3 Magnificent Dividend Stocks That I'm "Never" Selling

Source The Motley Fool

As a long-term dividend-focused investor, I face the very real risk that I end up falling in love with a stock. That could lead me to miss important cues if (or perhaps when) a company's business falters. However, I've sold great companies before (one is on this list) and regretted it, which is why I'm planning to never sell Realty Income (NYSE: O), Procter & Gamble (NYSE: PG), and Hormel Foods (NYSE: HRL).

Here's a quick look at why.

1. I sold Realty Income once, I won't do it again

I bought Realty Income a very long time ago when it was yielding more than 10%, largely because real estate investment trusts (REITs) were still a niche sector on Wall Street. When the yield fell to around 4%, I sold it, collecting a sizable capital gain. But I ended up missing out on years of dividend growth and, honestly, I regretted the short-term decision I made. As luck would have it, another REIT I owned was bought by Realty Income, and I'm a happy shareholder again. I won't be selling it a second time.

A person hugging a piggy bank.

Image source: Getty Images.

There are a couple of reasons for this dedication. First off, Realty Income has proven itself to be a conservative and reliable dividend payer. It has an investment grade-rated balance sheet and has increased its dividend annually for 29 consecutive years. That's not something you achieve by accident. Then there's the fact that it is the heavyweight champion of the net-lease niche. Net leases require tenants to pay most property-level operating costs. It is a fairly low-risk model if the property portfolio is large enough. Realty Income owns over 15,400 properties spread across North America and Europe. The company's size and financial strength, meanwhile, allow it advantaged access to capital markets to fund its growth.

I don't expect Realty Income to grow quickly, but slow and steady is just fine for me when you combine it with the REIT's 5% dividend yield.

2. Procter & Gamble has the skills needed to lead

Procter & Gamble (P&G) is another industry giant, this time in the consumer-staples space. You probably know its brands, which include Bounty, Tide, Pampers, and Gillette, among many others. It is a Dividend King, with 68 consecutive annual dividend increases under its belt. That's a record that few companies can match, but the real attraction here is centered around P&G's skill set.

The company is large and financially strong, but that's just table stakes in the consumer staples sector. What distinguishes P&G is its research and development, marketing, and distribution might. Few companies can match it. In fact, the company doesn't actually focus on gaining market share in the product segments it serves but on expanding the segment with new and innovative products. As an example, the company created the Swiffer business, adding an entirely new category to the cleaning-products niche. That required research and development (R&D) skills to create Swiffer, marketing skills to get consumers interested, and the ability to push the new product out to stores so it was widely available for purchase. All of that sounds easy, but it isn't, and P&G stands "Head & Shoulders" (pun intended, since that's one of the company's brands) above the competition.

Procter & Gamble currently yields around 2.4%. I bought it when the yield was closer to 4%, so I'm sitting on some nice capital gains. But I have no intention of selling; I'll just let this consumer-staples giant keep growing its business over time and rewarding me with more dividend increases. If you don't own it, it is probably one for the wishlist just in case a bear market comes along. If this baby goes out with the bathwater, you should jump at the opportunity to add it to your portfolio.

3. Hormel is struggling, and I'm doing OK with it

Like P&G, Hormel is a Dividend King. It has increased its dividend annually for 58 consecutive years. That said, it is deeply out of favor right now, offering investors a historically high 3.6% dividend yield. The stock is on the discount rack in a big way.

Once a meat producer, Hormel is now a food maker with a focus on branded-protein products including meats and nuts. It has been growing its portfolio via innovation and acquisition. It has also been expanding its reach globally. Basically, Hormel is looking to become one of the big names in the food sector. Lately, the effort hasn't been going well thanks to rising operating costs (which the company hasn't been able to pass along to consumers as well as peers), avian flu, a slow pandemic recovery in China, and the decision to buy Planters just as the nut segment of the snack sector started to slow down. None of these problems are insurmountable, but when they come all at once, they are pretty daunting. It isn't unreasonable for investors to be worried.

But there's a unique twist here. The Hormel Foundation owns nearly 47% of Hormel's stock, and the not-for-profit relies on the dividends it collects to support its operations. They have a vested interest in ensuring that Hormel does what it takes to keep the business growing and the dividend strong, which basically means there's an insider who has my back here. I'm not selling this one despite the troubles it faces right now. And you might want to hold your nose and jump aboard while the stock is still unloved. If the Hormel Foundation has anything to say about it, and it does, Hormel will figure out how to right the ship while continuing to support and grow its dividend.

I could change my mind, but I doubt it

There is always a chance that Realty Income, Procter & Gamble, or Hormel materially change the way they operate. If that were to happen, I'd have to reconsider my commitment to each of these reliable dividend stocks. But until that happens, I'm sticking with them, hopefully until I pass them on to my heirs. I learned my lesson when I sold Realty Income ... great businesses are worth holding on to.

