Autodesk (ADSK) Q3 2026 Earnings Call Transcript

Image source: The Motley Fool.

Date

Tuesday, Nov. 25, 2025 at 5:00 p.m. ET

Call participants

• President and Chief Executive Officer — Andrew Anagnost
• Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer — Janesh Moorjani

Need a quote from a Motley Fool analyst? Email pr@fool.com

Takeaways

• Total Revenue -- Increased 18% as reported and in constant currency in the third quarter, with approximately $124 million attributed to the new transaction model.
• Normalized Revenue Growth -- 12% in constant currency in the third quarter, excluding new transaction model impact.
• Billings -- Rose 21% as reported and 20% in constant currency in the third quarter; $135 million contributed by the new transaction model.
• Normalized Billings Growth -- 16% in constant currency, excluding new transaction model impact.
• Remaining Performance Obligations (RPO) -- Total RPO reached $7.4 billion; current RPO at $4.8 billion, both growing 20% with tailwinds from the new transaction model.
• Operating Margins -- GAAP operating margin stood at 25%, up approximately 330 basis points year-over-year; non-GAAP margin at 38%, a 120 basis point improvement.
• Free Cash Flow -- Third-quarter free cash flow totaled $430 million, benefiting from earlier billings and reduced cash tax payments.
• Share Repurchase Activity -- 1.2 million shares repurchased for $361 million in the third quarter; year-to-date repurchases at 3.7 million shares worth $1.07 billion.
• Updated Full-Year Guidance -- Fiscal 2026 billings guidance raised to $7.465 billion-$7.525 billion; fiscal 2026 revenue guidance increased to $7.15 billion-$7.165 billion; fiscal 2026 non-GAAP operating margin outlook now ~37.5% (or ~40.5% underlying); fiscal 2026 free cash flow guidance raised to $2.26 billion-$2.29 billion.
• Share Buyback Outlook -- Full-year share repurchases expected to reach $1.3 billion, a 50% increase over the prior fiscal year and at the high end of earlier guidance.
• AI Adoption Metrics -- Since launch, the AI-driven sketch auto constraint in Fusion has delivered over 2.6 million constraints; commercial user acceptance rates now exceed 60%, with 90% of those sketches fully constrained.
• Direct Revenue Growth -- Direct channel revenue grew 85%, driven by the Autodesk store and the scaling new transaction model.
• Go-to-Market Optimization -- Operational friction from the new transaction model is easing, and partners have completed first annual renewals under the system, with ongoing progress cited.
• Enterprise Business Agreement (EBA) Renewals -- Q4 is set for the largest EBA and product subscription renewal cohort of the year, with high customer engagement observed in Q3.

Summary

Management articulated that Autodesk (NASDAQ:ADSK) raised its full-year guidance for billings, revenue, operating margin, free cash flow, and share repurchases, highlighting underlying strength despite macroeconomic uncertainty. Executives emphasized that both revenue and billings growth benefited materially from the new transaction model and the transition to annual billings for multiyear contracts, creating tailwinds that will diminish in the next fiscal year. Strategic focus areas included acceleration of cloud-based design and make workflows, ecosystem integration for monetization, and ongoing AI feature deployment to drive user productivity and future revenue streams.

• Executive leadership confirmed no macro-driven changes in customer spending patterns, while certain sectors such as data centers and industrial saw elevated investment.
• CEO Anagnost stated, "Our goal is to decrease the number of people that are working on a particular project but increase the number of projects that our customers and our ecosystem are working on," underscoring a dual monetization strategy tied to both human and machine-based execution.
• Fusion adoption success stories and benchmarks showed measurable time savings compared to competitors, with one use case where Fusion completed a prototyping machining task in twelve hours, which is ten and fifteen days faster than competitive solutions.
• The updated partner incentive structure aims to shift compensation toward new business generation, with no significant behavioral changes observed in the channel to date.
• CFO Moorjani explained that "operating leverage and ongoing cost discipline" were primary drivers of margin expansion, although cloud and AI workloads are expected to be accretive to gross profit while posing a headwind to gross margin as they scale.
• Autodesk Construction Cloud continued to gain new customers and project migrations, with management noting low overall penetration and significant "additional expansion just driven by the power of our value prop."

Industry glossary

• AECO: Architecture, Engineering, Construction, and Operations; an industry segmentation Autodesk targets with its cloud-based and design solutions.
• EBA: Enterprise Business Agreement; large-scale, multi-user subscription contracts with enterprise customers, often renewed on annual cycles.
• ACC: Autodesk Construction Cloud; Autodesk's cloud-based platform supporting construction management and workflow convergence.
• Fusion: Autodesk's integrated platform for 3D CAD, CAM, and CAE, enabling cloud-based product development and manufacturing workflows.
• Forma: A cloud design application, part of Autodesk’s platform focused on data management and collaboration across customer workflows.
• MCP: Likely refers to Managed Cloud Platform or Model Coordination Platform in context; a basis for Autodesk’s cloud and data access APIs for users and AI.

Full Conference Call Transcript

Andrew Anagnost: Thank you, Simon, and welcome everyone to the call. We delivered strong results today with revenue and non-GAAP earnings per share topping the higher end of our guidance ranges. Billings, non-GAAP operating margin, and free cash flow exceeded our expectations. We are again raising our full-year guidance across the board. As demonstrated at Autodesk University, shared during our recent Investor Day, and reflected in our results today, we are well-positioned to deliver for Autodesk customers and investors even in an uncertain geopolitical, macroeconomic, and technological environment. We are successfully executing on the most far-reaching transformations in enterprise software, redefining our business model, go-to-market, products, and platform.

In doing so, we are making Autodesk more resilient and unlocking new avenues for growth and margin expansion. We're enhancing our products with cloud-based capabilities that seamlessly connect design and make workflows to deliver more value to our customers and expanding our addressable market opportunity. We're building a platform with a vibrant third-party ecosystem that will make our solutions more valuable, enable new monetization opportunities, and make Autodesk more efficient. And we're defining the AI revolution for our industries, empowering customers with new tasks, workflow, and systems automations, and capturing shared value subscription, consumption, and outcome-based business models that blend human and machine capabilities. Autodesk is building the future and the path to it.

