Fifth Third (FITB) Q2 2025 Earnings Transcript

Image source: The Motley Fool.

DATE

• Thursday, July 17, 2025, at 9 a.m. EDT

CALL PARTICIPANTS

• Chief Executive Officer — Tim Spence
• Chief Financial Officer — Bryan Preston
• Investor Relations Director — Matt Curoe
• Chief Credit Officer — Greg Schroeck

Need a quote from one of our analysts? Email pr@fool.com

RISKS

• The CFO said provision expense for Q2 2025 included a $34 million increase in our allowance for credit losses, driven by weaker Moody’s macroeconomic scenarios forecasting higher unemployment through 2027.
• Solar loan originations declined 72% from 2025 levels as new tax legislation eliminated certain credits, with management projecting a slower recovery.

TAKEAWAYS

• Adjusted Earnings Per Share: $0.90, excluding specified items, for Q2 2025, exceeding consensus estimates.
• Adjusted Revenue Growth: Adjusted revenues grew 6% year over year in Q2 2025, driven by 7% growth in net interest income (NII).
• Adjusted Pre-Provision Net Revenue (PPNR): Adjusted PPNR increased 10% year over year in Q2 2025.
• Positive Operating Leverage: 250 basis points of positive operating leverage in Q2 2025, marking the third consecutive quarter.
• Key Profitability Metrics: Adjusted Return on Assets was 1.2% for Q2 2025 and Adjusted Return on Tangible Common Equity reached 18% for Q2 2025.
• Efficiency Ratio: Efficiency ratio was 55.5% for Q2 2025.
• Net Charge-Offs: Net charge-offs were 45 basis points in Q2 2025, at the bottom of guidance and improved year over year.
• Nonperforming Assets (NPAs): Nonperforming assets (NPAs) declined 11% sequentially in Q2 2025, driven by an 18% reduction in commercial NPAs.
• Tangible Book Value Per Share: Tangible book value per share, inclusive of the impact of AOCI, grew 18% from the prior year and increased 5% compared to Q1 2025 in Q2 2025.
• Average Loan Growth: Average loan growth was 5% over the prior year, with increases across C&I, CRE, leasing, mortgage, home equity, auto, Provide, and Dividend platforms in Q2 2025.
• Commercial Relationship Manager Headcount: Commercial relationship manager headcount increased 11% year over year in Q2 2025.
• Home Equity Market Position: Ranked No. 2 by market share in core footprint, with first-half production growth third-best nationally.
• Net New Household Growth (Southeast Consumer Bank): Net new households in the Southeast consumer bank grew 6% over the prior year in Q2 2025.
• Average Cost of Consumer and Small Business Deposits (Southeast): Average cost of consumer and small business deposits was 191 basis points in Q2 2025.
• Loan Growth Contribution (Southeast Middle Market): More than half of total middle market loan growth over the past year was driven by the Southeast region.
• Middle Market Relationship Production (Southeast): 50% more new quality relationships year to date compared to the same period last year.
• Wealth Management AUM Growth (Southeast): Southeast markets grew assets under management 16% year over year, reaching nearly $16 billion in total AUM, with advisor headcount up 15%.
• Mobile App Recognition: Ranked No. 1 in user satisfaction among regional banks by J.D. Power.
• Embedded Payments Business (New Line): Fees increased 30% compared to the same period a year ago. Deposits attached to new line services rose to $3.7 billion, up $1.1 billion from a year ago.
• NII Outlook: Full-year NII guidance was raised to 5.5%-6.5% growth for 2025, with "record NII in 2025 even if there are zero rate cuts for the remainder of the year."
• Loan Growth Guidance: Full-year 2025 average total loans are expected to increase 5%, driven by C&I and auto lending.
• Deposit Cost Management: Interest-bearing deposit costs decreased by three basis points sequentially in Q2 2025 and declined 65 basis points over the last year.
• Branch Expansion: 10 Southeast branches added in 2025 so far, with another 40 openings projected before year-end 2025; 80% of locations for 200 new Southeast branches secured.
• LCR Compliance: Category 1 LCR was 120% for Q2 2025, and the loan-to-core deposit ratio was 76% for Q2 2025.
• Adjusted Noninterest Income: Adjusted noninterest income grew 3% year over year in Q2 2025, led by a 4% increase in Wealth fees and a 6% increase in Consumer banking fees over the prior year. Commercial payments fees declined in Q2 2025 due to lower card spend and higher earnings credits.
• Adjusted Noninterest Expense: Adjusted noninterest expense increased 4% compared to the year-ago quarter, down 4% sequentially in Q2 2025, and up 3% year over year, excluding deferred compensation, primarily for technology, branches, and personnel, in Q2 2025.
• Allowance for Credit Losses (ACL) Ratio: The allowance for credit losses (ACL) ratio increased by two basis points to 2.09% in Q2 2025 due to reserve build.
• CET1 Capital Ratio: CET1 capital ratio was 10.6%, up 13 basis points in Q2 2025; Pro forma CET1 ratio, including the AOCI impact of securities, was 8.6% at the end of Q2 2025.
• Share Repurchases: $400 million-$500 million targeted during the remainder of 2025.
• Full-Year Guidance (Key Highlights): Adjusted revenue growth is expected at 4%-4.5% for the full year 2025, Full-year PPNR growth is expected at around 7%. Adjusted noninterest income is projected to increase 1%-2% for the full year 2025, Adjusted noninterest expense is expected to rise 2%-2.5% for the full year 2025 compared to 2024, and Net charge-offs guidance was tightened to 43-47 basis points for the full year 2025.
• Third Quarter Guidance: NII up 1% sequentially, Adjusted noninterest income is expected to increase 1%-4% for Q3 2025, Third quarter adjusted noninterest expense is expected to rise 1% compared to the second quarter. Charge-offs are projected in the 45-49 basis point range for Q3 2025, and A stable CET1 ratio is targeted at 10.5% for 2025.

SUMMARY

Fifth Third Bancorp (NASDAQ:FITB) delivered notable year-over-year profit and revenue growth in Q2 2025, citing diversified loan production and continued momentum in core fee businesses as key contributors. Management highlighted durable deposit cost control, robust capital ratios, and targeted expansion in high-priority geographies such as the Southeast, all of which support forward-looking guidance despite mixed loan utilization trends. The company addressed sector-specific headwinds, including regulatory change and solar lending disruption, but signaled confidence in risk management, credit metrics, and the ability to sustain organic growth and return capital to shareholders.

