In this episode of Motley Fool Hidden Gems Investing, Motley Fool contributors Tyler Crowe, Jon Quast, and Lou Whiteman discuss:
To catch full episodes of all The Motley Fool's free podcasts, check out our podcast center. When you're ready to invest, check out this top 10 list of stocks to buy.
Where to invest $1,000 right now? Our analyst team just revealed what they believe are the 10 best stocks to buy right now, when you join Stock Advisor. See the stocks »
A full transcript is below.
Ever feel like you missed the boat in buying the most successful stocks? Then you’ll want to hear this.
On rare occasions, our expert team of analysts issues a “Double Down” stock recommendation for companies that they think are about to pop. If you’re worried you’ve already missed your chance to invest, now is the best time to buy before it’s too late. And the numbers speak for themselves:
Right now, we’re issuing “Double Down” alerts for three incredible companies, available when you join Stock Advisor, and there may not be another chance like this anytime soon.
See the 3 stocks »
*Stock Advisor returns as of August 3, 2026.
This podcast was recorded on July 23, 2026.
Tyler Crowe: Mag 7 earnings are getting off to a rough start today on Motley Fool Hidden Gems Investing. Welcome to Motley Fool Hidden Gems Investing. I'm your host, Tyler Crowe. Today, I'm joined by longtime Fool contributors Lou Whiteman and Jon Quast, doing a little bit of analyst shuffleboard this week with people filling in for a little bit of vacation. We're going to get into earnings because this week is one of the busiest earnings weeks that we have. Tons of companies are reporting. We want to dive into some of the companies we consider in the Hidden Gems Universe, some of the things we're looking forward to this earnings season.
But we wanted to start with the big moves on the day, which were obviously Tesla and Alphabet, two of the Mag 7 that are getting this earnings started, and it didn't look great. Both reported after the close yesterday, and both stocks, Google and Tesla, are down 7% and 13% respectively, as we tape. The largest reason, at least as far as I could tell, is that both companies are now solidly in cash burn mode with their investments. This was a fascinating tip, and I think I saw it in the Financial Times before we got started, guys, for the first time since going public back in 2002, 2003. Alphabet posted its first quarter ever of negative free cash flow. That sounds pretty egregious or very stark in something we've been talking about for a while. What did these numbers look like across the board?
Lou Whiteman: Look, we've known this was coming forever, and the interesting thing to me is we're finally starting to care about it because Alphabet, the numbers were great on one side of the ledger. 82% revenue growth, the Cloud backlog continues to go up double digits. But they are spending every bit of money that they bring in and more. Like you said, they actually went free cash flow negative. They actually boosted their capex spending, we thought last quarter was like, I can't go any higher than this. Hold my beer, as they say. They are now expecting to spend 195 billion-$205 billion in capex this year. That's a $15 billion boost from what they said previously. That's how you end up with negative free cash flow. This is a narrative story, Tyler, from most of its history, as you said, they had a ton of money, and they didn't know what to do with it all. That's why they had the other bets. Now, suddenly, this is looking like one of those boring old industrial businesses that I follow that for every dollar you make, you have to spend 98, $0.99, even maybe $1.01. It should be temporary, but how long is temporary, and how long does this drag out? These are the questions I think the market's asking today.
Jon Quast: I will point out, too, that there is a big difference between the cash burn in Tesla and Alphabet's results. Really, Alphabet is falling in with the other hyperscalers in their cash burn. They're really spending that all on the AI compute and the infrastructure to go along with that. Tesla, on the other hand, moving cars is why they're burning cash. They're lowering those prices to get cars out the door. That's a very different scenario than what the other players are facing. I think really you can make an argument. Maybe there's disagreement in the argument, but I think you can make an argument that Alphabet is making a good move here. You look at the Google Cloud segment, revenue up 82% year over year, operating income in the Google Cloud segment up over 200% year over year. There are real results here. There is real momentum with the AI investments. You can say that they're investing way more than what justifies the return that they're getting and I understand that. But there is some economic benefit that we can see, we can measure. Hopefully, it's a long tailwind. Whereas, Tesla, I think that there's more questions on the cash burn segment.
