Are Quantum Computing Stocks a Buy in January?

Source The Motley Fool

Sometimes, it just takes a little momentum for a stock market narrative to start. This is precisely what happened with quantum computing stocks in late 2024. Stocks like Rigetti (NASDAQ: RGTI), Quantum Computing (NASDAQ: QUBT), and IonQ (NYSE: IONQ) have shot up hundreds of percentage points in the last six months, crushing the returns of the hottest artificial intelligence (AI) stocks. The momentum began with the idea that quantum computing could help with AI workloads and was accelerated by a breakthrough quantum computer chip from Alphabet's (NASDAQ: GOOG)(NASDAQ: GOOGL) Google.

2025 has been a different story so far. The three quantum computing stocks referenced above collapsed in the first few days of this year after comments by Nvidia CEO Jensen Huang during the CES tech expo in Las Vegas. Should you buy the dip on these quantum computing stocks in January? Or is this short-lived party officially over?

Start Your Mornings Smarter! Wake up with Breakfast news in your inbox every market day. Sign Up For Free »

Let's dive further into these businesses and find out.

A volatility roller coaster stemming from headline reactions

Quantum computing is an early-stage technology that researchers have worked on for decades. Using the mysterious properties of quantum mechanics, quantum computers can solve highly complex problems that are virtually impossible for traditional computers to solve in a reasonable amount of time. These range from pharmaceutical simulations to atomic structures, encryption, or simply predicting the weather more accurately.

Rigetti, Quantum Computing, and IonQ are three companies working to make quantum computing a viable business. If they do, it could revolutionize the entire computer industry, which is massive when you combine both personal and commercial use cases. In fact, some researchers believe that quantum computers will be so powerful they will render the current encryption methods of cryptocurrencies broken.

Optimism with these new technologies has abounded in the wake of the new artificial intelligence tools that have taken the world by storm. These tools require a lot of computing resources to scale up, which quantum computers could theoretically provide. Microcap stocks such as Rigetti have soared on this optimism. Further fuel was thrown on the fire when Google's Quantum AI lab announced a new quantum computer chip called Willow, which Wall Street took as a sign that quantum computing is much closer to commercialization. Quantum Computing shot up over 1,000% in the last six months after the news was announced.

These headline reactions reversed when Huang soured on the immediate quantum timeline. Speaking during a Q&A session at CES earlier in January, he said that quantum computing commercialization was likely 15 to 30 years away. This is what caused the quantum computing stocks to collapse as much as 60% since the start of 2025.

Promising technologies with technical hurdles

It can pay to listen to Huang. It is perhaps his top priority at Nvidia to figure out what the future of computing will be. From his comments, it is clear that he is bullish on the potential of quantum computing (Nvidia works with a lot of these companies), but that he believes it will be many years before these products reach true commercialization.

Quantum computers at the moment are tiny, wildly expensive, and only operate in the most optimal conditions. When a quantum system interacts with its environment, it can screw up the whole computing process. It is also extremely difficult -- at least with current research methods -- to scale and correct errors with quantum computers. This makes them too unreliable to be used in commercial applications. They only work in the most optimal conditions in research labs.

The technology has been proven to work and shows immense promise, but there are still many technical hurdles that engineers need to solve with quantum computing. It will likely take billions of dollars in research spending before they are solved.

RGTI Market Cap Chart

Data by YCharts.

Should you buy the dip on quantum computing stocks?

Investors could talk all day about the promise of quantum computers. But that's all it is right now: a promise. These quantum computing companies generate minimal amounts of revenue that combine to less than $50 million over the last 12 months. All three have wildly negative profit margins. If Huang is correct that it will take at least 15 years for quantum computers to be commercialized, this is likely 15 years when IonQ, Quantum Computing, and Rigetti are losing money.

These are not situations you want to invest in. Even if you assume all three of these companies will help bring quantum computers to market, who is to say they will get there first? Google-parent Alphabet has vast resources and could win the race to quantum supremacy. It is unclear when quantum computers will get commercialized, and it is not guaranteed that these small quantum computing companies will be the ones to do it.

All three of these quantum computing stocks have wildly inflated valuations compared to their financial figures. Most long-term investors will want to avoid buying Rigetti, IonQ, and Quantum Computing stocks for their portfolio right now. Only heavy risk takers with long investing horizons should even consider them.

Don’t miss this second chance at a potentially lucrative opportunity

Ever feel like you missed the boat in buying the most successful stocks? Then you’ll want to hear this.

On rare occasions, our expert team of analysts issues a “Double Down” stock recommendation for companies that they think are about to pop. If you’re worried you’ve already missed your chance to invest, now is the best time to buy before it’s too late. And the numbers speak for themselves:

  • Nvidia: if you invested $1,000 when we doubled down in 2009, you’d have $352,417!*
  • Apple: if you invested $1,000 when we doubled down in 2008, you’d have $44,855!*
  • Netflix: if you invested $1,000 when we doubled down in 2004, you’d have $451,759!*

Right now, we’re issuing “Double Down” alerts for three incredible companies, and there may not be another chance like this anytime soon.

