Cryptopolitan Report: Saylor Sold Bitcoin & A Third Of Our Readers Say Nothing Has Changed

Where This Actually Started 

Digital asset treasuries are a mainstay in the crypto space these days but long before this title was established, there was only one company doing it. Strategy, then called Microstrategy, made its first Bitcoin purchase in August 2020. Founder and chairman of Strategy, Michael Saylor, has since turned the mid-sized enterprise software company into what is effectively a publicly traded Bitcoin holding vehicle. The pitch through the years has centered on one goal. Buy Bitcoin and do not sell Bitcoin ever. 

Strategy set the ball rolling for other companies to follow suit and created an entire category in itself. Today there are 181 public companies that hold BTC on their balance sheet. The total amount of BTC held amongst these companies is 1,338,651, which equates to 6.37% of BTC’s total supply. From Twenty One Capital and Metaplanet in Japan to several smaller entrants that showed up this year like American Bitcoin, the Trump-linked mining and treasury firm listed on Nasdaq as ABTC, crossed 8,000 BTC in early July. Even though Stragety is the leading player in this space by a long shot with over 63% dominance, the Saylor doctrine essentially spawned an asset class. 

Source: CoinMarketCap 

That said, the same doctrine came with a promise and that promise has now been broken twice. 

What Happened Over The Past Two Weeks  

Between June 29 and July 5, Strategy sold 3,588 Bitcoin for roughly $216 million at an average price of about $60,000 per coin, according to the company’s Form 8-K filed with the SEC on July 6. Saylor confirmed the sale on X the same day. The proceeds went directly to funding dividend obligations across five preferred stock series: STRF, STRE, STRK, STRD, and the monthly payout on STRC. 

This was not the first sale as a previous sale took place at the end of May. Strategy moved 32 BTC for around $2.5 million and despite the sell off being a small number on paper, it was the first sell off since 2022 and it did send a signal to the market. 

Here is what actually forced the move. STRC, Strategy’s variable-rate perpetual preferred share, now pays a 12% annual dividend, in cash, twice a month. It is designed to trade near its $100 stated value and function like a high-yield fixed-income product tied to Bitcoin collateral. As a piece of financial engineering it is genuinely clever. As a cash obligation, it never stops. The software business underneath Strategy does not generate enough operating cash to service it. So the dividend gets paid either by issuing more stock, taking on more debt, or selling Bitcoin. In late June and early July, Bitcoin was the cleanest option available. 

As of July 14, Strategy still holds 843,775 BTC. That makes the sale in July roughly 0.4% of its total holdings. The company has also disclosed a formal “BTC Monetization Program” of up to $1.25 billion in capacity, which is the framework this sale falls under. In accounting terms it is a small pruning. In narrative terms it is a rewriting of the pitch. Peter Schiff, who is not exactly a neutral observer but is often useful for framing bear cases, put it plainly on X: the model has flipped from “sell stock and debt to buy Bitcoin” to “sell Bitcoin to pay dividends and buy back stock”. 

The forward-looking thesis, at least from Strategy’s side, is that the company is now a “volatility refinery,” to borrow the term used on the Bitcoin Quant preferred equity tracker. Bitcoin sits on the balance sheet as raw volatility. The preferred shares strip that volatility out and sell it as fixed-income yield. Common stock absorbs the leverage and the upside. In that structure, occasional Bitcoin sales to fund dividends are not a betrayal of the pitch. They are a feature of the machine. Whether the market accepts that reframing is a separate question, and it is the question underneath every response in our poll. 

Reader Pulse: The Poll 

Reading The Result

The audience answering this newsletter poll is not necessarily one that holds MSTR, STRC, ASST or ABTC directly. What can be said with confidence is that these readers are well versed in Bitcoin and understand the mechanics of treasury companies: how they accumulate, how they finance, and how sell-side pressure from a name of Strategy’s size lands on the asset when broader sentiment is already fragile. That matters, because the responses here reflect a read on macro dynamics, not just a reaction to a single company’s move. The most notable feature of the result is that no answer cleared 34%. In an audience with a solid grasp of what this sale actually means for Bitcoin in a weak market, opinion is genuinely fractured. 

