Better Chip Stock: Navitas Semiconductor vs. Wolfspeed

Source The Motley Fool

Key Points

  • Navitas and Wolfspeed both produce next-gen chips for demanding markets.

  • Navitas operates a nimbler business model, but its stock looks overvalued.

  • Wolfspeed is spending a lot more money, but its stock seems undervalued.

  • 10 stocks we like better than Navitas Semiconductor ›

Over the past few years, silicon carbide (SiC) and gallium nitride (GaN) chips both gained momentum as alternatives to traditional silicon (Si) chips. SiC and GaN chips are both wide bandgap (WBG) semiconductors, which can switch faster, waste less energy, and operate at higher frequencies and temperatures than Si chips.

That makes them well-suited for electric vehicle (EV) power electronics, fast chargers, solar inverters, data center power supplies, and motor drives. Several chipmakers produce the two chips together because they complement each other, are manufactured in a similar way, and target the same markets -- but they're not exactly the same.

Where to invest $1,000 right now? Our analyst team just revealed what they believe are the 10 best stocks to buy right now, when you join Stock Advisor. See the stocks »

Illustration of cloud hovering over circuit board.

Image source: Getty Images.

SiC chips typically operate at mid- to high voltages, while GaN chips operate at low to mid-voltages. SiC chips are slower and generally pricier than GaN chips, but they're more robust and better suited for high-voltage EV powertrains and industrial systems. GaN chips are faster but more delicate, so they're usually installed in smaller devices like phone and laptop chargers.

Both types of chips have plenty of growth potential. The combined SiC and GaN chip market could expand at a compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of 25% from 2024 to 2032, according to Global Market Insights, as they replace Si chips in certain markets. Let's see which one of the top stocks in that niche market -- Navitas Semiconductor (NASDAQ: NVTS) and Wolfspeed (NYSE: WOLF) -- is a better long-term buy.

The differences between Navitas and Wolfspeed

Navitas and Wolfspeed both produce SiC and GaN chips, but their business models are different. Navitas is a fabless chipmaker which outsources its production to third-party foundries. Wolfspeed manufactures its own chips at its first-party foundries.

Navitas generates most of its revenue from its GaNFast Power ICs, which bundle together switching, sensing, control, and security features. In 2022, it increased its exposure to the SiC market by acquiring GeneSiC, a producer of SiC chips for the EV and data center markets, but that business is still smaller than its core GaN business.

Wolfspeed mainly manufactures and sells SiC materials and power devices. It previously produced GaN-on-SiC chips (which combine the two technologies) for radio frequency (RF) devices, but it sold that smaller business to MACOM in late 2023.

Both companies struggled with declining sales over the past year as the EV, solar, and industrial markets cooled off in a challenging macro environment. Navitas weathered that storm, but Wolfspeed filed for bankruptcy protection this June as it grappled with soaring manufacturing costs, rising debt, and widening losses. In September, Wolfspeed emerged from bankruptcy after reducing its total debt by 70%, extending its maturities to 2030, and reducing its annual cash interest expenses by about 60%.

Which chipmaker will grow faster?

Analysts expect Navitas' revenue to decline 44% to $46 million in 2025 and 12% to $41 million in 2026 as that cyclical slowdown continues. It's only expected to slightly narrow its net loss from $85 million in 2024 to $73 million in 2026. But in 2027, they expect its revenue to surge 80% to $74 million as the macro environment stabilizes and it ships its first chips for Nvidia's data centers.

Under a deal signed this May, Nvidia will install Navitas' GanFast and GeneSiC chips into its AI data centers to support its next-gen 800 V HVDC power architecture. It's expected to narrow its net loss to $62 million in 2027 as those tailwinds kick in, but it should stay unprofitable.

Wall Street expects Wolfspeed's revenue to rise 6% to $800 million in fiscal 2026 (which ends next June) and 16% to $926 million in 2027. That faster recovery should be driven by the expansion of the AI market (which requires a lot of high-voltage SiC chips) and the stabilization of the EV, industrial, and energy markets. Wolfspeed's vertically integrated business model -- which it continues to expand with its own 200mm plants -- should support that recovery.

