CoreWeave (CRWV) Q4 2025 Earnings Call Transcript

Source The Motley Fool
Logo of jester cap with thought bubble.

Image source: The Motley Fool.

DATE

Thursday, Feb. 26, 2026 at 5 p.m. ET

CALL PARTICIPANTS

  • Chief Executive Officer — Michael Intrator
  • Chief Financial Officer — Nitin Agrawal

TAKEAWAYS

  • Total revenue -- $5.1 billion, an increase of 168% year over year, confirmed by both management and the CFO.
  • Q4 revenue -- $1.6 billion, up 110% year over year, primarily driven by demand from hyperscalers, AI natives, and enterprises.
  • Revenue backlog -- $66.8 billion, up $11.2 billion sequentially, and over $50 billion year over year, reflecting significant multiyear customer commitments.
  • Active power -- Over 850 megawatts across 43 data centers at year-end, with approximately 260 megawatts added in Q4.
  • Contracted capacity -- More than 3.1 gigawatts at year-end, with nearly all expected online by 2027.
  • CapEx -- $14.9 billion for the full year, and $8.2 billion for Q4, higher than guidance due to accelerated infrastructure deployment.
  • Active customer growth -- The number of customers with $1 million-plus annual commitments increased approximately 150%.
  • Reserved instance customers -- Q4 saw twice as many new reserved instance customers as any previous quarter.
  • Storage product attach rate -- Approximately 80% of customers spending $1 million or more annually use at least one storage product.
  • Contract length -- Weighted average increased from four to five years over the past year.
  • Q4 adjusted EBITDA -- $898 million, nearly double the prior year's $486 million, yielding a 57% adjusted EBITDA margin.
  • Q4 adjusted operating income -- $88 million, with a 6% adjusted operating margin impacted by accelerated infrastructure deployment.
  • Q4 net loss -- $452 million compared to $51 million in the prior year; adjusted net loss was $284 million versus $36 million previously.
  • Q4 interest expense -- $388 million, up from $149 million the previous year, mainly due to increased debt for infrastructure scaling.
  • Q4 OpEx -- $1.7 billion, which includes $157 million in stock-based compensation.
  • Cash & equivalents -- $4.2 billion at year-end, including marketable securities and restricted cash.
  • 2026 CapEx guidance -- Expected between $30 billion and $35 billion, more than twice 2025 investment.
  • 2026 revenue guidance -- Projected at $12 billion to $13 billion, around 140% growth at the midpoint.
  • 2026 adjusted operating income guidance -- $900 million to $1.1 billion, with margins projected to sequentially rise throughout the year and reach low double digits by Q4.
  • 2026 capacity target -- Management expects to double active power capacity to over 1.7 gigawatts by year-end.
  • Q1 2026 guidance -- Revenue expected at $1.9 billion to $2.0 billion, adjusted operating income of $0 to $40 million, with Q1 identified as the margin trough period.
  • 2026 CapEx Q1 -- Projected at $6 billion to $7 billion for the quarter.
  • Q1 interest expense guidance -- Expected between $510 million and $590 million.
  • Future revenue visibility -- Anticipated annualized run-rate revenue of $17 billion to $19 billion exiting 2026, growing to over $30 billion by the end of 2027.
  • Financing progress -- 2025 saw over $18 billion raised in debt and equity, with a 300 basis point decline in weighted average interest rate this year, and a total 600 point reduction since 2023.
  • Convertible senior notes -- $2.6 billion raised in Q4; demand exceeded expectations and led to deal upsizing.
  • Revolving credit facility -- Expanded to $2.5 billion during Q4 to support liquidity and growth.
  • NVIDIA investment -- $2 billion strategic investment from NVIDIA in January to support expansion and platform development.
  • No near-term debt maturities -- Only self-amortizing contract-backed and vendor financing debt maturing before 2029.
  • Delayed draw term loans -- CoreWeave's backlog is largely financed with asset-level delayed draw term loans drawn as infrastructure becomes operational.
  • Contracted revenue start -- All new capacity contracts are expected to start generating revenue by the end of 2026.
  • Customer diversification -- Material progress in expanding the customer mix, with significant increases in enterprise, AI native, and hyperscaler engagement.
  • Older generation GPU demand -- Demand and pricing for A100 increased in 2025, while H100 pricing remained within 10% of start-of-year levels, with constrained supply and robust inference use cases.
  • Product portfolio expansion -- Four inorganic acquisitions completed; expanded partner ecosystem, including new products and increased attach rates for storage and other services.
  • Platform monetization -- Proprietary cloud stack commercialization underway, with NVIDIA testing and validation; not included in 2026 revenue guidance.
  • Backlog composition -- Majority of 2026 CapEx and deployments tied directly to signed, take-or-pay customer contracts.
  • Contract economics -- Similar contract structures and economics across customer types, with margin objectives maintained across SKUs and cohorts.
  • Contribution margin for mature contracts -- Mid-20s percentage range; fully mature EBITDA margins in some contracts reach approximately 70%.
  • Average selling price trends -- H100 recontracting at approximately 10% of original ASPs; A100 ASPs trending higher in recent contracts.
  • Recognition & certifications -- First to achieve NVIDIA Exemplar Cloud status for GB200, remaining SemiAnalysis' sole platinum-ranked AI cloud provider.
  • Future technology adoption -- Plans to bring NVIDIA Rubin, Vera CPU, and BlueField storage to market in 2026, expanding the product portfolio and customer capabilities.
  • Note: All quarters refer to fiscal periods ended Dec. 31, 2025, unless otherwise specified.

Need a quote from a Motley Fool analyst? Email pr@fool.com

RISKS

  • Nitin Agrawal explicitly cited, "Adjusted operating income was lower than expected as a result of deploying infrastructure ahead of our expectations," indicating near-term margin compression from rapid capacity ramp-up.
  • Management noted, "new capacity comes into service, data center lease costs, including power and depreciation expense, commence while customer revenue ramps over subsequent months," highlighting a timing mismatch that could weigh on interim margins.
  • Interest expense rose to $388 million in Q4, up from $149 million the prior year, reflecting increased debt loads required to support expansion, and resulting in a Q4 net loss of $452 million.

SUMMARY

CoreWeave (NASDAQ:CRWV) reported triple-digit annual revenue growth and expanded its contracted revenue backlog to $66.8 billion, supported by accelerated infrastructure buildout, expanded customer mix, and substantial increases in CapEx. Management's guidance projects a doubling of power capacity and more than 140% revenue growth in 2026, with deployment and contract timelines offering strong visibility into future cash flows and customer commitments. The company has secured significant external financing at declining interest rates, with capital expenditures for 2026 directly linked to existing take-or-pay contracts and all new capacity expected to generate revenue by year-end.

