NACCO (NC) Q4 2025 Earnings Call Transcript

Source The Motley Fool
Logo of jester cap with thought bubble.

Image source: The Motley Fool.

DATE

Thursday, March 5, 2026 at 8:30 a.m. ET

CALL PARTICIPANTS

  • President and Chief Executive Officer — J.C. Butler
  • Vice President and Controller — Elizabeth I. Loveman
  • Investor Relations — Christina Kmetko

TAKEAWAYS

  • Operating Profit -- $7.6 million, up 95% year over year and nearly 12% sequentially, with all three segments improving.
  • Revenue -- $66.8 million, representing 5% year-over-year growth.
  • Consolidated Gross Profit -- $12 million, an increase of 42% over the previous year.
  • Adjusted EBITDA -- $14.3 million, up 59% year over year and 14% sequentially.
  • Net Income / Loss -- Net loss of $3.8 million due to a $6 million after-tax pension settlement charge and increased tax expense; previous year was $7.6 million net income.
  • Utility Coal Mining Segment -- Operating profit grew to $7.2 million from $2 million, driven by improved results at Mississippi Lignite Mining Company and lower employee expenses.
  • Contract Mining Segment -- Revenue, net of reimbursed costs, rose 9% year over year, while segment operating profit was $900,000 and EBITDA totaled $3.3 million, affected by a $1.1 million loss contingency related to a safety incident.
  • Minerals and Royalties Segment -- Year-over-year increases in revenues, operating profit, and adjusted EBITDA, primarily from higher natural gas royalty revenues and increased natural gas production volumes.
  • Cash Flow from Operations -- $50.9 million for the full year, more than doubling from $22.3 million in the prior year.
  • Liquidity -- $124.2 million total, comprised of $49.7 million cash and $74.5 million available on the revolving credit facility as of year-end.
  • Outstanding Debt -- $100.9 million at year-end, up from $99.5 million a year earlier.
  • Capital Expenditures -- Anticipated 2026 investments will focus mainly on business development; $20 million budgeted for minerals investments, and $36 million planned for Contract Mining segment, with spending contingent on project suitability.
  • Strategic Contract Developments -- New multiyear dragline services contract with U.S. Army Corps of Engineers in Florida is ramping up, expected to continue growing in 2026.
  • Segment Guidance -- Management expects Utility Coal Mining segment profit improvement in 2026, offset by lower unconsolidated mining earnings as The Sabine Mining Company completes reclamation services.
  • Price Environment Impact -- Rising contractually determined per-ton prices at Mississippi Lignite anticipated to support results; power plant maintenance outage is temporarily reducing demand in Q1, with operations expected to resume mid-March.
  • Mitigation Resources Outlook -- Profitability forecasted in 2026, with more consistent results expected as the business expands, driven by mitigation credit sales and restoration services.
  • Pension Plan Settlement -- Completed in the quarter, triggering a $7.8 million noncash pension settlement charge ($6 million after tax).
  • Forecast Methodology Disclosure -- Management noted that operating and commodity price forecasts were developed prior to "recent developments in the Middle East."

Need a quote from a Motley Fool analyst? Email pr@fool.com

RISKS

  • President and Chief Executive Officer J.C. Butler said, "any delay or further changes in demand or dispatch or any reduced power plant mechanical availability could alter our expectations." for Mississippi Lignite Mining Company performance.
  • Vice President and Controller Elizabeth I. Loveman described possible year-over-year profit and EBITDA decrease in the Minerals and Royalties segment in 2026 due to "commodity price forecasts as well as development and production assumptions."
  • Adjusted EBITDA and segment guidance developed before "recent developments in the Middle East," with management cautioning that material changes in commodity prices or production "could change our expectations for 2026."

SUMMARY

Management emphasized the successful completion of a long-disclosed pension plan termination, which created a significant one-time financial charge impacting the quarter's net results. A new U.S. Army Corps of Engineers contract and anticipated expansion into a limestone quarry in Arizona signal ongoing diversification and growth initiatives beyond traditional coal operations. Liquidity remains robust amid elevated capital expenditure plans, which remain conditional on meeting strict investment criteria. Entry into large-scale infrastructure projects with limited exposure to commodity market fluctuations may support more stable revenue streams going forward.