On the bottom line, Wolfspeed is expected to narrow its net loss from $1.6 billion in fiscal 2025 to $255 million in fiscal 2027 as it reduces its debt. Wolfspeed still ended its latest quarter with $7.6 billion in total liabilities and negative shareholder equity, while Navitas had just $59 million in total liabilities and a low debt-to-equity ratio of 0.16.

Which stock is more reasonably valued?

With an enterprise value of $5.1 billion, Wolfspeed is valued at five times next year's sales. Navitas, with an enterprise value of $1.7 billion, trades at 42 times next year's sales.

Wolfspeed seems undervalued because it just emerged from bankruptcy, it's still shouldering a lot of debt, and it runs a capital-intensive business. Navitas operates a nimbler business with a lot of growth potential, but its valuations are likely being inflated by its headline-grabbing deal with Nvidia.

I wouldn't rush to buy either of these stocks in this frothy market. But if I had to choose one over the other, I'd pick Wolfspeed because it's cheaper and its near-term growth rates are healthier. Navitas might eventually grow faster than Wolfspeed, but its stock is too hot to handle right now.

Should you invest $1,000 in Navitas Semiconductor right now?

Before you buy stock in Navitas Semiconductor, consider this:

The Motley Fool Stock Advisor analyst team just identified what they believe are the 10 best stocks for investors to buy now… and Navitas Semiconductor wasn’t one of them. The 10 stocks that made the cut could produce monster returns in the coming years.

Consider when Netflix made this list on December 17, 2004... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you’d have $599,785!* Or when Nvidia made this list on April 15, 2005... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you’d have $1,165,716!*

Now, it’s worth noting Stock Advisor’s total average return is 1,035% — a market-crushing outperformance compared to 191% for the S&P 500. Don’t miss out on the latest top 10 list, available when you join Stock Advisor.

See the 10 stocks »

*Stock Advisor returns as of November 17, 2025

Leo Sun has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool has positions in and recommends Nvidia. The Motley Fool recommends Wolfspeed. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.