Our best days and greatest opportunities lie ahead. I've never been more confident in the long-term value we are creating for our customers, the industries that shape the world, and for you, our shareholders. I will now turn the call over to Janesh to discuss our quarterly financial performance and guidance. I'll then come back to update you on our strategic growth initiatives.

Janesh Moorjani: Thanks, Andrew. Q3 was another strong quarter. Overall, the underlying momentum of the business was similar to prior quarters and better than the assumptions we had built into our guidance range. We again saw strength in AECO, where our customers are benefiting from sustained investment in data centers, infrastructure, and industrial buildings, which is more than offsetting softness in commercial. Upfront revenue, the Autodesk store, and billings linearity during the quarter were also stronger than expected. Our go-to-market optimization plan remains on track, and operational friction from the new transaction model implementation continues to ease. Total revenue in the third quarter grew 18% as reported and in constant currency.

The contribution from the new transaction model to revenue was approximately $124 million in the third quarter. Total revenue grew 12% in constant currency and excluding the impact of the new transaction model. Please see the tables in our press release, earnings deck, and EXOR financials for details by product and region. Billings increased 21% as reported and 20% in constant currency. The contribution from the new transaction model to billings was $135 million in the third quarter. Billings grew 16% in constant currency and excluding the impact of the new transaction model. As a reminder, our billings growth this year is skewed by the new transaction model and by the transition to annual billings for most multiyear contracts.

These tailwinds will significantly diminish next year. RPO of $7.4 billion and current RPO of $4.8 billion both grew 20%, benefiting from tailwinds from the new transaction model. Turning to margins, third-quarter GAAP and non-GAAP operating margins were 25% and 38%, respectively, reflecting year-over-year increases of approximately 330 and 120 basis points, respectively. This reflected operating leverage and ongoing cost discipline and was partly offset by the margin drag from the new transaction model. Our margin progress this year sets us up well to achieve the long-term margin goals we talked about at our Investor Day. We still expect progress towards that goal to be nonlinear, given incremental headwinds to reported margins in fiscal 2027 from the new transaction model.

Third-quarter free cash flow was $430 million, which benefited from the earlier timing of billings in the quarter and lower cash tax payments. As a reminder, our free cash flow growth rate this year is also skewed by the transition to annual billings for most multiyear contracts. This tailwind will also significantly diminish next year. Moving on to capital allocation, we purchased approximately 1.2 million shares for $361 million at an average price of approximately $306 per share. Year to date, we have repurchased 3.7 million shares for approximately $1.07 billion.

Turning to guidance, I will again speak to the numbers excluding the impact of the new transaction model and in constant currency, to give you a clearer view of the underlying dynamics of the business. In the earnings deck, you will see that we split the impact of the new model and currency movements for our fiscal 2026 guidance. We've assumed the underlying momentum of the business remains consistent with previous quarters for the remainder of fiscal 2026. We have a large pool of EBA and product subscription renewals to close in the quarter of the year. And we'll also have our toughest new transaction model billings and revenue growth with last year.

The macroeconomic environment seems broadly stable, but macro uncertainty remains elevated, and we remain mindful of potential disruption as we continue to execute our sales and marketing optimization plan. So we built some risk into our guidance range for the remainder of fiscal 2026, and expect to again reflect these factors in our fiscal 2027 outlook in February. We remain disciplined and focused on the controllable factors that drive our revenue, operating margin, earnings per share, and capital allocation, which are the key building blocks of free cash flow per share.

Reflecting all this, we've raised our billings guidance range to between $7.465 billion and $7.525 billion and raised our revenue guidance range to between $7.15 billion and $7.165 billion, which flows through the current momentum of the business through our full-year underlying guidance. The bottom end of our full-year guidance range reflects some macroeconomic risk for the final quarter of the year. We've also raised our non-GAAP operating margin guidance for the year to approximately 37.5% or approximately 40.5% on an underlying basis, which excludes the impact of the new transaction model. We've also raised our free cash flow guidance range to between $2.26 billion and $2.29 billion.

As we said last February, utilization of U.S. deferred tax assets will mean we pay little U.S. federal cash tax in fiscal 2026. We do not, therefore, get incremental cash benefit from the One Big Beautiful Bill Act this year. Further, we now expect to buy back approximately $1.3 billion of stock, which is at the high end of our previous guidance and a 50% increase compared to fiscal 2025. The slide deck on our website has more details on modeling assumptions for the fourth quarter and full-year fiscal 2026. Andrew, back to you.

Andrew Anagnost: Thank you, Janesh. Autodesk is focused on the convergence of design and make in the cloud, enabled by platform, industry clouds, and AI. We are at the forefront of convergence because we've been evolving and investing in the business models, products, and platforms, and go-to-market that capitalize on it. We are at the forefront of neural AI foundation models we are deeply integrating into our products. Not as a surface-level add-on, and have access to decades of digital data enabling us to generate greater value for the next wave of AI for the physical world. AI will enable inference across tasks, workflows, and systems which will supercharge convergence.

Let me give you a few examples of our progress in the quarter. Our customers in AECO architecture, engineering, construction, and operations, are demanding convergence to reduce risk, increase quality, and optimize costs and resource use during the design and build phase of an asset. And to yield enhanced efficiency, resilience, and reuse during the operations and maintenance phase of an asset. Autodesk Construction Cloud has growing momentum with owners, designers, GCs, and subcontractors seeking to converge design and construction workflows. For example, a leading global food processor and asset owner is migrating over 700 active projects from a competitive solution to address challenges with end-to-end capital project management.

Infrastructure owners, like the South Carolina Department of Transportation, will replace legacy tools with Autodesk solutions to execute long-term plans to improve state infrastructure and resolve maintenance and resilience challenges. Integrated design-build companies like Daiwa House Industry Company Limited, a pioneer of industrialized construction in Japan, is adopting Autodesk Construction Cloud and Autodesk Informed Design to connect its manufacturing and construction processes, placing Autodesk at the center of its common data environment for building systems. And general contractors like Flynn Group are migrating to ACC to unify design intent with field execution in a single data environment to improve project coordination and efficiency.