  • Management's commentary confirmed commercial momentum in both hyperscaler and enterprise segments, and highlighted customer adoption of multiproduct offerings beyond GPU compute, signaling potential for diversified revenue streams as the platform matures.
  • Executive statements emphasized that pricing for key GPU products was stable or rising in the face of continued supply constraints, further supporting margin durability amid expanding deployments.
  • The company detailed that proprietary software and reference architecture validation by NVIDIA, and the potential for third-party software licensing, provide unrecognized upside not included in current-year guidance.
  • All new infrastructure contracts are expected to commence revenue generation by year-end, establishing clear short-term revenue realization aligned with previously signed backlog.
  • Financing improvements, including a 300 basis point reduction in weighted average interest rates, and a $2 billion investment from NVIDIA, position the company to continue rapid scaling while targeting investment grade status.

INDUSTRY GLOSSARY

  • H100: NVIDIA's Hopper GPU, a high-end accelerator for AI training and inference tasks.
  • A100: NVIDIA's Ampere-based GPU, used primarily for AI and high-performance computing workloads.
  • GB200 / Grace Blackwell: NVIDIA's next-generation AI platform combining Grace CPU and Blackwell GPU architectures, targeting large-scale model training and inference.
  • Take-or-pay contract: Long-term customer agreement requiring payment for reserved capacity whether or not it is fully utilized, supporting revenue visibility for the supplier.
  • Delayed draw term loan: Financing structure allowing borrowers to access funds as specific projects or assets become operational, rather than receiving all funds upfront.
  • Sunk: CoreWeave's proprietary cloud orchestration software for multicloud cluster management.
  • Weights & Biases: Platform for machine learning workflow management; noted for cross-selling as a CoreWeave cloud partner.
  • Active power: Operational data center power capacity, a key metric for cloud infrastructure scaling.

Full Conference Call Transcript

Michael Intrator: Good afternoon, everyone. Thank you for joining us. 2025 was a defining year for CoreWeave, Inc. Generated more than $5.1 billion of revenue, up 168% year over year. Grew our contracted revenue backlog to $66.8 billion, an increase of $11.2 billion sequentially, and more than $50 billion year over year. Reached more than 850 megawatts of active power as of December 31. And added approximately twice as many new reserved instance customers in Q4 versus any quarter in our history. We delivered these results while quickly resolving the data center delays we discussed last quarter, delivering the impacted deployments ahead of our Q3 earnings call expectation.

CoreWeave, Inc. is the fastest cloud in history to reach $5 billion in annual revenue. We remain in the early stages of the most transformative infrastructure buildout in history. And CoreWeave, Inc. is at the forefront, building and operating some of the largest purpose-built AI clusters for the world’s most demanding workloads.

Strip away the complexity and four fundamentals define where we stand. One, a demand environment that remains relentless, driving rapid adoption from an increasingly diversified set of hyperscalers, AI-native, and enterprise customers. Two, expanding opportunities for new margin-accretive avenues to monetize CoreWeave, Inc. Cloud, unlocked by the evolution of our platform beyond GPUs and the recent expansion of a partnership with NVIDIA. Three, a rapidly growing data center footprint underpinned by unmatched execution and a strategic approach to capacity expansion.

And four, a disciplined financial model deliberately designed to invest ahead of revenue to fulfill contracted demand backed by $66.8 billion in revenue backlog and providing strong visibility into durable cash flows, attractive returns, and the ability to drive down our cost of capital. We will speak to each of those today.

Regarding demand, the signals we are seeing across hyperscalers, AI natives, and enterprise customers are only intensifying as AI workloads get more complex, models scale faster, and adoption continues to proliferate. The breadth of this demand has translated to deepening engineering relationships with our largest customers and material progress on diversification. CoreWeave, Inc. is supporting the next generation of AI pioneers. As I mentioned, in Q4 we added approximately twice as many new reserved instance customers as any prior quarter in our history, including AI-native and enterprise companies like Cognition, Cursor, MercadoLibre, Midjourney, and Runway. We also expanded our relationships with some of our largest partners, including both of our existing hyperscale cloud customers.

Demand accelerated from each of these customer types, while pricing remained stable throughout 2025—trends that we have seen continue as we have started 2026. In total for the year, we grew the number of customers committed to spending at least $1 million on CoreWeave, Inc. Cloud by nearly 150%. These are not one-time infrastructure deployments. They represent sophisticated multiproduct opportunities, the early chapters of enduring platform relationships, and a growth engine that compounds as AI becomes more deeply embedded in how these companies operate.

We are also seeing significant increase in demand for prior generations of GPU architecture, where supply also remains constrained. Average H100 pricing in Q4 was within 10% of where it started the year, while average A100 pricing increased in 2025. From our customers, we understand the demand for this infrastructure is large for inference use cases, which are proliferating rapidly. We are signing this infrastructure into new reserved instance contracts ahead of when it becomes available, firmly putting to bed concerns about demand for older-generation SKUs. With largely all of our new 2026 capacity allocated, we continue to work diligently to expand our footprint to meet the overwhelming needs of existing and prospective customers for both near and long term.

These trends reinforce our conviction in the durability of demand and the longevity of this technology while running on CoreWeave, Inc. Cloud. In light of the insatiable demand environment and the persistent signals we are seeing from customers, we are accelerating our roadmap with the objective of adding more than five gigawatts of additional data center capacity beyond our already contracted footprint by 2030.

Moving on to new avenues to monetize CoreWeave, Inc. Cloud. Our platform is evolving as we unlock margin-accretive avenues for growth through new products and services as well as offering our proprietary cloud stack outside of our data centers to the broader NVIDIA ecosystem. AI natives and enterprise customers are not just consuming our core GPU infrastructure. They are engaging with our unified platform at significantly higher rates across CPU, storage, and software development tools. The opportunity to add additional value to these customers as their AI workloads mature is substantial and represents meaningful upside over time. This is already showing up across our platform. For example, approximately 80% of CoreWeave, Inc.

Cloud customers paying at least $1 million per year have adopted one or more of our storage products. Additionally, we are seeing strong cross-selling momentum with Weights & Biases, as we added hundreds of millions of CoreWeave, Inc. Cloud TCV from Weights & Biases customers in the second half of the year.