• CEO Spence emphasized that "M&A is a means to achieve a strategic outcome. It shouldn't be a strategy under itself." reiterating organic growth and density remain primary capital allocation priorities.
• CFO Preston stated, regarding the impact of tax credit changes, "we believe that the dividend net charge-offs have peaked in the second quarter" and anticipate further improvement in subsequent periods.
• Management explained Southeast de novo branches built during 2022-2024 are averaging over $25 million in deposit balances within the first twelve months after opening. noting the branch strategy outpaced expectations.
• Spence described stablecoins as a potential growth area—especially for cross-border payments—while minimizing risk to domestic deposit flows and in-person payments, suggesting increased activity benefits FITB's payments and banking infrastructure role.
• Greg Schroeck reported NPA reductions align with prior visibility, stating that Inflows of NPAs dropped 77% from the previous quarter. reflecting improved credit portfolio performance.
• Preston clarified that credit spreads remained stable, with only occasional "irrational" pricing to defend legacy client accounts.

INDUSTRY GLOSSARY

• Provide: FITB's fintech lending platform focused on healthcare practice finance for medical, dental, and veterinary professionals.
• Dividend: FITB's home improvement and solar lending fintech platform, now adapting product mix in response to federal tax credit changes.
• De novo branches: Newly established bank branches, as opposed to acquired locations, typically in growth markets.
• New Line: FITB's embedded payments business, facilitating instant payments infrastructure for commercial clients.

Full Conference Call Transcript

Tim Spence: Thanks, Matt, and good morning, everyone. At Fifth Third, we believe great banks distinguish themselves not by how they perform in benign environments, but rather by how they navigate uncertain ones. In a period of tariff negotiations, cross currents in interest rates, and significant regulatory change, Fifth Third continues to deliver excellent profitability, strong credit trends, and accelerating revenue growth. This morning, we reported earnings per share of $0.88 or $0.90, excluding certain items outlined on Page two of the release. Exceeding consensus estimates, adjusted revenues grew by 6% year over year, led by 7% growth in NII. Adjusted PPNR increased 10%. We delivered 250 basis points of positive operating leverage, our third consecutive quarter of positive operating leverage.

Our key profitability metrics continue to be very strong, and among the best of all peers who have reported thus far. Our adjusted return on assets was 1.2%. Our adjusted return on tangible common equity was 18%. And our efficiency ratio was 55.5%. Our credit metrics were strong and improved as we said they would. At 45 basis points, net charge-offs were at the bottom of our guidance range and improved over the prior year. NPAs declined 11% sequentially, led by an 18% decline in commercial NPAs. Early-stage delinquencies declined again and are near historical lows.

As a result of our strong financial performance, and the positioning of our balance sheet, tangible book value per share increased by 18% over the prior year and by 5% sequentially. The strategic investments we have made over the past several years drove our results in the quarter. In a quarter where uneven C&I loan demand and a soft housing market made loan growth tepid for the industry, our diversified loan origination platforms produced average loan growth of 5% over the prior year. We grew loans in the C&I, CRE, leasing, mortgage, home equity, auto, and both our Provide and Dividend fintech platforms. Investments we have made should continue to support strong loan growth in future quarters.

Commercial relationship manager headcount increased by 11% year over year, and Provide had record production in the first half of the year. In our home equity business, we were number two market share in our footprint, and first-half production growth was third best in the country. Both Provide and Home Equity are examples of the benefits we have achieved from digitally enabled lending channels combined with OneBank collaboration. Our investments in the Southeast also continue to produce strong results across business lines. Our consumer bank grew net new households by 6% over the prior year in the Southeast.

The granular deposit growth those households provide has provided flexibility to continue to manage deposit costs even as the Fed paused on rate cuts. In the second quarter, our average cost of consumer and small business deposits in the Southeast was 191 basis points. A 250 basis points plus spread to Fed funds. We have added 10 branches year to date in the Southeast, and we'll open another 40 before year-end. Bringing us to nearly 400 branches across all our Southeast markets. In commercial banking, our Southeast regions have contributed more than half of total middle market loan growth over the past year. With North Carolina, South Carolina, Georgia, and Alabama producing the strongest results.

New middle market relationship production has also accelerated across Southeast where our teams have added 50% more new quality relationships year to date than they did over the same period last year. In wealth management, our Southeast markets grew assets under management by 16% year over year, to nearly $16 billion in total AUM. Advisor headcount is up about 15% in the same markets, which should support future growth. We also continue to see benefits from our investments in innovative, tech-enabled products. In consumer, J.D.

Power recently recognized the Fifth Third mobile app as number one in user satisfaction among regional banks and we also launched an initiative to provide free wills to every Fifth Third customer through an exclusive partnership with FinTech Trust and Will. We will begin to embed AI-enabled functionality into our mobile app in the 30% revenue growth compared to last year, and an increase of more than $1 billion in commercial deposits connected to NewLine services. We continue to win more business from existing clients and to see transaction migration from legacy ACH to modern instant payments rails. During the quarter, Rippling selected NewLine to be their payments infrastructure provider. Joining our existing roster of blue-chip fintech customers.

In my annual letter to shareholders this year, I reminded readers that the global economy is a complex adaptive system, and the complex systems react to change in unexpected ways. These days, we are witnessing a lot of change in a short window of time. While we continue to be hopeful about the prospects for the second half of the year, we are also positioned to perform well in a broad range of environments. Our business mix is naturally resilient, our balance sheet is defensively positioned. And we have the flexibility to react quickly as conditions change.

Bryan will provide more detail on our outlook, but I want to emphasize that we do not need a change in the interest rate environment or a material change in market activity to continue to produce strong profitability and organic growth. We are raising our full-year guidance on NII, given the strong first-half performance. We remain very confident in achieving record NII in 2025, even if there are zero rate cuts for the remainder of the year. We will deliver a 150 to 200 basis points of full-year positive operating leverage even if the capital markets do not recover. Given the strong first-half performance and the expense levers we have at our disposal.

We will resume share repurchases in the third quarter. Our capital priorities continue to be funding organic growth, paying a strong dividend, and share repurchases in that order. Our operating priorities will also remain unchanged. Stability, profitability, and growth in that order. Before I hand it over to Bryan, I want to say thank you to our employees for your dedication to your clients. Your commitment to getting 1% better every day is why Fifth Third was recently recognized by USA Today as a top workplace and by Forbes as best employers for new grads. And I love being part of your team.

With that, Bryan will provide more detail on the quarter and our outlook for the second half of the year.

Bryan Preston: Thanks, Tim. Thank you to everyone joining us today. Our second quarter results again reflect the strength and momentum of our company. On an adjusted basis, revenue increased 6% year over year and 5% on a sequential basis. Our stable and growing NII remains a strong contributor to our performance. We continue to realize the benefits of our diversified balance sheet and business mix, through sustained loan growth, fixed-rate asset repricing, and the flexibility to execute proactive liability management. Our revenue performance combined with our ongoing expense discipline resulted in a 10% increase in pre-provision net revenue and 250 basis points of positive operating leverage on an adjusted basis compared to the second quarter of last year.