Disclaimer: For information purposes only. Past performance is not indicative of future results.
placeholder
Gold Price Forecast: XAU/USD recovers above $4,100, hawkish Fed might cap gainsGold price (XAU/USD) recovers some lost ground to near $4,105, snapping the two-day losing streak during the early European session on Friday. The precious metal edges higher on the softer US Dollar (USD).  Traders will take more cues from the Fedspeak later on Monday.
Author  FXStreet
Yesterday 01: 52
Gold price (XAU/USD) recovers some lost ground to near $4,105, snapping the two-day losing streak during the early European session on Friday. The precious metal edges higher on the softer US Dollar (USD).  Traders will take more cues from the Fedspeak later on Monday.
placeholder
Bitcoin slides deeper into red as bears lean on $96,600 wall and eye $90,000Bitcoin extends its decline after failing to reclaim $96,500, trading below $95,000, the 100-hour SMA and a bearish trend line near $96,600; unless bulls can force a decisive close back above $96,600–$97,200, the short-term path of least resistance stays lower, with $92,500, $90,000 and the main $88,500 support zone in focus.
Author  Mitrade
Yesterday 03: 35
Bitcoin extends its decline after failing to reclaim $96,500, trading below $95,000, the 100-hour SMA and a bearish trend line near $96,600; unless bulls can force a decisive close back above $96,600–$97,200, the short-term path of least resistance stays lower, with $92,500, $90,000 and the main $88,500 support zone in focus.
placeholder
Bitcoin briefly loses 2025 gains as crypto plunges over the weekend.Bitcoin experienced a sharp decline this weekend, briefly erasing its 2025 gains and dipping below its year-opening value of $93,507. The cryptocurrency fell to a low of $93,029 on Sunday, representing a 25% drop from its all-time high in October. Although it has rebounded slightly to around $94,209, the pressures on the market remain significant. The downturn occurred despite the reopening of the U.S. government on Thursday, which many had hoped would provide essential support for crypto markets. This year initially appeared promising for cryptocurrencies, particularly after the inauguration of President Donald Trump, who has established the most pro-crypto administration thus far. However, ongoing political tensions—including Trump's tariff strategies and the recent government shutdown, lasting a historic 43 days—have contributed to several rapid price pullbacks for Bitcoin throughout the year. Market dynamics are also being influenced by Bitcoin whales—investors holding large amounts of Bitcoin—who have been offloading portions of their assets, consequently stalling price rallies even as positive regulatory developments emerge. Despite these sell-offs, analysts from Glassnode argue that this behavior aligns with typical patterns seen among long-term investors during the concluding stages of bull markets, suggesting it is not indicative of a mass exodus. Notably, Bitcoin is not alone in its struggles, as Ethereum and Solana have also recorded declines of 7.95% and 28.3%, respectively, since the start of the year, while numerous altcoins have faced even steeper losses. Looking ahead, questions linger regarding the viability of the four-year cycle thesis, particularly given the increasing institutional support and regulatory frameworks now in place in the crypto landscape. Matt Hougan, chief investment officer at Bitwise, remains optimistic, suggesting a potential Bitcoin resurgence in 2026 driven by the “debasement trade” thesis and a broader trend toward increased adoption of stablecoins, tokenization, and decentralized finance. Hougan emphasized the soundness of the underlying fundamentals, pointing to a positive outlook for the sector in the longer term.
Author  Mitrade
Yesterday 03: 11
Bitcoin experienced a sharp decline this weekend, briefly erasing its 2025 gains and dipping below its year-opening value of $93,507. The cryptocurrency fell to a low of $93,029 on Sunday, representing a 25% drop from its all-time high in October. Although it has rebounded slightly to around $94,209, the pressures on the market remain significant. The downturn occurred despite the reopening of the U.S. government on Thursday, which many had hoped would provide essential support for crypto markets. This year initially appeared promising for cryptocurrencies, particularly after the inauguration of President Donald Trump, who has established the most pro-crypto administration thus far. However, ongoing political tensions—including Trump's tariff strategies and the recent government shutdown, lasting a historic 43 days—have contributed to several rapid price pullbacks for Bitcoin throughout the year. Market dynamics are also being influenced by Bitcoin whales—investors holding large amounts of Bitcoin—who have been offloading portions of their assets, consequently stalling price rallies even as positive regulatory developments emerge. Despite these sell-offs, analysts from Glassnode argue that this behavior aligns with typical patterns seen among long-term investors during the concluding stages of bull markets, suggesting it is not indicative of a mass exodus. Notably, Bitcoin is not alone in its struggles, as Ethereum and Solana have also recorded declines of 7.95% and 28.3%, respectively, since the start of the year, while numerous altcoins have faced even steeper losses. Looking ahead, questions linger regarding the viability of the four-year cycle thesis, particularly given the increasing institutional support and regulatory frameworks now in place in the crypto landscape. Matt Hougan, chief investment officer at Bitwise, remains optimistic, suggesting a potential Bitcoin resurgence in 2026 driven by the “debasement trade” thesis and a broader trend toward increased adoption of stablecoins, tokenization, and decentralized finance. Hougan emphasized the soundness of the underlying fundamentals, pointing to a positive outlook for the sector in the longer term.
placeholder
Gold Price Forecast: XAU/USD declines below $4,050 on USD strength and hawkish Fed comments Gold price (XAU/USD) extends the decline to around $4,030 during the early Asian session on Tuesday. The precious metal edges lower as traders dialed back expectations of a US interest rate cut next month.
Author  FXStreet
12 hours ago
Gold price (XAU/USD) extends the decline to around $4,030 during the early Asian session on Tuesday. The precious metal edges lower as traders dialed back expectations of a US interest rate cut next month.
placeholder
Ethereum Edges Toward Long-Term Holders’ Cost Basis, Now Only 8% Above Key Accumulation LevelEthereum is trading near $3,150 and just 8% above a key $2,895 long-term holders’ cost basis, with on-chain flows, macro uncertainty and support around $3,000–$2,800 all shaping what comes next for ETH.
Author  Mitrade
11 hours ago
Ethereum is trading near $3,150 and just 8% above a key $2,895 long-term holders’ cost basis, with on-chain flows, macro uncertainty and support around $3,000–$2,800 all shaping what comes next for ETH.
goTop
quote