Nvidia has lost about $1.7 trillion in market value since its Oct. 6 record, as investigations into CEO Jensen Huang fuel investor uncertainty.
Nvidia's own annual report warns that it is "highly dependent" on its longtime leaders and that poor succession planning could hurt it.
Analysts are trimming price targets but keeping buy ratings, and past founder exits show the successor and the business decide what happens next.
In just five weeks, Nvidia (NASDAQ:NVDA) has gone from the most valuable company in the world to a test case for one of investing's oldest questions: What happens to a company when the person who built it might have to leave?
Nvidia was worth about $5.78 trillion at its record close on Oct. 6. By about noon ET on Tuesday, it was worth about $4.04 trillion. That's roughly $1.7 trillion in value gone, a drop of about 30%.
Missed Nvidia in 2009? This Rare Signal Is Flashing Again. In 2009, a "Double Down" signal flashed for a little-known chipmaker called Nvidia. For the first time in years, that same "Total Conviction" signal is flashing for a company 1/100th the size of Nvidia. Continue »
Over the weekend, CEO Jensen Huang acknowledged an extramarital affair in an email to employees. The woman is reportedly a former executive at Megaspeed, a Singapore company that buys Nvidia hardware. U.S. intelligence officials reportedly suspect she passed information to Beijing, and China has rejected the allegations.
On Sunday, Nvidia's board said a committee of independent directors, with outside lawyers, would investigate whether Huang was the target of a foreign intelligence effort. The board said it had "no reason to believe that either national security or NVIDIA secrets were compromised" and that Huang had agreed to cooperate fully.
Since then, shareholders have filed a proposed class action against Nvidia and Huang, saying they were misled. President Donald Trump said the FBI is looking into the relationship, though he added, "I think he'll be in good shape."
None of that has forced Huang out, but investors now have to price in the chance that he leaves.
Huang co-founded Nvidia in 1993 and has run it ever since. Nvidia itself flags the risk. In its latest annual report, it warns that "we are highly dependent on the services of our long-standing executive team" and that "failure to ensure effective succession planning" could hurt its "long-term success."
Wall Street is trimming its expectations, but analysts aren't walking away. Wells Fargo cut its price target to $300 from $315 but kept a buy-equivalent Overweight rating, citing the investigation and the risk of losing a key leader. The bank said it sees little threat to AI demand or Nvidia's underlying business, and even after the cut, the target is about 80% above Tuesday's price. Meanwhile, Bernstein, which has an Outperform rating on shares, said the espionage claims appear to be "more form than substance" but noted that the allegations nevertheless represent a significant key-man risk. And Bank of America removed the stock from its "US 1 List" of top investment ideas.
Others see the sell-off as a bet on Huang himself. Gene Munster of Deepwater Asset Management said on a podcast this week that the stock now prices in roughly a 25% chance that Huang leaves, which is higher than his own estimate of 10% to 15%. Russell Pillemer, CEO of Pengana Capital, called Huang the "intellect" behind Nvidia and said there is "nobody who is an obvious successor."
Of course, there's no perfect comparison here, but there are past examples of key company executives leaving their firms under unexpected circumstances. The pattern? When the business is healthy, and the successor is clear, the company recovers, but when either is missing, the damage can last.
In the short run, probably another drop. Nvidia has no obvious No. 2: Huang holds both the president and CEO titles, and its annual report lists just four other executive officers, two of them 71. A board would likely need an interim leader or an outside search, and investors hate uncertainty.
But the business wouldn't change overnight. Nvidia's business looks healthy. In its latest quarter, revenue rose 106% to $96.2 billion, and data center sales reached $89 billion. The company expects about $108 billion in revenue this quarter, and that forecast already assumes no data center computing sales in China. Meanwhile, its chips are already in production, and this quarter's forecast doesn't depend on who signs the letters. The bigger question is the next five years: who sets strategy, and who manages Nvidia's relationships with Washington and its biggest customers.
Nvidia reports quarterly results on Nov. 17, next Tuesday. Investors should listen for three things: whether management addresses the board investigation, whether it says anything about succession, and whether its outlook holds up.
If Huang stays and the investigation clears him, today's price may look like an overreaction. If he leaves without a clear successor, the HP example suggests the drop could deepen. Either way, this is now a bet on leadership as much as on semiconductor stocks. Investors who own Nvidia should keep the position at a size they can live with until the board reports its findings.
Most investors think they missed the AI boat because they didn't buy Nvidia in 2005.
But according to our analysts, we’re only at the end of "Act 1"—the R&D phase. "Act 2" is the global rollout, a massive technology build-out that Google’s CEO says could be more profound than fire or electricity.
While everyone watches the chip designers, one "backbone" company provides the critical technology that Nvidia and AMD literally cannot function without. We’ve detailed this under-the-radar player in our new AI Playbook.
Continue »
Jonathan Ponciano has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool has positions in and recommends Apple, HP, and Nvidia. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.