Tangible book value per share, inclusive of the impact of AOCI, grew 18% from the prior year. And 5% versus the first quarter. Our investment portfolio philosophy, to focus on bullet and locked-out securities in order to have certainty of cash flows continues to pay off. The unrealized loss in our AFS portfolio improved 6% sequentially. Despite the ten-year treasury rate being a few basis points higher than the prior quarter end. The AFS burn down will continue to benefit tangible book value per share growth as these positions pull to par. Now diving further into the income statement, Net interest income grew 7% from the prior year, and 4% sequentially.

Net interest margin expanded nine basis points sequentially, Broad-based loan growth continued, repricing benefits and deposit cost improvements all contributed to this performance. NII was also favorably impacted by the payoff of the nonperforming loan. Which contributed $14 million to NII. And three basis points to NIM in the quarter. Excluding that payoff impact, NII still grew by 6% from the prior year and 3% sequentially. Which is at the high end of our guided range. This interest realization is an example of our proactive credit management working with our clients to achieve loss minimization through the workout process. As Tim highlighted, our diversified lending platforms continue to support strong balance sheet performance.

Average portfolio loans grew 1% sequentially, while period-end loans were stable. Despite a decrease in commercial utilization. Consumer loans were up 3% on a period-end basis, and 2% on an average basis from the prior quarter. On a period-end basis, we saw growth in every major consumer lending category. Led by continued strength in our secured lending products, such as auto, and home equity lending. Commercial loans increased 1% on an average basis and declined 1% on a period-end basis. As I highlighted in early June, line utilization peaked around April month-end at 37.5%. Post April, have seen a gradual decrease to 36.5% as of June 30.

Approximately 40% of the decrease in line utilization was driven by growth and commitments. In addition to the utilization trend, period-end loans were impacted by a $400 million sequential decrease in commercial construction balances as projects were refinanced into the permanent market. Economic uncertainty impacted client confidence, and resulted in the lowest quarter of commercial loan production over the last year. There were some bright spots, with continued strong production in Chicago, the Carolinas, Georgia, and Alabama. While utilization has impacted balances, commitments continue to grow. Middle market pipelines have also rebounded during the quarter, as our third quarter pipeline is up almost 50% from the prior quarter. Shifting to deposits.

Average core deposits were stable sequentially, as an increase in demand deposits was largely offset by a decrease in interest checking. Our strong liquidity profile continues to provide us with the flexibility to actively manage our overall funding costs while executing tactics to grow granular insured deposits. As a result of these efforts, interest-bearing deposit costs were down three basis points sequentially and 65 basis points over the last year, while we have continued to grow consumer and small business deposits. Which are up 1% versus the prior year. Compared to the first quarter, demand deposit balances were up 3% on an average and end-of-period basis.

This strong core deposit performance has allowed us to pay down over $4 billion of higher-cost non-relationship brokered time deposits over the last two years. We will continue to prioritize high-quality, low-cost retail deposits, particularly in the Southeast with our de novo investments. The most recent vintages of de novos are significantly outperforming expectations. Branches built between 2022 and 2024 are averaging over $25 million in deposit balances within the first twelve months after opening. Significantly outpacing our original expectations. We remain on pace to open 50 branches this year, with 10 opened in the first half. We have now secured approximately 80% of the locations for the additional 200 Southeast branches that we announced in November.

Our deposit success, along with investment portfolio positioning, has allowed us to maintain strong balance sheet liquidity while growing loans and managing deposit costs. We ended the quarter with full category one LCR compliance at a 120% and our loan-to-core-deposit ratio was 76%. Up 1% from the prior quarter. Moving on to fees. Reported noninterest income, was up 8% year over year. These results were impacted by security gains, and the impact of certain items detailed on page four of the release. Excluding the impact of the security gains and the other items, adjusted noninterest income for the quarter increased 3% compared to the same quarter last year.

Led by growth in wealth fees, which grew 4% over the prior year due to AUM growth of $8 billion and consumer banking fees, which were up 6%. Commercial payments fees decreased $2 million due to lower commercial card spend activity and higher earnings credits from increased demand deposit balances. Offsetting the increase in gross fee equivalent. Our embedded payments business, New Line, continued its strong growth with fees up 30%. Deposits attached to new line services increased to $3.7 billion. Up $1.1 billion compared to a year ago period. Capital markets fees were down 3% from the prior year. Primarily due to the continued slowdown in M&A advisory revenue. Bond underwriting and loan syndication activity was strong during June.

And client appetite for transactional activity during stable market periods remains robust. The security gains of $16 million were from the mark-to-market impact of our non-qualified preferred compensation plan, which is offset in compensation expense. Moving to expenses. Adjusted noninterest expense was up 4% compared to the year ago quarter. And decreased 4% sequentially. The sequential comparison is impacted by seasonal items in the first quarter associated with the timing of compensation awards, and payroll taxes. The previously mentioned deferred compensation mark to market increased expenses by $16 million for the quarter. Excluding the impact of the deferred comp mark to market in the quarter and in prior periods, expenses were down 5% sequentially.

And increased 3% compared to the prior year. The year-over-year increase in expense is due to continued investments in technology, branches, and sales personnel partially being offset by the ongoing savings generated by our value stream efficiency programs. Shifting to credit. The net charge-off ratio was 45 basis points at the lower end of our expectations for the quarter. And down one basis point sequentially. Commercial charge-offs were 38 basis points, up three basis points sequentially. Consumer charge-offs were 56 basis points, down seven basis points, primarily due to seasonal improvement in credit performance in auto and credit card. Our NPAs declined 11% sequentially as expected led by an 18% decrease in commercial nonperformers.

The NPA ratio decreased nine basis points sequentially to 72 points. Broad-based credit trends remain stable across industries and geographies, despite the market and economic volatility. Our provision expense for the quarter included a $34 million bill in our allowance for credit losses. This bill was primarily attributable to the deterioration the Moody's macroeconomic scenarios. Which now project a half a percent increase their baseline unemployment rate projections. Which is up to 4.7% by 2027. The scenario-driven increases were partially offset by improvement in the overall risk profile of the portfolio as indicated by the reduction in NPAs.

This increase in reserve build was slightly less than we expected in early June, as utilization trends and commercial construction pay downs impacted period-end loan balances. The reserve build increased our ACL coverage ratio, by two basis points to 2.09%, We made no changes to our scenario weightings during the quarter. Moving to capital. We ended the quarter with a CET1 ratio of 10.6% an increase of 13 basis points consistent with our near term target of 10.5%. Our pro forma CET1 ratio including the AOCI impact of securities, is 8.6% up 60 basis points year over year.

