Intermediate Treasury ETFs: Vanguard's VGIT Cuts Costs to the Bone While iShares' IEI Emphasizes Stability

Source The Motley Fool

Key Points

  • VGIT offers a lower expense ratio and slightly higher yield than IEI.

  • IEI has delivered slightly better 1-year and 5-year returns with a shallower drawdown.

  • Both ETFs focus on U.S. Treasuries but differ in maturity range.

  • These 10 stocks could mint the next wave of millionaires ›

Vanguard Intermediate-Term Treasury ETF (NASDAQ:VGIT) stands out for its low costs and modestly higher yield, while iShares 3-7 Year Treasury Bond ETF (NASDAQ:IEI) brings a slightly stronger recent performance and a narrower historical drawdown.

Both of these exchange-traded funds aim to provide investors with exposure to intermediate U.S. Treasury bonds, but they take subtly different approaches: VGIT targets maturities from three to 10 years, while IEI narrows in on the three- to seven-year segment. Here is how the two compare on cost, returns, risk, and composition.

Snapshot (cost & size)

MetricVGITIEI
IssuerVanguardIShares
Expense ratio0.03%0.15%
1-yr return (as of Dec. 11, 2025)2.2%2.4%
Dividend yield3.8%3.4%
Beta0.820.71
AUM$42.9 billion$17.4 billion

Beta measures price volatility relative to the S&P 500; beta is calculated from five-year weekly returns. The 1-yr return represents total return over the trailing 12 months.

VGIT is more affordable, with an expense ratio of 0.03% compared to IEI’s 0.15%. VGIT also offers a modestly higher yield, so cost-conscious investors prioritizing income may gravitate toward it, while IEI comes at a higher price for its slightly narrower focus.

Performance & risk comparison

MetricVGITIEI
Max drawdown (5 y)-15.43%-14.22%
Growth of $1,000 over 5 years$858$898

What's inside

IEI tracks U.S. Treasury bonds with maturities between three and seven years, offering a focused portfolio of 83 holdings and nearly two decades of operating history. Its top positions include Treasury Note 4.07%, Treasury Note 3.58%, and Treasury Note 2.92%, and the fund has no notable structural quirks or overlays.

VGIT, by contrast, casts a slightly wider net across the intermediate-term Treasury spectrum (three to 10 years), holding 105 U.S. Treasury issues. The fund’s top holdings are United States Treasury Note/Bond 2.03%, United States Treasury Note/Bond 1.98%, and United States Treasury Note/Bond 1.97%.

For more guidance on ETF investing, check out the full guide at this link.

What this means for investors

For investors seeking stability and reliable income, Treasury ETFs like the Vanguard's VGIT and iShares' IEI are strong options. Both funds invest in U.S. government bonds with similar maturity ranges, making them ideal for conservative investors looking to reduce portfolio volatility or preserve capital during uncertain times.

The standout difference lies in costs and yield. VGIT charges an ultra-low expense ratio of just 0.04%, compared to IEI's 0.15% -- a meaningful gap over time for buy-and-hold investors. VGIT also edges out IEI slightly on dividend yield, currently offering around 3.8% versus IEI's 3.4%. For income-focused retirees or conservative savers, these small advantages add up.

However, IEI brings its own strengths. It has demonstrated modestly better recent performance and experienced a shallower maximum drawdown during the 2022 bond market rout, suggesting slightly better downside protection during volatile periods.

Cost-conscious investors who prioritize long-term value should favor VGIT's rock-bottom fees, while those willing to pay a modest premium for potentially smoother performance during market stress might prefer IEI. Either way, both funds deliver the safety and predictability that Treasury investors value most.

Glossary

ETF (Exchange-Traded Fund): An investment fund traded on stock exchanges, holding a basket of assets like stocks or bonds.
Expense ratio: The annual fee, as a percentage of assets, that a fund charges its shareholders.
Dividend yield: Annual dividends paid by a fund, expressed as a percentage of its current price.
Beta: A measure of an investment's volatility compared to the overall market, often the S&P 500.
AUM (Assets Under Management): The total market value of assets that a fund manages on behalf of investors.
Max drawdown: The largest percentage drop from a fund's peak value to its lowest point over a specific period.
Intermediate-term Treasury bonds: U.S. government bonds with maturities typically between three and ten years.
Holdings: The individual securities or assets owned within a fund or portfolio.
Structural overlay: An additional investment strategy or feature layered on top of a fund's main holdings.

