Home Bancorp (HBCP) Q4 2025 Earnings Transcript

Image source: The Motley Fool.

DATE

Tuesday, January 27, 2026 at 11:30 a.m. ET

CALL PARTICIPANTS

• President & Chief Executive Officer — John W. Bordelon
• Senior Executive Vice President & Chief Financial Officer — David T. Kirkley
• Operator

TAKEAWAYS

• Net Income -- $11.4 million for Q4 with $1.46 per share; full year net income reached $46 million or $5.87 per share, marking a 29% increase in earnings per share.
• Net Interest Margin (NIM) -- 4.06%, a rise of 24 basis points from the prior year, with Q4 representing a sequential 4 basis point decline.
• Return on Assets (ROA) -- 1.29%, up 17 basis points from the previous year.
• Loan Growth -- Loans expanded by $38 million during Q4, with management projecting mid-single digit loan growth in 2026 as the pipeline builds and paydowns slow.
• Deposit Growth -- Total deposits increased by $192 million or 7%, driven by demand deposits and lower-cost money market accounts.
• Loan-to-Deposit Ratio -- Decreased to 92% from 98% a year earlier due to deposit growth.
• Texas Franchise -- Loans in Texas grew at a 15% annual rate and comprised 20% of the portfolio; a new Houston branch is set to open as the loan production office closes in the first quarter.
• Net Charge-offs -- $165,000 for Q4 and $908,000 for the year, with 2025 net charge-offs representing 3 basis points of loans and $128,000 less than 2024.
• Nonperforming Assets (NPA) -- Rose $5.2 million to $36.1 million, representing 1.03% of total assets, mainly due to downgrades of two relationships including a $4.1 million Houston townhome loan.
• Provision Expense -- $480,000 in Q4, which was $709,000 higher than Q3, attributed to loan growth.
• Allowance for Loan Loss Ratio -- Held steady at 1.21% compared to the prior quarter.
• Cost of Interest-Bearing Deposits -- Fell 6 basis points in Q4 and 15 basis points from the prior year; total cost for Q4 was 1.84% with expectations of further declines as deposit pricing reflects recent Fed rate cuts.
• Noninterest Income -- $4 million for the quarter, above expectations, with guidance of $3.8 million to $4 million for upcoming quarters.
• Noninterest Expenses -- Increased to $23 million, aligning with management’s expectations, with guidance of $22.5 million to $23 million for Q1 and rising afterward due to raises and new projects.
• Capital Management -- Tangible book value per share grew 9.6% annually since 2019, EPS grew 11.5% annually, the dividend rose 55% to $0.31 per share, and share repurchases totaled 17% since 2019.

Need a quote from a Motley Fool analyst? Email pr@fool.com

RISKS

• Nonperforming assets increased by $5.2 million, with management citing downgrades of two relationships as the primary cause.
• Competitive deposit pricing pressures continued as “some outliers in the 4.25% range” forced management to compete for funds.
• NIM declined 4 basis points sequentially, attributed in part to the immediate impact of rate cuts on loan yields, combined with delayed deposit repricing.

SUMMARY

Management emphasized that full-year earnings per share reached a record high, while deposit growth contributed to a lower loan-to-deposit ratio and reduced use of expensive funding sources. The Texas market’s contribution grew, with ongoing investments in Houston and a new branch set to expand capacity. Credit quality concerns arose as nonperforming assets increased, but management asserted confidence in portfolio equity and recovery prospects. Management expressed optimism regarding noninterest income, net interest margin expansion, and capital deployment flexibility, including selective M&A activity as stock valuation improves.

• David Kirkley said, “even if we go down 100 basis points in yields, we still think that our NIM is going to be relatively stable to what we just reported.”
• John Bordelon stated that management does not view the uptick in nonperforming assets as “an economic-driven downturn,” but rather as “one-off circumstances.”
• Expansion in the Texas market is expected to be further enabled by the transition from a loan production office to a full-service branch in Northwest Houston.
• Deposit costs are expected to continue declining as certificates of deposit reprice in line with recent interest rate reductions.