  • Mitigation Resources is positioned to generate a profit for the first time, with management expecting increased profitability as mitigation credit sales and restoration services scale.
  • "In 2026, the National Coal Council, which is an advisory committee to the U.S. Secretary of Energy, was reestablished," with management citing its advocacy for coal's strategic role in national energy policy and expecting a more favorable regulatory environment.
  • Segment-level capital deployment in 2026 is flexible, with $20 million budgeted for minerals and $36 million assigned to Contract Mining, but actual investments depend on the quality of available opportunities.
  • Management described entering a "significant harvest" phase in their investment-harvest business model, aiming for compounding, annuity-like returns rooted in long-term contracts.

INDUSTRY GLOSSARY

  • Mitigation Credits: Tradable environmental units representing the restoration or preservation of habitat or wetlands, used to offset environmental impacts from construction or development projects.
  • Dragline: Large excavation equipment used in surface mining and construction, capable of moving substantial volumes of material efficiently.
  • Reclamation Services: Activities focused on restoring mined land to a usable and environmentally sound state following completion of extraction operations.

Full Conference Call Transcript

J.C. Butler: Thanks, Christie, and good morning, everyone. Before I begin, I would like to take a moment to discuss an incident that happened at one of our Florida operations. The safety and well-being of our employees has always been a cornerstone of our company’s values. Despite this focus, a tragic incident in December resulted in the loss of two employees. This loss deeply affected us, and we extend our heartfelt condolences to the family, friends, and colleagues of these two individuals. This is a solemn reminder of the importance we place on protecting the well-being of our people every day. In the aftermath of this tragedy, we are actively reinforcing our safety expectations across the organization.

Our employees are the nucleus of our success, and their safety will always come before all else. I will now discuss our operating performance. We delivered a strong close to 2025. Our fourth quarter operating profit rose 95% over last year and almost 12% sequentially. All three of our reportable segments reported improved year-over-year results, led by a significant increase in the Utility Coal Mining segment. Overall, we continued to build upon the improving profitability and growth we experienced in the third quarter, highlighting the second half that overcame operational challenges experienced during the first half of the year.

We disclosed over the past several quarters that we were terminating our pension plan during the fourth quarter, and I am happy to report that we have now successfully settled all future pension obligations. As a result of completing this process, we recognized an after-tax termination charge of $6,000,000. This charge, and an increase in tax expense which Liz will explain in more detail, contributed to our reported fourth quarter net loss of $3,800,000. These transactional anomalies aside, I feel good about our underlying operating results, which contributed to the 59% year-over-year and 14% sequential increase in adjusted EBITDA. I believe these results represent a business delivering on its potential.

Our Utility Coal Mining segment, which features long-term mining contracts, remains the foundation of our business. I am pleased to say that our Utility Coal Mining segment reported a gross profit this quarter after a number of quarters of losses. For more than a year, I have discussed Mississippi Lignite’s unfavorable contract mechanics that resulted in a lower per ton sales price that unfavorably affected results. The team at Mississippi Lignite Mining Company has worked diligently to mine efficiently and control costs. And this quarter, the mine produced and sold more tons and, as a result, benefited from higher production efficiency and a lower cost per ton sold.

Production also outpaced deliveries in the period, leading to certain production costs to be capitalized into inventory. These factors drove the current quarter gross profit compared with the prior-year loss when results were affected by a significant inventory write-down. I would like to be able to say the results at Mississippi Lignite Mining Company are moving in the right direction now, especially with an anticipated increase in the contractually determined price per ton. However, the customer’s power plant began a maintenance outage in mid-February, which is affecting first quarter demand. The power plant is expected to resume operations in mid-March.

We are expecting year-over-year improvements at Lignite Mining Company in 2026, but any delay or further changes in demand or dispatch or any reduced power plant mechanical availability could alter our expectations. On our third quarter earnings call, we secured a multiyear dragline services contract as part of a U.S. Army Corps of Engineers dam construction project in Palm Beach County, Florida. This project is already starting to ramp up. We are excited about this opportunity as it advances our growth into large-scale infrastructure projects. This project also provides an opportunity to showcase the efficiency and environmental advantages of the new electro-drive Emtek draglines. We also anticipate commencing operations at a new limestone quarry in Arizona in 2026.

