Did You Catch the Latest From Shopify and Axon Enterprise?

In this podcast, Motley Fool analyst Jason Moser and host Ricky Mulvey discuss:

• The economic outlook from the Federal Reserve and the new U.S. trade deal with the U.K.
• How Axon Enterprise keeps posting impressive growth numbers.
• What increased global uncertainty means for Shopify.

Then, Ricky continues his conversation with Gerard Barron, CEO of TMC The Metals Company, about the environmental impact of deep sea mining.

Where to invest $1,000 right now? Our analyst team just revealed what they believe are the 10 best stocks to buy right now. Learn More »

To catch full episodes of all The Motley Fool's free podcasts, check out our podcast center. When you're ready to invest, check out this top 10 list of stocks to buy.

A full transcript is below.

Where to invest $1,000 right now

When our analyst team has a stock tip, it can pay to listen. After all, Stock Advisor’s total average return is 907%* — a market-crushing outperformance compared to 163% for the S&P 500.

They just revealed what they believe are the 10 best stocks for investors to buy right now, available when you join Stock Advisor.

See the stocks »

*Stock Advisor returns as of May 12, 2025

This video was recorded on May 08, 2025

Ricky Mulvey: The trade deals are coming, so are earnings. You're listening to Motley Fool Money. I'm Ricky Mulvey, joined today by import and export expert, Jason Moser. Jason, thanks for being here, man.

Jason Moser: Wait a minute. Don't you mean Art Vander-- No, no. Jason Moser. That's right. Hey, Ricky, how's it going?

Ricky Mulvey: It's going pretty well. We got a lot of news today. One thing about this news cycle is I'm not worried about having enough to talk about. We got Big Macro. We got Axon. We got Shopify. Let's get into it. Big Macro, two big stories. We had the Federal Reserve meeting yesterday. We also have a trade deal with the United Kingdom announced this morning. We will first start with the Fed meeting where J. Powell basically keeping his options open, telling folks to be a little cautious about the economy. "If the large increases in tariffs that have been announced are sustained, they are likely to generate a rise in inflation, a slowdown in economic growth, and an increase in unemployment. The effects on inflation could be short-lived, reflecting a one time shift in the price level. It is also possible that the inflationary effects could be more persistent." JMo, my translation here is, I think Jerome Powell is basically saying, please, please, please let this be a bluff or else we're getting stagflation.

Jason Moser: He is approaching things, I think the way most reasonable or rational investors would. It's we're taking it day by day. We're not going to go too far one way or the other. I appreciate the point he made in regard to the risks in regard to unemployment and potentially inflation are higher. He's not saying that they necessarily will go higher, but he's just saying the risks are higher, and a lot of that is just due to uncertainty. I'd be fascinated to see at the end of 2025 how many times the word uncertainty was actually mentioned, because it feels like it's a very common word these days, but generally speaking, I think they made the right call. There's no reason to do one thing or another. It does seem like we are making our way through uncertain time in pretty good shape. It's just day by day, though, isn't it? We just don't know exactly what's going to happen. But today, obviously, we got a headline in regard to the trade deal with the UK and we're going to get more information on that here as time goes on. But I think that could be a sign of good things to come, hopefully, but we'll have to wait and see.

Ricky Mulvey: JMo, you sound like an NFL offensive line coach dealing with some injuries when you're saying we're just taking things day by day. But I guess the same applies for Jerome Powell. With the meeting, as well, should have mentioned the headline, man, no change in interest rates. That was something that obviously President Donald Trump was rooting for. I think the positive spin on this is there's tariff uncertainty. You can control F for uncertainty as much as you want. Go have fun with that, JMo. But Jerome Powell saying the economy is pretty good. Inflation, we're pretty close to 2%, and the labor market remains "at or near maximum employment", seems like the overall temperature of the economy is looking pretty good right now, pretty warm and sunny if you take the tariffs out of the equation, which I guess you can't. Maybe that's a bad point.