We have also accelerated the development of CoreWeave, Inc.’s proprietary cloud stack, reference architecture, and related software solutions, including Sunk and Mission Control, which orchestrate every layer of our purpose-built cloud and increasingly define the CoreWeave, Inc. customer experience. In January, we announced NVIDIA intends to test and validate our platform, including our software and reference architectures, to work towards including those offerings within NVIDIA’s reference architecture for cloud, enterprise, and sovereign customers. Already, we are seeing select customers license Sunk as their default research-cluster management platform across their multicloud footprint. We expect the broader distribution of our proprietary cloud stack to become a growing source of higher-margin revenue over time.

The ability to monetize our platform both inside and now beyond our own data centers, through third-party licensing agreements, substantially expands our addressable market. This represents tangible long-term upside potential that is not reflected in the 2026 guidance we are providing today.

On to execution. We ended the year with more than 850 megawatts of active power, adding approximately 260 megawatts in the fourth quarter alone, across 43 active data centers, up from 32 at the start of the year. We contracted close to two gigawatts of additional power in 2025, ending the year with more than 3.1 gigawatts of contracted capacity, virtually all of which we expect to come online by 2027. Our contracted but not yet active capacity represents latent revenue potential that we will monetize as built and delivered. We will continue to strategically source land, power, and data center shell infrastructure.

Particularly looking beyond 2026, we see robust opportunities in the current market for CoreWeave, Inc. to grow our contracted power capacity and will also selectively leverage our expanded collaboration with NVIDIA to accelerate our roadmap further to better meet demand.

Operating at this scale and pace is inherently complex. When disruptions surface, we move decisively through disciplined coordination across teams and partners. We quickly cleared the delays discussed in our third quarter earnings call, and in total, we have now delivered more than 50,000 Grace Blackwells to the impacted customer, deploying servers on a rolling basis and delivering them within weeks of receiving access to the requisite data center infrastructure. We are delivering at this breakneck speed across several different sites, handing over tens of thousands of GPUs to different customers simultaneously.

I believe CoreWeave, Inc. is the only cloud platform that can move at this pace while providing the industry-leading performance and reliability that drives customers’ trust and allows us to capture additional wallet share.

The feedback and the results we are seeing from our closest customers are inspiring. Grace Blackwell running at scale on CoreWeave, Inc. Cloud is revolutionary. In Q4, we became the first cloud platform to reach NVIDIA’s Exemplar Cloud status for GB200, while remaining SemiAnalysis’ sole platinum-ranked AI cloud. We expect to remain at the forefront of execution and innovation across the AI cloud stack as we become one of the first to bring NVIDIA’s new Rubin GPU platform to market in 2026, while expanding our product portfolio to include NVIDIA’s Vera CPU and BlueField storage. The integration of these newer technologies into our proprietary cloud platform will help power new capabilities, including agented workflows for our customers.

The pace of our execution also explains why our capital expenditures for Q4 came in above guidance. Our teams were able to bring infrastructure into service ahead of our expectations, which we view as a high-quality acceleration of revenue capacity for 2026. To put our current scale into perspective, according to third-party estimates, CoreWeave, Inc. today is larger than the 15 largest neoclouds across North America and Europe combined. Bringing more than 260 megawatts online in a single quarter requires simultaneously orchestrating hardware, networking, storage, and purpose-built software across more than 100,000 GPUs and millions of interconnected system components, all in near perfect unison. This is among the most operationally complex undertakings in the technology industry.

It is also what CoreWeave, Inc. does better than anyone.

And finally, turning to our financial and business model. In 2026, we expect our CapEx will be at least $30 billion, more than 2x the CapEx in 2025. I want to frame that number in clear terms. This is a reflection of the extraordinary amount of contracted demand in front of us. Our revenue backlog has grown to $66.8 billion, and the vast majority of our intended capital deployment is to directly support this long-dated contracted demand, where we have direct visibility into our long-term margins, underpinned by durable cash flow.

The dividends of these investments will compound, as you will hear from Nitin as he provides some commentary around our targets for 2027 and beyond, in addition to our 2026 guidance. This backlog will continue to be primarily financed with the asset-level delayed draw term loans that we introduced to this market. We expect to continue to reduce our weighted average cost of capital along the way, while unlocking broader industry participation in the facilities. There is a diverse and growing demand to participate in CoreWeave, Inc.’s capital market journey.

We have cultivated a phenomenal financing vehicle for our business that enables us to scale at the pace of artificial intelligence while staying on our targeted path to reach investment grade.

Before I turn it over to Nitin, let me leave you with a few final thoughts. We have $66.8 billion of contracted revenue backlog, with every contract for new capacity expected to begin generating revenue by year-end 2026. We are delivering cloud infrastructure and converting it to revenue today. We are building and operating some of the largest purpose-built AI clusters for the world’s most demanding workloads at a pace and quality second to none. The demand driving the buildout is relentless, diversified, and growing, with customers engaging across our broadening product suite. Our contracted backlog gives us—and you—clear visibility into the trajectory ahead. The expansion of our collaboration with NVIDIA positions CoreWeave, Inc.’s platform as the natural destination for cloud, enterprise, and sovereign customers seeking optimal AI infrastructure performance inside and now beyond our own data centers. Our ability to see into the future of AI innovation and build towards its requirements is unmatched. We will continue to invest and grow this incredible market advantage with discipline and contracted cash flows as we deploy capital strategically to expand capacity, deepen our product suite, and develop the AI cloud that our customers demand. Our priority remains clear: deliver the most performant, reliable, and efficient AI platform for our customers at global scale. The market is accelerating, and CoreWeave, Inc. is primed to be both the beneficiary and the enabler of the AI revolution. With that, I will turn it over to Nitin.

Nitin Agrawal: Thanks, Mike, and good afternoon, everyone. Throughout 2025, we executed with discipline against the strategy we laid out for the year beginning with our IPO. We significantly diversified our customer base, more than doubled our contracted and active power capacity, and strengthened our balance sheet by unlocking new funding sources while lowering our weighted average cost of capital. We also broadened our product portfolio both organically and inorganically, successfully completing four strategic acquisitions to pull forward our roadmap. The current pace of the market and the scale of demand for CoreWeave, Inc. Cloud has created a clear opportunity, and in 2026, we are investing deliberately to meet it, accelerating our plans to further extend our leadership position.

Turning now to Q4 results. Revenue was $1.6 billion in Q4, up 110% year over year, driven by robust customer demand and exceptional execution. Full-year revenue was approximately $5.1 billion, up 168% year over year. Demand for CoreWeave, Inc. Cloud continues to intensify, with revenue backlog for the quarter ended at $66.8 billion, up more than 4x this year alone. As Mike noted, we made significant progress diversifying our customer base across hyperscalers, AI natives, and enterprises, a stated goal at our IPO last year. Moreover, customers are committing their foundational AI workloads to CoreWeave, Inc. for longer periods of time, resulting in the average weighted contract length increasing from roughly four years to roughly five years.