Turning to Minerals and Royalties, this segment grew year over year. Royalties from our legacy natural gas assets benefited from higher prices and production, more than offsetting the impact of lower oil prices and production. The Catapult team continues to actively pursue additional investment opportunities to support future growth in earnings. At Mitigation Resources, we expect increasing profitability over time from the sale of mitigation credits and as reclamation and restoration services expand. While performance is currently variable due to permit and project timing, Mitigation Resources is expected to generate a profit in 2026 and move toward more consistent results over time as the business expands. We continue to invest in our businesses to drive future growth.

Again, in 2026, we anticipate making significant capital investments. The majority of these planned expenditures relate to business development opportunities, and we will only make those investments if the projects meet our strict investment criteria. Overall, I continue to believe we are well positioned for meaningful growth. We are entering 2026 with clear opportunities to build on our 2025 momentum as we execute our growth strategy and create long-term value for our shareholders. Our approach is rooted in long-term contracts and investments which continue to deliver strong earnings and steady cash flow for compounding, annuity-like returns. We executed on this strategy over the past decade, and momentum continues to build.

I remain confident in our businesses and in our ability to deliver strong 2026 results and continued progress in the years to come. Before I turn the call over to Liz, I would like to say thank you to all of our employees. Our team delivered strong 2025 fourth quarter and full year earnings, and their hard work and commitment will enable us to continue to deliver in the future. We have an incredibly strong team across the company, and I am proud of the work that they do. With that, I will turn the call over to Liz to provide a more detailed view of our financial results and outlook. Liz?

Elizabeth I. Loveman: Thank you, J.C. I will start with some high-level comments about our consolidated fourth quarter financial results compared to 2024. In the 2025 fourth quarter, we generated consolidated gross profit of $12,000,000, an increase of 42% year over year, while our fourth quarter revenues of $66,800,000 increased 5%. We reported consolidated operating profit of $7,600,000, up from $3,900,000 in 2024, driven by improvements at all three of our reportable segments. These favorable results were partially offset by higher unallocated expenses. Consolidated adjusted EBITDA increased 59% to $14,300,000 versus $9,000,000 for the same period last year.

As J.C. discussed, we completed the termination of our pension plan and, as a result, recorded a $7,800,000 noncash pension settlement charge, or $6,000,000 after tax. This charge, combined with the fourth quarter true-up of tax expense to the full-year effective tax rate, resulted in a net loss for the quarter of $3,800,000, or $0.52 per share. This compared to net income of $7,600,000, or $1.02 per share, in 2024. Moving to the individual segments, the Utility Coal Mining segment reported operating profit of $7,200,000 in 2025, a significant increase over the $2,000,000 generated in the 2024 fourth quarter. Segment adjusted EBITDA increased to $9,700,000 from $4,200,000 in the prior year.

These year-over-year improvements were driven by the stronger operating performance at Mississippi Lignite Mining Company that J.C. discussed. Lower general and administrative employee-related expenses also contributed to the higher segment operating profit. Looking ahead, we expect an increase in operating profit in 2026 compared with 2025. Improvements at Mississippi Lignite Mining Company as a result of an increase in the contractually determined per ton sales price are expected to be partly offset by lower earnings at the unconsolidated mining operations. The lower unconsolidated mining earnings are due to reduced income at The Sabine Mining Company associated with the wind-down of reclamation services.

In the Contract Mining segment, revenues, net of reimbursed costs, grew 9% over the prior year, primarily driven by higher parts sales, partly offset by increased volumes of lower-price tons. Operating profit of $900,000 and segment EBITDA of $3,300,000 were comparable to the prior year. Improved margins at the mining operations and an increase in parts sales were offset by a $1,100,000 loss contingency and lower employee-related expenses. The loss contingency is related to costs associated with the incident J.C. discussed previously. Looking forward, higher customer demand, earnings contributions from new contracts, and continued momentum from 2025 activities are expected to lead to a significant year-over-year increase in results in 2026.

The Minerals and Royalties segment delivered year-over-year growth in revenues, operating profit, and segment adjusted EBITDA driven by improved natural gas pricing and increased production volumes due to increased royalty revenues. These benefits were partly offset by lower royalty oil revenues resulting from reduced oil prices and volumes. Lower employee-related expenses and higher earnings from an equity investment also contributed to the year-over-year profit improvement. At the Minerals and Royalties segment, newer investments are expected to contribute favorably to 2026 results. However, commodity price forecasts as well as development and production assumptions are expected to result in an overall year-over-year decrease in operating profit and segment adjusted EBITDA, particularly in the second half of the year.