We anticipate continued improvement in the unrealized losses in our securities portfolio given that approximately 63% of the fixed rate securities in our AFS portfolio are in bullet or locked out structures. Which provides a high degree of certainty to our principal cash flow expectations. Moving to our current outlook. With the continued momentum from the second quarter, we remain confident in our ability to achieve record NII and full year positive operating leverage approaching 2%. We now expect full year NII to increase to 5.5% to 6.5% up from our earlier guide. This outlook uses the forward curve at the July which assumed 25 basis point rate cuts in September, and December.

Due to the resiliency of our balance sheet, we expect to achieve record NII, and our updated full year guide with no further loan growth and no rate cuts. Full year average total loans are expected to be up 5% compared to 2024, with the increase primarily driven by C&I and auto lending production. Our cash position, securities portfolio, and commercial line utilization should remain relatively stable throughout the remainder of 2025. Full year adjusted noninterest income is expected to be up one to 2% as the muted capital market trends are offset by continued growth in other fee categories.

We now expect full year adjusted noninterest expense to be up two to two and a half percent compared to 2024. We will continue to execute our growth plan. With Southeast branch bills and Salesforce additions in middle market, commercial payments, and wealth. In total, our guide implies full year adjusted revenue, to be up 4% to 4.5% and PPNR to grow around 7%. Moving to credit. We are tightening the range for full year net charge offs, to 43 to 47 basis points. The timing of charge offs for individual credit may impact a particular quarter, but the midpoint of our full year expectation remains consistent with our beginning of the year guide.

Moving to our outlook for the third quarter. We expect NII to be up 1% from the second quarter due to the benefits from fixed rate asset repricing and day count. We expect average total loan balances to be stable to up 1% due to strengthening C&I pipelines, and continued broad based momentum in consumer loans. Excluding the impact of the security gains, we expect adjusted noninterest income to be up one to 4%. Third quarter adjusted noninterest expense is expected to be up 1% compared to the second quarter as we continue to invest. We expect third quarter charge offs to again be in the 45 to 49 basis point range. Turning to capital.

We will continue to target our CET1 ratio, at 10.5% Based on our current projections for balance sheet growth, we expect to repurchase 4 to $500 million of stock during the remainder of 2025. We continue to prioritize organic loan growth over share repurchases, in order to deliver the best long term returns for our shareholders. In summary, we expect to maintain our momentum in the second half of the year. And achieve record NII, positive operating leverage, and strong returns in an uncertain environment. All while continuing to invest for the long term. With that, let me turn it over to Matt to open up the call for Q&A.

Matt Curoe: Thanks, Bryan. Before we start Q&A, given the time we have this morning, we ask that you limit yourself to one question and one follow-up. And then return to the queue if you have additional questions. Operator? Please open the call for Q&A.

Operator: Press star. Then the number one on your telephone keypad. To withdraw your question, your first question comes from Ebrahim Poonawala with Bank of America. Please go ahead.

Ebrahim Poonawala: Hey. Good morning. Morning. I guess maybe Tim just thinking about capital allocation. So her Bryan talk about the buyback appetite for the back half of the year. But just talk to us around how you're thinking about deployment of capital. Clearly, we saw one of your competitors announce a bank deal earlier this week. Like, any sense of, like, strategically, even if we think about and bank M&A picking up, are there characteristics, be it size, be it market of a bank that we should be thinking about as shareholders of what we could buy? I mean, any perspective would be helpful. Thank you.

Tim Spence: Yeah. Great. Great question. So you know, I think from my point of view, the capital priorities of the bank are always gonna be organic growth first because a, organic growth is completely within our control. And b, the thing that makes you a good acquirer is the ability to run your core business effectively.

So the priority here is always gonna be to run the company to gain share on an organic basis and to make sure that there's adequate capital available to that in addition to that we provide that stable and over time growing dividend and that we're able to support the you know, the capital return to investors in periods where we have excess capital through share repurchases. I wasn't surprised to see the announcement earlier this week. I think I've said for a while that there was going to be more consolidation, like the I think the banking sector in The US is the least consolidated industry. And our banking sector is the least consolidated banking sector in the world.

So there is gonna continue to be more of that. What I know to be true though is that M&A is a means to achieve a strategic outcome. It shouldn't be a strategy under itself. There is an industrial logic to scale that I think holds in all sectors. But it's not just any kind of scale. Like, know, if you imagine us as being a in a military conflict where we had to fight an enemy that was 10 times our size. Would never march out into an open field. Single file, and try to face a larger army. You would pick your spots, You would try to use the terrain to your advantage. You'd get dense.

And you'd obviate the scale advantages that the competitor has. And if you think about the structure of the banking system in The US, I think that is the way to think about how you win. You know. We're gonna be way more successful building 350 branches in a single region in The US. We would be if we built three or four branches in the 100 largest cities. In The US. So the focus for us is always gonna be on density, It's gonna be on the ability to drive organic growth by spreading the cost of customer acquisition across multiple product lines.

So the relationship value that you get from the ability to deliver a broad range of products and services to customers is really important, to us. And it's always gonna be focused on ensuring that you have a sort of continuity in, people say, culture, but really in the mode of how you your business because there just are a lot of things out there that operate very differently than we do. So I think appetite's the same. We wouldn't have much conviction if one deal announcement changed. Our outlook on all on how to deploy capital. But the focus is gonna be on delivering our strategy in the mode that is most effective for shareholders.

Ebrahim Poonawala: That's good color. Thank you. And I guess maybe just a separate question. As we think about, you know, obviously, your charge off range narrowed, but as we think about the impact of the tax bill on the solar residential solar panel industry, Just give us how you are handicapping any potential risk tied to your exposure. And the business strategy from here going forward? At dividend? Thank you.

Bryan Preston: Yes. Ebrahim, it's Bryan. Thanks for the question. I guess, first, to just recap what's happened. The tax bill eliminated the tax credits on the residential solar lending business, starting in January. Now so what does that mean for us? First, this has no impact on our existing solar portfolio. Our customers have already earned their tax credits, so no impact on them. From a credit perspective, we believe that the dividend net charge offs have peaked in the second quarter. And as you can see from our NPA and delinquency trends in the first half of the year, the risk profile of the solar portfolio continues to improve.