We have $66.8 billion of revenue backlog, with every contract for our new capacity expected to begin generating revenue by year-end. We are delivering on our commitments today. These commitments are being made to current and past GPU generations as a part of broader customer roadmaps, with active conversations already underway for future SKUs.

Operating expenses in the fourth quarter were $1.7 billion, including a stock-based compensation expense of $157 million. We were able to deploy our data center server infrastructure faster than expected, while bringing online more capacity this quarter than any in our history. This drove the corresponding increase in our cost of revenue and technology and infrastructure spend. In addition, the increase in sales and marketing was driven by investments in scaling our go-to-market organization to capture the rapid growth of the AI opportunity. The increase in G&A was driven by professional services related to M&A and financing activities, public company costs, and additional headcount to support our growth.

Adjusted EBITDA for Q4 was $898 million compared to $486 million in 2024, increasing nearly 2x year over year. Our adjusted EBITDA margin was 57%. Adjusted operating income for Q4 was $88 million compared to $121 million in 2024. Our Q4 adjusted operating margin was 6%. Adjusted operating income was lower than expected as a result of deploying infrastructure ahead of our expectations. Net loss for the fourth quarter was $452 million compared to a $51 million net loss for 2024. Interest expense for Q4 was $388 million compared to $149 million in 2024, due to increased debt to support the scaling of our infrastructure. Adjusted net loss for Q4 was $284 million compared to $36 million in 2024.

Turning to capital expenditures. CapEx in Q4 totaled $8.2 billion and $14.9 billion for the full year, higher than anticipated due to our team’s ability to put infrastructure in service ahead of our expectations. As we previewed last quarter, the meaningful growth in construction in progress in Q4 to $9.4 billion, an increase of $2.5 billion quarter over quarter, reflects the significant scale of infrastructure we are on track to deliver in the near term. As a reminder, construction in progress represents infrastructure not yet in service and not yet being depreciated. As these assets come into service, they will drive incremental revenue and corresponding depreciation. Our financing structure is designed to match this deployment model.

The large majority of our term debt is as delayed draw facilities, meaning capital is only drawn as the data centers are operationalized. While global supply chains remain complex amid persistent supply-demand imbalances, we have consistently navigated these challenges through operational discipline and strategic sourcing. Our track record of bringing infrastructure online at scale gives us confidence in our ability to adapt and continue accelerating capacity deployments in 2026 and beyond.

Now let us turn to our balance sheet and strong liquidity position. As of December 31, we had $4.2 billion in cash, cash equivalents, restricted cash, and marketable securities. We continue to make significant progress in strengthening our capital structure and lowering our weighted average cost of capital. In Q4, we raised approximately $2.6 billion via our inaugural convertible senior notes offering, where investor demand dramatically exceeded the offering size, leading to its upsize. We also expanded our revolving credit facility in the quarter to $2.5 billion to manage liquidity and support our various growth initiatives.

In total, in 2025, we secured more than $18 billion of debt and equity, working with more than 200 investment partners and financial institutions, reflecting the depth and diversity of capital committed to CoreWeave, Inc.’s growth. As Mike discussed, in January, we announced the expansion of our commercial relationship with NVIDIA, which was accompanied by a $2 billion investment in CoreWeave, Inc. in support of our platform, team, and shared vision for AI infrastructure at scale.

Our efforts in Q4 and over the past year to optimize our structure and lower our weighted average cost of capital is evidenced by the 300 basis points decline in our weighted average interest rate during the year and represents a total reduction of nearly 600 basis points since 2023. To put that in perspective, the 300 basis points improvement represents nearly $700 million in annualized interest savings based on our Q4 debt balance. Going forward, we expect to continue to be able to reduce our weighted average cost of capital as capital providers and rating agencies increasingly appreciate our best-in-class execution as well as the durability of, and visibility into, the cash flows that underpin our take-or-pay customer contracts.

We have no debt maturities until 2029, other than self-amortizing contract-backed debt and OEM vendor financing.

Turning to tax, we recorded a non-cash tax benefit in Q4, driven primarily by the impact of One Big Beautiful Bill Act; our tax rate might fluctuate significantly in the future due to similar factors.

Demand continues to intensify and diversify across all customer categories. We are accelerating investments deliberately to capture the contracted demand, and the long duration of those commitments gives us clear cash flow visibility to deliver best-in-class cloud margins as the deployed capacity matures. We expect 2026 CapEx of $30 billion to $35 billion, which is more than double our 2025 investment. Substantially all of it is tied to our already signed customer contracts that we intend to bring online this year as we expect to double our active power capacity to more than 1.7 gigawatts by year-end.

As I have described previously, when new capacity comes into service, data center lease costs, including power and depreciation expense, commence while customer revenue ramps over subsequent months. In 2026, this effect is amplified by the scale of our deployment program. We will be bringing online roughly double the capacity of 2025, which means a corresponding increase in depreciation running ahead of associated revenue recognition.

For full year 2026, we expect revenue of $12 billion to $13 billion, representing approximately 140% growth year over year at the midpoint. We expect adjusted operating income of $900 million to $1.1 billion. We anticipate margins will ramp sequentially from low single digits in Q1, expanding in each of Q2 and Q3, and returning to low double-digit levels by Q4 as deployed capacity matures and revenue scales against the existing cost base. Our 2026 margin progression is a result of deliberate investments we are making to meet the insatiable demand for our platform. As our business and growth normalize, we remain confident in our ability to achieve 25% to 30% margins over the long term.

Our mature revenue contracts generate contribution margins in the mid-20s which, combined with the ramp-up of margin-accretive products and services we continue to unlock, gives us conviction in our ability to achieve this target. Our 2026 guidance excludes any meaningful revenue or margin benefits from the further monetization of CoreWeave, Inc.’s proprietary cloud stack to other NVIDIA cloud, enterprise, or sovereign customers, which we do expect to begin in 2026 and to become more meaningful in the coming years. This represents tangible long-term potential upside.

For Q1 specifically, we expect revenue in the range of $1.9 billion to $2.0 billion. We expect Q1 adjusted operating income between $0 and $40 million. Q1 represents the trough in our annual margin trajectory as we expect our CapEx deployments to be $6 billion to $7 billion of infrastructure in the quarter, as we continue to bring online significant further capacity beyond the approximately 260 megawatts we added in Q4. Our Q1 interest expense is expected to be in the range of $510 million to $590 million.