It is important to note that our forecast was developed prior to the recent developments in the Middle East. Any significant changes in commodity prices or production as a result of this conflict could change our expectations for 2026. Overall, we anticipate meaningful year-over-year improvements in consolidated operating profit, net income, and EBITDA in 2026. Turning to our liquidity, for the 2025 full year, we generated cash from operations of $50,900,000 compared to $22,300,000 in 2024. At December 31, we had outstanding debt of $100,900,000, up modestly from $99,500,000 at 12/31/2024. Our total liquidity was $124,200,000, which consisted of $49,700,000 of cash and $74,500,000 of availability under our revolving credit facility.

As a result of the anticipated capital investments in 2026, we expect a use of cash before financing greater than in 2025. With that, I will turn the call back to J.C. for closing remarks.

J.C. Butler: Thanks, Liz. To wrap up, I remain confident in our trajectory and long-term opportunities. Our businesses provide critical inputs for many industries. As the need for uninterrupted energy grows, industry fundamentals in natural resources are expected to continue to strengthen, reinforcing the critical need to keep existing reliable baseload resources online. In 2026, the National Coal Council, which is an advisory committee to the U.S. Secretary of Energy, was reestablished. This council is focused on advising the Department of Energy on reinforcing coal’s strategic role in U.S. energy policy and providing actionable advice on sustaining coal plant operations and prioritizing coal to support grid reliability, which supports our country’s economic competitiveness and national security.

The reestablishment of this council and the underlying improving regulatory environment reinforce my confidence in our prospects for 2026, as well as our overall business trajectory and longer-term growth opportunities. The building blocks for durable compounding growth at NACCO Industries, Inc. are firmly in place. Our team is focused on execution, operational discipline, and delivering long-term returns for shareholders. We will now open for questions.

Operator: As a reminder, to ask a question, simply press star 1 on your telephone keypad. Again, that is star 1 to ask a question. Our first question is from the line of Doug Weiss with DSW Investments. Please go ahead.

Doug Weiss: Good morning. I guess starting with the coal division, can you quantify how much the step down in Sabine work is?

Elizabeth I. Loveman: We have not quantified that number.

Doug Weiss: Okay.

J.C. Butler: But, I mean, Doug, what I would say—Doug, I think what I would say is, you know, when the plant—when the mine and the plant were operating and we were delivering coal, that was the highest level of income that we received from Sabine. As we step down into reclamation, that, you know, appropriately because, you know, we are scaling down the amount of work, that fee was reduced. As we exit that, you know, that situation, that is when it goes away. So it is not—I just want you to know that it is not going from, like, full-bore production level, which we had, you know, a couple years ago, to zero.

It is stepping down from a lower level.

Doug Weiss: Right. Okay. And at the same time, your, you know, your price index goes up this year. Right?

J.C. Butler: Yes. You are speaking at Red Hills at Mississippi Lignite Mining Company. Yes, we believe—know it is based on what happens to indices month to month, but we believe that we are going to see an increase in price during the course of the year.

Doug Weiss: Okay. And does that flow in—you know, is that weighted towards one—is there a seasonal element to that when that really starts to benefit you?

J.C. Butler: It is a formula that compares current prices for relevant indices to prior indices. So, you know, it is tracking movements over a one- and five-year period. And so, you know, just as we look at what was happening in the prior periods and what our expectations are in the future periods, we are able to, you know, develop a forecast. There is not really a seasonal component to price. However, you know, there is generally a seasonal component to deliveries.

In, you know, particularly in the South, power plants operate at their heaviest in the winter when it is cold, in the summer when it is hot, and the shoulder seasons typically do not operate at the same high level.

Doug Weiss: Okay. Yeah. So seasonal was a bad choice of words. I really just meant when in the year do you really start to see the benefit from that index reset?

J.C. Butler: Yes. You know, it is really just going to depend on how the indices play out over time. I think we have mentioned before that, you know, petroleum is represented in the basket of indices. And, you know, who knows how that is going to play out with what is going on in the Middle East. But very, very difficult to forecast that at this time. Obviously, when we developed our forecast, we did not know what the Middle East situation was going to develop.

Doug Weiss: I see. I mean, could that create kind of a windfall situation given the spike in oil prices?

J.C. Butler: I mean, look, I think we could play out lots of scenarios. I think you could say spikes in, you know, various things are going to drive the price up. But, you know, we can also see things happen in the market that cause some of those indices to drop as well. So I think it is really hard to forecast. I mean, every day you pick up The Wall Street Journal and you can read, even in just one newspaper, various views of how this might play out with respect to controlling prices, inflation, interest rates, and all the other stuff.