No, still the most disciplined BTC treasury out there (33.33%): The leading answer, and probably the position closest to how Saylor himself would frame it. Roughly a third of readers view the sale as a manageable, minor bookkeeping exercise inside a much larger and still-intact treasury thesis. Strategy still holds close to a million Bitcoin. The company bought 175,894 BTC in 2026 alone. Selling 3,588 coins to service a specific set of dividend obligations, while awkward optically, does not exactly undo that. This cohort is reading past the headline. They are looking at the balance sheet.

Doesn’t matter, I’m not invested in any of them (~23.7%): The second largest answer, and the one that quietly says the most about where the treasury company narrative sits right now. Almost a quarter of respondents effectively opted out. That is a meaningful signal in an audience that would have been much more actively engaged with this exact question 18 months ago. Some of it is fatigue. Some of it is the fact that MSTR is down more than 70% over the past year, and the treasury proxy trade has lost a lot of the shine it had at peak. When roughly one in four readers say they are not in any of these names, that is a comment on the category, not the company.

A little, this breaks the “never sell” pitch (~22.8%): Third place, and probably the most emotionally honest response in the set. This cohort is not saying Strategy is finished. They are saying the pitch that anchored the whole thesis has been broken, and that matters. Saylor spent years building a personality around never selling. That was not just marketing. It was the reason a chunk of the retail base bought into MSTR in the first place. For this group, the sale is not a fatal blow, but it is a promise not kept. That leaves a mark even if the numbers underneath it check out.

Yes, I’d rather hold the smaller stacks (Strive, ABTC) right now (~20.2%): Fourth place but probably the most consequential answer for how this story develops from here. One in five readers is now actively looking at the smaller Bitcoin treasury names as cleaner alternatives. Strive has spent 2026 accumulating debt-free. ABTC has been running a dual mining-and-treasury model that avoids the dividend obligation trap Strategy has walked into. Neither is close to Strategy in size. Both are being reconsidered by a segment of investors who liked the original pitch and want to hold the version of it that still applies.

Add the last two groups and you get 43% of the poll signalling that the sale has meaningfully changed how they see Strategy, either in belief or in allocation intent. Add the “doesn’t matter” group and you get 66% of readers who are not standing behind the company the way they might have been a year ago. This is the sentiment picture underneath the headline. A third of the audience is still with Saylor. The other two-thirds are somewhere between annoyed, indifferent, and actively rotating out.  

The Bigger Thing Nobody Is Quite Saying Out Loud

Strategy has effectively become a levered Bitcoin ETF wrapped inside a specialty finance company, and that is a fundamentally different animal than what it was in 2021. The BTC Monetization Program is not a one-time move and rather a framework. It signals that future dividend obligations will be met, at least in part, by selling Bitcoin. And that means the volume and cadence of those sales is now going to be a permanent feature of how the company operates, not a crisis measure.

That has knock-on effects the market has not fully priced in yet. Every quarter Strategy has to decide whether to fund STRC dividends with fresh preferred issuance, common equity issuance, or Bitcoin sales. Each choice has trade-offs. Fresh issuance can dilute. Bitcoin sales can spook the market. The company will now be constantly optimising across those three levers, and outside observers will be watching every decision as a signal about where the leadership team thinks Bitcoin is heading.

The 33% of our readers holding the “still the most disciplined” line have a defensible position. Strategy did not liquidate. It did not panic. It executed a planned dividend payment inside a stated framework. But the 43% who said this changes things also have a defensible position, and it is the one worth paying attention to over the next few quarters. If Bitcoin bounces, the sales become a footnote. If Bitcoin sits at these levels or drops further, the sales become a pattern, and a pattern is a much harder thing to defend than a one-off.

Either way, the “never sell” era is over. What comes next is a different kind of Bitcoin treasury story, and our readers are already sorting themselves into who is willing to hold that version and who is looking elsewhere.

Don’t just read crypto news. Understand it. Subscribe to our newsletter. It's free.