Signet Stock Tumbles. Is It a Buying Opportunity or a Warning Sign?

Source The Motley Fool

If you're a value investor, there's a good chance Signet Jewelers (NYSE: SIG) has popped up on your radar.

The company is the world's largest retailer of diamond jewelry, and it owns banners like Kay, Zales, and Jared. It operates in a mature industry, but its size gives it scale advantages. It has also been focused on leveraging loyalty programs, digital marketing, e-commerce, and services, which are harder for independent retailers to do.

Signet is reliably profitable, and the stock trades at a price-to-earnings ratio of less than 10, which is clearly value range in a market where the S&P 500 trades at a P/E of around 30.

However, investors didn't like what they saw in Signet's latest report, as the stock was down 12% after the company reported third-quarter earnings on Thursday.

Comparable sales improved for the sixth quarter in a row as it emerged from a post-pandemic lull, but they were still down 0.7%. As a result, overall revenue was down 3.1% to $1.35 billion, which was just shy of the consensus at $1.37 billion.

Management noted headwinds from challenges from the digital integration of the Blue Nile and James Allen banners as well as leadership transition costs after CEO Gina Drosos retired during the quarter and was replaced by J.K. Symancyk.

On the bottom line, adjusted earnings per share was flat at $0.24, which also missed estimates at $0.33. Adjusted operating income in the quarter fell from $23.8 million to $16.2 million, though the company's earnings per share from a lower tax expense and fewer shares outstanding.

Reflecting the challenges at its digital banners, Signet also cut its full-year guidance. It now sees revenue of $6.74 billion to $6.81 billion, compared to a previous range of $6.66 billion to $7.02 billion. On the bottom line, it cut its adjusted EPS range from $9.90 to $11.52 to $9.62 to $10.08, lowering the midpoint of that range by roughly a dollar and below estimates at $10.49.

A bride's hands with jewelry on them.

Image source: Getty Images.

The silver lining

It's not surprising that the stock fell on the news. After all, missing estimates and cutting guidance will tend to do that, but the headwinds facing Signet seem to be short-term.

The primary challenge facing the company is integrating the James Allen and Blue Nile digital banners.

In an interview with The Motley Fool, CFO Joan Hilson explained that as the company integrated the API from those banners, it negatively impacted traffic to the site and search functionality. However, she expected that to normalize within the next year, saying, "We're confident we'll be able to put that business back on track to our long-term expectations."

With those challenges expected to be short-term, a 12% decline in the stock on one earnings report seems excessive. Signet also continues to expect a ramp-up in engagements, which declined following the pandemic as dating patterns were altered by the global health crisis. However, engagements are expected to return to their historical levels in the next couple of years, which will benefit Signet as bridal jewelry makes up roughly half of its business. Engagement trends were weaker than expected in the quarter, which also contributed to subpar performance.

Meanwhile, the company continues to deliver solid performance in fashion, the non-bridal portion of the business, thanks in part to lab-created diamonds, which allow for a higher average transaction volume.

Is Signet a buy?

Despite the disappointing performance, the pieces for the growth of the business are still there, including a recovery in engagements, growth in fashion, share buybacks, increasing operating efficiencies, and growth in the service business.

At a price-to-earnings ratio of under 10 now, the stock looks more likely than not to outperform over the coming years.

Don’t miss this second chance at a potentially lucrative opportunity

Ever feel like you missed the boat in buying the most successful stocks? Then you’ll want to hear this.

On rare occasions, our expert team of analysts issues a “Double Down” stock recommendation for companies that they think are about to pop. If you’re worried you’ve already missed your chance to invest, now is the best time to buy before it’s too late. And the numbers speak for themselves:

  • Nvidia: if you invested $1,000 when we doubled down in 2009, you’d have $369,349!*
  • Apple: if you invested $1,000 when we doubled down in 2008, you’d have $45,990!*
  • Netflix: if you invested $1,000 when we doubled down in 2004, you’d have $504,097!*

Right now, we’re issuing “Double Down” alerts for three incredible companies, and there may not be another chance like this anytime soon.

See 3 “Double Down” stocks »

*Stock Advisor returns as of December 2, 2024

Jeremy Bowman has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.