Tyler Crowe: To that point, too, and Lou, you and I were mentioning it before the show was that not only is Tesla getting into cash burn mode now, their capex spending that they said they were going to do this year, which is about $25 billion. You could say so far this year, they're actually a little behind schedule. I think they've only spent 8.5 billion so far. The expectation is that the cash ramp for them over the rest of the year and presumably over the next several years is going to ramp up significantly from here.
Lou Whiteman: You said tests down more than Alphabet significantly more. I think for a good reason. I don't think we had high expectations for this quarter, so that's the good news, but this was a lousy quarter. Like Jon said, a lot of this was almost Crazy Elon's new car emporium. No deal is too good. That is why, look, even on what they made, two thirds of the earnings per share that they recorded, two thirds was marking to market the SpaceX holding. Not operations. Look, it was literally rocket ships, not automobiles that drove this quarter. SpaceX shares are down big since June 30th. Even that's not looking great.
But Tyler, as you said, free cash flow, negative $1.1 billion. But for the second straight quarter, the company underspent its capex budget. That's good if they don't need to spend it. But unfortunately, they still have a lot of spending that they intend to do, investing in optimist, investing in AI, all of what they're going to do if they stick to their full year guidance, and they haven't said that full year guidance is coming down with these first two quarters of not hitting their guidance. That means capex is going to double in the second half of the year. All of these free cash flow numbers we're looking at now, they're only going to get worse. Right now, we're in a world where, yes, deliveries are up, but when you grow deliveries by 34%, but your auto gross profit is only up 1%. That, I think, even better than margin, tells the tale, they're just moving inventory here. We knew this was a period of transition, but it's only just begun, and we're already seeing these numbers. I think that's why the market is reacting so negatively.
Tyler Crowe: I have this image in my head now, or you always hear radio or local TV commercials where it's the guy who owns the auto dealership, and it's like, I've bought too many. I made a business mistake. I need to clear this inventory. Now, I want an Elon Musk version of that in front of a Tesla store because that's just going to be etched in my mind forever. It's like Elon's crazy discount inventory. Everything must go sale going on. I want to back the lens up. This is where I think it really starts to fall into context here is that we saw both of these companies go into cash burn. Like I said, Google for the first time ever, Tesla for the first time in a long time with it going to presumably happen for a while. This is where to me, it is where it starts to become challenging as investor and how to figure this out because every single analyst McKinsey study projection of what AI infrastructure spending is going to be is it's just going up for the next 5-6 years.
If we are in a period where cash burn is now, and we're expected to continue on this path for the next five years. This is where I start to wonder, like how sustainable is this without some change in the trajectory of what we're doing here. I have to assume that if we were to see these companies just burned through cash for 2-3 years, yes, they can put up better earnings numbers, but doing that for that sustained period of time is going to really test investors resolve.
Lou Whiteman: Definitely. There's a prisoner's dilemma here, isn't there? Because all of these hyperscalers that have committed all this money and are basically betting the company on these frontier models, it is a weird moment. If they're going to stop this before they have to. The snowball has started rolling down the hill. How and when is it going to start? Tyler, here's what worries me about is that I think, and I'm not an AI expert. I'm not going to pretend to be, but I think there is growing credible evidence that a lot of the return on investment generating enterprise AI tools don't need the frontier models. There are millions of open source models out there. Not all of them are of good quality. Not all of them have security. Some of them are from foreign countries that they don't want to use. But there are good models out there. What if this is the kicker, and this is a nightmare scenario? What if we're spending these billions and billions for the frontier models that maybe do the hardest 5% of the work and 95% of the revenue and the AI goodness bypasses these models that we're spending on. How do you make that spending pay off then? Hopefully, there's another path. Hopefully that isn't the path we're headed on, but that is what keeps me up at night with the hyperscalers.
Jon Quast: I think, Lou, if that's the case, I think it underscores the fact that Apple played this perfectly because it is one of the companies that is in a very strong position to benefit from local AI, and the open source models do benefit the local AI. This is basically having your own hardware, running your own models. That's what we're talking about when we say local AI. Apple hardware is really optimized to do this well, and so Apple didn't get into the crazy capex game that the other companies did. Its hardware is already position to take advantage if that is a shift that is going to take place. I really think that's an incredible thing. To circle back to something you said earlier, imagine a scenario where this is just the cost of doing business now if you are a hyperscaler. It doesn't matter what the ROI is. What matters is staying in business, and so it is somewhat of a prisoner's dilemma. You are having to spend this much money on the AI infrastructure and compute and staying ahead of the game, and that's just how it is now. In that scenario, you're no longer the free cash flow machine. The cash flow is flowing out, but into the other companies downstream, the smaller fish that are now the bigger beneficiaries of that spending. I think if you are an equipment maker or an equipment manufacturer, one of these companies, they are seeing amazing tailwinds right now, that could continue, and it is something to watch.
