Intel Might Be Quitting the AI Training Market for Good

Key Points

• Intel scaled back its AI accelerator ambitions earlier this year.

• The company now appears to be refocusing on AI inference, admitting that Nvidia's lead is just too great.

• Intel could find success in this portion of the AI market, but a turnaround is going to take time.

• 10 stocks we like better than Intel ›

Intel (NASDAQ: INTC) has already pulled back on its effort to directly compete with Nvidia in the AI accelerator market. The company's Gaudi line of AI chips held promise, but immature software and an unfamiliar architecture ultimately doomed Intel's flagship AI offerings. The company later axed Falcon Shores, which was meant to succeed Gaudi 3 as a more traditional GPU, instead shifting its focus to rack-level solutions.

Reporting from The Oregonian suggests that Intel may now be pulling back further. In a recent broadcast to employees, CEO Lip-Bu Tan laid out some hard truths as the company embarks on a turnaround plan. One statement seems to put a nail in the coffin for Intel's AI chip efforts: "On training I think it is too late for us." Tan noted that Nvidia's market position was too strong to catch up.

Where to invest $1,000 right now? Our analyst team just revealed what they believe are the 10 best stocks to buy right now. Learn More »

Image source: Getty Images.

AI is still an opportunity for Intel

There are two distinct markets for AI accelerators. First, there's AI training, which uses powerful GPUs and mountains of data to train AI models in a computationally intensive process. The Grok 3 AI model from xAI used a cluster of 100,000 Nvidia H100 GPUs for training. Nvidia dominates the market for AI training chips, in part because its data center GPUs are the most powerful available.

Second, there's AI inference. Once an AI model has been trained, inference is the process of using that trained model. For the most advanced AI models running in cloud data centers, inference still requires extremely powerful GPUs with lots of ultra-fast memory. For smaller AI models, less powerful hardware can be more than sufficient.

Tan is right: At this point, there's probably no chance Intel will catch up in the AI training market. However, AI inference could ultimately be an even larger opportunity. Cloudflare, a leading edge-computing provider, has been predicting that inference would be a larger market than training in the long run. Cloudflare offers a variety of smaller AI models through its platform, and it can get away with using older, less powerful AI accelerators while still providing acceptable response times for its users.

AI inference, as well as agentic AI, will be Intel's focus from here on out, according to Tan. Speaking about agentic AI, Tan said: "That's an area that I think is emerging, coming up very big and we want to make sure that we capture." AI chips in edge data centers and directly inside devices like PCs designed to run fully trained AI models are areas where Intel could still win.

Some companies are pushing toward smaller, more efficient AI models capable of being run on cheaper hardware. IBM recently previewed its Granite 4.0 Tiny AI model, which will be capable of running on consumer-grade GPUs that cost just a few hundred dollars rather than data center GPUs that can cost tens of thousands of dollars. Selling AI chips that can run these types of models efficiently could be a huge market opportunity for Intel.

Unanswered questions

One big unknown right now is whether Intel will continue developing rack-scale AI solutions. The company previously stated that it would focus on Jaguar Shores, originally meant to succeed the now-defunct Falcon Shores, in the context of a rack-scale AI solution. It's unclear if Tan's statements mean that Intel is giving up on Jaguar Shores, or if Tan still sees rack-scale AI solutions as a viable market for the company.

Either way, it seems that Intel is refocusing its AI efforts on inference and largely ceding the AI training market to Nvidia and AMD. Given where Intel is today, this new strategy makes sense. However, as Tan noted in his communication with employees, a turnaround for Intel is going to be a "marathon."

Should you invest $1,000 in Intel right now?

Before you buy stock in Intel, consider this:

The Motley Fool Stock Advisor analyst team just identified what they believe are the 10 best stocks for investors to buy now… and Intel wasn’t one of them. The 10 stocks that made the cut could produce monster returns in the coming years.

Consider when Netflix made this list on December 17, 2004... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you’d have $680,559!* Or when Nvidia made this list on April 15, 2005... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you’d have $1,005,670!*

Now, it’s worth noting Stock Advisor’s total average return is 1,053% — a market-crushing outperformance compared to 180% for the S&P 500. Don’t miss out on the latest top 10 list, available when you join Stock Advisor.

See the 10 stocks »

*Stock Advisor returns as of July 15, 2025

Timothy Green has positions in Intel and International Business Machines. The Motley Fool has positions in and recommends Advanced Micro Devices, Cloudflare, Intel, International Business Machines, and Nvidia. The Motley Fool recommends the following options: short August 2025 $24 calls on Intel. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.