These stories have a common theme: converging people, processes, and data across the project lifecycle to increase efficiency and resilience while decreasing risk. Our comprehensive end-to-end industry clouds and platform drive convergence and extend our footprint further into the larger growth segments like infrastructure and construction that we discussed at Investor Day. All this is reflected in our sustained strong revenue and new customer momentum in infrastructure and construction. Our manufacturing customers are also demanding convergence to drive cost and research efficiency during the design and make process by converging product development workflows in the cloud, leveraging centralized and granular data in unified data models, and embracing AI-driven automation capable of industry transformation.

For example, industrial machinery companies like Micromatic are replacing disconnected competitive solutions with our unified design and make platform to connect data and workflows, which increases collaboration and drives efficiency and speed to market through component reuse and fast, reliable iterations. Machinists at an American cosmetics company will save hours per week by using Fusion for manufacturing and simulation to automate nesting, toolpaths, 3D printing, and programming of multi-axis machines to create spare parts. To further strengthen and scale its integrated design and manufacturing processes, Total Environment is leveraging Fusion's advanced capabilities in manufacturing simulation, design, and data management. By unifying workflows on a single platform, the company will eliminate disconnected tools, enhance collaboration, and improve efficiency across its operations.

And a French automobile manufacturer is adopting Fusion to produce motor prototypes after a benchmarking analysis showed the Fusion platform could complete a machining task in twelve hours, which is ten and fifteen days faster, respectively, than competitive solutions. Converged data opens up new opportunities for Autodesk. As customers seek to drive efficient innovation, Fusion is driving strong growth with extension attach rates increasing and driving average sales prices higher. And we're delivering meaningful productivity gains to customers where we deploy AI. We have continued to see success with our AI-powered sketch auto constraint infusion.

Since its launch this year, the AI model has delivered over 2.6 million constraints and has been retrained and the UX improved all along the way. The acceptance rates for auto constraint suggestions to commercial users have grown to more than 60%, with 90% of those sketches fully constrained. In education, Wake Technical Community College, Kimley-Horn, and Autodesk have entered a strategic partnership to prepare more than 6,000 students for high-demand careers in design, engineering, and construction. This initiative will integrate Fusion, Forma, Civil 3D, and Autodesk Construction Cloud into WTCC's coursework with Kimley-Horn's nationally recognized internship program, creating a direct pipeline from classroom to career.

And lastly, we continue to find new ways for our customers to consume our products and services in ways that work best for them. For example, a multidisciplinary AEC consultancy firm is using flex consumption to rapidly scale and manage projects across multidisciplinary teams and distributed supply chains to accelerate project delivery and reduce risk. Attractive long-term secular growth markets, our focused strategy of delivering ever more valuable and connected solutions to our customers, and a resilient business are generating strong and sustained momentum both in absolute terms and relative to peers. Our disciplined execution is driving greater operational velocity and efficiency. We are deploying capital to grow the business, further reduce share count, and enhance value creation over time.

In combination, we believe these factors will deliver sustainable shareholder value over many years. Operator, we would now like to open the call up for questions.

Operator: As a reminder, to ask a question, you will need to press 11 on your telephone. To remove yourself from the queue, you may press 11 again. Our first question comes from the line of Saket Kalia of Barclays. Please go ahead, Saket.

Saket Kalia: Okay. Great. Hey, guys. Thanks for taking my questions here and great to see the better results. Well done.

Andrew Anagnost: Thank you. Absolutely.

Saket Kalia: Andrew, maybe to start with you. I'd love to pick up on the theme from Analyst Day a little bit and see if you could just weigh in on sort of the seats versus consumption AI monetization debate for Autodesk. But maybe also as part of that, touch on your broader ecosystem of partners and customers. That make sense?

Andrew Anagnost: Yeah. That does make sense. And thanks for that question. It's very apropos. So look, there's three things we want to pay attention to here. The first one is there's still a fundamental capacity challenge in all the industries we serve, AEC and manufacturing. There isn't enough current capacity to meet all the demand for what needs to be built or the supply chain needs that need to be throughput inside of both manufacturing and AEC. So we have a capacity challenge. The second thing I think is really important is in the future, there's still going to be projects that require intensive human engagement in order to successfully execute. They're going to be more complex.

But there's also going to be projects in the future where there's less requirement for human engagement. Machines are going to execute more on these things. And there's going to be a balance between these two. You know? And the last thing is something I've been saying over and over again. You know? Our goal is to decrease the number of people that are working on a particular project but increase the number of projects that our customers and our ecosystem are working on.

And if you do that, what you're going to see is we're going to be capturing incremental consumption value to the things that we do, monetizing machine-based execution, providing outcomes, and all things associated with that while also still supporting the people-based work that's going to go on in the ecosystem. This is equally true of our customers. Our customers are going to be seeing their balance shift from sometimes, in some cases, billable hours to also consumptive execution through machine-based execution based on their intellectual property and their IP. And their unique knowledge set. So we're all on the same journey together, but it's going to play out over time.

And you're going to see us actually capturing more value and creating more capacity for the industry we need because the industry desperately needs it.

Saket Kalia: That's that makes a ton of sense and super helpful. Janesh, maybe for my follow-up for you, appreciate the detailed guide for this year. Was I was wondering if you were able to just give us any color on fiscal 'twenty seven high level as we think about our models.

Janesh Moorjani: Hey, Saket. I'm happy to do that. So let me elaborate a little bit on what I said in the prepared remarks. First off, just by way of context, the business is clearly performing very well this year. That said, we've got a lot of business to close, particularly in January. The second thing I'd point out is our sales and marketing optimization plan has gone very well so far. But we are not complete with that. As we touched on this a little bit at Investor Day. So I think there's still some risk of disruption next year. And then finally, while the macroeconomic indicators have been broadly stable, uncertainty does remain elevated in the environment.