Jason Moser: In regard to the Fed, I think things do look pretty good. They're trying to minimize inflation and maximize employment, and things are looking pretty good in that regard. When you poll economists out there in regard to the economy and where we're headed, we're always talking about recessions these days and in recession talk it's basically a coin flip right now. Nobody really knows we saw contraction in the first quarter. It remains to be seen, obviously, what will come of the second quarter. My suspicion is probably we see better second quarter numbers. If for nothing else, there will likely just be some pull forward in a lot of activity based on tariff uncertainty. But then by the same token, you look to student loans, for example, we're seeing collections on student loans. They will restart. That's 5.3 million federal student loan borrowers that will have to ultimately pay per year, and that absolutely can impact spending. But my suspicion is we don't enter recession, at least based on the Q2 numbers. I don't think we're going to see Q2 come in negative like we saw in Q1. Particularly because Q1 was so modest in contraction there. But again, time will tell.

Ricky Mulvey: That's before the ship stopped coming in. There's still a lot of ships not going at the port of Los Angeles. I don't know, man. I think you had it right when you said it's a coin flip. Honestly, I got no idea. But you know what the market is liking and feeling pretty good about? That's this United Kingdom deal. That was announced this morning. The headlines that the 10% tariff stays into effect, but there's some reciprocal agreements going on, specifically with beef and aluminum and there's going to be more export opportunities for the great ranchers, farmers, and producers of the United States, according to Donald Trump's post on Truth Social. I think this is the part that investors are really responding to. This is, "This deal shows that if you respect America and bring serious proposals to the table, America is OPEN FOR BUSINESS. Many more to come. Stay tuned." JMo, the thing that's important here, I want to highlight this with this fact. The S&P 500 is now back to the level it was on the day before Liberation Day. Things are bouncing back and investors seem very optimistic that more trade deals are coming as well.

Jason Moser: It has been a very bumpy ride thus far. Again, I think this reiterates why we invest the way we do here at Fool. We do not trade in and out of the market. We just aim to find good businesses, buy them at reasonable prices, and just hang on to them like Warren Buffett. I thought it was really interesting to see that Boeing announcement today. It sounds like Boeing is going to benefit from part of this UK trade deal, and that's a good thing. Ultimately, I think, listen, we all want to see positive results. We all want to see progress. Now, how that ultimately happens, it could be a bumpy road to get there. Hopefully, it looks like maybe we're on that path, though.

Ricky Mulvey: It's one of those examples, highlighting the way we invest the way we do. If you had all the information right now that you had a month ago, which is we basically have a trade embargo with China, 10% tariffs across the world, and maybe one major trade deal, you might say, the market is probably going to be down from where it is that day. It's basically impossible to predict. Speaking of a good business, we'll see about the valuation, JMo. Let's talk about Axon. Your beloved taser in public safety company reported this morning, you're ready to call this a lights out quarter? Revenue up almost a third from last year, net revenue retention of 123%, operating cash flow back into positive territory, free cash flow squeaked into positive Terry at $1 million. What's it out to you in the business results?

Jason Moser: I don't think I would call it a lights out quarter. It's the same as it ever was, to steal a line from Talking Heads. The company just continues to just perform. This was their 13th consecutive quarter of 25% or better revenue growth there. You saw top line growth of 31%, and that was thanks in large part to even more impressive, 34% growth in annual recurring revenue. I think that's becoming a more and more attractive part of this business, is the recurring revenue side of it. But ultimately are doing a very good job bringing it down to the bottom line. We saw GAAP earnings per share of $1.08 and non-GAAP earnings per share of $1.41. I think the only reason why we don't see that bottom line performing a little bit more impressively is just because they continue to reinvest in this business, and that's ultimately what they need to do. We're seeing that in things like their latest innovations. They have Axon vehicle intelligence this is a platform that expands capabilities and their automatic license plate reading technology with a product they have called Axon Outpost. Then they also have stationary video capabilities involved with that as well, called Axon Lightpost, and if you can imagine, cameras on Lightpost. Ultimately, this all just boils down to the company's explicit mission.