Doug Weiss: Well, and I had understood from your previous comments that it was not actually the wholesale petroleum price. It was more of the diesel price at the pump. Is that true, or did I misunderstand there?

J.C. Butler: So the price is based on published indices. So it is not like—it is not like we drive by the local gas station and see what diesel is selling for. It is the nationally, you know, federally published indices.

Doug Weiss: Okay. I gotcha. I guess moving on to Contract Mining, how large is the—you know, I know you probably do not want to quantify it, but just relative to a typical contract is the Army Corps of Engineers contract?

J.C. Butler: It is a significant contract. We are very excited about the opportunity, as, you know, we mentioned. It is an opportunity for us to apply our skills in a new market. Instead of, you know, mining aggregates that are going to be used either in a cement plant or, you know, sold as crushed aggregates or sand or gravel, this is an opportunity to go use our skills for infrastructure projects. So it is a pretty sizable project for us, and we are excited about the new opportunity and the partnership.

Doug Weiss: And what is the timing of that in terms of when that starts and when it gets up to full production?

J.C. Butler: We are already ramping up production. I do not actually know when it gets to full production. Liz, do you know that?

Elizabeth I. Loveman: I think it is going to depend a little bit on the timing of getting the additional dragline sessions, but it will ramp up throughout this year.

Doug Weiss: Yeah. It is going to ramp up throughout the year.

J.C. Butler: And, you know, it will be full steam ahead. One of the things that I find interesting about this project that I think we all are encouraged or excited by—this feature is, you know, this is not a contract where we are delivering aggregates. We are mining aggregates for a customer that is responding to customer demand. This is a contract where we have been asked to go in and move X amount of material. And, you know, obviously, we have to work in coordination with our customer to do that. But this is not a contract that has any exposure to market forces. So, you know, I think it is a pretty predictable, nice contract for us.

Doug Weiss: Yeah. You think there is an opportunity to add more business like that?

J.C. Butler: Well, we do not know, but I think we hope so.

Doug Weiss: Yeah. Okay. And how about Phoenix? How substantial is that new business?

J.C. Butler: I mean, that also is a nice contract. It is a sizable dragline that we have moved out there. As you know, Phoenix is just exploding with growth. So it seems like, you know, lots of potential there.

Doug Weiss: Mhmm. Okay. Interesting. You gave your capital expense targets. I guess two questions on that. Well, I guess I will start—just I will break them up. On the first one, is it reasonable to think that capital will be allocated in a manner similar to 2025 in terms of the divisional breakout?

J.C. Butler: You mean, like, the pie chart of CapEx?

Doug Weiss: Yeah. Like, how much is going to mining and how much is going to oil and gas and—

J.C. Butler: Well, I mean, I guess I would break that down by saying, you know, we are really clear that we budget $20,000,000 of investment capital for our minerals business. And, you know, there is nothing saying that we have to spend that $20,000,000. It is just what we put in our budget. So we spend twenty and, you know, if we do, great. If we do not, that is okay too. We are only going to spend it if we find the right project. So that is kind of a fixed number generally. You know, the total of that we published is a pretty big number.

And we said that, you know, the majority of what we are going to spend is with respect to growth. So I think it really determines how those opportunities play out. I think we do disclose a breakout in the 10-K. Liz can probably point us to that in a second. But, ultimately, this is going to depend on what opportunities do we really find. If you are talking about our forecast, it is in the 10-K. If you want to talk about where it actually gets spent, it really is dependent upon what projects we find and which ones, you know, meet our investment criteria.

I think we have been really clear about how we think about deploying capital, and if we do not meet our investment criteria, then we just do not invest.

Doug Weiss: Right. So in terms of the—sorry. Go ahead.

Elizabeth I. Loveman: No. I was going to say you can find the breakout in the 10-K in our MD&A, where we have a discussion of 2025 actual and 2026 planned CapEx.

Doug Weiss: Okay. Okay. Great. In terms of the Army Corps of Engineers work and the Phoenix work, that capital has already been spent. Right? So this would be capital for new contracts. Is that right?

J.C. Butler: There is some additional capital for the Army Corps of Engineers project. That is going to end up being a three-dragline project. And so we are still getting the final draglines commissioned in order to construct and commissioned in order to do that project.

