Both the Vanguard S&P 500 Growth ETF (VOOG) and the Vanguard Russell 1000 Growth ETF (VONG) have low expense ratios of 0.07% and 0.06%, respectively
VOOG maintains a more concentrated portfolio than VONG.
While both funds share similar technology sector exposure, VOOG has delivered higher total returns over the trailing one-year and five-year periods.
Investors comparing Vanguard Russell 1000 Growth ETF (NASDAQ:VONG) and Vanguard S&P 500 Growth ETF (NYSEMKT:VOOG) will find two low-cost funds offering heavy exposure to large-cap technology stocks -- with slight variations in their concentration and benchmark methodology.
Both ETFs provide a solid path to owning some of the fastest-growing companies in the U.S. market. VONG tracks the growth components of a 1,000-stock benchmark, while VOOG filters a narrower list of 500 established large-cap names. Those methodologies create meaningful differences in the number of holdings and, ultimately, in historical performance.
| Metric | VONG | VOOG |
|---|---|---|
| Issuer | Vanguard | Vanguard |
| Expense ratio | 0.06% | 0.07% |
| 1-year return (as of June 25, 2026) | 14.32% | 24.57% |
| Dividend yield | 0.42% | 0.44% |
| Beta | 1.17 | 1.18 |
| AUM | $54.8 billion | $26.5 billion |
Beta measures price volatility relative to the S&P 500; beta is calculated from five-year monthly returns. The 1-year return represents total return over the trailing 12 months. Dividend yield is the trailing-12-month distribution yield.
The cost difference between these two funds is negligible -- VONG charges 0.06% annually while VOOG charges 0.07%. And both funds offer a similar dividend yield of around 0.4%, making them more suitable for capital appreciation than steady income.
| Metric | VONG | VOOG |
|---|---|---|
| Max drawdown (5 yr) | (32.72%) | (32.74%) |
| Growth of $1,000 over 5 years (total return) | $1,819 | $1,927 |
Launched in 2010, VOOG holds 146 stocks, focusing on S&P 500 companies with strong growth characteristics. Its largest positions include Nvidia (NASDAQ:NVDA) at 14.3%, Microsoft (NASDAQ:MSFT) at 9.3%, and Apple (NASDAQ:AAPL) at 6.4%. Sector weightings lean heavily into technology at 52.6%, followed by communication services at 16.7%, and consumer cyclical at 9.0%. VOOG’s concentration means its top 10 holdings represent a significant portion -- roughly 60% -- of its total assets under management (AUM).
Also launched in 2010, VONG is more broadly diversified with 387 holdings, capturing a wider cross-section of the growth landscape. Its largest positions include the same three top holdings -- Nvidia at 13.1%, Apple at 11.9%, and Microsoft at 9.0%. VOOG’s sector weightings include a 53.9% technology tilt, followed by 12.7% in consumer cyclicals, and 12.4% in communication services. VONG’s top 10 holdings represent about 61% of its total AUM.
For more guidance on ETF investing, check out the full guide at this link.
For growth-focused investors, the choice between VOOG and VONG is closer than it might look on paper.
Both funds are anchored by the same mega-cap technology names. Nvidia, Microsoft, and Apple sit at the top of each portfolio, and both funds have roughly 53-54% of their assets in technology. Whether you own VOOG or VONG, you're making a meaningful bet on the AI infrastructure build-out and the continued dominance of U.S. large-cap tech.
VOOG's tighter portfolio of 146 S&P 500 names means it leans more heavily on the largest companies -- and right now, its top holdings are among the most dominant businesses in the world. Nvidia's 14% portfolio weight alone reflects just how much the AI infrastructure build-out has reshaped the large-cap growth landscape. When those mega-cap names run, VOOG tends to run a little harder -- which helps explain its edge in returns over the past one-year and five-year periods. VOOG also benefits from the S&P 500's implicit quality filter. Every company in its portfolio has already met the profitability and liquidity thresholds required by the index -- a bar that tends to weed out speculative names.
VONG’s 387 total holdings include many companies in the mid- to large-cap tiers -- companies that have cleared the Russell 1000's growth screen but haven't yet earned a spot in the more selective S&P 500. For investors who believe the next wave of growth leaders is still working its way up the market-cap ladder, that broader exposure -- that includes more emerging growth stories -- has real appeal.
With nearly identical expense ratios, neither fund is a bad choice for a long-term growth investor. The decision is really about whether you want pure mega-cap growth conviction or a slightly wider lens that includes tomorrow's potential household names.
Before you buy stock in Vanguard Admiral Funds - Vanguard S&P 500 Growth ETF, consider this:
The Motley Fool Stock Advisor analyst team just identified what they believe are the 10 best stocks for investors to buy now… and Vanguard Admiral Funds - Vanguard S&P 500 Growth ETF wasn’t one of them. The 10 stocks that made the cut could produce monster returns in the coming years.
Consider when Netflix made this list on December 17, 2004... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you’d have $387,428!* Or when Nvidia made this list on April 15, 2005... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you’d have $1,221,398!*
Now, it’s worth noting Stock Advisor’s total average return is 895% — a market-crushing outperformance compared to 205% for the S&P 500. Don't miss the latest top 10 list, available with Stock Advisor, and join an investing community built by individual investors for individual investors.
See the 10 stocks »
*Stock Advisor returns as of June 26, 2026.
Andy Gould has positions in Apple and Nvidia and has the following options: long January 2027 $125 calls on Nvidia and short January 2027 $125 puts on Nvidia. The Motley Fool has positions in and recommends Apple, Microsoft, and Nvidia. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.