All the enhancements we've done to this business that we've made to our platform from the installer management program, installer biller coverage, joint borrower, collections enhancements. It's all helped to drive this credit improvement. We expect net solar charge offs to decrease 15% to 20% in the third quarter from the second quarter level and decrease again in 2026 by another 15 to 20%. Next, the tax bill will impact future originations. As the tax credit associated with the residential solar leasing product was extended, to the end of 2027. This will create an uneven playing field in the solar finance industry for about two years. We expect the leased panel volume to increase solar loans will decrease significantly.

As a result, we think that our 2026 solar originations are probably down 70 to percent from 2025 levels. While we were hopeful to have a level playing field in 2020 where both products were treated equally, we'll at least see that occur in 2028. Now how are we responding? We've been innovating to create a home equity product that we expect to launch in the 2026 on the Dividend platform. While this product will not have a tax credit, it'll allow borrowers to own their solar panels and generate tax deductible interest. Which should matter to some homeowners. Home equity product will also improve Fifth Third's collateral position from a UCC to a second lien.

This product should also be appealing for other home improvement projects. So while we believe the solar originations will be down in 2026, with the new home equity product combined with other enhancements we've made to in our dividend home improvement lending platform, we expect continued growth of our dividend loans in the low single digits next year.

Tim Spence: Yeah. Just to put a point on one of the things Bryan said strategically. Ebrahim, The interest we had in home improvement as a category predates the by several years. It's since it's always been a home equity bank. But we also did the partnership with GreenSky back in 2015 or 2016. I remember when it was. And I think what we learned as we spent time in home improvement is that the place that banks can play uniquely is in relative to fincos and nonbank lenders. Is in the larger more complex home improvement programs, things that are require multiple draws or that involve a prime and a series of subs.

And that what the fintechs can do in those markets is to finance the windows or the doors They can't finance the whole kitchen. Right? Like, a full renovation. And so what we like about Dividend, in addition to believing in the importance of distributed power generation and storage, which by the way, we still believe is an important part of the way that gonna solve the energy demand that we have in The US. The fact that solar is one of the most complex home improvement installations between the need for their reinforced of the roofing, the installation of the panels, the high voltage electrical. And then working with the power companies to get permission to operate.

It's gonna provide a really nice exoskeleton. That's always been the dream to be able to deliver home equity to a broader range of projects. And in fact, today, even prior to the sort of expected reduction in solar volumes that Bryan mentioned, like, five, 30% of new originations are home improvement, non solar related. So there is a good core business. What is gonna happen is the origination volumes are gonna fall. So I think our view is the dividends probably are gonna grow in line with the balance sheet as opposed to growing at a faster rate on a go forward basis. Meaning, call it low to mid single digits. As a point of focus for us.

But as Bryan said, the credit trends are incredibly encouraging. And I think they underline the comments that we've been making about focusing on the best quality installers and on super prime credit. So we're just not seeing the deterioration that, you know, folks who were full spectrum lenders have had to struggle with.

Ebrahim Poonawala: Very comprehensive. Thank you both.

Operator: Your next question comes from Scott Siefers with Piper Sandler. Please go ahead.

Scott Siefers: Good morning, guys. Thanks for taking the question. Bryan, wanted to ask on the margin improvement. You know, even if we adjust for the benefit of the NPA that you discussed in your prepared remarks, Much better than you had articulated might be the case earlier this year. So, you know, I think we can see on slide five kinda what's what's happening between quarters. But I guess just in your view, what's coming in better than you might have anticipated earlier this year, and what are we thinking about the pace of, improvement opportunity going ahead or looking ahead?

And then I guess the follow ups, I was hoping you might be able in your response, to sort of address what you see as competitive dynamics on both the loan and deposit sides, you know, rational, irrational, etcetera.

Bryan Preston: Yeah. Thanks, Scott. Great question. You know, I would tell you the big thing that I think was the out performance item outside of the NPA payoff was the DDA performance we've seen. You know, we were expecting to be able to transition back the growth mode on DDA now that the interest rate environment has been stable for a period of time. But we saw really strong performance this quarter. That certainly was a big driver of our success. We continue to feel really good about our ability to have gotten cost out of our deposit book while continuing to improve the composition.

I think that's probably an underappreciated thing about what we've been able to do over the last year, just how much we've been able to strengthen the deposit base especially with growth in the consumer small business sector. From a NIM perspective, continue to feel like we did earlier this year, which is, you know, two to three basis points of NIM improvement each quarter driven by fixed rate asset repricing continuing as well as loan growth. It's really just gonna be kind of the core blocking and tackling and improvement of the business over time. So nothing, nothing dramatic there.

And you said, if we adjust for the three bps from the interest recovery, we'd be more in line with the three o. The three zero nine NIM. And that three bps a quarter puts right where we expected to be at the end of the year in that kind of mid teens range. Of three fifteen ish feels right still very achievable. So feel very good about the trajectory from here. From a competitive landscape perspective, you know, our industry is always very competitive. I don't think I would actually really call out much that we're seeing on either the loan or the deposit side at this point.

Spreads look in line with what we've been seeing over the last six to twelve months across almost every asset class on the lending side. Mhmm. And deposit competition has been very, very rational, and we've seen great success in continuing to be able to find growth in the right pockets and improving the deposit base. Perfect.

Scott Siefers: Alright. Good. Thank you very much, Bryan.

Operator: Next question comes from Ryan Nash with Goldman Sachs.

Ryan Nash: Good morning, everyone.

Tim Spence: Hey. Long time listener, first time caller. Is this sports radio talk? I wish.

Ryan Nash: Tim, maybe outside of the movement in utilization, you know, we're obviously seeing signs of loan growth improving. You talked about know, investments to support loan growth. Lenders up 11%, outlook sounds upbeat. So maybe just talk more specifically about your expectations for loan growth. And as you're out to corporates, do you feel they've gotten confident enough to start making big investment decisions and borrowing more? Thank you. And I have a follow-up.

Tim Spence: Yeah. Yeah. Great question. So let me take it by category. I think on the consumer side of the equation, the thing that gives us confidence is the diversity of the loan origination platforms. We've got. Right?

You know, we have long been believers that while residential mortgage is really important, product for us to offer to consumers, it wasn't a great balance sheet asset, and the byproduct of that is between we're able to do in home improvement, what will be continued expansion in home equity, which has been an important driver of our growth, and the fact that the risk adjusted spreads in the auto business are great, right now I we just feel very confident in our ability to continue to generate what will be broad based know, market plus a point or two sort of growth out of the consumer side. Of the business.

And that provides a lot of ballast for us as you look at the uncertainty that exist in the corporate. I mean, the positives when you talk to customers, on the commercial side of the equation at the moment, are one, there is a sort of general belief that as we continue to now uncertainty around trade and the tariff levels, that there's a value to them in running with a little bit extra inventory and that supports utilization. We're not seeing the big buys that we saw in the first quarter that drove up utilization.