So just we just think it's best to maintain a prudent posture on our underlying growth for fiscal twenty seven. We're performing very well this year, and we're looking forward to the rest of the year.

Saket Kalia: Very helpful. Thanks, guys.

Janesh Moorjani: Thank you.

Operator: Thank you. Our next question comes from the line of Adam Borg of Stifel. Awesome. And thanks so much for taking the question.

Adam Borg: Just on the Autodesk Construction Cloud, it's great to hear the continued traction and even the customer coming over migrating 700 active projects. When you think about your existing Autodesk Construction Cloud installed base, for those existing customers, how penetrated are you in terms of the cost of the projects that are already brought over to Autodesk? Any color around that and the ability to continue selling broader parts of your growing ACC portfolio, be it payments or preconstruction, etcetera, would be really helpful. And then I have a follow-up.

Andrew Anagnost: I really like that question. Okay? So first off, let me just start at the fundamental level. Alright? The reason why Construction Cloud's doing so well is that we've got this design to preconstruction through construction execution solution. It's completely unique in the industry. And it's built on a modern platform. This is not an aging platform. That's going to kind of age out of what people need in the future. It's a highly connected AI-ready SaaS-based platform. That's really a huge selling point for us. And what you just mentioned there, Adam, is completely true.

As we're acquiring new customers and penetrating new accounts and displacing competitors in lots of accounts, what we're doing is we're starting off with a set of projects. So we're not even fully penetrated in all the projects that we've executed with our customers to date with I mean, in accounts where we are with our customers today. So there is actually not only increased penetration that will happen over time within the accounts we have as new projects come and light up and old projects sunset, but there's also additional expansion just driven by the power of our value prop.

Adam Borg: That's really helpful. And maybe just building on the theme of convergence. In design and manufacturing, we talked about this a little bit at Investor Day. But as you think about convergence and the opportunities with fusion over time, how do you think about the PLM market more broadly? For all that? Thanks so much.

Andrew Anagnost: Yes. So another great question. Alright? And I really appreciate it. So first off, remember, we're targeted at the mid-market, and that's where there's a lot of growth in supply chain activity. These customers need convergence because they need this end-to-end digital productivity. And I just want to make it super clear to everybody. Most of those customers have nothing. With regards to PLM. They don't have anything. Alright? They may have a data management solution. They may not. Most of their work is actually done through spreadsheets and ad hoc connectivity with some of their ERP systems. They don't have any kind of strong data management or lifecycle solution. We're building a solution for those customers.

And we're going to go in there and say, you can get what the big boys have. And you can get the kind of control and the cloud visibility and the cloud data flow that was reserved only to a few. And they need a modern platform. They need a SaaS-based platform. They need what we're bringing with Fusion. So that's how I look at the market. We built these capabilities in the Fusion. We're continuing to enhance them, and we're already starting to see success with small accounts of two to three users expanding to larger accounts because we have these tools that are really hard for a lot of people in the mid-market to get and deploy.

Adam Borg: Incredibly helpful. Thanks again.

Operator: Thanks for the questions. Thank you. Our next question comes from the line of Jay Vleeschhouwer of Griffin Securities. Please go ahead, Jay.

Jay Vleeschhouwer: Thank you. Good evening. Andrew, my first question for you is a corollary to the question I asked you a quarter ago about the pace of new technology adoption. And the question has to do with something interesting you said at AU. I think it might have been a main stage you said, as far as your customer base is concerned, that, quote, no one gets left behind. End quote. Which is an important general commitment. But what are the practicalities of that in terms of customer migration, packaging, promotion, all those sorts of things that you've done or will need to do with regard to migrating your customers in the way that you implied?

Andrew Anagnost: Yeah. So look. We're attacking this from multiple vectors. Okay? So first off, packaging is the first one. Right? As you know, if you're a collections customer or a Revit customer, you get the Forma design application shipped with your subscription. So you're already getting something that is you're paying for the future and the present. Alright? So you're capturing the value right there. And you're part of the ecosystem. The other thing that we're doing is we're also making sure that we have the CDE available to as many customers as possible. That's Forma data management. And we'll talk more about that in the future, which is a really important piece of the puzzle as well.

The other thing that's really important, and it needs to get airtime because you're going to see something similar evolve in the Fusion world as well as we talked about Revit as rolling out as the first Forma connected client next year. And what that means is what we're doing is we're tightly connecting the workflows between the feature-deep desktop product that customers use today and the evolving emerging product they'll be using tomorrow. So that they can seamlessly move between these two products in such a way that they can get the benefit of one while also harnessing simply and easily the benefit of the other. That's a really important part of the strategy as we move forward.

Because the adoption does take time. It takes time for people to change these things. And we're also hyper-focused, especially on the AI side, on rolling out features that may not look sexy at the headline level, but are real productivity enhancers for our customers that get real adoption. What you're seeing with auto-constrained infusion is a great example of that. It's a highly adopted feature. Now explaining it to everybody exactly what it does usually requires a video, but to a customer, they get it. And they love it. They accept these things at, like, 60% acceptance rates. Some of these sketches are 90% constrained.

It's the kind of stuff that you're going to see us continue to roll out that really makes a difference in how our customers work.

Jay Vleeschhouwer: Thank you for that. Janesh, given the revenue upside across each of the segments, could you comment on any new or incremental trends you're seeing in usage telemetry, either by vertical or geo or standalone product versus collections, anything of that kind? In terms of the usage component that helped drive some of that growth. Within AUC manufacturing and so forth.

Janesh Moorjani: Jay, thanks. What I'd say is the momentum in Q3 continued from the first half. And the trends we saw in Q3 were similar to what we saw in Q2 as well. And you see that strength reflected in the different product lines and the different areas of the business. I touched on some of the areas within AECO, for example, around data centers, infrastructure, and industrial that were all bright spots again. And you see that reflected in products as well. Similarly, when you look at the Autodesk store and some of our emerging geographies that did well, you'll see the trends reflected in those, the products that get sold through those routes as well.

So overall, I'd say it was very consistent with what we had seen in Q2. Nothing new that I would highlight as an emerging trend.

