IonQ vs. Quantinuum vs. Infleqtion vs. Rigetti vs. D-Wave: Which Is the Best Quantum Computing Stock to Bet On?

Source Motley_fool

Key Points

  • IonQ and Quantinuum are quantum computing accuracy leaders.

  • Rigetti's systems are fast, but trail on accuracy.

  • Infleqtion and D-Wave Quantum are trying to develop technologies with the accuracy of trapped-ion qubits and the speed of superconducting qubits.

  • 10 stocks we like better than IonQ ›

Quantum computing offers the promise of being the next big technological breakthrough after artificial intelligence (AI). The technology has drawn the interest of the U.S. government, which has been investing in the sector. Meanwhile, investors can buy the stocks of several public companies that are attempting to develop fault-tolerant quantum computers using a variety of different techniques.

Five of the best-known pure plays in the space are IonQ (NYSE: IONQ), Quantinuum (NASDAQ: QNT), Rigetti Computing (NASDAQ: RGTI), Infleqtion (NYSE: INFQ), and D-Wave Quantum (NYSE: QBTS). Let's consider which of these quantum stocks looks like the best buy.

Missed Nvidia in 2009? This Rare Signal Is Flashing Again. In 2009, a "Double Down" signal flashed for a little-known chipmaker called Nvidia. For the first time in years, that same "Total Conviction" signal is flashing for a company 1/100th the size of Nvidia. Continue »

IonQ and Quantinuum

All quantum computers are built around qubits, which are extremely sensitive to even the slightest external interference. As a result, their computations have high error rates. The error-reduction and error-correction problems are among the chief challenges faced by every company trying to make quantum computing practical.

The two companies at the forefront of accuracy, though, are IonQ and Quantinuum. Both companies use trapped-ion technology: Each qubit in their computers is made out of an individual charged atom (aka, an ion). This method results in qubits that are more stable than qubits created using other techniques. The result is that IonQ has achieved 99.99% 2-qubit gate fidelity (a standard metric for quantum computing accuracy), while Quantinuum sits at 99.92%.

The companies differ primarily in how they hold their qubits in place. IonQ uses a combination of lasers and microwave antennas built into its chips, while Quantinuum employs only lasers, arguing that microwave antennas slow computational speed too much.

Quantinuum is known for its comprehensive software stack, while IonQ has been developing an entire quantum ecosystem, having made acquisitions in quantum sensing, networking, and satellite transmission. It is even in the process of acquiring quantum chip foundry SkyWater Technology, a deal that will enable it to manufacture its own chips in-house and become vertically integrated.

Rigetti Computing

Rigetti is pursuing one of the more common approaches to quantum computing: superconducting qubits. These are electronic circuits that can be made in conventional semiconductor fabs. While they must be brought to temperatures near absolute zero in order to operate, which requires expensive dilution refrigerators, they are controlled by microwave pulses, and the qubits don't need bulky lasers to hold them in place.

The big advantage is that this technique provides much faster speeds than trapped-ion and other approaches. The disadvantage is that Rigetti lags in accuracy, with 2-qubit fidelity currently around 99.1% for its new Cepheus-1-108Q system. While that may sound close to the level that IonQ has reached, in the world of computing, it is considered way behind.

Artist rendering of quantum computing.

Image source: Getty Images.

Infleqtion

Infleqtion has carved out a niche in quantum sensing and precision timing tools, giving it a solid revenue base as it pursues the development of a fault-tolerant quantum system using neutral-atom technology. Similar to trapped-ion technology, it creates each qubit out of an individual atom. But because it uses atoms that are not charged, they don't repel each other. This allows neutral-atom systems to operate with higher qubit densities.

Right now, Infleqtion's technology sits between trapped-ion and superconductor techniques. Its technology is faster than the trapped-ion approach but much slower than superconducting qubits. Meanwhile, the 99.73% 2-gate fidelity it recorded in 2024 is much better than Rigetti's but still meaningfully trails its trapped-ion peers.

D-Wave Quantum

D-Wave Quantum has established itself as a leader in quantum annealing, which offers a niche solution for solving optimization problems. Because the technology is more mature and less complex, the company has already started to commercialize its systems, which can be particularly useful for certain industries like finance and logistics, where finding the most efficient solutions to complex problems (or even a solution that's close to the best) can provide a company with competitive advantages.