For us, but we do hear from clients that they, at the moment, are preferring to run long balance with a little bit more inventory than they otherwise would carried just to compensate for any short term disruptions and supply chain. Second, the bonus the accelerated depreciation schedule on capital equipment. It is in some pockets in our customer base generating real interest in replacing equipment. It felt last year and the second half of the year in particular, like The US was underinvested a little bit in capital equipment purchases.

We heard from clients who had rental businesses, like yellow metal rental businesses, and otherwise, that there had been a big boom in rental demand as people tried to buy time. To ensure that they got the benefit of the taxes. So I think that is a positive catalyst You know, the element that just hasn't come through, and that's reflected in middle M&A activity everywhere is the M&A driven demand. And at some point, there should be a little bit of a capitulation where either the sellers accept that with higher interest rates being maybe a more permanent phenomenon that they need to accede to, you know, buyer pricing expectations.

Or you have buyers who have been patient who conclude that this is the time to go. Know? But that's really the third leg of the stool. Between the capital purchases, the inventories. And then eventually some M&A.

Ryan Nash: Got it. And given your comments from before, you know, you talked about identifying 80% of the locations in the Southeast, 150 to 200 basis points of operating leverage. Guess, given the success that you're seeing in your business plus the success in the Southeast, does it make sense to accelerate your efforts here from an organic perspective? And just how are you thinking about the pacing of your growth initiatives from here? Thank you.

Tim Spence: Yeah. Think somewhere Jamie Leonard is grinning like a Cheshire. Cat right now because we have been running, like, what the years that I was the head of the consumer many years ago, the best we were ever able to do was to open 25 or 30 branches in any individual year. And they're running at a pace of 50 to a year. At this stage. So we have doubled the effort there. The other thing that we've invested in, we haven't spent a lot of time talking about.

Is a big boost in the sophistication of our direct capabilities, which then support that there's a way that we bootstrap the de novos and, you know, get a lot of early growth in terms of households and deposit balances. So we are accelerating the investments in those markets to the that we find a way to build 65 a year, I would love it. It's just what we have been unwilling to do is to compromise on the quality of the locations. And there then is nothing that we can do as it relates to the pacing on getting through local zoning jurisdictions.

And otherwise, So if, you know, if we have the ability to get 60 done a year, we're gonna get 60 done a year for certain.

Ryan Nash: It. Thanks for taking the question. Yep.

Operator: Your next question comes from the line of Gerard Cassidy. Please go ahead.

Thomas Leddy: Hi. Good morning. This is Thomas Leddy standing in for Gerard.

Tim Spence: Hey,

Thomas Leddy: Given all the recent headlines, can you just give us your thoughts on stablecoins and how broader adoption could impact both your payments business and deposit level

Tim Spence: Yep. Yep. Happy, happy to do that. I'm I happen to be pretty excited about the prospects. For stablecoins. But maybe not in the same places that are getting a lot of the headlines these days. We have a little bit of an advantage here in that we've banked a couple of the largest infrastructure providers to the crypto and the stable coin sector for a few years now. And we've been able to watch the use cases that have evolved on those platforms and get a sense for it. We also have a kind of an interesting asset that a lot of the other banks don't have.

In the Newline platform, which is really well architected to be able to support both the sort of payments and the intraday liquidity act to make stable coins work as you know, both stores of value and payment rails. Our interest are one where there are companies that have the compliance infrastructure and the operational robustness. To bank them. And there are things that we that we will do there, whether it relates to reserve accounts or payment rails. And otherwise, then secondarily, as a user of stable coins, I think in particular and some of the cross border payments and then cross platform settlement. Applications that are out there.

Banks like us, who are US domestic banks have been outsourcing that sort of cross border payment activity to correspondent banks. That's a greenfield, and anything that we can do even if it's disruptive in terms of the margins. Is a net positive. For us. So I'm I'm I'm quite excited about that as a potential use case for our clients. I think the thing that's gotten a lot of the attention that I just don't believe in is the risk that stablecoins pose or don't pose to point of sale payments and to domestic payments in general.

And I think the reason that the media has been wrong on this one is that there's been such a focus on the cost of the credit card acceptance. When cash checks, ACH, and debit are all already price competitive and all already basically universally you know, accepted. So the reason that people accept credit cards is because consumers wanna use credit cards. And the reason consumers wanna use credit cards is because they either need the liquidity that the credit line provides or because they want the rewards. And the stable coin rails today don't offer either of those features.

And if they get added, gonna have to increase the cost of acceptance, you know, in order to offset the cost of providing the liquidity. Or the, you know, the cash back rewards or otherwise, So, you know, stable coins in markets with unstable central banks are not a broad based banking system. You know, absolutely an interesting application internationally. Stable going stable coins for cross border payment, or for collateral on different exchanges. Interesting use case. Domestic payments, you know, I think there's probably more smoke than fire on that one right now.

Thomas Leddy: Mhmm. Okay. Thank you. That's helpful color. And then just lastly, it appears, you know, expected regulatory relief for the industry will potentially have a pretty big impact on at least the money center banks evidenced by the recent stress test results and their resulting stress capital buffers. You just share your thoughts on the potential benefits specifically for Fifth Third from the expected regulatory relief, you know, we might see over the next year or so?

Tim Spence: Yeah. Absolutely. I, think if you asked the Tim Spence from 2023 or 2024, If I would regret not voluntarily submitting to an additional stress test, I would have thought that you were crazy. But I at the at the moment, I wish that all banks had undergone the stress test this last time around because it probably would've helped you all to understand the benefits that will accrete to regional banks. In addition to the big money center. Guys, the stress testing relief is gonna be for everybody. The opacity of that process and the models that were used are just not helpful, and we're believers that transparency is a good thing.

And I think you saw that you know, potential upside that the regional banks will get in the form of capital from, you know, more rational scenarios and better tuned models and otherwise. And I expect us to see a benefit from that. We obviously will benefit from the a step away from gold plating on Basel three, from you know, a sort of a more risk based view of the liquidity rules that were originally proposed. And I have been quite encouraged by governor Bowman's speeches. As it relates to the evolutions in the super supervisory approach. Across the bank regulators.

And then lastly, you already mentioned it earlier, but that was an encouraging sign that one of our peers announced the M&A transaction and expected a six month approval and close. Like, that's evidence of a you know, well oiled regulatory review process. All that said, just want everybody to remember that there's another side to this, which is not just the banks that are seeing regulatory relief. There are a lot of nonbanks. Competitors who also have a lot of influence in Washington. Some of whom is a category gave 10 times. In this last election cycle, what all banks in total gave and who as a result you know, are influential in policy making circles.