Where to invest $1,000 right now

When our analyst team has a stock tip, it can pay to listen. After all, Stock Advisor’s total average return is 962%* — a market-crushing outperformance compared to 193% for the S&P 500.

They just revealed what they believe are the 10 best stocks for investors to buy right now, available when you join Stock Advisor.

See the stocks »

*Stock Advisor returns as of December 16, 2025.

Sara Appino has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.

Disclaimer: For information purposes only. Past performance is not indicative of future results.
placeholder
U.S. November Nonfarm Payrolls: What Does the Rare "Weak Jobs, Strong Economy" Mix Mean for U.S. Equities?1. IntroductionAfter retreating from the late-October highs, U.S. equities embarked on a bottoming rebound in mid-to-late November, a trend driven by the interplay of multiple factors. That said, it i
Author  TradingKey
10 hours ago
1. IntroductionAfter retreating from the late-October highs, U.S. equities embarked on a bottoming rebound in mid-to-late November, a trend driven by the interplay of multiple factors. That said, it i
placeholder
Senate Delays Crypto Market Structure Hearings to Early 2026The Senate Banking Committee has postponed cryptocurrency market structure hearings until 2026, citing ongoing bipartisan negotiations.
Author  Mitrade
15 hours ago
The Senate Banking Committee has postponed cryptocurrency market structure hearings until 2026, citing ongoing bipartisan negotiations.
placeholder
Bitcoin Slides 5% as Sellers Lean In — Can BTC Reclaim $88,000?Bitcoin has dropped back below $88,000 after rolling over from $90,500, with price still trading under the 100-hour Simple Moving Average. The sell-off found a floor at $85,151, and BTC is now consolidating near that base, but rebounds are facing pressure from a bearish trend line around $89,000. Bulls need to retake $88,000–$89,000 to ease downside risk; failure to do so keeps $85,500–$85,000 and then $83,500 in play, with $80,000 as the deeper “line in the sand.” Bitcoin (BTC) is back in damage-control mode after a sharp pullback wiped out recent gains. The price failed to reclaim the $90,000–$90,500 band, rolled over, and slid through $88,500 before briefly dipping under $87,000. Buyers did show up around $85,000, but the rebound so far looks more like stabilization than a clear trend reversal. Bitcoin dips hard, finds a bid near $85,000(h3) BTC’s latest move lower began when it couldn’t build follow-through above $90,000 and $90,500. Once that upside stalled, sellers took control and pushed price down through $88,500. The slide accelerated enough to spike below $87,000, but the market didn’t free-fall. Bulls defended the $85,000 zone, printing a low at $85,151. Since then, Bitcoin has been consolidating below the 23.6% Fibonacci retracement of the drop from the $93,560 swing high to the $85,151 low — a clue that the bounce is still shallow and that sellers haven’t fully backed off yet. Structurally, BTC is still on the back foot: It’s trading below $88,000, and It remains below the 100-hour Simple Moving Average, keeping short-term trend pressure pointed downward. Resistance is layered, and $89,000 is the problem area(h3) If bulls try to turn this into a recovery, they’ll have to climb through multiple ceilings in quick succession. First, BTC faces resistance around $87,150, followed by a more meaningful barrier near $87,500. From there, the market’s attention snaps back to $88,000 — the level BTC just lost and now needs to reclaim. A close back above $88,000 would improve the tone, but it doesn’t solve the bigger issue: there’s a bearish trend line on the hourly BTC/USD chart (Kraken feed) with resistance near $89,000, which also lines up with the next technical hurdle. If BTC can push through $89,000 and hold, the rebound could extend toward $90,000, with follow-through targets at $91,000 and $91,500. But until price clears that $88,000–$89,000 zone, rallies are at risk of being sold rather than chased. If BTC fails to reclaim resistance, the downside path is clear(h3) The near-term bear case is simple: if Bitcoin can’t climb back above the $87,000 area and keep traction, sellers may attempt another leg lower. Support levels line up like this: Immediate support: $85,500 First major support: $85,000 Next support: $83,500 Then $82,500 in the near term Below that, the major “don’t break this” level is still $80,000. If BTC slips under $80,000, the risk of acceleration to the downside increases significantly — not because it’s magic, but because it’s the kind of psychological and structural level that tends to trigger forced de-risking. Indicators: momentum still leans bearish(h3) The intraday indicators aren’t offering much comfort yet: Hourly MACD is losing pace in the bearish zone. Hourly RSI remains below 50, suggesting sellers still have the upper hand on short timeframes. So while the $85,000 defense held for now, the market hasn’t flipped bullish — it’s just stopped bleeding.