Tyler Crowe: I think I've said it here once before, and I'll say it again. One of these companies is the Ask Jeeves of the AI world. We just don't know which one it is yet. Coming up after the break, we'll keep on doing earnings. [MUSIC]
ADVERTISEMENT: In 2026, I've been trying to improve my health, but here's the thing I found if you're not tracking your blood work, you're basically flying blind. That's why I'm excited to partner with Rythm. Rythm is the world's easiest blood test to help you learn what's happening inside your body. Takes about two minutes at home, no needles, just a sleek and painless collection device that sticks on your arm. Once your blood is collected, you put the sample in the package that Rythm provides, and they will even arrange to have it picked up from your front door. I did my first test about a month ago. The Rythm kit came in the mail. I drew my blood in about two minutes. Couldn't be easier. The results were live in about two days, and the portal makes it easy to understand what's going on. They've even got an AI health coach to help explain your results and recommend actions. Since I got my labs, I've changed the way I've eaten, pounds are starting to come off, and it's easy to determine if something like a GLP-1 is right for you. I'm not one to run to the doctor, so the fact that I can do this at home and get fast results is what has me hooked, and my second kit is already on the way. Rythm is only $79 per month, a fraction of traditional lab testing, ships right to your door, and you can cancel anytime. Right now, Rythm is offering our listeners 15% off for your first month and free shipping at rythm.com/fool. That's Rythm with one H, R-Y-T-H-M Health.com/fool for 15% off your first month and free shipping. Stop guessing, start testing rhythmhealth.com/fool.
Tyler Crowe: Look, we're about a 20-, 25-minute podcast on any given day. Trying to break down every single company that's delivering earnings this week would be practically impossible. I think there was 150 companies that were reporting today alone. We have to do pick and choose what we want to do here. What we did before the show is went through the universe of companies that are recommended in the various Hidden Gems Universe that we have. I'm going to give you guys the floor to highlight some earnings results from this Hidden Gems Universe. But before we do that, last week, IBM telegraphed and said, we're not going to have great results. IBM is part of some of the Hidden Gems Universe. I wanted to just do a quick follow-up, Lou. Was it as bad as they said it was last week when they're like, revenue might not be a little bit short here.
Lou Whiteman: The funny thing is, it was never that bad, but, yes, it came in as telegraph. Revenue was 17.16 billion, which is short of 17.9 billion, but come on, really. The interesting thing here was the guidance. I think what freaked the market out was this idea that IBM saying that, Look, people are spending on hardware, not our software. You can read that as temporary or you can read that as, it's a want to have, not a must have, which is not a great position to be in. IBM expects revenue growth in the 4-5% range for the rest of the year. That's not great, but it's something at least, and I think it's calming, stocks down somewhat, but I think it is calming nerves relative to last week.
Jon Quast: I think the other thing to go along with that Lou is the fact that IBM CEO saying it didn't fully anticipate what played out. Capex budget is already set for the year. For the most part, there is a shift happening from the software budget to the hardware budget because hardware simply costs more, and the CEO saying, we did expect that shift to happen, but it played out way more than what we expected. I think that in a fast-moving space like this, you really want your companies to have a firm handle on what is happening in real time and IBM admitting a little bit that we don't fully know what's going on here. I think that is the concern a little bit, maybe overblown, but I think that's what investors are responding to.
Tyler Crowe: The one that stood out to me the most. It sounded like a timing thing. They're like mainframe business was way down, which I'm like, but you said this was a shift to hardware. Maybe I'm not quite as up to IBM, but I was like, That sounds a little more hardware-y than software. But either way, we're going to follow up on that one, obviously, some other time because it's a big movie here. But guys, of the Hidden Gems Universe, what was it stock that stuck out to you that's reported in the last couple of days? Jon, we'll start with you.