And they wanna do a lot of the things that either banks have traditionally done or to have access to things that you know, banks have traditionally only had access to without being banks. So there's a lot of work that we are continuing to try to do on Washington just to make sure that there's a balanced view on what a level playing field looks like. I'm I would love to see more de novo charters approved because that would mean that the competitors that we have to face in the in the field every day are playing by the same set of rules.

That we are But that, you know, it we that there is gonna be a balance. There's gonna be relief for us and increased competition.

Thomas Leddy: Okay. Great. Thank you for the color, and thank you for taking my questions.

Operator: Your next question comes from Erika Najarian with UBS. Please go ahead.

Erika Najarian: Hi. Good morning. Good morning. Brad, had a few questions just on you know, balance sheet mix from here, and I'm looking at sort of the period end data, the period end data looked a little bit soft for commercial and very strong for consumer. Given, Tim, and your comments about commercial clients and activity levels for the second half of the year, should we expect that mix of growth to change? Or is there a dynamic where you can continue to see strong consumer growth in the back half of the year in addition to a pickup in C&I growth.

Bryan Preston: No. I would expect I would act actually expect to see a pretty balanced growth in the second half of the year, Erika. Certainly, the utilization trends which we had a very strong fourth quarter and first quarter, and it was one of the things that I think we've talked about previously, which was you know, hey, there is a risk that you could see a little bit of a pullback. We do think that we continue to hear that inventory builds was a significant theme for the utilization pickup, and that has certainly reversed some. But we still feel good about growth from here. It's part the reason why we actually increased our full year average balance loan guide.

Because of the strength that we're seeing. I mentioned in prepared remarks that pipelines in commercial were up 50%. They're actually pipelines are now in line where pipelines were a year ago, and that led to a pretty strong, end of the year last year. So even though that little bit of a pullback in utilization as well as the couple pay downs that we saw in commercial construction. We feel we still feel pretty positive that we're gonna be able to see some nice commercial growth in the second half to supplement what we think is gonna be continued broad based growth from a consumer perspective.

Erika Najarian: Okay. And to that end, if the consumer is still solid and you're seeing that acceleration based on the pipeline. I'm wondering about your deposit strategy or funding strategy in the second half of the year. I mean, clearly, your demand deposit momentum is strong. Total deposits were down a smidge or flat I guess, like, you know, as we think about the second half of the year, how are you balancing optimizing your mix versus gathering more deposits for funding Or do you have enough cash? I think it's $13 billion at period end that could help fund that incremental loan growth And sorry for the compound question.

Would it be then for deposit costs in the second half of the year?

Bryan Preston: Yeah. We're we're at this point, we're we feel very good about our balance. Sheet positioning, and we are going to be focused on continuing to be core deposit funded. We've done what we've needed to do from a rate cut perspective. We do think that while our forecast based off of forward rates assumes three cuts, know, we are somewhat in a higher for longer camp right now, and are definitely more focused on balanced growth. And probably cost stabilization, if not maybe a big point or two higher as we grow. From a from a funding cost perspective, But it's always gonna be dependent on overall what the balance sheet needs.

So we are we do plan to be in a more balance growth mode at this point as long as it's constructive from an NII perspective.

Erika Najarian: Got it. Thank you.

Operator: Your next question comes from Mike Mayo with Wells Fargo. Please go ahead.

Mike Mayo: Hey. I'm gonna stick with the, the metaverse, analogy here, and this it's a little bit different. But I'm not really sure which camp you're in. I hear what you're saying, but is commercial loan growth back? To the industry, or is it not back? And I'll let you choose column a or column b here.

Tim Spence: It's back. If you look at the biggest banks, it's back. That's more capital markets.

Mike Mayo: You guide 5% loan growth for the year. That's pretty high. The middle market pipeline's up 50%, as you said. But on the not back column, we've talked about the less commercial loan growth in the second quarter. Others talked about being temporary due to tariffs, that it's relationship banking is muted. Just in time borrowing, you mentioned the utilization down, I guess, 50 basis points core. Extra growth in commitment. And you know, if you're your guide for the year does not imply much growth left. So yeah, you're talking like, hey. Things are back, but then your guide, you're kind of all close to that guide so your flown stone probe much more.

So is loan growth back, or is it not? Or is it still TBD? Thanks.

Tim Spence: Yeah. I appreciate you holding up the mirror, Mike, because if I did say all those things in sequence, I can understand why you're confused. The I think that you hit on a really important point at the beginning there that I just wanna emphasize, and then I'm gonna answer your is it back or is it not back question, which is it depends a little bit on the universe. That you're in. Right? We don't play in the, you know, upper end of the markets businesses. Right? You see activity at the money center banks, at the investment banks, that just doesn't exist in our that's a different universe. Our universe is Main Street, banking.

It's principally privately owned businesses. Or businesses that were privately owned and are now owned by sponsors. And I think in that universe, loan growth is back. It just may not be back at the level that when people said loan growth was gonna be back that everybody thought about. The amount of uncertainty you have to navigate if you are a manufacturer or materials provider is massive in this environment. Like, having spent a lot of time out with clients this quarter, It just I every time I walk away from one of these manufacturing ecosystems, I think to my no way to understand the complexity unless you're involved in it.

Like, a some time with you know, a supplier to apply to the major appliance manufacturers. It's like there's eight or 10 components in any sort of household compliance. There's an assembly and there's a casing. Like, every one of those components is you know, five to 25 parts, whether it's the control panel or the pump or the circuit board or whatever. And something like three quarters of those parts and most appliances are made overseas today. So there's, like, some domestic alternatives in some cases. And where there are domestic alternatives, some have enough capacity like the sheet, the steel, as I understand, as an example.

There's enough capacity to build the external casing from all the appliances that could come back. But if you are a consumer aluminum, like, if we had a 100% you know, of the capacity online for aluminum in The US, we couldn't even meet half the demand. One of our aluminum clients told me the other day, So then yeah. You know, there are places where you could add. But if you're gonna add capacity to The US, you gotta have real confidence in what the tariff levels are gonna be over time. And most of these deals have not been settled out yet.

It you know, and then another case is, like, if you need refrigerant for an HVAC unit or something like that, like, the refining processes are dirty enough that they don't comply with EPA standards, and therefore, gotta rely on China. For stuff like that. So there are good reasons to borrow, and we are seeing people exercise to borrow. But it's in the context of a big cloud with a question mark on how to think about your supply chain, whether it's or component manufacturers. And on what you can push through in, you know, in terms of prices. Because there's a tug of war going on behind the scenes.