Doug Weiss: Oh, okay. You be able to say about how much is left on that project?

Elizabeth I. Loveman: We have not disclosed that. I mean, I would say what we spend in 2026 is included in the $36,000,000 we have for the Contract Mining segment.

J.C. Butler: Okay. So that number is in the $36,000,000.

Doug Weiss: Yeah. Okay. I guess in terms of allocating to the minerals segment, does Eiger give you—you know, do you have an opportunity to continue to invest capital in that operation? Is that an attractive use of your capital, you know, as they expand?

J.C. Butler: Well, I mean, a couple pieces of that. We think it is a very attractive use of our capital. It is why we, you know, invested an additional amount in their operations. I think—and we are very enthusiastic about the investments that we have made with them. I think it is a great piece of our Minerals and Royalties platform. You know, the work that they are doing, I think, is for the most part funded. So I do not—one, I do not know that there would be additional opportunities to invest. But I also think, you know, we want to pay attention to diversifying our investments.

You know, the whole premise of Catapult—or our minerals segment—is we started with a highly concentrated investment in Appalachian natural gas assets, and the goal here is to diversify into other basins and other minerals. Eiger is a piece of that. Taking more Eiger, I think, you know, is more concentration as opposed to more diversification, which is our primary goal. Now I am not going to rule out that we would ever invest more in Eiger, but I would say, generally, we are more likely to end up, you know, investing in mineral and royalty interests like we have in the past.

Doug Weiss: Mhmm. Okay. If you hit that capital target, my guess is you are going to be somewhat cash negative for the year. Do you have a leverage level where you feel, you know, where you get uncomfortable or where you are willing to go up to?

J.C. Butler: Well, I do not ever want to get to a level where I start to feel uncomfortable. You know, we talk often about our desire to have a conservative financial structure. As we have discussed, you know, we have been through a period of investing in all these businesses, and we believe that we are, you know, entering a period of significant harvest in a, you know, investment-harvest business model. So, you know, one, we do not know whether we are going to spend the entire $89,000,000.

And, two, we are going to watch our level of harvest that is going on during the year, and we will certainly manage in an appropriate way so that we do not ever get to a point where we are having a call and I am like, I am a little uncomfortable with where we are in our leverage. I do not want to get there.

Doug Weiss: Yeah. Okay. I guess last question from me is just on Mitigation Resources. So is most of the revenue in the unallocated line, is that mostly Mitigation Resources?

J.C. Butler: Yes.

Doug Weiss: Okay. And how are you feeling about that business in terms of growth and, you know, I saw that you said it would be profitable at the end of the year. Is that something you expect to continue going forward into next year?

J.C. Butler: Yes. You know, yes, we expect it to reach profitability and grow from there. The mitigation banks—you know, there are two parts to that business. One is the mitigation banking business. Speaking of invest and then harvest, you know, we have identified properties in high-growth areas. In some instances, we will acquire property with opportunity to improve the streams and/or wetlands on that property. And, you know, you get permits approved with the Army Corps of Engineers, and then there is basically a ten-year process where we do work that would involve improving the streams and/or wetlands and then monitoring. And you receive credits.

We know upfront how many credits we are going to get, and the mitigation banks that we have already got in place have a very large value of credits that are going to be released from them over time. So we have got a pretty good horizon on the—you call it credit inventory—that we will be able to sell in the future from just our existing credits. Now, you know, that is all subject to timing because, obviously, you have got to get through the Army Corps of Engineers upfront permitting process. Then you have got milestones that we need to hit with the work that we are doing. We are confident that we could be successful with that.

But then you also have got, you know, what are customer projects, what is their timing look like, when do they get their Army Corps permit, and how does their development proceed. So we think all of this is moving in a positive direction, and will continue to do so in the future. And all of that gets mixed in with shorter-term reclamation and restoration projects, you know, that we are finding really nice success in that part of the business. So you blend those two together, and we think this business is on a really nice trajectory—trajectory that will really start taking hold later this year.

Doug Weiss: Okay. Great. Well, nice quarter, and glad to see things continue to go well overall. And so thanks. Thank you for your hard work and for taking my questions.

J.C. Butler: Great. Doug, we always appreciate your questions. Thank you for your interest.

Operator: And with no further questions in queue, I will now hand the call back over to J.C. for closing remarks.