They want to protect life, and they're trying to do that in a number of different ways, whether it's tasers that stun, don't kill or whether it's cameras or audio that records evidence and actually gives us the reality of the situation. It's just a company that continues to fire on all cylinders, as Ron Gross would say. I'm very impressed with them. You look at the segment growth in the business alone, the hardware side of the business, 26.1% for the quarter, but the software and services side of the business, 38.7%. That, to me, speaks to why this is such an attractive investment because they have this massive installed hardware base, and they continue to develop very attractive software and services that not only keep their customers coming back, but they keep them coming back for more. It reminds me a little bit of a company that I think a lot of us know.

Ricky Mulvey: Are you going to do the Apple comparison?

Jason Moser: Well, I was going to say, but you already spoiled it. So yeah, I'm going to go do it.

Ricky Mulvey: You should go ahead and do it.

Jason Moser: It's the Apple of public safety.

Ricky Mulvey: I saw some takes on Odd X where it's like this is a hardware company becoming a software business. But really, it's both. You can't have one without the other. But the software seems to be the major growth engine for Axon, and you look at some innovations for how it's expanding that total addressable market. They're doing, what is it, body cams with translation on it now. It's not just tasers and police, it's total public safety. I think that's something that initially why I was hesitant about the stock is I was like, OK, it's just public safety, but they're continuing to prove investors like me wrong again and again, JMo.

Jason Moser: Well, I'm glad you said that you can't really have one without the other. You look at something like a Google, for example, and obviously, that's really a software play. Again, going back to Apple, what's made that company so successful through the years is building great hardware and then supporting with tremendous software. I think Axon is doing just that. They've built a tremendous hardware environment, but then they're supporting it with things like evidence.com, and then these investments in AI, utilizing AI in order to make the business better, the Draft One transcription plan we talked about before, shaving just hours of work off of our police forces here around the country. Then the AI Era plan, which ultimately opens up customers to all of the new innovations that the company continues to launch as time goes on. They've just done a very good job of coupling terrific hardware with really what seems like even better software, and very difficult to get out of that once you get logged in.

Ricky Mulvey: Something I want folks to know, though, the valuation on this company has shot up dramatically over the past year. This has always been a relatively expensive stock. Back in Julyish of 2024, we're looking at like 60 times forward earnings, which is that's growthy. That's about 3X the multiple of the S&P 500. But now, JMo, after this latest quarter, we are at like 118 times forward earnings. We're more than 100 times forward earnings. Compared to Palantir, this is a value stock, man. But compared to almost any other company in the market, this is growthy, growthy, growthy. Are we at nosebleed valuation yet, and any concerns about that valuation for investors looking at this stock?

Jason Moser: I will say, I am an Axon shareholder. I've recommended the stock in our services here, and I'm a big fan. I'm hanging on for the ride. I do get a little nervous sometimes about what happens when they break that 25% revenue growth rate streak, because it's a matter of when not if. I will eventually happen. I don't know exactly how the market will react to that. But when you look at the way the company performs, now, number one, this is a company that really dominates its market. It is the market leader. You look at these results for the quarter, again, tremendous, raising guidance for the full year, tremendous, total addressable market, well over $100 billion according to their estimations. That's tremendous, right? These are the types of companies that garner those premium valuations. It's well over 100 times earnings today, but that's not abnormal. It's scary. It's something to think about. It's not something that you just go buy this thing blindly without thinking about valuation. We always say valuation matters. But again, you look at the market opportunity that they're pursuing. You look at the things that are coming around the corner. I had the great fortune to interview the president of the company Josh Isner a couple of times, and I asked him this. Specifically, I was like, what's around the corner? Man, what's next for you? Listen, this is going to be a robotics company. You need to count on that. Now, whether that is just full fledged robocop or some sort of derivation thereof, I don't know, but this is not a company that is sitting still, and I think that's really important to consider when you look at the valuation and you look at the overall market opportunity, and you consider the fact that public safety is something that I think we all really ultimately support. That's not just domestically, that is a global thing. It's a tremendous business, I think, with a lot of opportunity ahead. I certainly understand the market's premium valuation today.