Should you invest $1,000 in Realty Income right now?

Before you buy stock in Realty Income, consider this:

The Motley Fool Stock Advisor analyst team just identified what they believe are the 10 best stocks for investors to buy now… and Realty Income wasn’t one of them. The 10 stocks that made the cut could produce monster returns in the coming years.

Consider when Nvidia made this list on April 15, 2005... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you’d have $826,069!*

Stock Advisor provides investors with an easy-to-follow blueprint for success, including guidance on building a portfolio, regular updates from analysts, and two new stock picks each month. The Stock Advisor service has more than quadrupled the return of S&P 500 since 2002*.

See the 10 stocks »

*Stock Advisor returns as of October 7, 2024

Reuben Gregg Brewer has positions in Hormel Foods, Procter & Gamble, and Realty Income. The Motley Fool has positions in and recommends Realty Income. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.

Disclaimer: For information purposes only. Past performance is not indicative of future results.
placeholder
Gold Price Forecast: XAU/USD drifts higher above $4,200 as Fed delivers expected cutGold price (XAU/USD) gains momentum to around $4,235 during the early Asian session on Thursday. The precious metal extends its upside after the US Federal Reserve (Fed) delivered an expected third consecutive interest rate cut and maintained its outlook for just one cut in 2026.
Author  FXStreet
Dec 11, Thu
Gold price (XAU/USD) gains momentum to around $4,235 during the early Asian session on Thursday. The precious metal extends its upside after the US Federal Reserve (Fed) delivered an expected third consecutive interest rate cut and maintained its outlook for just one cut in 2026.
placeholder
Gold remains bid as lack of Fed clarity and geopolitical frictions persistGold (XAU/USD) advances modestly on Friday as traders seem to book profits ahead of the weekend, yet clings to gains of over 0.51% after reaching a seven-week high of $4,353. At the time of writing, XAU/USD trades at $4,302 as traders digest comments from Federal Reserve (Fed) officials.
Author  FXStreet
Yesterday 01: 34
Gold (XAU/USD) advances modestly on Friday as traders seem to book profits ahead of the weekend, yet clings to gains of over 0.51% after reaching a seven-week high of $4,353. At the time of writing, XAU/USD trades at $4,302 as traders digest comments from Federal Reserve (Fed) officials.
placeholder
Ethereum Price Slips Lower — $3,000 Looms as the Key BattlegroundEthereum is attempting to recover from a $3,026 low but remains below $3,200 and the 100-hour SMA, with a bearish trend line near $3,175 capping rebounds as bulls need a clean break above $3,200 to target $3,250–$3,400, while a drop below $3,050 risks a retest of $3,000 and $2,940.
Author  Mitrade
Yesterday 03: 25
Ethereum is attempting to recover from a $3,026 low but remains below $3,200 and the 100-hour SMA, with a bearish trend line near $3,175 capping rebounds as bulls need a clean break above $3,200 to target $3,250–$3,400, while a drop below $3,050 risks a retest of $3,000 and $2,940.
placeholder
Macro Analysts: Hawkish Japan Could Push Bitcoin Below $70KAnalysts predict Bitcoin may face further declines towards the $70,000 mark if the Bank of Japan raises interest rates as expected.
Author  Mitrade
Yesterday 05: 48
Analysts predict Bitcoin may face further declines towards the $70,000 mark if the Bank of Japan raises interest rates as expected.
placeholder
Bitcoin Slides 5% as Sellers Lean In — Can BTC Reclaim $88,000?Bitcoin has dropped back below $88,000 after rolling over from $90,500, with price still trading under the 100-hour Simple Moving Average. The sell-off found a floor at $85,151, and BTC is now consolidating near that base, but rebounds are facing pressure from a bearish trend line around $89,000. Bulls need to retake $88,000–$89,000 to ease downside risk; failure to do so keeps $85,500–$85,000 and then $83,500 in play, with $80,000 as the deeper “line in the sand.” Bitcoin (BTC) is back in damage-control mode after a sharp pullback wiped out recent gains. The price failed to reclaim the $90,000–$90,500 band, rolled over, and slid through $88,500 before briefly dipping under $87,000. Buyers did show up around $85,000, but the rebound so far looks more like stabilization than a clear trend reversal. Bitcoin dips hard, finds a bid near $85,000(h3) BTC’s latest move lower began when it couldn’t build follow-through above $90,000 and $90,500. Once that upside stalled, sellers took control and pushed price down through $88,500. The slide accelerated enough to spike below $87,000, but the market didn’t free-fall. Bulls defended the $85,000 zone, printing a low at $85,151. Since then, Bitcoin has been consolidating below the 23.6% Fibonacci retracement of the drop from the $93,560 swing high to the $85,151 low — a clue that the bounce is still shallow and that sellers haven’t fully backed off yet. Structurally, BTC is still on the back foot: It’s trading below $88,000, and It remains below the 100-hour Simple Moving Average, keeping short-term trend pressure pointed downward. Resistance is layered, and $89,000 is the problem