Jay Vleeschhouwer: Thank you.

Operator: Thank you. Our next question comes from the line of Jason Celino of KeyBanc Capital Markets. Your line is open, Jason.

Jason Celino: Hey. Great. Thanks for taking my question. I wanted to ask about the normalized growth you saw this quarter, the 12%. You know, again, similar to last quarter, slight acceleration. But was there, like, what was the inorganic contribution to that normalized number? I'm just trying to understand if there was some modest acceleration. And if there was, you know, what do you think drove that?

Janesh Moorjani: Yeah. I'm happy to touch on that. There was nothing unusual with respect to M&A activity in Q3 that affected those underlying growth rates. I'd say what we saw there was just the continuing momentum we've seen in the business, as I mentioned just a moment ago. The sources of where that outperformance came from in terms of the upfront revenue, the Autodesk store, and stronger billings linearity during the quarter, I think all of those played a role in helping us get to the ultimate outcome that we delivered over here. So overall, it was a strong quarter across the board. The team executed really well, and I think that's what you're seeing reflected in the numbers.

Jason Celino: Okay. Great. No. That's helpful. And then when we think about the commentary around the EBA cohorts that you have for Q4, I'm just curious what type of behavior you've seen so far from, like, a renewal standpoint or if customers are willing to engage earlier, just curious if you have any tidbits that will be helpful there. Thank you.

Janesh Moorjani: Jason, in terms of what we saw in Q3 was very strong engagement from many of those customers. We closed all the business that we were expecting to close. And if I think about some of the typical metrics that we have around attach rates and so forth, those all played out as we expected they would. Q4 is our largest quarter for EBA renewals, and we also have a very large product subscriptions renewal cohort to close here in this quarter. Q4 is heavily weighted towards January, so there's still a lot that we need to get done. But, again, the team did well here in Q3, and that momentum has continued nicely.

Jason Celino: Okay. Wonderful. Thank you.

Operator: Thank you. Our next question comes from the line of Taylor McGinnis of UBS. Please go ahead, Taylor.

Taylor McGinnis: Yeah. Hi. Thanks so much for taking my questions. Andrew, first one for you. Just on you mentioned earlier about still some elevated uncertainty out there, but it sounds like you guys are seeing some strength in areas like data centers, industrials, and whatnot. When you speak with customers regarding their spending plans across AEC manufacturing and M&E for calendar 2026, or fiscal year 2027? I guess any early insights that you could share with the group in terms of what you guys are expecting to see?

Andrew Anagnost: Yeah. You know, customers aren't flagging any differences in their spending pattern. Alright? I think one of the things that's really, really important to note is one, the current momentum is going to continue a little bit. And also, what the customers are looking for is they're preparing for future productivity enhancements. So everyone's investing in their digital infrastructure. It's trying to get ready for any changes in the demand patterns, what sector might be more important as we move forward. So most of our customers are flagging a continuation of their investment.

Some areas are flagging a little bit more investment because they've been kind of maybe slow on the investment in the past, but we don't see anything changing in terms of the consistency level right there.

Taylor McGinnis: Perfect. Thank you. And then, Janesh, maybe just one for you. On billings growth, you made several comments in the prepared remarks just about how growth has been elevated this year because of the new transaction model and also because of the larger base of multiyear billings customers, and we're going to start to lap that going into next year and see some moderation in growth. So can you just help us unpack the mechanics there a little bit more? So as we look into 2027, could we start to see, if we adjust for FX and the new transaction model, revenue growth and billings growth start to align with one another?

Or is it possible that we could actually see some tougher comps and maybe there's a divergence between the two? Any additional color you can give there, I think would be helpful.

Janesh Moorjani: Taylor, I'll break that into two parts. One is around the underlying business performance that you mentioned and the second is just the mechanical aspects of modeling the growth for fiscal 2027. So first, in terms of just the underlying growth that we see in the business, we feel very good about this year. And if you look back at the last couple of years, we've demonstrated consistent growth, and that trend has continued this year. We've also talked before about the diversification of our business across industries, across geographies, and customer sizes, that's a strength for us. And again, we saw that play out here in Q3 as well.

If I look ahead, we're excited by the growth potential of businesses like Fusion, Infrastructure, and some of the others that we outlined at Investor Day. So overall, I think we're executing really well, including on the AI and road map, and we feel very well positioned in that regard. So if I think about the growth for the future, I think all of those things give me confidence. But also when I guide for next year, I will consider, as I mentioned, the go-to-market optimization and the macro risks that I touched on at the start of this call. And then in terms of some of the underlying mechanics, thank you for the question.

I think it's actually helpful to spell out what we expect to see next year. So to break that apart, if I think about the billings and free cash flow growth rates this year, they have been inflated because of the transition to annual billings, so most multiyear contracts. That's a business model transition that we expect to complete during Q1 of next year. And so we expect that reported billings and free cash flow growth will start to normalize during next year. Billings and revenue growth rates have also been inflated this year from the new transaction model, for which we provide the details separately on an underlying basis.

And on that transition, we expect a smaller impact from that in '27 than we had in '26. We'll also have incremental headwinds to reported operating margins from the new model next year. But ultimately, as you know, these are just near-term accounting effects. And the underlying business has been performing consistently well. Our goal is to try and get to as reported numbers as soon as we can. So that will be our focus in the future.

Taylor McGinnis: Great. Thanks for all the color.

Janesh Moorjani: Of course.

Operator: Thank you. Our next question comes from the line of Elizabeth Porter of Morgan Stanley. Please go ahead, Elizabeth.

Elizabeth Porter: Great. Thanks so much for the question. I wanted to follow-up regarding some of the new AI capabilities like auto constraints, which appear to have high rates and measurable productivity gains. The question is, are these product improvements translating into observable changes in multiproduct adoption or expansion activity? And just as the platform overall delivers more value with AI, how are you thinking about the pricing power? Any sort of larger, more periodic price increases, or a steadier cadence tied to just incremental AI-driven capabilities? Is that an opportunity that you look forward to? Thank you.