Ricky Mulvey: Maybe can we say uncertainty with the valuation, JMo?

Jason Moser: I wonder how many times we said uncertainty in this show.

Ricky Mulvey: Let's hit Shopify. Investors gave Shopify's quarter a meeh, even though this business delivered revenue growth aroundish 20%. But the thing that really stood out to me was this free cash flow number. That's up more than 50% from a year ago at $363 million. I don't know why I said it is $363 million. I'm looking at this business as a shareholder of Shopify. I'm pretty happy about it. But why doesn't Wall Street care about this e-commerce giant becoming a revenue and cash flow machine JMo?

Jason Moser: I am a shareholder, as well, and I've recommended the stock, and I am very happy with these results, and I'm content to hang on. Listen, you look at the way the stock was behaving pre-market versus where it is now. As we record, the shares are basically flat now. I think maybe the market's coming to its senses a little bit because this was a good quarter. I think one of the concerns and it's very understandable you look at Shopify's merchants, which are ultimately their customers, those are small to medium sized businesses, and a lot of these businesses are susceptible to broader economic headwinds, tariffs and whatnot. You can see where there might be some, let's say it, Ricky, uncertainty.

In regard to near-term results, as far as these tariff policies and trade negotiations play out, the elimination of the de minimus tax exemption, that'll likely have an impact, as well. Maybe it won't be substantial. I guess time will tell there. But again, this is one of those businesses where a headline could change everything. I mean, a headline that is beyond its control. A headline that really centers around the macroeconomic conditions could make all the difference in the world for business like this one. I look at the numbers they recorded, I mean, I've got no concerns at all.

Ricky Mulvey: The de minimus thing is something I have questions about, as well. I know Shopify had a big editorial about how much this would hurt small businesses this quarter. President Harley Finkelstein coming out, saying, hey, it's not really a big deal. We're spread out across the world. I definitely, as an investor in Shopify, have some questions about that potential impact for this business. We're over time, even though we've got a lot more to talk about. Jay Mo, appreciate you being here. Thank you for your time and your insight. Many thanks.

Up next, part two of my conversation with CEO of The Metals Company, Gerard Barron. It's a company looking to mine or pick up rocks in the Pacific Ocean. We talked about the sticky political situation this company is in on yesterday's show. Today, we're hitting the environmental questions. Like, what happens when you start messing with the bottom of the deep ocean?

Ricky Mulvey: You mentioned the environmental impact, and I want to make sure we spend some time there. To be clear, this is a space where if you're listening, you should recognize the bias. Gerard definitely wants to pull up these rocks and turn them into cobalt and sell them. I have a small position in The Metals Company, and I've also looked into this, and it's one where I see some environmental argument where we want to protect the oceans, and we don't really know a lot about the bottom of the sea floor, especially in the deep ocean. What I don't see the environmentalists having a strong argument for, though, Gerard, is whether this is actually worse than the way we currently get nickel and cobalt out of the ground on land. I think you said that the environmentalists misunderstand what you're doing and the environmental impact of The Metals Company. What do you think the environmentalists misunderstand about picking up rocks in the deep sea?

