GLD Holds More Gold While IAU Is More Affordable

Source The Motley Fool

Key Points

  • IAU comes with a lower expense ratio than GLD, making it more cost-effective for long-term gold exposure.

  • GLD has larger assets under management (AUM) and slightly lower price volatility than IAU.

  • Both ETFs closely track gold prices, but GLD has experienced a smaller maximum drawdown over the past five years.

  • 10 stocks we like better than SPDR Gold Shares ›

iShares Gold Trust (NYSEMKT:IAU) and SPDR Gold Shares (NYSEMKT:GLD) both offer simple access to gold prices, but IAU charges a lower expense ratio, while GLD manages more assets under management (AUM) and has seen less severe historical drawdowns.

Both IAU and GLD are physically backed gold exchange-traded funds (ETFs) designed to mirror the price movement of gold bullion, appealing to investors seeking a straightforward way to gain gold exposure without owning the metal itself. This comparison looks at how they stack up on cost, performance, risk, and structure.

Snapshot (cost & size)

MetricIAUGLD
IssuerISharesSPDR
Expense ratio0.25%0.40%
1-yr return (as of 2026-02-04)73.1%72.9%
Beta0.260.26
AUM$80.2 billion$173.3 billion

Beta measures price volatility relative to the S&P 500; beta is calculated from five-year weekly returns. The 1-yr return represents total return over the trailing 12 months.

IAU looks more affordable for long-term holders due to its lower expense ratio, while GLD charges a higher fee but commands the largest assets under management (AUM) among gold ETFs.

Performance & risk comparison

MetricIAUGLD
Max drawdown (five years)(20.93%)(21.03%)
Growth of $1,000 over five years$2,719$2,700

What's inside

GLD is invested entirely in physical gold, classified under basic materials, and has existed for over 21 years. While holdings data are not detailed, it operates as a pure play on gold bullion, with no sector or company-level tilts, and does not introduce unique quirks or hedges.

IAU also tracks the price of gold through physical holdings and is classified under real estate due to sector mapping conventions, though in practice it behaves as a direct gold proxy. Like GLD, IAU offers no yield and its portfolio is entirely focused on gold bullion, making both funds functionally similar in terms of underlying exposure.

For more guidance on ETF investing, check out the full guide at this link.

What this means for investors

Admittedly, investors will struggle to find material differences in these funds from just a surface-level comparison. As previously mentioned, both of the funds offer a similar performance over time. Both precious metals ETFs are also similar in terms of time of existence.

GLD is slightly older with a November 2004 inception date. Still, since IAU came into existence in January 2005, BlackRock’s iShares moved quickly to compete with State Street‘s SPDR Gold Shares.

As for significant differences, one that appears meaningful is the expense ratio, with GLD charging 0.40% compared to just 0.25% for IAU.

Indeed, the difference between the expense ratios likely will make little difference in terms of returns, though one may struggle to find a justification to pay an extra 0.15% to hold GLD.

The other major difference, which draws less attention, is assets under management. In that regard, GLD is the clear leader, managing $173.3 billion in assets versus just $80.2 billion for IAU.

Still, both funds have the name recognition and a level of assets under management that should make investors feel comfortable with either fund. Thus, investors are more likely to focus on IAU’s lower expense ratio when comparing the two ETFs.

Should you buy stock in SPDR Gold Shares right now?

Before you buy stock in SPDR Gold Shares, consider this:

The Motley Fool Stock Advisor analyst team just identified what they believe are the 10 best stocks for investors to buy now… and SPDR Gold Shares wasn’t one of them. The 10 stocks that made the cut could produce monster returns in the coming years.

Consider when Netflix made this list on December 17, 2004... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you’d have $432,297!* Or when Nvidia made this list on April 15, 2005... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you’d have $1,067,820!*

Now, it’s worth noting Stock Advisor’s total average return is 894% — a market-crushing outperformance compared to 194% for the S&P 500. Don't miss the latest top 10 list, available with Stock Advisor, and join an investing community built by individual investors for individual investors.

See the 10 stocks »

*Stock Advisor returns as of February 5, 2026.

Will Healy has positions in SPDR Gold Shares and iShares Gold Trust. The Motley Fool recommends BlackRock. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.

Disclaimer: For information purposes only. Past performance is not indicative of future results.
placeholder
Markets in 2026: Will gold, Bitcoin, and the U.S. dollar make history again? — These are how leading institutions thinkAfter a turbulent 2025, what lies ahead for commodities, forex, and cryptocurrency markets in 2026?
Author  Insights
Dec 25, 2025
After a turbulent 2025, what lies ahead for commodities, forex, and cryptocurrency markets in 2026?
placeholder
Analyst Flags XRP as Market’s ‘Best Risk/Reward’ Play as Token Tests Critical $1.60 SupportCrypto analyst Scott Melker identifies a prime risk/reward setup for XRP as it tests key support at $1.60, offering a tight stop-loss against potential upside targets near $2.00.
Author  Mitrade
Feb 03, Tue
Crypto analyst Scott Melker identifies a prime risk/reward setup for XRP as it tests key support at $1.60, offering a tight stop-loss against potential upside targets near $2.00.
placeholder
Ethereum Price Forecast: ETH faces heavy distribution as price slips below average cost basis of investorsEthereum (ETH) extended its decline on Wednesday, dropping more than 5% over the past 24 hours toward the $2,100 level, which is below the $2,310 average cost basis or realized price of investors, according to CryptoQuant's data.
Author  FXStreet
Yesterday 01: 53
Ethereum (ETH) extended its decline on Wednesday, dropping more than 5% over the past 24 hours toward the $2,100 level, which is below the $2,310 average cost basis or realized price of investors, according to CryptoQuant's data.
placeholder
Bitcoin Leverage Flush Evaporates $775M as Capital Rotates Into Defensive Infra PlaysBitcoin's plunge to $70K triggers a $775M leverage washout, driving a capital rotation into quantum-secure infrastructure project BMIC as investors seek uncorrelated alpha.
Author  Mitrade
18 hours ago
Bitcoin's plunge to $70K triggers a $775M leverage washout, driving a capital rotation into quantum-secure infrastructure project BMIC as investors seek uncorrelated alpha.
placeholder
Bitcoin’s Drop to $69K Wipes Out 15 Months of Bull Market GainsPrecious metals' volatility mirrored Bitcoin's downturn as it targets lower price points.
Author  Mitrade
18 hours ago
Precious metals' volatility mirrored Bitcoin's downturn as it targets lower price points.
goTop
quote