INDUSTRY GLOSSARY

• Net Charge-offs: The amount of loans written off as uncollectible, net of recoveries, during a period.
• AOCI: Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income — equity component reflecting unrealized gains or losses on available-for-sale securities and certain other items.
• SBA Business: Refers to originating loans that are partially guaranteed by the U.S. Small Business Administration.

Full Conference Call Transcript

John Bordelon: Thank you, David. Good morning, and thank you for joining our earnings call today. We appreciate your interest in Home Bank as we discuss our results, our expectations for the future and our approach to creating long-term shareholder value. We're proud of everything we accomplished in 2025 and believe we are well positioned to continue the outstanding performance you've come to the expect from Home Bank. Yesterday afternoon, we reported fourth quarter net income of $11.4 million or $1.46 per share. For the full year 2025, net income was $46 million or $5.87 per share which is a record for Home Bank and 29% higher than our 2024 earnings per share.

Fourth quarter net interest margin was 4.06% and the ROA was 1.29%, which was sharply higher than the fourth quarter of 2024, and that NIM was 3.82% and an ROA of 1.12. Loans grew by $38 million in the fourth quarter or 6% annualized as strong December originations exceeded still elevated payoffs and pay downs. Our pipeline is building and paydowns appear to be slowing, so we expect growth in 2026 to be in the mid-single digits. While loan growth in 2025 was not up to our historical trends, Deposits grew by 7% or $192 million with strong growth in demand deposits and relatively low-cost money market accounts.

As a result of our success attracting deposits, we were able to reduce our loan-to-deposit ratio to 92% in the fourth quarter from 98% a year ago. We intend to continue to focus on deposits, which will build franchise value and position us for increased profitability when we return to our historical rate of loan growth. We continue to have success with our Texas franchise, which is now in its fourth year of operation. We now have 15 commercial bankers in 5 branches and 1 loan production office in the Houston market and expect to open a new full-service branch and close the loan production office in the first quarter.

We expect the lending team we hired in late 2023 will be even more productive than they have been. Since entering the Texas market in 2022, loans have grown at a 15% annual rate and now represent 20% of our loan portfolio. Nonperforming loans increased in 2025, but our charge-offs remain very low, and we don't expect that to change due to our conservative underwriting standards and proactive credit management. As you can see on Slide 16, our net charge-offs have averaged about 6 basis points over the last 6 years. We continue to perform at a level above our peer banks and expect this trend to continue.

We are confident in Home Bank's future and our ability to meet our higher standards in all economic climates. With that, I'll turn it back over to David, our Chief Financial Officer.

David Kirkley: Thanks, John. Slide 5 in our investor presentation has a summary of the last 6 quarters. As John mentioned, fourth quarter net income totaled $11.4 million, an 8% decrease from the prior quarter but a 21% increase from a year ago. The decline in net income was primarily due to an increase in provision expense related to loan growth during the quarter. Net interest income was stable when compared to third quarter, decreasing $58,000 while NIM decreased 4 basis points to 4.06%. Year-over-year, 2025 NIM increased 32 basis points to 4.03%, while ROA increased 25 basis points to 1.33%.

Yield on loans decreased 9 basis points quarter-over-quarter due to repricing of variable rate loans after the three Fed rate cuts in September. The contractual rate on new loan originations during the quarter was 7%. Despite recent rate cuts, our yield on interest earning assets increased 14 basis points to 5.88% in 2025. Slides 14 and 17 provide additional details on cash flows from our loan and investment securities portfolio that should support NIM expansion in 2026. Excluding floating rate loans repricing in the next 3 months, 41% of loans with a blended rate of 5.7% are expected to reprice or refinance over the next 3 years.

Over that same time period, half of our investment portfolio is expected to mature with a roll-off yield of 2.56%, which is well below current available yields. Slides 15 and 16 of our investor presentation provides some additional detail on credit. We had $165,000 in net charge-offs in the fourth quarter and $908,000 of net charge-offs in 2025 which was only 3 basis points of total loans and $128,000 less than 2024. Fourth quarter nonperforming assets increased $5.2 million to $36.1 million or 1.03% of total assets. The increase was primarily due to the downgrade of two relationships and partially offset by paydowns. The largest was a $4.1 million relationship with two separate townhome development loans in Houston.