Gerard Barron: Well, let me say I'm an environmentalist myself. I care about the planet. I care about the oceans. I care about the trees and the biodiversity living among them. But let's go back to first principles. It makes sense that we carry out extractive industries in parts of the planet where there is the least life, not the most life. Now, the nodules are based on the abyssal planes. I mentioned before the amount of life there is measured in grams per square meter. There's no alternative use for that part of the seafloor. There's no one living there that we have to move aside. We can't grow crops there. We can't move people to live there in the future. We compare that to what we're doing on land, where our Number 1 revenue comes from nickel from our nodules, and 100% of the growth in nickel is coming from what we call rainforest nickel. I urge your listeners and investors to go on Google Rainforest Nickel, because that's the alternative that we want to slow down and stop. From an environmental perspective, it's just so straightforward because you have to think about what the true impact of current metal production is because a lot of people don't think about where the materials that, whether it's your knife and fork or your phone battery or your electric car battery, if it is not grown, it is mined. We all believe that we're heading toward circularity, that we can recycle more and more in the future, but we do not have enough metals in the system for that to be a significant part of the current supply mix.

The environmental argument is very clear in my opinion. We have carried out lifecycle analysis. We've had other companies carry out lifecycle analysis, like Benchmark Mineral Intelligence, a highly regarded independent firm. They have compared the impacts of producing nickel and the other metals on land compared to what our impacts will be. What I can tell you is that our impacts are a fraction compared to the land-based alternative. That's good news. The notion that we don't know enough about this part of the ocean floor is also a misnomer circulated by activists who don't want this industry to start. We have, for example, ourself carried out 22 expeditions to our license area. In total, there have been more than 200 expeditions since the 1970s. We know a lot about this part of the ocean floor. We also know that it recovers much faster than people imagined. We ran our collector trials back in 2022, and we were able to return there 12 months later to see what the recovery rates were like. It was really encouraging. Of course, there have been other studies, more recently, something called SMARTEX that visited a site that was originally disturbed for nodules in the 1970s, and they returned last year. They've now published their results. We have an enormous amount of environmental data around this part of the ocean floor, and so I think the environmental evidence supports it. For those people that are concerned about the environmental impacts, so am I, and that's why we've carried out so much environmental research. Of course, we have a regulator who will oversee us to make sure that we work within boundaries that we do operate within the rules and the permits that will be granted to us.

Ricky Mulvey: One in the weeds question on that and then I want to get a couple of financial questions. You mentioned about sea life returning to the zones where you're picking up rocks, kicking up some sediment. There's another research done decades ago, and this was Daniel Jones of the National Oceanography Center, found that there were persistent impacts to marine life and physical changes to seafloor 44 years after mining took place on the ocean floor. What you're saying is your evidence found that life was returning just one year after. Can you explain the disconnect here for people saying it sounds like this could cause disruption to life for decades after you have these robots coming through, picking up rocks and kicking up sediment.

Gerard Barron: Well, it's a little bit like glass half full glass, half empty. For example, Daniel, what he refers to there were some trials that I mentioned, the SMARTEX campaign that ran out last year, and they came back to an area that had nodules collected 44 years earlier. Now, what happened 44 years earlier is the technology was nowhere near what it is today. They actually used an Archimedes screw drive system to propel the collector on the sea floor. They also used an entirely different hydraulic type of collector system. In fact, those screw drives made an indentation of up to 80 centimeters into the sea floor. You compare that to what we did back in 2022, we impacted the top three centimeters. Just like a very light snowplow. In fact, we had some of the challenges with keeping the collector on the sea floor. But what they found in that study that you refer from Daniel Jones is full recovery of sediment, macrofauna and foraminifera in the tracks and the plume areas. What I've seen activists do is look at that study and say, I can still see the track marks. Well, let me tell you. If you go and drive your car down the Atacama desert and you make a big set of imprints and you go back there 44 years later, you'll probably still see them there.