Andrew Anagnost: Yeah. So thank you for the question, Elizabeth. So first off, let's be very clear. This is a multiyear journey here that we're on. Alright? And I want to be clear that we're going to be kind of moving along with our customers here and focusing on key areas of adoption and finding levers of productivity that make a real impact on them. We're starting with tasks. Auto constraints is a classic example of a task within the modeling. We're going to do a lot of that. That task automation is highly protective of our existing business and the hour.

What the customers love is they see large incremental productivity increases that are not classically easy to replicate in a traditional kind of development model and feature creation model. So task automation is highly protective of the existing business. It is highly retentive, and we see some of that with some of the satisfaction ratings we get with some of this technology move forward. We're going to be moving more and more into workflow automations as you see us move next year. We talked about some of this at AU. We showed some pretty compelling workflows between various products and across various products from design to preconstruction planning and things like that.

Those workflow automations are going to ultimately offer additional monetization opportunities because some of it will be included with the subscription, but some of it will not. Will be charged for incrementally. And as the customers adopt those and as we find the right workflow levers, you're going to see us start to capture some of that value. Now as we move down the curve into systems level optimization, those are going to capture the most value. They're further down in the pipeline, but they're also the kind of things that have huge impacts on our customers and huge value delivery. And we're going to capture some of that value.

We're going to share some of it with our customers, but we're going to capture that value. So face automations are highly retentive. They have retentive effects. You can see that with the way the customers are satisfied with the product and what they see in the product. The workflow automations are going to be also highly retentive, but they're also going to offer incremental monetization opportunities and system level optimizations will offer more monetization opportunities. But this is going to take time.

Elizabeth Porter: Great. And then just as a follow-up, I wanted to ask on the margins, where it was really impressive to see the underlying margin kind of move up in the full-year guide. The question is, where are you seeing the most outsized success that's driving up the full-year view? And what are the levers that are having more of an impact in the near term versus what can be more of a driver next year for the underlying margin trajectory?

Janesh Moorjani: Elizabeth, maybe I'll take that one. I think the underlying levers are the same near term as well as longer term. The biggest lever in terms of achieving our margin targets over the long term will be our go-to-market optimization. And on that, we've already made great progress so far, and that will ultimately further reduce our sales and marketing as a percentage of revenue. We also have inherent operating leverage, which is something that we've demonstrated for a few years now. And so that shows up in the near-term numbers, and that will also be a driver for us longer term. And embedded in that operating leverage, there are a few puts and takes.

You know, to start with, on the gross margin front, we expect that cloud and AI workloads will be accretive to gross profit dollars, but they will pose a headwind to gross margin as they scale. We think that's actually a sign of success if that happens in terms of our strategy for adoption working quite nicely. On the R&D side, as we've shared before, we'll continue to prioritize investments in innovation and AI-driven initiatives. But at the same time drive efficiency through common components in the platform. And on the G&A side, we will just scale efficiently as we continue to grow the business. So those are some of the things that I see.

And in terms of the rate of progress of getting to the 41% margin target that we outlined, as I've mentioned earlier, the path to getting there will be nonlinear, just given the additional margin headwinds we expect from the new transaction model this year. But overall, we feel we are well on our way to achieving the target, and we've already raised the current year outlook here by 50 basis points. So we feel pretty good about that.

Elizabeth Porter: Thank you.

Operator: Thank you. Our next question comes from the line of Josh Tilton of Wolfe Research. Your line is open, Josh.

Josh Tilton: Hey, guys. Thanks for sneaking me in, and congrats on another great quarter. Two for me. One more near term, one maybe long term. Just in the near term, you know, I think if I look back, this is probably one of the biggest to the billings growth guide going into a Q4 that we've seen maybe ever. And I'm just trying to understand, or maybe you could help me unpack what exactly is driving that near-term performance. And then my follow-up to that is just more longer term. The agency transition seems to be going well. It's wouldn't say well underway, but, you know, I feel like it's hit maybe critical mass to some extent.

Can you maybe talk to some of the levers that you have to incentivize this newly formed channel to drive better new business growth for you guys going forward? Thanks.

Janesh Moorjani: Josh, maybe I'll start. In terms of the outperformance that we had here in the third quarter, there's a couple of sources. One is, as I mentioned, just consistent strong execution from the team, which is something that we are all very proud about. But the second is also just in terms of the guidance philosophy that we had and the approach that we took entering the quarter where, as you know, against the low end of our billings guidance, we had assumed a pretty severe macro scenario, which we had been quite transparent about. That didn't play out. The broader macroeconomic environment was relatively stable. I think you saw some of the benefits of that here as well.

And as if I think about the Q4 view on that, and the extent of risk that we've got baked in, the guidance range, particularly on billings, is a little bit of risk baked in at the lower end of the range. But given that we've got basically just a little over two months here left to go in the year, we didn't feel like we needed to take as a dim view of the macro Q4 as we had previously taken.

Andrew Anagnost: And to the second part, Josh, I'll weigh in on that a little bit. Okay? So there's a couple of things that we're enabling with the new transaction. One, we have better customer intelligence, which is going to allow us to be more efficient with our partner engagements. The other one is we're working really hard to automate more of the things that are associated with renewals. So if you look at the way we want to move forward, you're going to see us incenting the channel more on new business than on renewals, which is going to align the channel with kind of our long-term objectives.

It's easier to make renewals now, so we should be paying less on renewals. And we should be paying more on new business so that the channel can build the right kind of capacity for the new business and hunt a bit more and renew in a more automated way. So look for us to continue to push that as we head into next year. Tighter intelligence going into the channel, more efficiency, more automation, more self-service tied to renewals. And a stronger emphasis on new business generation.

Josh Tilton: Love to hear it. Thank you so much.

Operator: Thank you. Our next question comes from the line of Joe Vruwink of Baird. Your line is open, Joe.

Joe Vruwink: Hi, great. Thanks for taking my question. I wanted to go back to the FY 2027 outlook. And I guess what I really want to ask is, do you need the same level of prudence when you frame the forward outlook like you have been using? And I just sit here and appreciate that this year, started eight to nine. It looks like it'll end closer to eleven. There's something to be said about prudence, but also nothing wrong with communicating strength when it's evident.