The long-term nature of our contracted revenue backlog provides us with visibility well beyond 2026. As we continue on our hypergrowth trajectory, we expect to exit 2026 with annualized run-rate revenue of $17 billion to $19 billion, which we expect to grow to more than $30 billion of annualized run-rate revenue as we exit 2027. We are not building towards this trajectory speculatively. Contracted customer demand, deep strategic partnerships, active infrastructure deployment, industry-leading capabilities, and a thoughtful approach to capital markets give us the confidence to put these numbers forward.

We delivered a strong fourth quarter and full year, capping a transformative 2025. We grew our contracted revenue backlog to $66.8 billion while meaningfully diversifying our customer base, secured more than $18 billion in debt and equity capital at progressively lower costs, and strengthened our platform through new products, services, and strategic acquisitions. We enter 2026 with 850 megawatts of active power across 43 data centers, on track to exceed 1.7 gigawatts by the year-end, with every contract for our new capacity expected to begin generating revenue this year.

Our 2026 investment program is fully supported by contracted demand and, as we noted, our guidance excludes the potential upside from licensing CoreWeave, Inc.’s proprietary cloud stack, which we expect to begin contributing in 2026 and scale in the years ahead. Thank you. We look forward to your questions.

Operator: At this time, if you would like to ask a question, press star, then the number one on your telephone keypad. To withdraw your question, simply press star-1 again. We kindly ask that you limit yourself to one question for today’s call. We will pause for just a moment to compile the Q&A roster. Your first question comes from the line of Keith Weiss with Morgan Stanley. Please go ahead.

Josh Baer: Hi. This is Josh Baer on for Keith. And thank you for the question. Congrats on a good quarter. You came in nicely ahead on CapEx, and it is great to hear the delivery delays resolved quicker than expected. Trying to align that with seeing the active power, which is more in line, and revenue guidance in the range, which is well below the typical level of upside. So I was hoping you could unpack some of those dynamics. If you are moving faster, why did that not show up in the active power and the revenue? Maybe it did. Thanks.

Nitin Agrawal: Thanks, Josh, for your question. As we deploy capacity, a lot of that capacity came online towards the end of the quarter, and you are going to see the monetization of it in 2026. We continue to build our capacity at a rapid pace. As we talked in our prepared remarks, we will continue to deploy that capacity for 2026 throughout the year as well, including Q1. That is the impact that you are seeing. Relative to the Q1 number, we are basically providing the guidance for the first time for 2026 and Q1 at this moment.

Josh Baer: Okay. Thank you. And it is really great to see the list of enterprise customers. I was hoping you could unpack what that type of contract and deal looks like from those enterprise customers. We have a great sense for what a hyperscaler mega contract looks like, but any chance you could run through size, duration, pricing, associated with those enterprise customers? Thanks.

Michael Intrator: So we do not speak to individual contracts. But what you are seeing is, in an environment where there is so much intense competition for the product we deliver, which is the most cutting-edge computing infrastructure delivered through CoreWeave, Inc. Cloud, the contracts largely look very similar to the hyperscale contracts in tenor. In tenure? And we work with each of the individual enterprise clients as we are putting together an appropriate structure for their business model and for their clients.

Josh Baer: Great. Thank you.

Operator: Your next question comes from the line of Amit Daryanani with Evercore. Please go ahead.

Amit Daryanani: Yep. Thanks for taking my question. I guess my question is really around the cost of financing, especially given the $30 billion plus kind of CapEx number we have for the year. Just wondering, as you continue scaling capacity, can you sort of quantify where you estimate your blended cost of capital is? How has that really evolved over the last twelve months? And, when you negotiate with these data center operators, how do they assess your credit profile? Is it really tied to your customer contracts and who they are, or is it something else?

And then just on the financing side, does the NVIDIA credit support, the guarantor framework, help translate into a measurable step down in your borrowing cost, you think, in 2026?

Michael Intrator: Thank you for the question, or questions. So look. We have made incredible progress at the company. As the company matures as a business, as we have a more extensive track record of operating this infrastructure, of working with the client, delivering infrastructure, you have seen our cost of capital drop 100 basis points in the last twelve months. You have seen it drop 600 basis points over the last two years. We expect that will continue. It is a trend that is being driven by our business increasingly performing well with these ATL structures. When you are talking about the data centers, you know, we added close to two gigawatts’ worth of infrastructure in 2025.

And just to give you scale and perspective, at the end of 2024, we had 1.3 gigawatts in our portfolio. So you have seen a material increase in our capacity to access, build, and drive data center contracts. We are excited about that. An important stepping stone for us as we continue to drive the business. The ability to enter into contracts with that scale of data center capacity is once again a reflection of the business maturing, the creditworthiness, and scale of the business increasing. As far as the data center operators go, I can tell you what I think. Right? And what I think is that data center operators are very interested in working with CoreWeave, Inc.

They are looking for a diversified portfolio of tenants in their data centers. They are looking to get exposure to a company like CoreWeave, Inc. that represents so much of the AI infrastructure that is going to be ultimately delivered. And so they kind of look at us as a pure-play way of really getting access to the scaling of artificial intelligence, and they want that exposure.

As far as our relationship with NVIDIA in terms of accelerating our ability to get access to data centers, I think the perspective that you should take here is that, obviously, working with an investment-grade counterparty as the offtake will have an impact on the cost of capital or the cost that is associated with the data center. Obviously, working with NVIDIA—which we do selectively, but certainly not exclusively—when we are building out our data center portfolio will have a positive impact on the costs associated with our data center footprint.

Amit Daryanani: Perfect. Thank you very much for all the insights.

Operator: Your next question comes from the line of Mark Murphy with JPMorgan. Please go ahead.

Mark Murphy: Thank you so much, and congratulations on just very, very strong bookings. Mike, some of the AI models have demonstrated a pretty leap forward in the last couple of months. And, you know, the one that is in the headlines is Claude to Code. But I do not think we have seen models yet that were fully, deeply trained on some of these gigantic Blackwell or GB200 or the NVL data centers—really the stuff that CoreWeave, Inc. has pioneered and mastered. I am curious what you are hearing in the marketplace just in terms of how those Blackwell-based models are coming along.

If we end up seeing six or any of the other ones in the next three to six months, do you think it is going to feel like a huge step forward in their capabilities, or is it looking more like a steady evolution on the Blackwell systems?

