Germany skips Palantir for military use as US AI leaders face revenue crunch

Vice Admiral Thomas Daum, Inspector of Cyber and Information Space and Germany’s highest-ranking officer in the domain, has dashed the prospects of deploying Palantir software in its flagship military cloud project.

The military leader cited concerns over data sovereignty and the US firm’s operational model, saying that he does not see that happening right now.

The decision comes at an uncomfortable period for American tech companies that have included patronage from international governments as part of their revenue channels while burning through capital ahead of highly anticipated stock market listings.

Why is Germany shutting Palantir out of its military cloud?

Germany’s armed forces are building a secure private cloud for data processing and AI applications, a project it considers indispensable to modern digital defense.

Palantir, through its Maven platform, already serves NATO and several member states. Germany, a member state, also uses intelligence outputs, as Daum acknowledged. 

However, the vice admiral pointed out that external parties, namely representatives of Palantir, are operating this technology, and that granting a private US firm access to Germany’s national database is, for him, currently inconceivable.

Germany has reportedly shortlisted three candidates for the project, and two are based in Germany, while one is headquartered in France. The companies are Almato, Orcrist, and ChapsVision, respectively. Their software is expected to be tested this summer, with a contract to be awarded before year-end.

Palantir’s political profile is a major reason for Germany’s reservations. Germany’s Defense Minister Boris Pistorius has previously flagged concerns about Palantir’s co-founder Peter Thiel’s minority stake in German drone manufacturer Stark Defense.

That contract was only cleared after the ministry received assurances that Thiel held no operational authority over the company.

Is Germany’s caution part of a wider pushback against US AI dependency?

Berlin’s decision may not be in isolation, as research by Stanford Institute for Human-Centered AI (HAI) showed that governments worldwide are racing to achieve what they call “AI sovereignty,” driven by fears of overreliance on a small number of providers and their home countries.

The United Kingdom has reportedly committed £500 million to a sovereign AI unit, while France and Brazil are building domestic regulatory frameworks with similar intent. China itself is another major AI powerhouse, ranking very close to the United States.

However, Washington seems to be fighting such AI independence from coming to fruition, as reported in February, a State Department cable signed by Secretary Marco Rubio instructed diplomats to lobby against foreign data sovereignty laws, stating that they could disrupt AI and cloud services provided by US firms.

The cable singled out the EU’s GDPR as unnecessarily burdensome, and recent developments suggest that framing has hardened European resolve rather than softened it.

Can US AI firms afford to lose international government business?

Germany’s procurement stance comes at a time when some of the US AI sector’s largest players prepare for public listings while carrying losses that dwarf their revenues.

SpaceX’s AI division accounted for 61% of the company’s $20.74 billion in total capital expenditure in 2025 while running an operating loss of $6.4 billion, according to Reuters.

None of the three major AI IPO candidates, SpaceX, OpenAI, or Anthropic, expects to reach profitability before the end of the decade.

OpenAI’s situation is particularly strained ahead of a planned listing as early as the fourth quarter of this year. The Wall Street Journal reported that the company missed internal targets for both weekly active users and annual ChatGPT revenue last year, after Google’s Gemini captured market share.

Chief Financial Officer Sarah Friar has warned internally that the company may struggle to fund future computing contracts if revenue growth does not accelerate, while some board directors are not exactly pleased with CEO Sam Altman’s strategy of locking up $600 billion in future data center commitments.

If other sovereign powers continue to route defense and critical infrastructure business toward domestic or European alternatives, the addressable markets these firms are selling to investors will contract before they ever fully materialize, which can be disastrous to their respective bottom lines.

If you're reading this, you’re already ahead. Stay there with our newsletter.