The Vanguard S&P 500 ETF and Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF have been elite performers.
However, combining them in a portfolio gives you a heavy tech concentration.
There's still a defensible reason for owning both -- but in moderation.
The Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (NYSEMKT: VOO) is one of the simplest and best ways to build a long-term portfolio. But what if you want to give it some more growth?
Adding the Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF (NASDAQ: QQQM) seems like an obvious solution. It gives investors exposure to a lot of the U.S. economy's biggest tech and growth companies. And it's delivered tremendous returns over the past several years. There's just one problem: If you already own the S&P 500, you already own most of those companies in fairly sizable allocations.
Missed Nvidia in 2009? This Rare Signal Is Flashing Again. In 2009, a "Double Down" signal flashed for a little-known chipmaker called Nvidia. For the first time in years, that same "Total Conviction" signal is flashing for a company 1/100th the size of Nvidia. Continue »
That doesn't necessarily mean you should eliminate QQQM from consideration. But it does mean you're making a bigger bet on a single sector than you might realize.
Image source: Getty Images.
The Vanguard S&P 500 ETF and Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF track two unique indexes. But when you look more closely at their compositions, you'll see many similarities.
Seven stocks -- Nvidia, Apple, Microsoft, Broadcom, Amazon, and both of Alphabet's share classes -- are in the top 10 of both funds. They account for roughly 33% of the S&P 500 and 34% of the Nasdaq-100. Overall, there's a 53% overlap. Combining these two ETFs doesn't really give you a dramatically more diversified portfolio, or much of a different portfolio at all.
The Vanguard S&P 500 ETF currently holds around 36% of its assets in the tech sector. The Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF has roughly 66% in tech and another 17% in consumer discretionary names like Amazon and Tesla.
If you create a portfolio with a 50/50 split between these two ETFs, you've got about half of your money committed to one sector. That can be a big advantage when those companies are leading as they have been over the past few years. But it poses a significant risk when market leadership changes.
Adding QQQM to VOO provides an understandable growth tilt. But it can significantly alter your risk profile in a concentrated way, even if both ETFs individually look diversified.
Yes, but in moderation. The S&P 500 is already historically top-heavy, both in terms of tech exposure and the top 10 holdings. Adding the Nasdaq-100 to it mostly makes those concentration problems worse.
But that may be what you want if you're investing heavily in the artificial intelligence (AI) trade. It would have worked well over the past few years and could continue to do so if these companies are leading. But it's a risky bet. And one you should be aware of at all times.
Before you buy stock in Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF, consider this:
The Motley Fool Stock Advisor analyst team just identified what they believe are the 10 best stocks for investors to buy now… and Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF wasn’t one of them. The 10 stocks that made the cut could produce monster returns in the coming years.
Consider when Netflix made this list on December 17, 2004... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you’d have $430,571!* Or when Nvidia made this list on April 15, 2005... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you’d have $1,399,268!*
Now, it’s worth noting Stock Advisor’s total average return is 986% — a market-crushing outperformance compared to 214% for the S&P 500. Don't miss the latest top 10 list, available with Stock Advisor, and join an investing community built by individual investors for individual investors.
See the 10 stocks »
*Stock Advisor returns as of August 28, 2026.
David Dierking has positions in Apple and Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF. The Motley Fool has positions in and recommends Alphabet, Amazon, Apple, Broadcom, Microsoft, Nvidia, Tesla, and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.