With most of the major distribution partners right now on what percentage of any sort of a tariff needs to be absorbed, where in the supply chains. The result is you're seeing people make decisions, but it's not like a wild animal spirits risk on sort of an environment. So do I think that there's a possibility we could do better on the loan growth front? Absolutely. I also think there's a possibility where the second half of the year could be involved in all sorts of uncertainty. And we're not believers in providing guidance we're not able and it requires some market externality to achieve.

Like, we are believers in putting guidance out and putting plans together that we believe we can deliver under a broad range of scenarios. And if the market backdrops better, then it's always easier to scale up. To support more activity than it is to do an online if you are overly optimistic. And it doesn't come through.

Mike Mayo: I guess that goes to your point about you know, changes to complex systems and difficulty and predicting those.

Tim Spence: Like, I thought our world was complex, and then you sit and some of these supply chain discussions, and it's way more hard to difficult to sort of take apart than an alco meeting. It's a third Got it. Alright. Thank you so much. Thank you.

Operator: Your next question comes from Chris McGratty with KBW. Please go ahead.

Chris McGratty: Oh, great. Good morning, everybody. Hey, Chris. Maybe following up on the loan growth. I mean, any comments on credit spreads? Are you've seen a lot of peers talk a little bit more optimistically about growth in the quarter. What have you seen, if anything, on credit spreads?

Bryan Preston: Hey, Chris. It's Bryan. Credit spreads have actually been stable. You know, in general, we're seeing spreads that in line with what we've seen, honestly, for the last handful of quarters. So nothing that we would call out on that front. Mean, the only thing that we're seeing from time to time is that some folks are getting a little bit irrational on protecting house accounts. Every now and then, and it's more about defending business. Versus seeing unreasonable credit spreads as people are trying to grow.

Chris McGratty: Okay. Perfect. And then my follow-up would be on credit, you know, the improvement in classifieds and nonaccruals this quarter and tightened up the charge off guide. The back half of the year, I mean, maybe a little bit more detail on what you're seeing in the resolution process. That gives you confidence, borrower conversations, know, inflow activity, stuff like that would be great.

Greg Schroeck: Yeah. Thanks. It's Greg. So we I would put the NPA reduction that's in talked about. Kind of in the category of doing what we said. We said last quarter, we had good visibility into the resolution of 40% of our commercial NPAs. Over the next few quarters We hit 18% of that this quarter, and I feel good about our ability to hit 40% over the next couple of quarters based on what based on what we're seeing. I think to your question too, not only did we make great progress on the existing NPAs, our inflows of NPAs dropped 77% from last quarter. So we're not seeing the inflows that we that we had the prior quarter.

So it's it's a good reflection of improved overall credit performance. And just our ongoing proactive portfolio management.

Chris McGratty: Very helpful. Thanks a lot.

Operator: Your next question comes from Steve Alexopoulos with TD Cowen. Please go ahead.

Steve Alexopoulos: Hi, everybody.

Tim Spence: Hey.

Steve Alexopoulos: Tim, I wanna go wanna go back to your not on this table. Gotta ask quite a bit here is, what does it mean to Fifth Third customers? Right? Stripe, who's talking about adopting their own stable point potentially What does it mean for business Right? Do you stick it as relevant to a company like that if they have their own stable coin. Could you unpack that for us?

Tim Spence: Yeah. That the I mean, the narrow answer is for a company like a Stripe, right, or a company like a Fireblock, or some of these others that we are have been fortunate to do business with, The propagation of these technologies is a good thing, and it probably, on balance, creates more business opportunity for Fifth Third. K? Because the in order to buy a stable coin, you have to on ramp currency from fiat and we're in that business. And in order to convert a stable coin back into a dollar post transaction, you have to off ramp it and we're in that business.

And you gotta be able to hold the value on the reserve account somewhere and manage intraday and liquidity, so the minting and burning of coins throughout the day. And we're a good provider of instant payments, rails. That, you know, they that they essentially can develop directly into their existing code base. You don't have a recon process that has to get done the way that you would you know, if you were using some other infrastructure. So I think that is an encouraging.

What I will say though is if you look at the Stripe, and you look at the, you know, the Robin Hoods and some of the others who have been more vocal and active about what they would do with stable coins. A lot of the focus is still on cross border activity. Right? Stripe gets both bills and collects payments from companies all over the world, and then has to pay for hosting and a variety of services and all sorts of jurisdictions around the world.

That's the perfect sort of an ecosystem for a stable coin because you can move currency on chain and then transacting it instantaneously or near instantaneously across borders in places where there isn't interoperability in the domestic payment schemes today. So I think I'm I'm quite optimistic about what that means for us. The wild card would be if you saw people move money out of banks and into stable coins in the US, for domestic payments or domestic cash management. That feels highly unlikely to me. We have digital money that provides it you know, a yield, which stablecoins don't in the form of all of these online banks. And money market funds that already exist.

And we have low cost you know, ubiquitous and, you know, it's already embedded in the instant or near instant payment schemes that you know, if there's a sort of a good enough task that you have to run on this stuff.

Steve Alexopoulos: Got it. Okay. That was my question. Thank you.

Tim Spence: Great. I think I'm I'm go ahead. I was gonna say I understand from math that was the last of our questions. And before we wanna close it out, I just wanna give a quick shout out to our friends at Skyline Chili down the road who were just named the best regional restaurant chain in The US. Just lends more evidence to my belief that the best regional businesses bloom in Cincinnati. So congratulations, guys.

Matt Curoe: Thanks, Tim. And thanks, Tiffany. And thanks, everyone, for your interest in Fifth Third. Please contact the investor relations department if you have any follow-up questions. Tiffany, you may now disconnect the call.

Operator: Ladies and gentlemen, that concludes today's call. Thank you all for joining. You may now disconnect.

Where to invest $1,000 right now

When our analyst team has a stock tip, it can pay to listen. After all, Stock Advisor’s total average return is 1,059%* — a market-crushing outperformance compared to 180% for the S&P 500.

They just revealed what they believe are the 10 best stocks for investors to buy right now, available when you join Stock Advisor.

See the stocks »

*Stock Advisor returns as of July 14, 2025

This article is a transcript of this conference call produced for The Motley Fool. While we strive for our Foolish Best, there may be errors, omissions, or inaccuracies in this transcript. Parts of this article were created using Large Language Models (LLMs) based on The Motley Fool's insights and investing approach. It has been reviewed by our AI quality control systems. Since LLMs cannot (currently) own stocks, it has no positions in any of the stocks mentioned. As with all our articles, The Motley Fool does not assume any responsibility for your use of this content, and we strongly encourage you to do your own research, including listening to the call yourself and reading the company's SEC filings. Please see our Terms and Conditions for additional details, including our Obligatory Capitalized Disclaimers of Liability.

The Motley Fool has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.