Jon Quast: For me, Tractor Supply. Ticker symbol TSCO. This is a business that I really like and one that I've highlighted before. It's fallen a lot here recently and the valuation is historically quite low. I've thought that this is a good stock to buy because I see the business is very resilient. One of the reasons that I believe the business is resilient is just how much of the business is with companion animals or pets, in other words. About a quarter of the business is addressing the pet market. Roughly another quarter is for livestock,50% of the business is towards the animals. I really see that as a, people spend money for their animals. That's just how it is. This is in the Q2 report here that just came out, the company owns 209 Petsense stores. They're actually going to close 75 of those. About 1/3 of that part of the business, it's closing. Also saying that the companion animal segment of the business within Tractor Supply is struggling, and so they're going to put some emphasis on there. For me, this is really the foundation of an investment thesis with Tractor Supply is that this part of the business remains resilient. Right now it's under pressure a little bit. I think this is something to monitor if you're an investor a Tractor Supply over the next several quarters. Is this a trend or is this a one off?
Lou Whiteman: That's interesting. Because you know people are feeding their pets. Are they just not feeding their pets?
Jon Quast: [OVERLAPPING] From Tractor Supply.
Lou Whiteman: Look, guys, one more for you, quick shout-out to RTX, the artist formerly known as Raytheon Technologies. Ticker is, unsurprisingly, RTX. They're up 8% today, up 22% for the year. After a strong report fueled by growth on both the commercial and defense side of the business. They also raised full-year guidance, so they see this continuing. All segments were up across the board, which you rarely see with RTX. That's been one of the problems with them. Special shout-out here for the defense side. 18% revenue growth, massive quarter for new orders, too. Listen to this. They book $2.42 worth of new business for every $1 they build out in the quarter. That is a great way to telegraph growth from here. I think all you have to do is pick up the newspaper know what's going on in the defense side. On the commercial side, airplanes are still running hard. They are really set up well to take advantage of what looks like a big side of tailwinds on each side of the business.
Tyler Crowe: I want to do a quick thing and try to flip the script on Balf because each Petsense stock, Lou, you got Tractor Supply. It's down about 45% over the past year, trading at about 14 times earnings. Based on some of the things that Jon said, are you interested in buying? I'm going to flip the question to you as well, Jon, interested in RTX, based on up 36%, trading at 39 times earnings.
Lou Whiteman: I'm genuinely scared of retail, but Tractor Supply supply is always one I've looked at. Maybe if they get cheap enough, I might look at it, but look, in retail I'm not much of a shopper, and so I'm really bad at spotting trends. I just hide from retail most of the time.
Jon Quast: This is a very uninspiring podcast, as I say the same thing about defense contractors. I will say I don't own any of my portfolio, Lockheed Martin I have always been a big fan of. If I was to plunge in there, I'd probably go Lockheed first, but this is a space that I always worry about what is going to shift over every four-year presidential cycle, and so I've just never taken the dip, but I will admit that Lou has me interested here after posting some really interesting numbers here, especially with the 242 to every dollar they fill out. Very interesting that.
Tyler Crowe: Certainly a lot of moving parts at RTX with the defense and the commercial side. Interesting to see, and also nice that I didn't hear anything of Pratt and Whitney, we've got some problems that we need to fix. I think that's the first time.
Lou Whiteman: We're finally past that.
Tyler Crowe: Coming up after the break, we're going to take a look ahead for the rest of the earnings coming up this earning season.
ADVERTISEMENT: This episode is brought to you by Accenture. When your advertising operations fall out of sync, everything else follows. Spotify and Accenture are working together to reinvent the rhythm of ad sales, using automation, analytics, and smarter workflows to simplify campaign delivery and access better data across the business. The result, less time spent on operations, more time connecting brands with the moments and fandoms that matter most. Learn more at accenture.com/spotify-UK.
ADVERTISEMENT: What if the drink's pink and the cream’s pink? Chill. It's no big deal. Just get the new strawberry candy plus frappe from our new McCafe Summer drinks range now at McDonald's. Available until 7th of September. Price and participation may vary. Frappes is not available on delivery. Subject to availability.