Michael Intrator: Look. The Blackwell systems are amazing. Right? They represent the next step function in computing power that allows these data scientists, these companies that are driving the models, to be able to build and scale infrastructure in a way that they just have not been able to historically. And my expectation is—and certainly every indication from the model companies—is that the rate of increasing performance from these models, we are just getting going. Now it is early in the deployment of Grace Blackwell. Right? There are not that many clusters that exist at the size and scale that we talked about we have already delivered.

As those clusters come online within our portfolio, within the global portfolio, I think it stands to reason, and you will see step functions in performance that are associated with this new technology. We are really excited about it. And I think our customers are extraordinarily excited about it because they understand what they are going to be able to do with this technology is so incredibly performant, both from a training perspective, but also from an inference perspective when it becomes available.

Mark Murphy: And Mike, thank you for that. And just by extension, because you just said inference, how are you weighing the merits of focusing on the NVIDIA reference architecture? It is obviously very powerful for the massive training runs and some work beyond that. Just the other side would be any inclination to work with custom ASICs that, you know, they do legitimately seem to offer better inferencing price-performance. And then, you know, obviously, NVIDIA’s acquisition of Groq maybe kind of—I do not know if you think that sort of resets the playing field in a way that, you know, staying NVIDIA reference architecture might kind of reign supreme even for inferencing. Just wondering how you sort of project that forward.

Michael Intrator: So look. Whenever we have these calls and whenever I am asked about this, I kind of speak to the way that we have gone about building our business, which is we are client-led. Our clients are coming to us, and they are telling us the infrastructure that they need in order to drive their business. And I want to be clear that when they say infrastructure, it is not a training infrastructure. It is not inference infrastructure. It is AI infrastructure. Right? And they are coming to us specifically because we are able to deliver such an incredibly performant continuum of the NVIDIA technology. They know we are great at it. That is why they come to us.

Are they looking for other technologies from other providers? Well, that stands to reason. But what I know is that we are unable to catch up with the demand signals that are coming in for the product that we deliver. And so we are going to focus on continuing to drive the solution that we have that is so performant and that has overwhelmed our ability and the market’s ability to deliver infrastructure for the past three years.

Mark Murphy: Thank you very much.

Operator: Your next question comes from the line of Brent Thill with Jefferies. Please go ahead.

Michael Intrator: Brent? We cannot hear you.

Brent Thill: Hey. Good afternoon. Nitin, I had a quick question just on the guide, and just from a perspective, I know when you look at the revenue guide, you were in line, operating income a little lower, and your CapEx was way higher. I guess it just kind of illustrates even the guide you gave us all that some of the metrics can really vary. I am just curious, in terms of how you are thinking about the guide going forward or some of the variables that you have taken out from maybe what you saw in Q4? Are those variables taken out? Or has your guidance changed a little bit?

Again, I know this is incredibly difficult to make an estimation, but some of the numbers were effectively kind of outside the range of what you initially gave us.

Nitin Agrawal: Thanks, Brent, for your question. So from a guide perspective, let me break it down by a few variables here. We talk about the CapEx numbers. That is fundamentally in service of our contracted customer backlog, which we disclosed this quarter to be at $66.8 billion, and that is what is driving the investment in our platform. And when you think about the revenue ramp, we talked about that as well, that almost all of our contracts that we are backlogged will start generating revenue in this year. So that is the ramp that you are seeing. We delivered 850 megawatts of power in this fiscal year, and for 2026, we expect to be at 1.7 gigawatts of power.

When you think about margin—when all of this comes together in margins—the margin progression effectively is a result of these deliberate investments that we are making to meet the insatiable demand that we have on our platform. We talked about Q4. Q4 alone, we brought 30% of our total active power base, which naturally creates some near-term margin compression as capacity costs ramp ahead of full revenue maturity and recognition. As I mentioned in my remarks, Q1 represents the trough of what we would see in margins, and then from there on, as we scale into the capacity deployed, we will expand margins quarterly from there, returning to low double digits by Q4.

We also talked a little bit about the long-term trajectory of this business. Our strategy and our management philosophy has continued to be to invest in terms of customer demand with contracted backlog, which still continues to be the case. Over the long term, how it manifests itself in our business as it grows and normalizes, we remain confident in our ability to achieve 25% to 30% margins. The factors that give us confidence in that domain—if we look at our mature, fully ramped contracts, and that portfolio—that generates contribution margins in the mid-20s. We continue to ramp up our margin-accretive products and services in our product portfolio.

For instance, we had announced in Q3 that our storage revenue on our platform eclipsed $100 million in ARR. Today, we also discussed how attach rates for storage are now at 80% in our large customer base. While not included in our 2026 guidance, we see tangible long-term upside potential from further monetization of CoreWeave, Inc.’s proprietary cloud stack to other NVIDIA cloud, enterprise, and sovereign customers. So what you are seeing in 2026 is a reflection of the acceleration of the growth on the back of our existing backlog, which continues to grow with customer demand.

Michael Intrator: I wanted to add a couple of things here. Our margins reflect the cost of building tomorrow’s revenues. That is what we are doing. As Nitin said, the fundamental margins at a stabilized facility are in the mid-20s. And as we continue to build our infrastructure, as there are more infrastructures online, that will come to bear. The variance that you are seeing is a function of how much infrastructure we are bringing on versus the installed capacity. We brought on 260 megawatts worth of power in Q4. It is fully a third of our installed capacity. So the variance that you are going to see there is higher.

As we continue to grow and scale our company, as the incremental data center capacity that we bring on becomes relatively smaller, you will see less variance from us. This is what the acceleration looks like: making the decision to invest to pull in tomorrow’s revenue, to be able to serve our clients, is a fundamental strategic decision that the company made. And we are doing this extremely responsibly because we are not doing this “we are going to build it, then they are going to come.” We are doing this leaning into the backlog of contracts that we have already sold.

Brent Thill: Great. Thanks for the color.

Operator: Your next question comes from the line of Gabriela Borges with Goldman Sachs. Please go ahead.

Gabriela Borges: Hey, good afternoon. Thanks for taking my question. Nitin, I wanted to ask you about the diversity of customers that you have on your platform. I am curious if you can share with us your observations on how the unit economics or how the attractiveness of how these customers are using the CoreWeave, Inc. platform is different between type of customers. So a little bit of a broad question. I know the pricing model is based on dollars per GPU and then the length of the committed contract, but curious if you could share your observations on customer behavior across the different cohorts. Thank you.

