The Schwab U.S. Small-Cap ETF offers a lower expense ratio and broader diversification through 1,721 holdings.
The iShares Core S&P Small-Cap ETF manages $102.9 billion in assets under management (AUM) and has shown a lower maximum drawdown over the last five years.
Although both funds track small-cap stocks, the Schwab fund has achieved a higher total return over the trailing 12 months.
The Schwab U.S. Small-Cap ETF (NYSEMKT:SCHA) offers lower costs and broader market coverage, while the iShares Core S&P Small-Cap ETF (NYSEMKT:IJR) provides a more concentrated portfolio with higher liquidity.
Both funds serve as low-cost gateways to the smallest corners of the domestic equity market. While they share similar sector exposures, the primary difference lies in their index strategies.
The Schwab fund casts a wide net across nearly the entire small-cap universe, while the iShares fund focuses on a more selective set of companies that must meet S&P's specific financial viability standards. This distinction affects how each portfolio reacts to market cycles.
| Metric | SCHA | IJR |
|---|---|---|
| Issuer | Schwab | iShares |
| Expense ratio | 0.04% | 0.06% |
| 1-yr return (as of May 7, 2026) | 44.0% | 37.1% |
| Dividend yield | 1.0% | 1.2% |
| Beta | 1.10 | 1.04 |
| AUM | $22.4 billion | $102.9 billion |
Beta measures price volatility relative to the S&P 500; beta is calculated from five-year monthly returns. The 1-yr return represents total return over the trailing 12 months. Dividend yield is the trailing-12-month distribution yield.
The Schwab fund remains one of the most affordable options in the category with a 0.04% expense ratio, which minimizes the drag on long-term returns. Although the iShares fund costs slightly more at 0.06%, it may appeal to income-focused investors because it currently provides a higher trailing-12-month dividend payout compared to its Schwab counterpart.
| Metric | SCHA | IJR |
|---|---|---|
| Max drawdown (5 yr) | (30.8%) | (28.0%) |
| Growth of $1,000 over 5 years (total return) | $1,380 | $1,320 |
The iShares Core S&P Small-Cap ETF tracks a more selective index of 640 holdings, focusing on companies that must meet specific market capitalization and profitability criteria. This focus on "quality" in the small-cap space is reflected in its sector exposure, which is balanced between financial services at 16%, industrials at 16%, and technology at 15%. Its largest positions include Viavi Solutions (NASDAQ:VIAV) at 0.74%, Sanmina (NASDAQ:SANM) at 0.71%, and Formfactor (NASDAQ:FORM) at 0.66%. The fund was launched in 2000 and has paid $1.60 per share in dividends over the trailing 12 months.
In contrast, the Schwab U.S. Small-Cap ETF offers much broader diversification through 1,721 holdings, capturing a wider slice of the total market. Its sector tilts favor technology at 18%, followed by financial services and industrials at 16% each. Its top holdings include Sandisk (NASDAQ:SNDK) at 4.08%, Lumentum (NASDAQ:LITE) at 1.53%, and Revolution Medicines (NASDAQ:RVMD) at 0.64%. The Schwab fund was launched in 2009 and has a trailing-12-month dividend of $0.34 per share. By including a larger number of holdings, it provides exposure to more micro-cap names that the more selective iShares fund might exclude.
For more guidance on ETF investing, check out the full guide at this link.
Investing in small-cap stocks is a great way to add diversification to a portfolio and deliver exposure to high-growth companies. Both the iShares Core S&P Small-Cap ETF (IJR) and Schwab U.S. Small-Cap ETF (SCHA) seek to help investors with this. Choosing between the pair comes down to a few factors.
SCHA’s much broader set of holdings, totaling nearly 2,000 equities, is more representative of the small-cap portion of the U.S. stock market. This helped it deliver a greater one-year return. Its share price is also far lower than IJR, with a 2-for-1 stock split performed in 2024 contributing to this.
SCHA’s downsides are its smaller AUM, which means reduced liquidity compared to IJR, and because small-cap stocks are more volatile than larger companies, the ETF’s greater slice of these businesses led to a larger max drawdown and beta. SCHA is better suited for investors who want a fund that’s more representative of the small-cap universe, and are willing to accept the higher risk.
IJR limits its holdings because it screens stocks based on quality filters, such as positive earnings. This lowers the investor risk inherent in small-cap companies, although it means a less diversified portfolio compared to SCHA. IJR also boasts a much bigger AUM, which can appeal to active traders. It is the better ETF for investors concerned with risk and volatility, and are willing to pay a slightly higher expense ratio in exchange for this greater stability.
Before you buy stock in iShares Core S&P Small-Cap ETF, consider this:
The Motley Fool Stock Advisor analyst team just identified what they believe are the 10 best stocks for investors to buy now… and iShares Core S&P Small-Cap ETF wasn’t one of them. The 10 stocks that made the cut could produce monster returns in the coming years.
Consider when Netflix made this list on December 17, 2004... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you’d have $471,827!* Or when Nvidia made this list on April 15, 2005... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you’d have $1,319,291!*
Now, it’s worth noting Stock Advisor’s total average return is 986% — a market-crushing outperformance compared to 207% for the S&P 500. Don't miss the latest top 10 list, available with Stock Advisor, and join an investing community built by individual investors for individual investors.
See the 10 stocks »
*Stock Advisor returns as of May 11, 2026.
Robert Izquierdo has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool has positions in and recommends Lumentum, Viavi Solutions, and iShares Core S&P Small-Cap ETF. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.