Meanwhile, following its acquisition of Quantum Circuits, D-Wave is looking to apply what it learned in developing quantum annealing to superconducting qubit architecture. It plans to use Fluxonium qubits, which can remain in their quantum states longer, and a dual-rail gate-model processor with built-in error detection. It believes that by combining these technologies, it can create a system with the accuracy of a trapped-ion system and the speed of superconducting qubits.

The verdict

Ultimately, for those who want to invest in this still-speculative technology, taking a basket approach could prove to be a wise course, as no one knows yet which of the many qubit technologies will reach fault tolerance and commercial viability first. However, if I could only invest in one quantum stock, it would be IonQ. It has the accuracy lead today, and I think its ecosystem and vertically integrated approach should give it an advantage.

Should you buy stock in IonQ right now?

Before you buy stock in IonQ, consider this:

The Motley Fool Stock Advisor analyst team just identified what they believe are the 10 best stocks for investors to buy now… and IonQ wasn’t one of them. The 10 stocks that made the cut could produce monster returns in the coming years.

Consider when Netflix made this list on December 17, 2004... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you’d have $370,332!* Or when Nvidia made this list on April 15, 2005... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you’d have $1,272,280!*

Now, it’s worth noting Stock Advisor’s total average return is 904% — a market-crushing outperformance compared to 208% for the S&P 500. Don't miss the latest top 10 list, available with Stock Advisor, and join an investing community built by individual investors for individual investors.

See the 10 stocks »

*Stock Advisor returns as of July 22, 2026.

Geoffrey Seiler has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool has positions in and recommends IonQ and SkyWater Technology. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.

Disclaimer: For information purposes only. Past performance is not indicative of future results.
placeholder
Intel Price Forecast: Nvidia Picked Xeon 6, Invested $5B, Yet Analysts Still Trail INTCIntel Corporation (NASDAQ: INTC) sits at $140.05, holding firm on the ascending trendline within the 2H timeframe. The RSI indicator is currently reading 55.21, positioning it as neutral-
Author  TradingKey
7 Month 02 Day Thu
Intel Corporation (NASDAQ: INTC) sits at $140.05, holding firm on the ascending trendline within the 2H timeframe. The RSI indicator is currently reading 55.21, positioning it as neutral-
placeholder
NVIDIA Price Forecast: Michael Burry Shorts NVDA, but Analysts See $299On July 1, NVIDIA (NASDAQ: NVDA) sits at $198.34, failing to break above the former support level that is now serving as resistance between $198 and $205 on the 2H chart's downward blue c
Author  TradingKey
7 Month 02 Day Thu
On July 1, NVIDIA (NASDAQ: NVDA) sits at $198.34, failing to break above the former support level that is now serving as resistance between $198 and $205 on the 2H chart's downward blue c
placeholder
Meta Compute Launch Sends AI Compute Stocks Tumbling GloballyMeta’s plan to sell surplus computing power hit chip stocks hard on Wall Street. Meta’s own shares climbed nearly 9% on the news.The announcement flipped years of assumed AI compute scarcity into a su
Author  Beincrypto
7 Month 02 Day Thu
Meta’s plan to sell surplus computing power hit chip stocks hard on Wall Street. Meta’s own shares climbed nearly 9% on the news.The announcement flipped years of assumed AI compute scarcity into a su
placeholder
Brent Crude Oil Erases Entire War Premium, Falls 40% to Pre-War LevelsBrent crude oil has erased its entire war premium, sliding roughly 40% from its March peak near $120 to trade around $72.25 on Wednesday. The move returns oil to its pre-war support base.The retreat f
Author  Beincrypto
7 Month 02 Day Thu
Brent crude oil has erased its entire war premium, sliding roughly 40% from its March peak near $120 to trade around $72.25 on Wednesday. The move returns oil to its pre-war support base.The retreat f
placeholder
Today’s Market Recap: Chip Stocks Retreat Collectively, Meta Rises Against the Trend, Non-Farm Payrolls Become the Next Key CatalystOn July 1, Eastern Time, U.S. stocks closed fluctuating lower on the first trading day of the second half of the year. Although some megacap tech stocks such as Meta (
Author  TradingKey
7 Month 02 Day Thu
On July 1, Eastern Time, U.S. stocks closed fluctuating lower on the first trading day of the second half of the year. Although some megacap tech stocks such as Meta (
goTop
quote