S&P 500 ETFs like the one from Vanguard have a strong history of outperforming active funds.
Dollar-cost averaging into the ETF over a long period of time is a great way to create long-term wealth.
Among exchange-traded fund (ETF) issuers, Vanguard stands above the rest in my view. The firm had the second-highest assets under management (AUM) at the end of 2025, sitting at $2.64 trillion, trailing only BlackRock. Meanwhile, Vanguard has always been the low-cost leader, focusing on index-based funds.
While I'm a stock picker at heart, I think one of the best investments that most people can make is in an index-based ETF. And with their low expenses and strong liquidity, Vanguard index ETFs are some of the best around.
Where to invest $1,000 right now? Our analyst team just revealed what they believe are the 10 best stocks to buy right now, when you join Stock Advisor. See the stocks »
Image source: Getty Images.
The fact of the matter is that the S&P 500 has outperformed more than 85% of actively managed large-cap funds over the past decade. One reason for this is costs, and the expenses of actively managed funds can greatly eat into investors' returns over time.
The Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (NYSEMKT: VOO), which tracks the index, has an expense ratio of only 0.03%. That means you're paying only $0.30 for every $1,000 invested. That essentially lets you keep nearly all your gains, which becomes increasingly important as your portfolio balance grows over time.
The other big reason market-cap-weighted index funds like the Vanguard S&P 500 ETF tend to outperform actively managed funds is that they operate in the exact opposite way most fund managers invest. Fund managers typically will pare top-performing positions in the name of risk management, while they will also double down on their "best ideas" after they have pulled back.
Market-cap-weighted indexes like the S&P 500 do the opposite. They let their winners continue to run and become bigger percentages of their holdings, while they let losers naturally fade.
This Darwinian survival-of-the-fittest approach works because the market actually isn't driven by a large group of stocks going up, but instead by a handful of megawinners. A JPMorgan Chase study found that between 1980 and 2020, over 40% of stocks in the Russell 3000 had negative absolute returns, while about 10% drove the market's overall performance.
That's why using the Vanguard S&P 500 ETF as a core holding that you consistently dollar-cost average into over a long period of time is one of the best ways to create long-term wealth. The ETF is a proven winner, with an average annual return of 15.5% over the past decade. If you had invested $1,000 a month over that period, you would have had over $270,000 at the end of it, but at a similar return over 30 years, that would jump to over $6 million, with 94% of it coming from gains.
Before you buy stock in Vanguard S&P 500 ETF, consider this:
The Motley Fool Stock Advisor analyst team just identified what they believe are the 10 best stocks for investors to buy now… and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF wasn’t one of them. The 10 stocks that made the cut could produce monster returns in the coming years.
Consider when Netflix made this list on December 17, 2004... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you’d have $369,577!* Or when Nvidia made this list on April 15, 2005... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you’d have $1,301,557!*
Now, it’s worth noting Stock Advisor’s total average return is 908% — a market-crushing outperformance compared to 208% for the S&P 500. Don't miss the latest top 10 list, available with Stock Advisor, and join an investing community built by individual investors for individual investors.
See the 10 stocks »
*Stock Advisor returns as of July 23, 2026.
JPMorgan Chase is an advertising partner of Motley Fool Money. Geoffrey Seiler has positions in Vanguard S&P 500 ETF. The Motley Fool has positions in and recommends BlackRock, JPMorgan Chase, and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.