We feel that between the loan values on these properties and the guarantor strength, there will be no material losses on this relationship. We reported a $480,000 provision expense related to loan growth during the quarter, which was an increase of $709,000 from the prior quarter. We feel very confident in reserves as our allowance for loan loss ratio was stable from the third quarter at 1.21%. Average deposits increased by $58 million in the fourth quarter and by $187 million or 7% in 2025. Average noninterest-bearing deposits, which represent 27% of total deposits increased by $3 million in the fourth quarter and $40 million in 2025.

2025's deposit growth helped us reduce more expensive FHLB advances by $173 million to just $3 million at the end of the fourth quarter. The cost of interest-bearing deposits decreased 6 basis points in the fourth quarter and decreased 15 basis points since the fourth quarter of 2024. Our overall cost of deposits in the fourth quarter was an attractive 1.84%, and we expect additional reductions in the first quarter as recent Fed rate cuts are reflected in our deposit pricing. Slide 22 of the presentation has some additional details on noninterest income and expenses. Noninterest income was $4 million, which was slightly above fourth quarter expectations of $3.6 million to $3.8 million.

Going forward, we expect noninterest income to increase to between $3.8 million and $4 million over the next several quarters. Noninterest expenses increased by $515,000 to $23 million and was in line with expectations. Noninterest expenses are expected to be between $22.5 million and $23 million in the first quarter and then increase to between $23.3 million and $23.7 million from there as annual raises take effect and new projects kick off. Slides 23 and 24 summarized the impact our capital management strategy has had on Home Bank. Since 2019, we grew per share tangible book value adjusted for AOCI at a 9.6% annualized rate. Over that same time period, we also increased EPS at an 11.5% annualized growth rate.

We've increased our quarterly dividend per share by 55% to $0.31 per share and repurchased 17% of our shares. And we've done this while maintaining robust capital ratios. This positions us to be successful in varying economic environments and to take advantage of any opportunities as they arise. With that, operator, please open the line for Q&A.

Operator: [Operator Instructions] The first question comes from Feddie Strickland at Hovde Group.

Feddie Strickland: I just wanted to start on the credit side. I hear you on the limited loss history here and the fact that charge-offs really haven't been that high the last couple of quarters or for a while here. But when do you think we might see a shift in the trajectory of the Class 5 and NPAs as you work through some of these credits?

John Bordelon: Yes. It's hardening a little bit that sometimes it takes a little bit longer, especially those credits in Louisiana and Mississippi. Texas products typically move a little bit faster, we're finding out a more closer date, there is usually about 60 days or less. So we are working through a lot of these. A couple of the newer ones we had were not on our radar and then they just kind of popped up a little bit. So we do believe that the two subdivision properties in Texas, we should be getting back out of foreclosure or they should be sold by February 3. We think there's a lot of equity still in that property, very good locations.

We had another facility in Texas that the tenant moved out and the landlord is looking to sell the property. He has some interested parties just hasn't gotten there yet. So he's actually waiting -- he filed some lawsuits to be able to get back rent that the tenants had, and we'll see about that. But the most part, it's a good facility that should not have trouble selling. But once again, it just takes a little bit of time. So we had a lot of one-off circumstances. We don't see this as an economic-driven downturn.

And we just see different scenarios where people are able to maintain the rental property or in the case of the two subdivisions, the person never started the development of those subdivisions.

David Kirkley: One of the properties that John was talking about in February, that's about $5.5 million that once again, will either be paid off, refinanced out or will foreclose on and move to sell quickly.

Feddie Strickland: Got it. So all I'll see -- what we can see NPAs come down about $5.5 million if nothing else comes on. Is that a fair assumption?

John Bordelon: We hope so. We think the property is if we do take them back should be able to sell relatively quickly, it does take a little bit of time in Texas to get permits and things of that nature. That would be the only thing that would slow it up, we think.

Feddie Strickland: Okay. And shifting gears to the loan pipeline, does the makeup look any meaningfully different from what's on the books today? Or I guess, in other words, do you expect any sort of longer-term shift in the portfolio? I know in the past, you talked about more C&I.

