2 Social Security Cost-of-Living Adjustment (COLA) Changes Retirees Really Want to See

Source The Motley Fool

The 2025 Social Security cost-of-living adjustment (COLA) came in at just 2.5%. That's well under the 3.2% retirees got last year and far less than what many were hoping for. The high inflation over the last few years has made it difficult for retirees to afford their basic expenses, and many fear this will only get worse in 2025.

For years, groups like The Senior Citizens League (TSCL) have been calling for changes to the way the government calculates COLAs, but so far, there hasn't been any movement. The following two options, though far from a certainty, could significantly improve retirees' finances and help Social Security maintain its buying power over time.

Serious person holding documents looking at laptop.

Image source: Getty Images.

1. Instituting a minimum COLA of 3%

Right now, Social Security COLAs are tied to the inflation rate as determined by annual changes in the third-quarter Consumer Price Index for Urban and Wage Earners and Clerical Workers (CPI-W). The 2024 third-quarter average was 2.5% higher than the 2023 third-quarter average, hence the 2.5% COLA.

But many feel this isn't sufficient. TSCL found that Social Security benefits have actually lost about 20% of their buying power since 2010, largely due to insufficient COLAs. Instituting a mandatory floor of 3% would make it more likely that Social Security's buying power will at least hold steady over time.

It's also possible that in some years where inflation is lower, like 2024, a mandatory 3% COLA could increase Social Security's buying power a little. But it's unclear whether the government would actually allow this.

2. Basing COLAs on the CPI-E instead of the CPI-W

One of the oddest things about the Social Security COLA calculation is that the CPI-W actually excludes retiree households. It focuses specifically on urban households with at least one-half of their income coming from clerical or hourly wage occupations. Those 62 and older are covered by a separate index known as the Consumer Price Index for the Elderly (CPI-E).

Many understandably feel the Social Security Administration should use the CPI-E instead of the CPI-W to calculate benefits because the CPI-E more accurately reflects senior spending. This can be quite different from the spending habits of workers.

TSCL found that if the government had used the CPI-E instead of the CPI-W, retirees would've gotten larger COLAs in seven out of 10 years between 2014 and 2024. That would've earned the average beneficiary nearly $2,700 more over that time.

Between this idea and the mandatory 3% COLA floor, the switch to the CPI-E is more likely to happen. Some politicians have put forth this idea over the years, but so far, it hasn't gained any traction.

Are these changes likely to happen?

Many retirees -- and workers, for that matter -- are curious about whether the government is actually going to make any reforms to Social Security or its COLAs. While we can't predict the future, it's safe to say this isn't likely anytime soon.

Social Security is facing a funding crisis, with its trust funds expected to be depleted in roughly a decade. Without government intervention, this would lead to benefit cuts of around 23%. It's unlikely it'll go this far. Social Security has been in trouble before, and the government has made changes to keep it going.

But it probably won't make any changes that would boost Social Security's COLA right now because that could drain the trust funds even faster. It's more likely that any changes to the COLAs would occur alongside a government plan to increase Social Security's future funding.

This is all speculation right now. All we can do, apart from making it clear to our legislators that Social Security is an important issue for us, is to build up our own savings as much as possible. The less dependent we are on Social Security, the less affected we'll be by whatever happens in the future.

The $22,924 Social Security bonus most retirees completely overlook

If you're like most Americans, you're a few years (or more) behind on your retirement savings. But a handful of little-known "Social Security secrets" could help ensure a boost in your retirement income. For example: one easy trick could pay you as much as $22,924 more... each year! Once you learn how to maximize your Social Security benefits, we think you could retire confidently with the peace of mind we're all after. Simply click here to discover how to learn more about these strategies.

View the "Social Security secrets" »

The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.

