Base crumbled under pressure, Infected game flees to Solana

Source Cryptopolitan

Viral game “Infected” rage-quitted Ethereum’s Base and is packing its bags for Solana. The pandemic simulation game that spread like wildfire announced it is ditching Base for Solana after its launch turned into a gas fee horror show.

Infected’s team says that Base couldn’t handle the transaction volume, causing gas fees to spike and players to quit mid-outbreak. Base architect Jesse Pollak has claimed that Base never crashed. Meanwhile, Base’s total value locked (TVL) has recorded a decline of around 4% over the last 7 days.

Base gas fees killed Infected hype?

In an X post, Infected declared that after building solely on Ethereum for the past 4 years they are migrating all of their upcoming games to Solana. It mentioned that Base wasn’t able to handle their demand but it is not solely the chain’s problem. It added that it’s a fundamental scaling issue for all EVM chains.

It highlighted that their team experimented with various consumer apps but then they narrowed it down to one concept i.e. speculative simulation games. Their team believes that speculation has huge potential beyond just meme coins as it will evolve into a bigger industry over the next 2 years.

Infected went mega-viral, it received 130K signups in 48 hours, and 50K Twitter followers in two months. But when they launched on Base, things fell apart. Gas spiked and most of the people couldn’t make transactions for the first 30 min. Since it is a momentum-based game, the first 30 minutes were make or break.

As per the data shared, daily gas spent on Base pre-Infected (23 Feb) was 43.515 ETH and on Infected day 1 it was 145.850 ETH.

The team believed in L2 scaling for ETH, but after this, they think EVM chains have a fundamental scaling issue that won’t be solved anytime soon. They anticipate that Solana is winning this race in terms of culture and user base.

Base didn’t crash, but it still lost

Infected praised the ETH community for being visionary, long-term oriented, and highly technical, however, it lacks in focusing on today’s users. It pointed out that there is a huge divide between builders and users on EVM.

It stated that on one hand, most builders on Ethereum have no idea who the users are and what they want. On the other hand, Solana builders focus on real-world products and actual users. It named most of the popular consumer apps on Solana like pumpfun, vectorfun, daosfun and more.

The viral game added that they have doubted Solana for long but now they got it why  they’ve dominated the space over the past year. It added “If our users were on XRP, we’d build on XRP. If they were on the Bitcoin mainnet, we’d go there. But today, they’re on Solana.”

Jesse Pollak responded to the claims and stated that Base’s team reached out to the Infected directly immediately after the post and they haven’t responded yet. He asserted that Base did not crash and the chain hummed along, just as it should.

DefiLlama data shows that Base has managed to grew its TVL by 8.3% over the last one month. It now stands at $3.05 billion. Meanwhile, Solana’s TVL has taken a hit of almost 15% at the same time to hover around $6.33 billion.

Cryptopolitan Academy: Tired of market swings? Learn how DeFi can help you build steady passive income. Register Now

Disclaimer: For information purposes only. Past performance is not indicative of future results.
placeholder
October hike odds climb toward 60% as Goldman and BofA both flip — what Warsh's "dose of accommodation" really changedRate futures now price roughly 55% to 62% for a 25bp hike at the October 27-28 FOMC, up from about 30% before Chair Warsh's post-meeting framing that the Fed is merely "removing some accommodation." Goldman Sachs has added an October hike to its forecast and Bank of America now sees moves in both October and December. Here is the repricing, the language behind it, and the two data points that decide it.
Author  Irene Q.
Sep 23, Wed
Rate futures now price roughly 55% to 62% for a 25bp hike at the October 27-28 FOMC, up from about 30% before Chair Warsh's post-meeting framing that the Fed is merely "removing some accommodation." Goldman Sachs has added an October hike to its forecast and Bank of America now sees moves in both October and December. Here is the repricing, the language behind it, and the two data points that decide it.
placeholder
Strong profits, falling shares: bank earnings day one meets a memory-chip rout — with CPI and ASML aheadGoldman Sachs blew past estimates (EPS $17.01 vs $13.09 expected, profit +33%) while JPMorgan missed ($5.75 vs $5.93) and Wells Fargo fell 3% — yet the S&P 500 finished flat at 7,805.45, pinned below its record close as a memory-chip rout (SOX −2.67%, Micron under $1,000) kept the pressure on. Tonight brings the week's decider: US September CPI at 8:30 ET, then Bank of America, Morgan Stanley, BlackRock and ASML before the open. Here are the levels, both cases, and the watch list.
Author  Irene Q.
Oct 14, Wed
Goldman Sachs blew past estimates (EPS $17.01 vs $13.09 expected, profit +33%) while JPMorgan missed ($5.75 vs $5.93) and Wells Fargo fell 3% — yet the S&P 500 finished flat at 7,805.45, pinned below its record close as a memory-chip rout (SOX −2.67%, Micron under $1,000) kept the pressure on. Tonight brings the week's decider: US September CPI at 8:30 ET, then Bank of America, Morgan Stanley, BlackRock and ASML before the open. Here are the levels, both cases, and the watch list.
placeholder
US September CPI recap: inflation hits 3.7% as core runs hot — is an October Fed hike back on the table?September CPI landed hot: headline 3.7% y/y, core 2.6% y/y and 0.3% m/m. October hike odds jumped from ~22% to ~37% — yet the dollar faded to 101.74, gold closed higher and the S&P 500 fell 1.11%. Here is the full repricing, the levels and what to watch next.
Author  Irene Q.
Yesterday 05: 52
September CPI landed hot: headline 3.7% y/y, core 2.6% y/y and 0.3% m/m. October hike odds jumped from ~22% to ~37% — yet the dollar faded to 101.74, gold closed higher and the S&P 500 fell 1.11%. Here is the full repricing, the levels and what to watch next.
placeholder
Gold defends $4,100 as BofA targets a break below $4,000 — why the Middle East bid is missingSpot gold flushed to $4,099.89, a whisker above October's $4,090 low, then rebounded to close at $4,138.25 (+0.82%) — even as US CPI ran hot. Bank of America sees gold below $4,000 within three months, citing shrinking demand and official-sector selling. Here are the levels, the drivers and what would flip the script.
Author  Irene Q.
Yesterday 06: 57
Spot gold flushed to $4,099.89, a whisker above October's $4,090 low, then rebounded to close at $4,138.25 (+0.82%) — even as US CPI ran hot. Bank of America sees gold below $4,000 within three months, citing shrinking demand and official-sector selling. Here are the levels, the drivers and what would flip the script.
placeholder
Gold Price Analysis Today | Forex Gold Analysis | XAU/USD Analysis - October 15, 2026Get the latest gold price analysis, forex gold insights, and XAU/USD analysis for October 15, 2026. Read on for the details.
Author  Mitrade
Yesterday 07: 01
Get the latest gold price analysis, forex gold insights, and XAU/USD analysis for October 15, 2026. Read on for the details.
goTop
quote