And I think you're not only seeing strength, but it would seem like next year, you know, definitely end of stages and some transitional elements, early stages on things like consumption or cloud adoption that can contribute more. I'm just wondering if some of that factors into a different approach to the Outlook.

Janesh Moorjani: Hey, Joe. So, look. On fiscal twenty seven, it will make sense to talk about the specifics when we are actually guiding to fiscal twenty seven in February. What I wanted to do today is just share our overall enthusiasm for how we're executing here in Q3. I talked about some of the momentum that we're seeing and some of the factors that continue to excite me about the business in the long run and just be transparent about some of the factors I'll consider when I set guidance. In terms of the specific levels of those, we will talk about those on the next call.

Joe Vruwink: Okay. No. That's fair enough. At AU, there are some good sessions from your large customers on how they've set up kind of centralized Autodesk development teams, and you have different regional teams that are now building around platform services in a coordinated way. You know, a lot more talk about how agents are factoring into what these teams are now starting to do. I guess there's this idea still percolating out there that AI is going to make it easier for your large E&C customers, these same entities, to maybe just do more internally.

And I guess, I want to ask what you're seeing on this topic and really when we see a large E&C account, talk about data scientists on staff and, you know, what they're doing. We really think, well, Autodesk is ultimately having a role here?

Andrew Anagnost: Yeah. You should absolutely think that, Joe. Okay? Our goal is to make it easier for them to apply their IP with their data scientists to the workflows that make the most impact on their business. But our platform is going to be everywhere in this. And the services and agents we build associated with our platform are going to be core to how they create that value from their IT. Incrementally above some of the models that we build ourselves and that we deploy into their environments. We want to coordinate and work with agents they may build internally with the agents that we have, and one should be augmenting the other.

So look for our platform to be everywhere that these customers actually execute and incrementally build capabilities on.

Joe Vruwink: Okay. Thank you.

Operator: Next question comes from the line of Bhavin Shah of Deutsche Bank. Your line is open, Bhavin.

Bhavin Shah: Great. Thanks for taking my questions and congrats on the strong results. Janesh, I know you spoke about this briefly in your prepared remarks, but in terms of channel productivity, excuse me, how much time is still spent on operational elements? When do you think the channel gets back to full productivity? And is there any kind of impact also with all the M&A activity happening with your resellers?

Janesh Moorjani: Yeah. We continue to address some of the operational friction that partners faced on the new transaction model. Andrew referenced that as well. I think we've made very good progress, and I think much of that is behind us at this point in time. There's a bit more to be done, but we are well on our way. We saw the EMEA partners get their first renewals here in September on the new transaction model, and that generally went as we expected it would. And I think at this point, we've lapped all of the first annual renewals.

So in terms of the future, we continue to focus on how we and our partners can deliver more valuable and data-driven and connected products and services to our customers. We have seen, you know, the strategy working quite nicely, particularly at the low end where many of the customers previously used to buy from the non-contracted partners or the silver partners are now buying from us directly on the store. And some of our larger partners are focused on continuing to build out value-added services that allow them to build more connectivity and offer better solutions to customers, which then works quite nicely for us in the long term as well.

Bhavin Shah: That's helpful there. And as a follow-up, Andrew, maybe just for you, there's been some recent headlines about agents turning 2D sketches into 3D models via CAD software. As innovation continues to evolve here, what role can Autodesk play? How are you thinking about evolving the product capabilities as agents and copilots to turn sketches into the models continues to evolve?

Andrew Anagnost: I think you should assume that the level of data that Autodesk has in this particular area and the level of focus will certainly excel above anything else you see out there. We just focus where the biggest returns are right now.

Bhavin Shah: Makes sense to me. Thanks for taking my questions.

Janesh Moorjani: Thank you.

Operator: Thank you. Our next question comes from the line of Tyler Radke of Citi. Please go ahead, Tyler.

Tyler Radke: Yes. Thank you for taking the question. So the direct revenue has grown I think it was up 85% this quarter. You called out strength in the online store, the Autodesk store. Just wondering, you know, is this strength is this coming in well above your expectations? And how should we just think about the mechanics of taking more business direct and potentially that being a tailwind to the reported revenue that we're seeing?

Janesh Moorjani: Tyler, I'd say in Q3, things were as we expected they would be. We were expecting to see an increase in the mix of direct revenue as the new transaction model continues to scale. So that generally played out the way we expected it would. And in terms of the impact of that on the model, it does affect the as-reported numbers, as you know, which is why we also provide the views on an underlying basis. I'd say the store strength has continued for some time.

A portion of that might be channel shift, but a lot of it is also just general strength we've seen particularly in a number of the countries around the world that we've talked about where we haven't rolled out the new transaction model, we've been seeing strength in those countries as well. So I think it is a bit broader based on that.

Tyler Radke: Great. Helpful. And then, Janesh, just on the underlying growth, I know you got some questions on this, specifically as we think about FY 'twenty seven guidance. But you know, you started off the year in sort of the high, single-digit ballpark. And I think we look at the Q4 guide, normalized growth is closer to kind of the low teens. Is that a fair characteristic of where the underlying growth of the business is today? Maybe there's some one-up or one-time revenue in that Q4 number as it relates to EBAs. Just help us understand, like, where is that underlying growth of the business? In your view now?

And I assume that's maybe a few points higher than it was at the beginning of the year.

Janesh Moorjani: Tyler, at the start of the year, when we laid out our guidance, again, we had prudent for a variety of reasons. It was also my first guidance for the full year as CFO. We had just done a restructuring. There were a number of other factors as well that played into that. But if I and at that point, I had mentioned that I viewed the business as being a consistent and resilient business, and I think that played out quite nicely.

If you look at the growth we've seen over the last couple of years, and then if I look at this year, we've had very consistent growth across the three quarters of this year and that same consistency is implied in the guide for Q4 as well. So we feel very good about the way we've executed and all the irons we have in the fire to continue to sustain our momentum in the future. But again, we will consider our overall risks around go-to-market execution as well as the macro when we guide.

