Healthcare ETF Comparison: Fidelity's FHLC vs. Invesco's Biotech-Focused IBBQ

Source The Motley Fool

Key Points

  • The Fidelity MSCI Health Care Index ETF features a lower expense ratio of 0.08% and a higher dividend yield of 1.2%.

  • The Invesco Nasdaq Biotechnology ETF has delivered a higher 1-year total return of 56.4% but carries a more significant maximum drawdown of 37.9%.

  • The Fidelity MSCI Health Care Index ETF provides broader exposure with 365 holdings and manages $3.3 billion in assets under management (AUM).

  • 10 stocks we like better than Fidelity Covington Trust - Fidelity Msci Health Care Index ETF ›

The Fidelity MSCI Health Care Index ETF (NYSEMKT:FHLC) provides broad, low-cost access to the entire healthcare sector, whereas the Invesco Nasdaq Biotechnology ETF (NASDAQ:IBBQ) targets a narrower slice of biotech with higher recent returns.

Healthcare investors often choose between specialized niches and broad industry exposure. While both funds target the medical space, they differ significantly in their risk profiles, expense structures, and historical volatility, making the choice dependent on whether an investor seeks pure-play biotech or diversified healthcare.

Snapshot (cost & size)

MetricIBBQFHLC
IssuerInvescoFidelity
Share price$36.45 (as of 2026-08-27)$83.48 (as of 2026-08-27)
Expense ratio0.19%0.08%
1-yr return (as of 2026-08-27)56.4%29.2%
Dividend yield0.7%1.2%
Beta0.620.60
AUM$95.3M$3.3B

Beta measures price volatility relative to the S&P 500; beta is calculated from monthly returns over the available fund history (up to five years). The 1-year return represents total return over the trailing 12 months. Dividend yield is the trailing-12-month distribution yield.

Cost-conscious investors may prefer the Fidelity fund, which charges 0.08% compared to the Invesco fund at 0.19%. Additionally, the Fidelity fund provides a higher payout, with a yield gap of 0.48 percentage points over its peer.

Performance & risk comparison

MetricIBBQFHLC
Max drawdown (5 yr)(37.9%)(17.7%)
Growth of $1,000 over 5 years (total return)$1,421$1,331

What's inside

The Fidelity MSCI Health Care Index ETF seeks to correspond to the MSCI USA IMI Health Care Index. Its largest positions include Eli Lilly (NYSE:LLY) at 12.93%, Johnson & Johnson (NYSE:JNJ) at 8.81%, and Abbvie (NYSE:ABBV) at 6.30%. The fund holds 365 securities and focuses on healthcare and technology. It was launched in 2013. The Fidelity MSCI Health Care Index ETF has paid $1.02 per share over the trailing 12 months, which on its recent ~$83.5 share price works out to a 1.2% yield.

The Invesco Nasdaq Biotechnology ETF seeks to mirror the performance of the Nasdaq Biotechnology Index, which gauges biotech and pharmaceutical companies traded on the Nasdaq. Its top holdings include Amgen (NASDAQ:AMGN) at 8.59%, Vertex Pharmaceuticals (NASDAQ:VRTX) at 8.10%, and Gilead Sciences (NASDAQ:GILD) at 7.33%. It manages 251 holdings and maintains a 100% allocation to the healthcare sector. It was launched in 2021. The Invesco Nasdaq Biotechnology ETF has paid $0.26 per share over the trailing 12 months, which on its recent ~$36.5 share price works out to a 0.7% yield.

For more guidance on ETF investing, check out the full guide at this link.

Which looks like the better buy

For those seeking to invest in the healthcare field, the Fidelity MSCI Health Care Index ETF (FHLC) and Invesco Nasdaq Biotechnology ETF (IBBQ) offer convenient, efficient ways to do so, but are very different choices. Picking between them depends on your investment objectives.

FHLC is for investors who want broad exposure. While it seeks to mirror the performance of the the MSCI USA IMI Health Care Index, FHLC does not hold every stock, but rather, a representative sample using characteristics such as market cap. Its a more diversified fund with over 300 holdings that span both biotech and the larger healthcare sector. It may not have the explosive growth offered by IBBQ, but its larger dividend yield and broad exposure provides more stability, as demonstrated by its far lower max drawdown.