Nitin Agrawal: Yeah. I think a lot of this depends upon the variables that we have talked about in terms of how we structure our contracts. The term length, the amount of upfront payment, the generation, and the demand for that capacity at that moment all dictate into it. Fundamentally, as Mike described, our contracts look mostly similar across our customer base. The exception, of course, is the volume element that we look at—things when we are talking about larger customers versus smaller customers. But across the board, in our customer profile, we look to generate similar economics for the infrastructure that we are generating as the market dynamics go on.

Mike talked about how, for Hoppers, we are continuing to see incremental demand and demand of recontracting those Hoppers at about 10% of the original ASPs when they were first contracted; to A100s where the ASPs are actually increasing as we write newer contracts. Those dynamics are broader market dynamics, but across our customer base, the economics kind of look relatively similar.

Michael Intrator: The only thing I would add is that one of the things that I do think is very exciting is that many of the enterprise customers, many of the smaller AI-native customers, they are coming onto our infrastructure, and they have the ability to use the H100s and the A100s. Their ability to build product and to be able to serve inference with that infrastructure is a really wonderful sign of the depth and resiliency of the bid that is looking for compute. It is new use cases—people doing things that we have never seen before. It is really exciting.

Gabriela Borges: Thank you for the thoughts.

Operator: Your next question comes from the line of Ben Reitzes with Melius Research. Please go ahead.

Ben Reitzes: Hey, guys. Thanks a lot. I wanted to ask the other side of, I believe it was the Brent Thill question. One of the things going on in the industry is there is all this CapEx and not enough margin or cash flow necessarily in the near term. And so, you know, I think that is what he was getting at is that you guys were talking about your margins being 20% to 25% over the long term, and then your confidence to get there. What is your confidence in the rate of the CapEx growth? Like, we understand you are spending now to get the revenue. But does that growth rate moderate more than we are thinking?

As those margins go up, do you need to keep spending at this kind of upside versus the Street on the CapEx side in order to hit those numbers? Just a little bit more color on the CapEx side that balances Brent’s question on the margin would be really helpful in the rate of that trajectory. Thanks a lot.

Michael Intrator: Thanks, Ben. That is a good question. And I think it is really important that we deconstruct that question into at least two pieces. The first piece is that our business is built on a success-based model where clients come to us and buy long-term contracts to get access to the infrastructure to build their business. And so when a hyperscaler comes to us and buys infrastructure for five years, they are going to be purchasing that infrastructure from us at a fixed price for five years.

And that is a very stable way to go about building our revenue and our margins, and that is where Nitin gets the confidence around the margins from, because we know not only what we are going to make now, but we know what we are going to make as those contracts move through the five-year cycle that they have been put under a take-or-pay contract. And so that is a very stable way to go about building a business. It is a very stable way to go about getting access to the capital markets that we are able to finance the builds.

And that is a fundamental building block of how CoreWeave, Inc. has gone about building its business really since the beginning.

The second question kind of embedded in that is, what is our confidence interval that there will be a continuation of demand for computing infrastructure? And this is a great opportunity for me to talk a little bit about what we are seeing in the demand stack, because the demand stack is actually fascinating. Not only are we seeing the proliferation of demand across the economy, going from where it was initially really housed within the hyperscaler clouds and the foundation models, you are now seeing it explode into the enterprise. You are seeing it move into sovereign. You are seeing all these new participants beginning to come in and securing the infrastructure that they need.

You are also seeing a really fascinating component where it is moving from just the GPU—which was the initial wave of demand that we used to launch our company—but really now starting to move out into storage, into CPUs, and that is really a function of the portfolio of clients that are using our infrastructure really extending into the application lane. And so as far as the demand goes, we have got our fingers on the pulse in a way that very few companies in the world have. We are getting information fed in from across the entire economy as people are trying to get access to the infrastructure that they require.

So we are very confident in our contractual position relative to the portfolio of clients that we have, and we are very excited about the portfolio of different types of clients, and we are very excited about the different types of compute that they are using. And so it is really threefold of information—threefold of confidence—around the drive towards accessing compute via CoreWeave, Inc.

Nitin Agrawal: Ben, a couple of data points that I will just add. As we discussed in our prepared remarks, our 2026 CapEx—substantially all of it—is tied to already signed customer contracts we intend to bring online this year, and we expect to double our deployed power capacity. So that is one data point. The second data point that I want to make sure that you get is from an EBITDA margin perspective. I know you talked about where is the cash associated. From an EBITDA margin perspective, we generated 57% margin this quarter.

When I think about the long-term contracted customer contracts that we have and those scaled customer contracts, we talked about they are in the mid-20s from a contribution margin perspective. You look at the EBITDA margins for those, they are in the 70% zone. So that is something that gives us confidence in terms of when our contracts scale, they can generate a lot of cash for us.

Ben Reitzes: Thanks, guys.

Operator: Your next question comes from the line of Brad Zelnick with Deutsche Bank. Please go ahead.

Brad Zelnick: Congrats on an absolutely amazing year. Just, guys, as we look to Rubin-tent contracts ahead, are you seeing demand for similar five-year duration? And is there anything different about how these deals are priced, the amount of prepayment that you would expect, or anything else? And how should we think about the ROIC on these deals versus prior-generation contracts and the economics that you have outlined in your original S-1? Thank you.

Michael Intrator: Thanks. It has not even been a year yet, although it does feel like it. I think we have got eleven months under our belt. So look. In the written statements that we made, we talked a little bit about the fact that one of the trends that we are seeing is the extension of the contracts from an average of four years up to an average of five years. And obviously, that is great for us. It is stabilizing for our business. It gives us a lot of confidence around building and scaling the infrastructure.

And so that is the first thing I would highlight to you: the clients that are coming in and using this infrastructure are gaining more confidence in the longevity of the usefulness of the infrastructure, which once again gets back to many of the important components that are required for us to build our business. The pricing on the infrastructure—we kind of think about that from a margin perspective. And as the infrastructure changes in price, we are altering our pricing of how we deliver it to clients in order to target the type of margins that Nitin spoke to. And so those are some of the trends that you are seeing.

Now, as far as prepay goes, prepayment is always a lever which we can use with clients to change the economics around a contract. One of the things that is very exciting for us is, as we continue to drive down our cost of capital, our dependency on prepayments is reduced.

Brad Zelnick: Alright. Thank you.

Operator: Your final question comes from the line of Michael Turrin with Wells Fargo. Please go ahead.

Michael Turrin: Hey. Great. Thanks very much. Appreciate you taking the question. This is for Nitin or Mike. Can you just speak to what gives you confidence in the $30 billion run rate by 2027 and how much of that is already booked versus business your team needs to go get? And maybe as a second part, just if you could speak to any change in demand you are seeing. Mike, you touched on some of the segments of the market, but just any change in demand you are seeing across those segments and how you prioritize across those as well. Thanks very much.