area(h3) If bulls try to turn this into a recovery, they’ll have to climb through multiple ceilings in quick succession. First, BTC faces resistance around $87,150, followed by a more meaningful barrier near $87,500. From there, the market’s attention snaps back to $88,000 — the level BTC just lost and now needs to reclaim. A close back above $88,000 would improve the tone, but it doesn’t solve the bigger issue: there’s a bearish trend line on the hourly BTC/USD chart (Kraken feed) with resistance near $89,000, which also lines up with the next technical hurdle. If BTC can push through $89,000 and hold, the rebound could extend toward $90,000, with follow-through targets at $91,000 and $91,500. But until price clears that $88,000–$89,000 zone, rallies are at risk of being sold rather than chased. If BTC fails to reclaim resistance, the downside path is clear(h3) The near-term bear case is simple: if Bitcoin can’t climb back above the $87,000 area and keep traction, sellers may attempt another leg lower. Support levels line up like this: Immediate support: $85,500 First major support: $85,000 Next support: $83,500 Then $82,500 in the near term Below that, the major “don’t break this” level is still $80,000. If BTC slips under $80,000, the risk of acceleration to the downside increases significantly — not because it’s magic, but because it’s the kind of psychological and structural level that tends to trigger forced de-risking. Indicators: momentum still leans bearish(h3) The intraday indicators aren’t offering much comfort yet: Hourly MACD is losing pace in the bearish zone. Hourly RSI remains below 50, suggesting sellers still have the upper hand on short timeframes. So while the $85,000 defense held for now, the market hasn’t flipped bullish — it’s just stopped bleeding.
Author  Mitrade
11 hours ago
Bitcoin has dropped back below $88,000 after rolling over from $90,500, with price still trading under the 100-hour Simple Moving Average. The sell-off found a floor at $85,151, and BTC is now consolidating near that base, but rebounds are facing pressure from a bearish trend line around $89,000. Bulls need to retake $88,000–$89,000 to ease downside risk; failure to do so keeps $85,500–$85,000 and then $83,500 in play, with $80,000 as the deeper “line in the sand.” Bitcoin (BTC) is back in damage-control mode after a sharp pullback wiped out recent gains. The price failed to reclaim the $90,000–$90,500 band, rolled over, and slid through $88,500 before briefly dipping under $87,000. Buyers did show up around $85,000, but the rebound so far looks more like stabilization than a clear trend reversal. Bitcoin dips hard, finds a bid near $85,000(h3) BTC’s latest move lower began when it couldn’t build follow-through above $90,000 and $90,500. Once that upside stalled, sellers took control and pushed price down through $88,500. The slide accelerated enough to spike below $87,000, but the market didn’t free-fall. Bulls defended the $85,000 zone, printing a low at $85,151. Since then, Bitcoin has been consolidating below the 23.6% Fibonacci retracement of the drop from the $93,560 swing high to the $85,151 low — a clue that the bounce is still shallow and that sellers haven’t fully backed off yet. Structurally, BTC is still on the back foot: It’s trading below $88,000, and It remains below the 100-hour Simple Moving Average, keeping short-term trend pressure pointed downward. Resistance is layered, and $89,000 is the problem area(h3) If bulls try to turn this into a recovery, they’ll have to climb through multiple ceilings in quick succession. First, BTC faces resistance around $87,150, followed by a more meaningful barrier near $87,500. From there, the market’s attention snaps back to $88,000 — the level BTC just lost and now needs to reclaim. A close back above $88,000 would improve the tone, but it doesn’t solve the bigger issue: there’s a bearish trend line on the hourly BTC/USD chart (Kraken feed) with resistance near $89,000, which also lines up with the next technical hurdle. If BTC can push through $89,000 and hold, the rebound could extend toward $90,000, with follow-through targets at $91,000 and $91,500. But until price clears that $88,000–$89,000 zone, rallies are at risk of being sold rather than chased. If BTC fails to reclaim resistance, the downside path is clear(h3) The near-term bear case is simple: if Bitcoin can’t climb back above the $87,000 area and keep traction, sellers may attempt another leg lower. Support levels line up like this: Immediate support: $85,500 First major support: $85,000 Next support: $83,500 Then $82,500 in the near term Below that, the major “don’t break this” level is still $80,000. If BTC slips under $80,000, the risk of acceleration to the downside increases significantly — not because it’s magic, but because it’s the kind of psychological and structural level that tends to trigger forced de-risking. Indicators: momentum still leans bearish(h3) The intraday indicators aren’t offering much comfort yet: Hourly MACD is losing pace in the bearish zone. Hourly RSI remains below 50, suggesting sellers still have the upper hand on short timeframes. So while the $85,000 defense held for now, the market hasn’t flipped bullish — it’s just stopped bleeding.
goTop
quote