Tyler Crowe: We normally do a question-and-answer section here, but it is earning season, so we're going to skip it today. But I do want to remind you, if you want to get your question in, go ahead and email us at podcasts@fool.com. That's podcasts with an S at fool.com. We always ask Number 1, keep it Foolish, keep it short and keep it in compliance with SEC. We can't give out any individualized advice. With that in mind, like I said, we're going to look forward to the rest of the earning season coming up. I want to ask you guys, I'm going to put you in the position. You are my stock salmias for the rest of this quarter. Sell me on two companies that you think are worth following this upcoming earning season.
Lou Whiteman: I don't know if this will be bitter or sweet, but on Tuesday morning, PayPal is scheduled to release results and hold a conference call. The report could be interesting because we have a chance to see if that under new management, there's any signs of growth at PayPal. But more interesting, I think, is the conference call, because management will almost certainly be asked a lot of questions about the reported $53 billion takeover offer for the company. Now, guys, I get all of my financial advice these days from Polymarket and Polymarket says there's a 73% chance that this deal gets done. I'll be honest, I'll take the under. I'm a lot more skeptical at $60.50 per share, which is the offer price if that's good enough. But really, what matters is, I'm curious what management thinks. Based on last quarter's free cash flow trends, I think 60,50 is way too low. I think maybe they have to sweeten it by 15 bucks or so. I'm really interested to see if that free cash flow held up and whatever commentary we have, PayPal just got a lot more interesting.
Tyler Crowe: Polymarket and Kalshi not gambling sites, futures commodity contracts? Right?
Lou Whiteman: That's right.
Tyler Crowe: Jon, what are you seeing?
Jon Quast: Airbnb isn't scheduled to report until Aug. 5, but that's the one this earning season that I'm very interested in, probably because I think Airbnb is simply my favorite business in the world. I really do. I know some people hate it. I'm taking a trip next week. I'm staying in two different great places on Airbnb. I really love the business and the model here. But I have to be honest, the stock is an absolute dud over the last five years, actually down 2% over the last five years. The benefit here is that it is trading at nearly its cheapest valuation over the last five years at only 19 times free cash flow. This business generates gobs of cash flow. It's a fantastic business model in that regard. But what I'm watching and what I need to see at some point from Airbnb is, can it use its free cash flow effectively to generate shareholder value? So far, not really. The company is investing in some new product lines that it hopes will drive growth over the long-term, hopefully profitable growth. But that just hasn't played out so far. Recently, it spent over 80 million to buy an office building in Manhattan. I don't think that's a great use of cash personally as a shareholder, so I'm not thrilled about that. I know for a fact that Airbnb can generate cash flow, but can they use it to create value for shareholders? That's what I need to start seeing at some point, as much as I love Airbnb, at some point, they've got to show me that they can grow this stock.
Tyler Crowe: Over the past 12 months, Airbnb has bought back about $4.6 billion worth of stock, and they've been doing somewhere 3-4 billion every year since 2023. I actually have a strange, harebrained idea, almost like a half-baked idea, if you will, for Airbnb. They always hold a ton of cash, which is basically in escrow for when somebody orders a place, but then it doesn't actually give it to the person who owns the facility until the service is actually rendered. Airbnb needs a chief investment officer, like an insurance company who actually gets to invest and manage the float because they have a float of money almost similar to an insurance company. They got $10 billion just sitting on the balance sheet right now in this, it's held for other reasons. I don't see why they aren't getting some chief investment officer because, why not? That's another investment opportunity.
Lou Whiteman: My idea for them was they can charge a clean-up fee to anyone who attends the conference call.
Tyler Crowe: That's rough.
As always, people on the program may have interest in the stocks they talk about, and The Motley Fool may have formal recommendations for or against, so don't buy or sell stocks based solely on what you hear. All personal finance content follows Motley Fool editorial standards, and it's not approved by advertisers. Advertisers are sponsored content and provided for informational purposes only. To see our full advertising disclosure, please check out our show notes. Thanks for producer Dan Boyd and the rest of The Motley Fool team. For Lou, Jon, and myself, thanks for listening, and we'll chat again soon.
Jon Quast has positions in Airbnb and Tractor Supply. Lou Whiteman has positions in Lockheed Martin. Tyler Crowe has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool has positions in and recommends Airbnb, Alphabet, Apple, International Business Machines, PayPal, RTX, Tesla, and Tractor Supply. The Motley Fool recommends Lockheed Martin and recommends the following options: short September 2026 $47.50 calls on PayPal. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.