This is where environmental messaging can be really weaponized to say, I can still see the fact that you were here. It's like, yes, but let's look at what's happening in that sediment with the organisms that depend on it and live in it. What we found with our own trials back in 2022, when we went back there one year later, was that the foraminifera in the tracts recovered to 30% of pre-disturbance levels. That's after one year, 30%, and 50% of the diversity had returned. We also found that actually disturbing some of the sediment is actually good for productivity because there's so little food there that when you disturb it, the critters say, something going on over here. Let's move over and see if we can get some nutrients. I guess let's also put it in context. The ocean is such a vast body of water, like hundreds of millions of square kilometers, about 360 million square kilometers, and we're impacting a tiny grain of sand in an Olympic-sized swimming pool. That's the comparison. It has an amazing ability to react to survive. For example, about 500 miles to our east is the East Pacific Rise, where there are these hydrothermal vents that have been operating at about 2,000 meters below sea level. They are spewing a constant stream of poisonous gases, sulfur and the likes, into the ocean every hour of every day. People think the ocean is this beautiful, pristine, never disturbed before body of water. But of course, it's not. It's a living thing, and the biggest risk to that living body of water is global warming and acidification. What we need to do to slow down all of that is to stop destroying our carbon sinks on land. We need to stop destroying all of the biodiversity and indigenous people that live among it and depend on those environments, and we need to be looking for where can we get the lowest impact both to people and to the environment, supply of these critical minerals for the future.

Ricky Mulvey: Gerard, I think you make a strong case, and I also think that some of the opposition to your projects are not entirely out of the goodness of folks' hearts. I think there's some outside interests that may be affecting the messaging. As we wrap up, I want to give you one question from a fool named Omar M. in Florida. He's very interested in your company, and he wants to know what are the key milestones or catalysts that he should be looking for in 2025 and 2026 on the road to commercialization?

Gerard Barron: Well, hi, Omar. The first is Fast Track permitting. The second is we will have some more strategic names involved, and I've talked for years about the fact that people wanted to earn into our assets to come and help us, whether that's on the offshore production side or the onshore processing side. The thing that always slowed down those conversations were the permitting pathway. But with the permitting pathway now looking secure, those parties are back at the table, and so expect there to be a steady stream of news of really credible names coming to help us unlock this opportunity. Quality names, permits, and then of course, the economics that go with it. One of the beautiful things about these nodules is the high grade of the material. One of the things that has a big impact on economics, of course, is how much revenue I can secure out of every ton of these nodules. If I think about this as a polymetallic, so it's full of nickel, copper, cobalt, and manganese, but the metal that most people know about is copper. While it's only 1.1% copper, if I put the nickel, cobalt, and manganese into copper equivalents, it's more than 7% copper equivalent. Last year, the average grade of copper mind was 0.6 of 1%. You just work out the numbers. It's far more lucrative for every ton of material.

Now, the other amazing thing we have about this resource is when we put it on a boat, we can send it anywhere. We can send it to an existing processing plant in Japan because we don't have to build or permit it. But the most fantastic thing is we can also send it to the United States of America. That's why part of the executive order was calling on US agencies to help us to say, bring back the jobs, bring back the industry, reindustrialize the United States of America. We have a resource that's mobile. We have a resource that can service that need, so it's a really exciting time. This is a new industry. We happen to be in the preeminent position. President Trump fired the starting gun with that executive order recently, and I thank the shareholders who've been with us because it's not easy. We have environmental groups hating on us for, as you say, a lot of very nefarious reasons, in our opinion. But I think there are great days ahead, and it's going to be one hell of a journey, and I invite you all to come with me. It's going to be fun.

Ricky Mulvey: Gerard Barron, fascinating company to follow. He's the CEO of The Metals Company. Appreciate your time, your insight, and thank you for joining us on Motley Fool Money.

As always, people on the program have interest in the stocks they talk about and the Motley full may have formal recommendations for or against, so don't buy or sell stocks basally on what you hear. Our personal finance content follows Motley Fool editorial standards, and while not approved by advertisers, advertisements and sponsored content are provided for informational purposes only. See our full advertising disclosure. Please check out our show notes. Motley Fool only picks products that would personally recommend to friends like you. I'm Ricky Mulvey. Thanks for listening. We'll be back tomorrow.

Jason Moser has positions in Axon Enterprise and Shopify. Ricky Mulvey has positions in Shopify and TMC The Metals Company. The Motley Fool has positions in and recommends Apple, Axon Enterprise, Palantir Technologies, and Shopify. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.