Disclaimer: For information purposes only. Past performance is not indicative of future results.
placeholder
Big Tech's $800 billion AI bill faces its first real test — free cash flow is the judgeAlphabet and Microsoft report after the close on October 28, Amazon on October 29, with hyperscaler AI capex running near $800 billion a year. Meta's negative free cash flow and 9.40% drop on October 22 was the warning; this week's prints decide whether cloud growth and backlog can pay for the buildout. Here are the consensus numbers, the free-cash-flow table and the two-sided test.
Author  Irene Q.
Oct 26, Mon
Alphabet and Microsoft report after the close on October 28, Amazon on October 29, with hyperscaler AI capex running near $800 billion a year. Meta's negative free cash flow and 9.40% drop on October 22 was the warning; this week's prints decide whether cloud growth and backlog can pay for the buildout. Here are the consensus numbers, the free-cash-flow table and the two-sided test.
placeholder
Anthropic files for a $2 trillion IPO — the $80.7 billion loss is the decoy, the $450 billion compute bill is the riskAnthropic publicly filed its S-1 on October 26, revealing $16.29 billion of first-half revenue (+1,304% year over year) and a $80.7 billion net loss — of which $72.4 billion is a non-cash convertible-note charge. The real number is the $450 billion of signed, mostly non-cancelable compute commitments. Here is what the filing says, why NVDA, ARM and MU are the tradeable read-through, and the conditions that decide whether the AI trade passes its first public valuation test.
Author  Irene Q.
Oct 27, Tue
Anthropic publicly filed its S-1 on October 26, revealing $16.29 billion of first-half revenue (+1,304% year over year) and a $80.7 billion net loss — of which $72.4 billion is a non-cash convertible-note charge. The real number is the $450 billion of signed, mostly non-cancelable compute commitments. Here is what the filing says, why NVDA, ARM and MU are the tradeable read-through, and the conditions that decide whether the AI trade passes its first public valuation test.
placeholder
Fed October Rate Decision Preview: Rate Hike Pause Has Become Consensus, How Will US Stocks, Dollar, and Gold React?The Federal Reserve will announce its October interest rate decision at 14:00 Eastern Time on October 28, and Fed Chair Warsh will hold a press conference at 14:30. Markets currently wide
Author  TradingKey
Oct 27, Tue
The Federal Reserve will announce its October interest rate decision at 14:00 Eastern Time on October 28, and Fed Chair Warsh will hold a press conference at 14:30. Markets currently wide
placeholder
Bitcoin is back above $80,000 — but 75% of the bounce was shorts, not buyersBitcoin trades at $80,669, back above the $80,000 line after touching $79,145 on October 24. But 75.4% of the last 24 hours of futures liquidations were shorts, CME open interest fell 36,545 BTC in October, and spot ETFs lost $773.5 million on October 22-23. Price is up; positioning is down. Here is why the bounce is a squeeze, and the four things that would make it real.
Author  Suzie
Yesterday 05: 54
Bitcoin trades at $80,669, back above the $80,000 line after touching $79,145 on October 24. But 75.4% of the last 24 hours of futures liquidations were shorts, CME open interest fell 36,545 BTC in October, and spot ETFs lost $773.5 million on October 22-23. Price is up; positioning is down. Here is why the bounce is a squeeze, and the four things that would make it real.
placeholder
Brent's $115 front month sits $4.6 above January — the $14 spread to WTI is the supply-risk premiumDecember Brent trades at $115.29 while January is $110.71, a $4.58 backwardation. The December Brent-WTI spread is $14.2, versus a $3-5 normal. That gap, not the headline, is where the Middle East supply risk is priced. Here is what the curve says, why the December contract's expiry on October 30 will mechanically cut the headline by $4.6, and the 108.81 neckline that decides the next move.
Author  Irene Q.
Yesterday 06: 21
December Brent trades at $115.29 while January is $110.71, a $4.58 backwardation. The December Brent-WTI spread is $14.2, versus a $3-5 normal. That gap, not the headline, is where the Middle East supply risk is priced. Here is what the curve says, why the December contract's expiry on October 30 will mechanically cut the headline by $4.6, and the 108.81 neckline that decides the next move.
goTop
quote