John Bordelon: All of '25, we had some payoffs versus second quarter, they weren't as large as they were in the third quarter, but we did have payoffs and pay downs throughout our portfolio. So I think it's just maybe because of higher rates are people selling their businesses to profits and such and the loans get paid off, but we're not -- we didn't have much of that at all a little bit but not much in fourth quarter. We're thinking hopefully, we have less of that in 2026. So the loan growth is there if we don't have the payoffs.

Feddie Strickland: And just a last question, just update on what you're hearing from customers throughout different parts of the footprint, how are things in New Orleans versus Houston? Just curious where you might see a little bit more versus a little bit less growth incrementally?

John Bordelon: We're not hearing anything negative in any of our markets, especially with rates coming down, yield curve coming down a little bit. So I think it's probably leaning a little more towards the positive side. Obviously, the national scene is always a concern what happens with interest rates, what happens with the economy and such. But for the most part, we have not heard any negative comments.

Operator: The next question comes from Joe Yanchunis at Raymond James.

Joseph Yanchunis: So I was hoping you could talk a little about the SBA business as we enter into 2026. Yes, as it currently stands, do you think the business will be a driver of growth? Or will it take some more investments to really grow the business?

John Bordelon: That's a great question. We got into the SBA business after the Texan Bank acquisition, and we kind of have been slow to develop it. But as rates went up, the request were much smaller and few and far between. So we do anticipate that with the lower interest rates, that should pick up. I don't think we're low enough yet to where it's going to be tremendous, but it should be much better than it has been in the last two years.

Joseph Yanchunis: Got it. And just a quick clarification. All my questions are great questions. So capital levels continue to build. You throttle down the buyback with current levels where the stock price is. Would you characterize M&A as one of the top capital deployment priorities? And if that's the case, can you talk about how the pace of conversations changed in recent months?

John Bordelon: Well, a couple of important factors, I think, Dave and I have been speaking to people opportunities that have been out there for the last 3 years, of course, with the high interest rates and some of the balance sheet being a little upside down, it was not very attractive. The other important component there was we did not have a commodity that we felt we could use. So we looked at smaller deals that we could pay cash for.

So now that our stock price is getting closer to a [ 140 ] of tangible or so, we feel as though we have the power to go out and maybe look for a little bit larger banks that we feel very comfortable with. So we're very optimistic about 2026 M&A.

Joseph Yanchunis: And what would the larger deal look like just in terms of size or if you want to talk some geography as well?

John Bordelon: Yes. I mean we're probably not looking at anything over $1.5 billion, I mean, half our size or less.

Joseph Yanchunis: I appreciate that. And kind of last one for me here. In the back half of '25, you purchased nearly $20 million of securities. How should we think about the size of the bond portfolio as you move throughout '26?

David Kirkley: I think it's going to be relatively in the same percentage of assets to 11% to 12%. We expect loan growth, we expect our balance sheet to increase a little bit. So I expect the investment portfolio to increase book basis -- excuse me, on a par basis by about $15 million to $20 million and then whatever happens on AOCI as it comes back.

Operator: The next question comes from Stephen Scouten at Piper Sandler.

Stephen Scouten: I appreciate the time. I'm curious, John, I heard you say you feel pretty good about that team you have in Texas from 2023. Do you feel like there's opportunities with all the M&A we've seen in that environment to continue to add to that team? Or is there kind of plenty of capacity there now to grow at the pace you want to grow?

John Bordelon: Well, we never lost anybody in the Texan acquisition, and we added about 3 other people to that. And then we did a pull out 2 years ago, I guess, it is now a 3-person team -- actually a 4-person team with 3 relationship managers. So that's the -- that's where we're building a new branch in Northwest Houston, and that's going to give them full branch capabilities. It's been very difficult as a loan production office for the last 2 years for them to grow as much, especially on the deposit side. So we're very excited about that team and hope to continue to grow in that market. Absolutely.

Stephen Scouten: Okay. Got it. And then when you think about the kind of overall loan growth capacity for the franchise as we look at '26. Is kind of -- is mid-single digit the right way to think about it? Or do you have aspirations for more given what you're seeing in the Houston MSA?

John Bordelon: I think the only thing that's going to push it past mid-single digits is potentially lower interest rates that may spur the economy a little bit more. I don't know if we're going to see that until maybe midyear or second half of the year, it's anybody's guess, right, where interest rates go. But it looks like the long end staying up a little bit. So potentially, it may be better in the second half of the year than the first half of the year. But I still think based upon the pipeline that we had in fourth quarter, I think first half of the year is still going to be mid-single digits.

