forward on the ramp up. Just a couple questions about that. Once you are at two shifts and you are up and running, how many trailers will that accommodate? Should I just think about it as only dry van or dry van plus flatbed and other things that you are doing?
Brent Yeagy: Let me see if I can unpack that for you, Jeff. When I think about capacity, we are adding two shifts across the board except for one line, which we will hold off on just a little bit longer to see how a couple of sub-segments go. Even with that implementation, we should be in that 42,000-45,000 unit run rate just on dry vans on an annualized basis. That is what we are looking to install with about 5,000 units of additional second shift volume with that last remaining line. We will look to pull that sometime in Q1 or Q2. We see a couple things to work itself out in terms of demand profile.
Then on top of that, you will have the incremental. That is without overtime, which can be anywhere from 5%, 10%-20%. That you can then tack onto it from a modeling perspective. I will just jump to it. A third shift is not going to be just a linear extrapolation. It will be a little bit less than that, but it will be ballpark similar. I would discount that a little bit in terms of what the effective capacity would be. Again, I will catch up. That is on an annualized basis. That is assuming we have demand to utilize every day fully. That is just dry vans.
We still have incremental shifts both on tank and on platform that we can add, as well as full contingent of labor on a one-shift operation, specifically in tank. We are not even talking truck shifts yet.
Jeff Kauffman: Okay. Nope. I got it. The drop that I am seeing second quarter to the third quarter in average trailer ASP, and I understand there are a lot of things that go into that number. Is that largely mix-related? I also saw a decline on the truck body average ASP. Can you help me understand what is happening 2Q to 3Q? When do I start to see those ASPs go up on the new business that you are signing? Am I not going to see that till 2027, or are we going to start to see a little bit of that in 4Q?
Pat Keslin: Yeah, I'll take that one, Jeff. If you look at the consolidated trailer pricing, that is greatly impacted by mix. Specifically, we've been ramping dry vans, whereas our higher ASP product line, specifically tanks on the trailer side, has not seen that sort of increase. I would describe our dry van pricing Q2 to Q3 similar, so there wasn't a significant reduction there. We are going to start to see, if you take mix out of the equation, we are going to see an uptick in the fourth quarter. We referenced it in the prepared remarks, talking about a 200-300 basis points material margin improvement.
That is specific to dry vans and is currently in our backlog pricing for the fourth quarter. Then you're really going to see a significant uptick once we get into 2027. That was the reference that our 2027 backlog right now in dry vans is a 600-basis point improvement on what we saw in Q2. Most of that improvement you're going to see flowing through in our ASPs. You always have to take into account the percentage of the total that is dry vans, because as that goes up, that's going to bring the average ASP down.
Jeff Kauffman: All right. If I just do a little back of the envelope math here. If I look at operating margins, they peaked at about 12%. Now, that was in the sugar high-induced COVID. I would hope toward peak of cycle, we're up in that double-digit range or close to it, and they're going to be closer to -6% in 2026. They were -6.5% in 2025. If we are saying up 600 basis points, in 2027 based on our backlog, that kind of gets us back to breakeven, right? Before we consider operating efficiencies and things like that to scale up. Let's say you get to that 35,000-40,000 unit production range.
What kind of operating margins should we be seeing at that range? Should we be seeing, and you can talk about gross margins if you want. Should we be seeing something in that mid-single digit range? If so, is that mainly driven by operating efficiencies, or do we require additional raw material recapture to get up to those kind of middle-of-cycle profit levels?
Pat Keslin: Yeah, you've nailed the projection out there. I would put at the kind of volumes that we talked about at the current pricing levels to be in that mid-single digit percentage of margins. It would take an incremental step up in pricing relative to material costs to get back to the numbers that you were referencing in previous cycles.
Jeff Kauffman: Okay. Of course, mix plays into that, too.
Pat Keslin: Yeah.
Jeff Kauffman: Okay. Those are my questions. Thank you.
Brent Yeagy: Thanks, Jeff.
Pat Keslin: Thanks, Jeff.
Operator: There are no further questions at this time. I will now turn the call back to John Cummings for closing remarks. Thank you.
John Cummings: Thanks everybody for joining us today. We look forward to speaking with you throughout the quarter. Have a wonderful rest of your day.
Operator: This concludes today's call. You may now disconnect.
Before you buy stock in Wabash, consider this:
The Motley Fool Stock Advisor analyst team just identified what they believe are the 10 best stocks for investors to buy now… and Wabash wasn’t one of them. The 10 stocks that made the cut could produce monster returns in the coming years.
Consider when Netflix made this list on December 17, 2004... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you’d have $334,308!* Or when Nvidia made this list on April 15, 2005... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you’d have $1,323,413!*
Now, it’s worth noting Stock Advisor’s total average return is 897% — a market-crushing outperformance compared to 213% for the S&P 500. Don't miss the latest top 10 list, available with Stock Advisor, and join an investing community built by individual investors for individual investors.
See the 10 stocks »
*Stock Advisor returns as of October 29, 2026.
This article is a transcript of this conference call produced for The Motley Fool. While we strive for our Foolish Best, there may be errors, omissions, or inaccuracies in this transcript. Parts of this article were created using Large Language Models (LLMs) based on The Motley Fool's insights and investing approach. It has been reviewed by our AI quality control systems. Since LLMs cannot (currently) own stocks, it has no positions in any of the stocks mentioned. As with all our articles, The Motley Fool does not assume any responsibility for your use of this content, and we strongly encourage you to do your own research, including listening to the call yourself and reading the company's SEC filings. Please see our Terms and Conditions for additional details, including our Obligatory Capitalized Disclaimers of Liability.
The Motley Fool has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.