Author  Mitrade
18 hours ago
Bitcoin has dropped back below $88,000 after rolling over from $90,500, with price still trading under the 100-hour Simple Moving Average. The sell-off found a floor at $85,151, and BTC is now consolidating near that base, but rebounds are facing pressure from a bearish trend line around $89,000. Bulls need to retake $88,000–$89,000 to ease downside risk; failure to do so keeps $85,500–$85,000 and then $83,500 in play, with $80,000 as the deeper “line in the sand.” Bitcoin (BTC) is back in damage-control mode after a sharp pullback wiped out recent gains. The price failed to reclaim the $90,000–$90,500 band, rolled over, and slid through $88,500 before briefly dipping under $87,000. Buyers did show up around $85,000, but the rebound so far looks more like stabilization than a clear trend reversal. Bitcoin dips hard, finds a bid near $85,000(h3) BTC’s latest move lower began when it couldn’t build follow-through above $90,000 and $90,500. Once that upside stalled, sellers took control and pushed price down through $88,500. The slide accelerated enough to spike below $87,000, but the market didn’t free-fall. Bulls defended the $85,000 zone, printing a low at $85,151. Since then, Bitcoin has been consolidating below the 23.6% Fibonacci retracement of the drop from the $93,560 swing high to the $85,151 low — a clue that the bounce is still shallow and that sellers haven’t fully backed off yet. Structurally, BTC is still on the back foot: It’s trading below $88,000, and It remains below the 100-hour Simple Moving Average, keeping short-term trend pressure pointed downward. Resistance is layered, and $89,000 is the problem area(h3) If bulls try to turn this into a recovery, they’ll have to climb through multiple ceilings in quick succession. First, BTC faces resistance around $87,150, followed by a more meaningful barrier near $87,500. From there, the market’s attention snaps back to $88,000 — the level BTC just lost and now needs to reclaim. A close back above $88,000 would improve the tone, but it doesn’t solve the bigger issue: there’s a bearish trend line on the hourly BTC/USD chart (Kraken feed) with resistance near $89,000, which also lines up with the next technical hurdle. If BTC can push through $89,000 and hold, the rebound could extend toward $90,000, with follow-through targets at $91,000 and $91,500. But until price clears that $88,000–$89,000 zone, rallies are at risk of being sold rather than chased. If BTC fails to reclaim resistance, the downside path is clear(h3) The near-term bear case is simple: if Bitcoin can’t climb back above the $87,000 area and keep traction, sellers may attempt another leg lower. Support levels line up like this: Immediate support: $85,500 First major support: $85,000 Next support: $83,500 Then $82,500 in the near term Below that, the major “don’t break this” level is still $80,000. If BTC slips under $80,000, the risk of acceleration to the downside increases significantly — not because it’s magic, but because it’s the kind of psychological and structural level that tends to trigger forced de-risking. Indicators: momentum still leans bearish(h3) The intraday indicators aren’t offering much comfort yet: Hourly MACD is losing pace in the bearish zone. Hourly RSI remains below 50, suggesting sellers still have the upper hand on short timeframes. So while the $85,000 defense held for now, the market hasn’t flipped bullish — it’s just stopped bleeding.
placeholder
AUD/USD remains depressed below mid-0.6600s; downside seems limited ahead of US NFP reportThe AUD/USD pair attracts some sellers for the fourth straight day on Tuesday and trades around the 0.6630 region, down just over 0.10%, during the Asian session.
Author  FXStreet
19 hours ago
The AUD/USD pair attracts some sellers for the fourth straight day on Tuesday and trades around the 0.6630 region, down just over 0.10%, during the Asian session.
placeholder
Macro Analysts: Hawkish Japan Could Push Bitcoin Below $70KAnalysts predict Bitcoin may face further declines towards the $70,000 mark if the Bank of Japan raises interest rates as expected.
Author  Mitrade
Yesterday 05: 48
Analysts predict Bitcoin may face further declines towards the $70,000 mark if the Bank of Japan raises interest rates as expected.
goTop
quote