Tyler Radke: Thank you.

Operator: Thank you. Our next question comes from the line of Ken Wong of Oppenheimer and Company. Please go ahead, Ken.

Ken Wong: Thank you for taking my question. Andrew, I wanted to circle back on a comment that you made about the incentive structure to partners. Realized that you guys are taking it down on renewal to incentivize some hunting. Any early feedback from partners? And I realized it doesn't take effect usually until February, but any early behavioral changes that you guys are noticing from the channel?

Andrew Anagnost: Yeah. Nothing pronounced. Okay? No early changes. Obviously, partners always have lots of questions when we change their incentive structure. But generally speaking, they get what we're trying to do, and they understand what's going on here. We're not trying to take money out of the channel ecosystem. We're trying to shift how it gets paid out. Makes total sense to them. We haven't seen any initial kind of changes in their behavior right now at all.

Ken Wong: Okay. Perfect. And then on the OBVA side, Janesh, I realize you're not expecting any tailwinds on the free cash side. Are you guys seeing any early impact on the top line in terms of kind of customer spending behavior or any customer project activity?

Janesh Moorjani: Nothing that I would directly attribute to the One Big Beautiful Bill Act yet.

Ken Wong: Okay. Great. Thank you, guys.

Janesh Moorjani: Thank you.

Operator: Thank you. Our next question comes from the line of Koji Ikeda of Bank of America. Your question, please, Koji.

Koji Ikeda: Yeah. Hey, guys. Thanks for taking the questions. I wanted to follow-up on a previous question on free cash flow. And Janesh, I think you mentioned there's about two more quarters left before free cash flow normalization. Did I hear that right? And then beyond that, what should quarterly free cash flow seasonality look like? Is there a fiscal year example from the past that we could look at that would be a good representation of what it would look like going forward?

Janesh Moorjani: Yes. Koji, the comment earlier was around the growth rates that we would expect will come down. If I think about the app dollars of billings that we have at this point in time associated with the change in the multiyear to annual billing transition, I think that piece is done. But in terms of thinking about cash flow and providing maybe a general rule of thumb, I would say holding aside any significant discrete items, we generally would expect free cash flow growth to be correlated with our underlying non-GAAP net income growth. And, of course, we will call out any large discrete items when we provide guidance.

Koji Ikeda: Got it. And then maybe a follow-up here question for Andrew and thinking about the AI strategy and the data access strategy for AI through MCP, and API calls. How have customer usage trends been around there? And any update on how we should be thinking about any timing of the monetization opportunity with the data access strategy. Thank you.

Andrew Anagnost: Yeah. So there's actually fairly robust use of some of our APIs by the customers. And, you know, also we'll be monetizing some of that access as well, and a lot of customers are expecting that. Most customers won't be impacted by that, but those customers that are most heavily using machine-based kind of applications associated with our APIs will probably see impacts in terms of billings associated with their usage. Right? Again, the AI monetization will play out over time. The API monetization will play out over time. But MCPs and APIs are definitely another source of monetization that you'll see us pulling the lever for as we move forward.

Koji Ikeda: Thank you.

Andrew Anagnost: Thank you, Koji.

Operator: Thank you. Our next question comes from the line of Michael Turrin of Wells Fargo Securities.

Michael Turrin: Hey. Thanks for squeezing me in. I'll give you a chance to summarize some of the prior comments. I think high level the question is you're raising numbers across the board for fiscal twenty six, it's not something we're seeing a whole lot of across software these days. So maybe just expand on your perspective around what's driving that and how much of that is beyond the scope of just macro and business model changes? And then on cats, specifically, it's another quarter of standout growth, 15%. So maybe touch on that segment and if there are any specific dynamics to be mindful of there as well. Thank you.

Janesh Moorjani: Yes. I'm happy to touch on both of those. If I had to summarize Q3, I would say it reflects the consistent momentum we've seen from sustained execution this year. Against the backdrop of a stable macro, while in the guide at the lower end, we had assumed that the macro would worsen. So I think it's both our execution as well as the more prudent guidance assumptions that didn't play out. In terms of the growth of the AutoCAD business, there's a few factors there. That growth is partly affected by just the mechanical accounting on the new transaction model as well. So I think that's part of what you're seeing.

But, also, we talked about strength in the Autodesk store and strength in emerging countries like India and LatAm and The Middle East. And some of the AutoCAD strengths that we've seen come from those countries and from the Autodesk store as well.

Andrew Anagnost: You know, Michael, I'll just add one more thing to this because I have to. You know, we have been making some serious and important strategic decisions over the last three years about how our business is structured and how we move forward. You're seeing the results. Alright? These are the results that we ultimately said we were going to deliver, and a result of those investments and those changes. They were hard changes, difficult lifts. Now you're seeing the performance associated with those lifts.

Michael Turrin: Thanks very much.

Operator: Thank you. And that is all the time we have for Q&A today. I would now like to turn the conference back to Simon Mays-Smith for closing remarks. Sir?

Simon Mays-Smith: Thank you, Latif, and thank you, everyone, for joining us. Looking forward to seeing many of you on the road over the coming weeks. Wishing my fellow Brits a happy Budget Day tomorrow and my fellow Americans a happy Thanksgiving on Thursday. Thanks very much, everyone.

Operator: This concludes today's conference call. Thank you for participating. You may now disconnect.

This article is a transcript of this conference call produced for The Motley Fool. While we strive for our Foolish Best, there may be errors, omissions, or inaccuracies in this transcript. Parts of this article were created using Large Language Models (LLMs) based on The Motley Fool's insights and investing approach. It has been reviewed by our AI quality control systems. Since LLMs cannot (currently) own stocks, it has no positions in any of the stocks mentioned. As with all our articles, The Motley Fool does not assume any responsibility for your use of this content, and we strongly encourage you to do your own research, including listening to the call yourself and reading the company's SEC filings. Please see our Terms and Conditions for additional details, including our Obligatory Capitalized Disclaimers of Liability.

The Motley Fool has positions in and recommends Autodesk. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.