Christina Kmetko: This is Christina. With that, I will conclude our Q&A session. Before we conclude, I would like to provide a few reminders. A replay of our call will be available online later this morning. We will also post a transcript on the Investor Relations website when it becomes available. If you have any questions, please reach out to me. My phone number is in the press release. An audio recording of the event will be available via the Echo Replay platform. The Echo Replay will expire on Thursday, March 12, 2026, at 11:59 PM.

Operator: This does conclude today’s conference call. You may now disconnect.

Should you buy stock in Nacco Industries right now?

Before you buy stock in Nacco Industries, consider this:

The Motley Fool Stock Advisor analyst team just identified what they believe are the 10 best stocks for investors to buy now… and Nacco Industries wasn’t one of them. The 10 stocks that made the cut could produce monster returns in the coming years.

Consider when Netflix made this list on December 17, 2004... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you’d have $532,066!* Or when Nvidia made this list on April 15, 2005... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you’d have $1,122,072!*

Now, it’s worth noting Stock Advisor’s total average return is 960% — a market-crushing outperformance compared to 193% for the S&P 500. Don't miss the latest top 10 list, available with Stock Advisor, and join an investing community built by individual investors for individual investors.

See the 10 stocks »

*Stock Advisor returns as of March 5, 2026.

This article is a transcript of this conference call produced for The Motley Fool. While we strive for our Foolish Best, there may be errors, omissions, or inaccuracies in this transcript. Parts of this article were created using Large Language Models (LLMs) based on The Motley Fool's insights and investing approach. It has been reviewed by our AI quality control systems. Since LLMs cannot (currently) own stocks, it has no positions in any of the stocks mentioned. As with all our articles, The Motley Fool does not assume any responsibility for your use of this content, and we strongly encourage you to do your own research, including listening to the call yourself and reading the company's SEC filings. Please see our Terms and Conditions for additional details, including our Obligatory Capitalized Disclaimers of Liability.

The Motley Fool has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.

Disclaimer: For information purposes only. Past performance is not indicative of future results.
placeholder
How to Survive Bitcoin Winter? Will It Still Fall Below $60,000 in 2026?Recently, after meeting with the CEO of Coinbase, Donald Trump pressured Congress to push for the CLARITY Act. Driven by this news, Bitcoin (BTC) prices once surged past $73,000, successf
Author  TradingKey
7 hours ago
Recently, after meeting with the CEO of Coinbase, Donald Trump pressured Congress to push for the CLARITY Act. Driven by this news, Bitcoin (BTC) prices once surged past $73,000, successf
placeholder
US Dollar Index gathers strength to near 99.00 on Middle East tensions, robust US services data The US Dollar Index (DXY), an index of the value of the US Dollar (USD) measured against a basket of six world currencies, currently trades near 99.00 during the early European trading hours on Thursday. The DXY edges higher amid uncertainty and persistent geopolitical risks in the Middle East.
Author  FXStreet
8 hours ago
The US Dollar Index (DXY), an index of the value of the US Dollar (USD) measured against a basket of six world currencies, currently trades near 99.00 during the early European trading hours on Thursday. The DXY edges higher amid uncertainty and persistent geopolitical risks in the Middle East.
placeholder
Gold rises as safe-haven demand increases on Iran warGold price (XAU/USD) extends its gains for the second successive session on Thursday as traders seek safety amid the ongoing war in the Middle East.
Author  FXStreet
10 hours ago
Gold price (XAU/USD) extends its gains for the second successive session on Thursday as traders seek safety amid the ongoing war in the Middle East.
placeholder
Senate to vote on Trump’s pro-Bitcoin Fed pick as BTC hits four-week highThe US Senate is set to vote on President Trump’s nomination of Kevin Warsh as the next Federal Reserve chair.
Author  Cryptopolitan
15 hours ago
The US Senate is set to vote on President Trump’s nomination of Kevin Warsh as the next Federal Reserve chair.
placeholder
WTI climbs to $76.00, eyes one-year high amid rising tensions in the Middle EastWest Texas Intermediate (WTI) US Crude Oil prices attract fresh buyers on Wednesday and climb back closer to the highest level since January 2025, touched the previous day.
Author  FXStreet
Yesterday 10: 13
West Texas Intermediate (WTI) US Crude Oil prices attract fresh buyers on Wednesday and climb back closer to the highest level since January 2025, touched the previous day.
goTop
quote