Kopp sold 117,878 shares of Viridian Therapeutics; the estimated transaction value was $3.5 million based on quarterly average pricing.
The transaction value represented 2.4% of 13F reportable assets under managment (AUM).
Post-trade stake: 55,295 shares valued at $1.1 million (as of the most recent 13F filing).
Kopp's remaining position in Viridian now represents about 0.7% of AUM, placing it outside the fund’s top five holdings.
According to an SEC filing dated April 20, 2026, Kopp Family Office, LLC, reduced its stake in Viridian Therapeutics (NASDAQ:VRDN) by 117,878 shares during the first quarter. The estimated value of the transaction was $3.5 million, calculated using the stock’s average closing price for the quarter. The fund still held a 55,295-share position in Viridian at quarter-end.
| Metric | Value |
|---|---|
| Price (as of April 21, 2026) | $14.33 |
| Market Capitalization | $1.5 billion |
| Revenue (TTM) | $70.8 million |
| Net Income (TTM) | ($342.6 million) |
Viridian Therapeutics, Inc. is a clinical-stage biotechnology company focused on discovering, developing, and commercializing antibody therapies for rare and serious diseases.
Kopp Family Office's decision to cut its Viridian Therapeutics position by more than two-thirds isn't necessarily a red flag -- but events since the quarter ended have made it look prescient. The fund trimmed a position that has now underperformed the broader market by more than 28 percentage points over the past year, with Viridian shares falling more than 50% since mid-March. For Kopp’s investment managers, that kind of relative drag can be reason enough to reduce exposure, particularly when the stock represents a small, speculative slice of an otherwise ETF-heavy portfolio.
Kopp’s top five holdings are all broad-market or international ETFs, suggesting a relatively conservative, index-oriented strategy. A clinical-stage biotech like Viridian -- which has yet to bring a product to market but is now weeks away from a potential FDA decision on its lead candidate -- fits the profile of a higher-risk, event-driven satellite position rather than a core holding. Trimming Viridian from 3.4% to 0.7% of AUM looks more like portfolio discipline than a total loss of conviction.
On the financial side, Viridian is spending heavily to get to the finish line -- the company posted a net loss of $343 million for full-year 2025, up from $270 million the prior year, as it ramped up commercial preparations and clinical trial activity. That said, it ended 2025 with a strong cash position of roughly $875 million, bolstered in part by a royalty financing deal with DRI Healthcare that could bring in up to $300 million tied to approval and sales milestones.
What's changed dramatically in 2026 is the competitive picture. On March 30, Viridian reported Phase 3 REVEAL-1 top-line data for elegrobart -- its subcutaneous candidate -- that met primary endpoints but raised questions: improvements in inflammation were limited, and there were reports of tinnitus. The market's reaction was swift, with shares falling more than 30% the day of the report. Then, on April 7, Amgen (NASDAQ:AMGN) reported Phase 3 results for a subcutaneous version of its already-approved Tepezza that showed a 77% proptosis response rate -- numerically stronger than elegrobart's 54% (Q4W) and 63% (Q8W) results. VRDN fell another 20%+ on that news. Several analysts maintained bullish ratings and price targets for Viridian well above current levels, arguing that veligrotug's profile and elegrobart's more convenient dosing schedule (as few as four total injections versus Tepezza's twelve) still represent a meaningful commercial opportunity. But the story has clearly shifted from a straightforward pipeline-to-approval narrative to a genuine question of market differentiation.
For retail investors curious about the rare disease and autoimmune space more broadly, this episode is a reminder of how quickly the calculus can change in clinical-stage biotech -- particularly when a well-capitalized incumbent like Amgen is competing in the same niche. Rather than concentrating in a single clinical-stage name, some investors prefer broader exposure through healthcare ETFs -- such as the Health Care Select Sector SPDR Fund (NYSEMKT:XLV) or the iShares Biotechnology ETF (NASDAQ:IBB) -- which spread risk across many companies.
Bottom line: Kopp's Q1 trim looks more like noise than signal -- a routine reduction of a small, high-risk position in an ETF-dominated portfolio -- but the real story at Viridian has since become much louder, and the competitive headwinds from Amgen are a development worth watching regardless of what any one fund manager does.
Before you buy stock in Viridian Therapeutics, consider this:
The Motley Fool Stock Advisor analyst team just identified what they believe are the 10 best stocks for investors to buy now… and Viridian Therapeutics wasn’t one of them. The 10 stocks that made the cut could produce monster returns in the coming years.
Consider when Netflix made this list on December 17, 2004... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you’d have $511,411!* Or when Nvidia made this list on April 15, 2005... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you’d have $1,238,736!*
Now, it’s worth noting Stock Advisor’s total average return is 986% — a market-crushing outperformance compared to 199% for the S&P 500. Don't miss the latest top 10 list, available with Stock Advisor, and join an investing community built by individual investors for individual investors.
See the 10 stocks »
*Stock Advisor returns as of April 21, 2026.
Andy Gould has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool has positions in and recommends Amgen, Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF, and Vanguard FTSE Emerging Markets ETF. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.