Disclaimer: For information purposes only. Past performance is not indicative of future results.
placeholder
Gold Price Analysis Today | Forex Gold Analysis | XAU/USD Analysis - November 11, 2026Get the latest gold price analysis, forex gold insights, and XAU/USD analysis for November 11, 2026. Read on for the details.
Author  Mitrade
Nov 11, Wed
Get the latest gold price analysis, forex gold insights, and XAU/USD analysis for November 11, 2026. Read on for the details.
placeholder
Bitcoin lost its 200-day average — but the exit started three sessions before the CPIBitcoin fell 2.5% to about $73,400 on 11 November, an 11-week low, breaking its 200-day moving average near $73,100. The 24-hour liquidation tally reached $632 to $705 million, roughly 82% of it longs. But spot ETF outflows began three sessions earlier and USDT's market cap has shrunk $6.6 billion in 60 days — the leveraged length left before the inflation print did. A double top at 81,890 and 81,080 leaves a measured target of 69,366.
Author  Suzie
Nov 11, Wed
Bitcoin fell 2.5% to about $73,400 on 11 November, an 11-week low, breaking its 200-day moving average near $73,100. The 24-hour liquidation tally reached $632 to $705 million, roughly 82% of it longs. But spot ETF outflows began three sessions earlier and USDT's market cap has shrunk $6.6 billion in 60 days — the leveraged length left before the inflation print did. A double top at 81,890 and 81,080 leaves a measured target of 69,366.
placeholder
Nvidia slid 7.7% after hours while AMD and Broadcom rose — the AI trade changed hands, it didn't breakNvidia closed Wednesday at 173.73, up 2.87%, then fell as much as 8.1% to 159.44 after reports that its board was preparing for a possible leadership change. The same session, the Philadelphia Semiconductor Index rose 5.7% with all 30 components higher, CoreWeave jumped 24.7% on 168% revenue growth, and Micron added 11.9%. If AI demand were being repriced, AMD and Broadcom would not be bid. This is a governance discount on one name, and 204.54 — the 200-day average — is the level that settles it.
Author  Irene Q.
Nov 12, Thu
Nvidia closed Wednesday at 173.73, up 2.87%, then fell as much as 8.1% to 159.44 after reports that its board was preparing for a possible leadership change. The same session, the Philadelphia Semiconductor Index rose 5.7% with all 30 components higher, CoreWeave jumped 24.7% on 168% revenue growth, and Micron added 11.9%. If AI demand were being repriced, AMD and Broadcom would not be bid. This is a governance discount on one name, and 204.54 — the 200-day average — is the level that settles it.
placeholder
Gold hit a one-year low while central banks bought 321 tonnes — the sellers were never the ones you thinkSpot gold closed at 3,876 on Thursday, down 2.8% and its lowest close in more than a year, with an intraday low near 3,852. The dollar is at a 19-month high of 103.21 and the 10-year yield is at 5.10%, so the price move is easy to explain. What is harder to explain is who sold: central banks bought 321 tonnes in Q3, the PBoC added for a 24th straight month, ETF holdings are near a record 4,256 tonnes, and roughly 95% of the futures selling came from non-reportable and sovereign-type accounts rather than hedge funds. This piece separates the two books that have to balance.
Author  Irene Q.
Yesterday 02: 40
Spot gold closed at 3,876 on Thursday, down 2.8% and its lowest close in more than a year, with an intraday low near 3,852. The dollar is at a 19-month high of 103.21 and the 10-year yield is at 5.10%, so the price move is easy to explain. What is harder to explain is who sold: central banks bought 321 tonnes in Q3, the PBoC added for a 24th straight month, ETF holdings are near a record 4,256 tonnes, and roughly 95% of the futures selling came from non-reportable and sovereign-type accounts rather than hedge funds. This piece separates the two books that have to balance.
placeholder
Brent rose 3.3% and US crude stocks built 4.66 million barrels in the same weekBrent January settled at 95.82, up 3.3%, and WTI at 88.74, up 2.55%, after the US signalled it would not pursue a deal with Iran and attacks on Gulf shipping continued. In the same week, EIA data showed US crude inventories rising 4.657 million barrels against expectations of a 1.1 million draw, with gasoline up another 1.799 million. OPEC output also rebounded 1.96 million barrels a day to 27.16 million in October, led by Saudi Arabia at 10.56 million. This piece separates the geopolitical premium from the physical balance and lays out where each side of the trade is anchored.
Author  Irene Q.
Yesterday 03: 06
Brent January settled at 95.82, up 3.3%, and WTI at 88.74, up 2.55%, after the US signalled it would not pursue a deal with Iran and attacks on Gulf shipping continued. In the same week, EIA data showed US crude inventories rising 4.657 million barrels against expectations of a 1.1 million draw, with gasoline up another 1.799 million. OPEC output also rebounded 1.96 million barrels a day to 27.16 million in October, led by Saudi Arabia at 10.56 million. This piece separates the geopolitical premium from the physical balance and lays out where each side of the trade is anchored.
goTop
quote