See 3 “Double Down” stocks »

*Stock Advisor returns as of January 13, 2025

Suzanne Frey, an executive at Alphabet, is a member of The Motley Fool's board of directors. Brett Schafer has positions in Alphabet. The Motley Fool has positions in and recommends Alphabet and Nvidia. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.

Disclaimer: For information purposes only. Past performance is not indicative of future results.
placeholder
Gold ends three-week slide at the $4,400 line — eight straight days of ETF inflows vs a 5% 10-year and a 100 dollarSpot gold closed Friday at $4,378.39, up 0.84% on the day and about 0.8% for the week — its first weekly gain in four weeks — with the intraday high of $4,399.67 leaving it 33 cents shy of the $4,400 line. Gold ETFs have now logged eight straight sessions of inflows, but with the 10-year back above 5% and the dollar index near 100, here is what decides whether this is a reversal or a bounce.
Author  Suzie
Sep 20, Sun
Spot gold closed Friday at $4,378.39, up 0.84% on the day and about 0.8% for the week — its first weekly gain in four weeks — with the intraday high of $4,399.67 leaving it 33 cents shy of the $4,400 line. Gold ETFs have now logged eight straight sessions of inflows, but with the 10-year back above 5% and the dollar index near 100, here is what decides whether this is a reversal or a bounce.
placeholder
October hike odds climb toward 60% as Goldman and BofA both flip — what Warsh's "dose of accommodation" really changedRate futures now price roughly 55% to 62% for a 25bp hike at the October 27-28 FOMC, up from about 30% before Chair Warsh's post-meeting framing that the Fed is merely "removing some accommodation." Goldman Sachs has added an October hike to its forecast and Bank of America now sees moves in both October and December. Here is the repricing, the language behind it, and the two data points that decide it.
Author  Irene Q.
Sep 23, Wed
Rate futures now price roughly 55% to 62% for a 25bp hike at the October 27-28 FOMC, up from about 30% before Chair Warsh's post-meeting framing that the Fed is merely "removing some accommodation." Goldman Sachs has added an October hike to its forecast and Bank of America now sees moves in both October and December. Here is the repricing, the language behind it, and the two data points that decide it.
placeholder
Four jobs reports in five days: what JOLTS, ADP, claims and the September payrolls mean for the October Fed decisionThe US labour market faces its densest data week of the month. JOLTS job openings land Tuesday (7.2 million expected), ADP on Wednesday (70,000 expected), initial claims on Thursday and the September non-farm payrolls on Friday (100,000 expected, down from 162,000). Markets price a 64%-70% chance of another quarter-point Fed hike on October 28. The dollar index sits at 100.77 and the S&P 500 at 7,729.8.
Author  Mitrade
Yesterday 06: 33
The US labour market faces its densest data week of the month. JOLTS job openings land Tuesday (7.2 million expected), ADP on Wednesday (70,000 expected), initial claims on Thursday and the September non-farm payrolls on Friday (100,000 expected, down from 162,000). Markets price a 64%-70% chance of another quarter-point Fed hike on October 28. The dollar index sits at 100.77 and the S&P 500 at 7,729.8.
placeholder
Nvidia's $150 billion buyback landed — and the AI sector fell anyway. That's the signal worth tradingNvidia closed up 1.68% at $228.86 on 28 September after announcing a $150 billion share repurchase authorisation, the largest single corporate buyback on record, while the rest of the AI complex sold off: AMD -3.6%, Micron -2.6%, Meta -4.8% and the Philadelphia Semiconductor Index -1.61%. The divergence is not noise. Capital is rotating toward cash-flow certainty, not abandoning the AI theme. With Micron reporting after the close on 30 September, here is what the split means.
Author  Irene Q.
8 hours ago
Nvidia closed up 1.68% at $228.86 on 28 September after announcing a $150 billion share repurchase authorisation, the largest single corporate buyback on record, while the rest of the AI complex sold off: AMD -3.6%, Micron -2.6%, Meta -4.8% and the Philadelphia Semiconductor Index -1.61%. The divergence is not noise. Capital is rotating toward cash-flow certainty, not abandoning the AI theme. With Micron reporting after the close on 30 September, here is what the split means.
placeholder
The 30-year Treasury just hit a 22-year high — and the bond market is not pricing the Fed, it is pricing the deficitThe 30-year Treasury yield closed at 5.56% on 28 September, the highest since June 2004, while the 10-year reached 5.24% and the 20-year 5.60%. The curve has steepened roughly 30bp in eight sessions even as October hike odds sit at 70.3%. That gap is the story: the long end is repricing fiscal and inflation risk, not policy. With PCE on Wednesday and payrolls on Friday, here is what the long end is really saying.
Author  Irene Q.
8 hours ago
The 30-year Treasury yield closed at 5.56% on 28 September, the highest since June 2004, while the 10-year reached 5.24% and the 20-year 5.60%. The curve has steepened roughly 30bp in eight sessions even as October hike odds sit at 70.3%. That gap is the story: the long end is repricing fiscal and inflation risk, not policy. With PCE on Wednesday and payrolls on Friday, here is what the long end is really saying.
goTop
quote