Stephen Scouten: Okay. Great. And then just maybe last thing for me. Kind of thinking about the trajectory of the NIM and David, I heard you obviously say you think there's some expansion opportunities there. I guess, kind of two parts to that. What do you think the scale of that potential upside could be? And then two, can you kind of help me reconcile the -- obviously, on page, was it, 21 of your presentation. What would show is kind of a liability sensitive -- I mean, excuse me, like an asset-sensitive appearance on the balance sheet versus what we've kind of seen in practice and kind of how I think about your balance sheet and the upside from lower rates?

David Kirkley: Yes. So we had 3 rate cuts since mid-September. And so that impacts the loan portfolio immediately, and you saw that as a 9 basis point decline in loan yields. We have a very short deposit portfolio, but it does take a couple of months to realize the impact of rate cuts through CD repricing. Our NIM in December was 4.08% and that's reflective -- that's due to seeing our deposit cuts actually playing out on the income statement. And you're going to see more of that come through in Q1 as a lot of the CDs are repricing. So we took the impact of the rate cuts and that reduced our loan portfolio by 9 basis points.

We've been originating in the 7% range, and we have roll off yields, a pretty healthy roll-off yield. So in the base case scenario, we see NIM ticking back up to 4.1% and 4.15% throughout the year. So that answers one of your questions, I believe. As far as rate sensitivity goes, change in net interest income, you got to remember that this projection is based off of the next 12 months. It's not saying, "Oh, my NIM was 4.05% and then down 100 basis points, I'm going to lose 4.1% of my NIM.

It's -- my NIM is projected to increase in the base case to 4.1%, 4.15% in the base case, not from the 4.04% we just -- I mean, 4.06% we just reported, it's a 4.1% or a live asset-sensitive bank from that base case. And so even if we go down 100 basis points in yields, we still think that our NIM is going to be relatively stable to what we just reported.

John Bordelon: I think the biggest headwinds we have right now in regards to NIM or some outliers on the deposit side, throwing some really high CD rates out there. So we're having to compete a little bit for that. That hasn't been the issue. Pretty much a lot of banks were all in the same general vicinity rate-wise, but there are some outliers in the 4.25% range.

Stephen Scouten: But generally, I guess this is kind of a shock scenario, but it sounds like you have a lag that's actually beneficial as those CDs repriced over time from each subsequent cut. So theoretically, it could impact the NIM negatively for the first 30 days, but then probably there's some strength after the fact as deposits reprice. Is that maybe the best way to think about it?

David Kirkley: Yes, that does, yes. But I'm glad John did bring that up. We are seeing more -- a much wider range of deposit pricing in some of our markets than we had over the last, I guess, probably 1.5 years with the spread between the high and the average.

Stephen Scouten: Yes. Makes sense. People have seeing loans out there that they want to fund up. So yes, I would imagine it all gets a little bit more competitive. But to your point, hopefully, that means we got better economic strength. So we shall see. I appreciate all the color.

Operator: This concludes our question-and-answer session. I would like to turn the conference back over to John for any closing remarks.

John Bordelon: Thank you. And once again, thank you all for joining us today, and we look forward to speaking to many of you in the coming days and weeks, and thank you for your interest in Home Bancorp. Have a great day.

Operator: The conference has now concluded. Thank you for attending today's presentation. You may now disconnect.

This article is a transcript of this conference call produced for The Motley Fool. While we strive for our Foolish Best, there may be errors, omissions, or inaccuracies in this transcript. Parts of this article were created using Large Language Models (LLMs) based on The Motley Fool's insights and investing approach. It has been reviewed by our AI quality control systems. Since LLMs cannot (currently) own stocks, it has no positions in any of the stocks mentioned. As with all our articles, The Motley Fool does not assume any responsibility for your use of this content, and we strongly encourage you to do your own research, including listening to the call yourself and reading the company's SEC filings. Please see our Terms and Conditions for additional details, including our Obligatory Capitalized Disclaimers of Liability.

The Motley Fool has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.