Michael Intrator: I am going to do it in reverse order if that is okay. One of the things that we as a business are very interested in is making sure that we have a diversified perspective on what the compute is being used for. And so we are really out there working with everyone that consumes compute in every way that we can because we feel like that gives us the best view on where the demand is going to come from.

And I have said this before: one of the things that is going to happen here is, as compute becomes more available, you are going to see businesses that do not even exist yet—ideas that do not even exist yet—have an opportunity to come into existence. Those will be new clients of ours, and we want to be able to pick them up right at the beginning as they go ahead and build these new incredible businesses.

Moving on to your question around the $30 billion run rate, what we are doing is we are taking the contracted power that we have and we are projecting out when the existing contracts that have already been sold—and like I said, we are virtually sold out in 2026 of all of our capacity—and then continuing to add contracts that will be allocated once they come online in 2027. And we have vast and sustained interest from our clients to get more capacity, to bring on more compute. And these are some of the largest, most creditworthy companies in the world. These are some of the most important AI labs in the world.

These are the people that are building the AI future, and they are trying to secure infrastructure through CoreWeave, Inc., and it is really exciting. And when you move through that exercise, we have a lot of confidence in the $30 billion number that we have put out.

Michael Turrin: Thank you.

Michael Intrator: Alright. So like I said, we have got eleven months in here, and I appreciate all of you working with us as we have built this company. So as we wrap up here, I want to thank the CoreWeave, Inc. team and our partners. None of these accomplishments would have been possible without you. I am incredibly proud and humbled of the across the organization. From product velocity and innovation to operational excellence, and financial rigor. The focus and intensity across our organization is what enables us to continue our hypergrowth trajectory and the size of the incredible opportunity that lies ahead. Thank you all for joining us today.

We appreciate your support, and we look forward to updating you in the future. Thank you.

Operator: Ladies and gentlemen, this concludes today’s call. Thank you all for joining. You may now disconnect.

Should you buy stock in CoreWeave right now?

Before you buy stock in CoreWeave, consider this:

The Motley Fool Stock Advisor analyst team just identified what they believe are the 10 best stocks for investors to buy now… and CoreWeave wasn’t one of them. The 10 stocks that made the cut could produce monster returns in the coming years.

Consider when Netflix made this list on December 17, 2004... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you’d have $456,188!* Or when Nvidia made this list on April 15, 2005... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you’d have $1,133,413!*

Now, it’s worth noting Stock Advisor’s total average return is 916% — a market-crushing outperformance compared to 194% for the S&P 500. Don't miss the latest top 10 list, available with Stock Advisor, and join an investing community built by individual investors for individual investors.

See the 10 stocks »

*Stock Advisor returns as of February 27, 2026.

This article is a transcript of this conference call produced for The Motley Fool. While we strive for our Foolish Best, there may be errors, omissions, or inaccuracies in this transcript. Parts of this article were created using Large Language Models (LLMs) based on The Motley Fool's insights and investing approach. It has been reviewed by our AI quality control systems. Since LLMs cannot (currently) own stocks, it has no positions in any of the stocks mentioned. As with all our articles, The Motley Fool does not assume any responsibility for your use of this content, and we strongly encourage you to do your own research, including listening to the call yourself and reading the company's SEC filings. Please see our Terms and Conditions for additional details, including our Obligatory Capitalized Disclaimers of Liability.

The Motley Fool has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.

Disclaimer: For information purposes only. Past performance is not indicative of future results.
placeholder
Oil prices rise as US and Iran extend talks into next weekUS-Iran talks end with no deal but signs of progressOPEC+ to consider oil output increase for April, sources sayBrent and WTI benchmarks register slight daily gainsBy Anna Hirtenstein LONDON, Feb 27 (Reuters) - Oil prices rose on Friday but were on track to finish the week relatively flat after t...
Author  Reuters
8 hours ago
US-Iran talks end with no deal but signs of progressOPEC+ to consider oil output increase for April, sources sayBrent and WTI benchmarks register slight daily gainsBy Anna Hirtenstein LONDON, Feb 27 (Reuters) - Oil prices rose on Friday but were on track to finish the week relatively flat after t...
placeholder
Silver Price Forecast: XAG/USD jumps above $90 as AI valuation risks boost safe-haven demandSilver price (XAG/USD) is up 2.4% to near $90.60 during the European trading session on Friday. The white metal strengthens as escalating concerns over valuations of Artificial Intelligence (AI) stocks have prompted demand for safe-haven assets.
Author  FXStreet
10 hours ago
Silver price (XAG/USD) is up 2.4% to near $90.60 during the European trading session on Friday. The white metal strengthens as escalating concerns over valuations of Artificial Intelligence (AI) stocks have prompted demand for safe-haven assets.
placeholder
Top 3 Price Prediction: Bitcoin, Ethereum, Ripple – BTC, ETH and XRP consolidate with short-term cautious bullish biasBitcoin (BTC), Ethereum (ETH) and Ripple (XRP) are consolidating near key technical areas on Friday, showing mild signs of stabilization after recent volatility.
Author  FXStreet
13 hours ago
Bitcoin (BTC), Ethereum (ETH) and Ripple (XRP) are consolidating near key technical areas on Friday, showing mild signs of stabilization after recent volatility.
placeholder
Gold rises to near $5,200 amid US tariff uncertainty, US PPI data in focusGold (XAU/USD) attracts some buyers to around $5,195 during the early Asian session on Friday. The precious metal edges higher as US tariff uncertainty spurs safe-haven demand. Traders await the release of the US January Producer Price Index (PPI) reports later on Friday for fresh impetus. 
Author  FXStreet
13 hours ago
Gold (XAU/USD) attracts some buyers to around $5,195 during the early Asian session on Friday. The precious metal edges higher as US tariff uncertainty spurs safe-haven demand. Traders await the release of the US January Producer Price Index (PPI) reports later on Friday for fresh impetus. 
placeholder
Bitcoin Rallies 4% to Near $70,000 as Market Optimism ReturnsBitcoin price nears $70,000 as market bullish sentiment rebounds.On Thursday (February 26), Bitcoin (BTC) saw a rare strong rally recently, jumping nearly 4% on the day to a high above $6
Author  TradingKey
Yesterday 06: 12
Bitcoin price nears $70,000 as market bullish sentiment rebounds.On Thursday (February 26), Bitcoin (BTC) saw a rare strong rally recently, jumping nearly 4% on the day to a high above $6
goTop
quote