The Vanguard Russell 1000 Growth ETF has significantly lower costs than the iShares Russell 2000 Growth ETF while managing a much larger pool of assets under management.
The iShares Russell 2000 Growth ETF has delivered higher total returns over the trailing 12 months but experienced a deeper maximum drawdown over the last five years.
The Vanguard Russell 1000 Growth ETF portfolio is heavily concentrated in large-cap technology firms, whereas the iShares Russell 2000 Growth ETF offers more balanced exposure across healthcare and industrial sectors.
The Vanguard Russell 1000 Growth ETF (NASDAQ:VONG) focuses on large-cap leaders with lower costs, while the iShares Russell 2000 Growth ETF (NYSEMKT:IWO) targets smaller, more volatile growth companies with higher recent returns.
Investors seeking growth often choose between the stability of dominant large-cap leaders and the high-octane potential of smaller firms. While both funds target growth characteristics, their market cap focus leads to different volatility profiles. This comparison examines how a large-cap growth powerhouse matches up against a small-cap growth specialist, looking at whether higher recent returns justify the additional risk.
| Metric | VONG | IWO |
|---|---|---|
| Issuer | Vanguard | iShares |
| Expense ratio | 0.06% | 0.24% |
| 1-yr return (as of May 6, 2026) | 32.6% | 41.3% |
| Dividend yield | 0.4% | 0.4% |
| Beta | 1.15 | 1.46 |
| AUM | $50.6 billion | $14.3 billion |
Beta measures price volatility relative to the S&P 500; beta is calculated from five-year monthly returns. The 1-yr return represents total return over the trailing 12 months. Dividend yield is the trailing-12-month distribution yield.
The Vanguard fund is significantly more affordable, maintaining an expense ratio of 0.06% compared to the 0.24% charged by the iShares fund. This 0.18 percentage point gap means the iShares fund costs four times as much annually as its large-cap counterpart, which can impact total returns over long horizons. Both ETFs offer an identical trailing-12-month distribution yield of 0.4%.
| Metric | VONG | IWO |
|---|---|---|
| Max drawdown (5 yr) | (32.7%) | (40.5%) |
| Growth of $1,000 over 5 years (total return) | $1,974 | $1,294 |
The iShares Russell 2000 Growth ETF provides exposure to 1,093 small-cap stocks, focusing on healthcare at 25%, technology at 22%, and industrials at 21%. Its largest positions include Bloom Energy (NYSE:BE) at 3.71%, Credo Technology Group (NASDAQ:CRDO) at 1.79%, and Sterling Infrastructure (NASDAQ:STRL) at 1.38%. Launched in 2000, it has a trailing-12-month dividend of $1.51 per share and tracks smaller firms with high growth potential but often less established track records.
In contrast, the Vanguard Russell 1000 Growth ETF takes a more concentrated approach with 394 stocks, leaning heavily into technology at 51%, consumer cyclical at 13%, and communication services at 12%. Top holdings include NVIDIA (NASDAQ:NVDA) at 12.90%, Apple (NASDAQ:AAPL) at 11.61%, and Microsoft (NASDAQ:MSFT) at 8.80%. Launched in 2010, the fund has paid $0.56 per share over the trailing 12 months and emphasizes dominant large-cap firms that often have greater access to capital and more stable cash flows.
For more guidance on ETF investing, check out the full guide at this link.
Investors seeking growth stocks can look to the iShares Russell 2000 Growth ETF (IWO) and Vanguard Russell 1000 Growth ETF (VONG) as an efficient way to gain this exposure. Deciding which to invest in comes down to a few key factors.
VONG seeks robust returns by targeting large-cap growth U.S. stocks. Since these are often found in the tech sector, this ETF is heavily weighted in that direction. While its one-year return isn’t as great as IWO’s, VONG’s focus on large caps contributed to its lower beta and max drawdown, since smaller companies are often more volatile than established businesses such as Microsoft. VONG is the superior choice for investors who want a low-cost means of gaining large-cap growth stock exposure, while limiting risk.
IWO takes a different approach to growth stocks by pursuing small caps. Smaller companies exhibit greater potential for business expansion compared to established players, which makes IWO’s strategy compelling. This also contributed to the ETF’s far better one-year performance compared to VONG.
Another of IWO’s strengths lies in its broader holdings of more than 1,000 stocks. Consequently, the fund possesses better diversification across industries, making it resilient against a downturn in a particular sector. However, it’s more expensive, and small-cap stocks hold higher volatility. IWO is for investors who want to target small-cap companies for their greater growth potential or to supplement a portfolio that already holds many of the large-cap stocks in VONG.
Before you buy stock in iShares Trust - iShares Russell 2000 Growth ETF, consider this:
The Motley Fool Stock Advisor analyst team just identified what they believe are the 10 best stocks for investors to buy now… and iShares Trust - iShares Russell 2000 Growth ETF wasn’t one of them. The 10 stocks that made the cut could produce monster returns in the coming years.
Consider when Netflix made this list on December 17, 2004... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you’d have $471,827!* Or when Nvidia made this list on April 15, 2005... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you’d have $1,319,291!*
Now, it’s worth noting Stock Advisor’s total average return is 986% — a market-crushing outperformance compared to 207% for the S&P 500. Don't miss the latest top 10 list, available with Stock Advisor, and join an investing community built by individual investors for individual investors.
See the 10 stocks »
*Stock Advisor returns as of May 11, 2026.
Robert Izquierdo has positions in Apple, Microsoft, and Nvidia. The Motley Fool has positions in and recommends Apple, Bloom Energy, Microsoft, Nvidia, and Sterling Infrastructure. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.