IBBQ is for investors comfortable with the volatility inherent in this high risk, high reward fund. This is the ETF for those seeking the incredible upside potential of biotech companies. But since these businesses depend on unpredictable clinical trials data on the path to federal approval of their treatments, IBBQ's performance can be volatile.

Should you buy stock in Fidelity Covington Trust - Fidelity Msci Health Care Index ETF right now?

Before you buy stock in Fidelity Covington Trust - Fidelity Msci Health Care Index ETF, consider this:

The Motley Fool Stock Advisor analyst team just identified what they believe are the 10 best stocks for investors to buy now… and Fidelity Covington Trust - Fidelity Msci Health Care Index ETF wasn’t one of them. The 10 stocks that made the cut could produce monster returns in the coming years.

Consider when Netflix made this list on December 17, 2004... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you’d have $435,803!* Or when Nvidia made this list on April 15, 2005... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you’d have $1,334,577!*

Now, it’s worth noting Stock Advisor’s total average return is 966% — a market-crushing outperformance compared to 211% for the S&P 500. Don't miss the latest top 10 list, available with Stock Advisor, and join an investing community built by individual investors for individual investors.

See the 10 stocks »

*Stock Advisor returns as of September 2, 2026.

Robert Izquierdo has positions in Amgen and Johnson & Johnson. The Motley Fool has positions in and recommends AbbVie, Amgen, Eli Lilly, Gilead Sciences, and Vertex Pharmaceuticals. The Motley Fool recommends Johnson & Johnson. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.

Disclaimer: For information purposes only. Past performance is not indicative of future results.
placeholder
Gold Price Forecast: Will Gold Keep Falling After Dropping Below $4,300 as US-Iran Conflict Drives Up Oil Prices?As of the Asian trading session on September 2, gold prices (XAUUSD) fell below $4,300 intraday to a low of $4,282.45, with the latest price hovering around $4,320, down nearly 9% cumulat
Author  TradingKey
9 hours ago
As of the Asian trading session on September 2, gold prices (XAUUSD) fell below $4,300 intraday to a low of $4,282.45, with the latest price hovering around $4,320, down nearly 9% cumulat
placeholder
Escalating US-Iran Conflict Drives Up Oil Prices, WTI Returns Above $90, Gold Falls Near $4,300 As of the Asian session on September 2, international oil prices surged, with WTI crude (USOIL) reclaiming $90, and Brent crude (UKOIL) rising above $95, reaching a high of $97.04; meanwh
Author  TradingKey
16 hours ago
As of the Asian session on September 2, international oil prices surged, with WTI crude (USOIL) reclaiming $90, and Brent crude (UKOIL) rising above $95, reaching a high of $97.04; meanwh
placeholder
US Dollar Index Price Forecast: DXY eyes 99.75 confluence hurdle amid Fed bets, Iran risksThe US Dollar Index (DXY), which tracks the Greenback against a basket of currencies, regains positive traction on Tuesday and climbs back above the mid-99.00s during the first half of the European session.
Author  FXStreet
Yesterday 10: 16
The US Dollar Index (DXY), which tracks the Greenback against a basket of currencies, regains positive traction on Tuesday and climbs back above the mid-99.00s during the first half of the European session.
placeholder
WTI holds above $85.50 as Middle East risks tighten global supplyWest Texas Intermediate (WTI) oil price gains ground for the second successive day, trading around $85.60 per barrel during the Asian hours on Tuesday.
Author  FXStreet
Yesterday 01: 29
West Texas Intermediate (WTI) oil price gains ground for the second successive day, trading around $85.60 per barrel during the Asian hours on Tuesday.
placeholder
Crude Oil Price Forecast: US-Iran Conflict Escalates Again, Will Brent Continue to Rise After Breaking $90? The US and Iran exchanged direct fire again after more than a month, rapidly escalating shipping risks in the Strait of Hormuz and pushing international oil prices back above $90 a barrel
Author  TradingKey
Aug 31, Mon
The US and Iran exchanged direct fire again after more than a month, rapidly escalating shipping risks in the Strait of Hormuz and pushing international oil prices back above $90 a barrel
goTop
quote