Did Anthropic Just Give Investors Another DeepSeek Moment?

It's reminiscent of the market's 2025 reaction to DeepSeek, a Chinese start-up that seemed like it could deliver the same AI capabilities with a fraction of the hardware requirements. This "DeepSeek Moment" caused investors to rethink their assumptions.

In this podcast, Motley Fool contributors Tyler Crowe, Matt Frankel, and Jon Quast discuss:

• Which stocks may be more safe.
• Sudden shifts in the job market.
• How the economy impacts their investing.
• Stocks on their radar.

To catch full episodes of all The Motley Fool's free podcasts, check out our podcast center. When you're ready to invest, check out this top 10 list of stocks to buy.

A full transcript is below.

This podcast was recorded on Feb. 05, 2026.

Tyler Crowe: Software companies terrible no good, very bad day. This is Motley Fool Money. Welcome to Motley Fool Money. My name's Tyler Crowe. Today, I'm joined by longtime contributors Matt Frankel and Jon Quast. Guys, sometimes decades happen and nothing happens, and sometimes decades happen in a month. Yes, I'm using a Lenin quote on an investing podcast, but it really does feel like that this week because it has been a busy one. We're going to talk about jobs numbers. We may make a couple cracks at Google's earnings and their stock going down today, but we're going to start with software companies, especially like SaaS companies and a lot of things that has been going on in that space recently. It was right around this time last year when we were talking about AI having this deep seat moment. Investors were terrified that a Chinese company had built some impressive AI algorithms that ran on commodity hardware and were much more efficient than some of the AI models that we were seeing from Open AI. Well, this week, software companies, I think, had what we could call their anthropic moment. That's when AI Company Anthropic launched Claude Cowork. It's a AI tool designed to replace many software tools on the market today. Just to give some examples of the software companies that were reeling from this, over the past week, shares of Shopify are down 23%, Monday.com, and Fastly are down 15%. Bill Holdings is down 16%, and this is all as we're recording today. I could keep going. The list is long, and this is just a brief encapsulation of what we've seen at a lot of software and SaaS companies in the last few weeks and months. I want to put this to both of you. With the DeepSeek moment that we had last year, it seemed to have passed. AI spending is exploding and Meta, Alphabet, all these companies are full steam ahead, and there doesn't seem to be as many issues as we thought about a year ago. Will this anthropic moment for software like, have a similar result, or are there deeper concerns for these companies?

Matt Frankel: First of all, Tyler, I love the Lenin quote you pulled out because I feel like New Year's Day was seven months ago, and it was like one month ago. We're in a very slow time period right now. But yeah, the answer to your question is, it depends if this is another DeepSeek moment or not. I really think the risk here varies based on the type of software company we're talking about. In some ways, it could be an overreaction. In some ways, it could be legitimate concerns. I think of software stocks in a three baskets, I guess, I'd say. One, there's the massive and deep pocketed software leaders think like Microsoft, in that case. They're not going anywhere. Then there are what I call the ecosystem companies, the ones that are mission critical for their customers and are just so rooted into their customer's business. Shopify is a great example of that from the stocks that you just mentioned. Then there are the software companies that essentially do one thing. Sometimes they do it really well, but essentially perform one function for a business that not only the business would be fine without, but if the Claude Cowork could make an AI driven alternative, they wouldn't feel any difference. Not that these companies are going to go away or anything, but like HubSpot and Atlassian, those are down way way off the highs. Those are two examples I'd put in that third basket. No, I don't think AI is going to completely destroy any of them. As earnings trickle out over the next couple weeks, we're going to get some really valuable insights from CEOs who are almost guaranteed to get questions about all this in their conference calls. But my general feeling is that the more mission critical the software company is to its customers and the more different things that it does, the better off that it's going to be in this anthropic moment, as you put it.

Jon Quast: This anthropic moment is really fascinating because on the one hand, this is what everyone has been saying all along, ever since AI really started to take hold of the headlines that it was going to replace certain softwares. We've been expecting this but on the other hand, everyone's acting surprised. Now, in the comparison to DeepSeek, I'm not certain that the DeepSeek moment is fully over. What Deepseek showed us is that it's possible maybe to do more with less when it comes to the AI hardware. I would say, when you look at the bottlenecks in this industry, it's all physical. There's a lot of physical bottlenecks, and I think that that points to a continuation of, we need to learn how to do more in AI with less physical components. I don't think that that trend has fully played out. I think the initial panic that was what the market was down by, and it's like, Oh, it didn't collapse overnight. I think we might see something similar here with Anthropic. The general trend is pointing toward what Matt said. There is going to be software that is replaced by AI. I think that we saw Anthropic come out with its new products. This is the initial panic to that. I think in coming months and quarters, we're going to see, Okay, it's not a overnight collapse, but I think the general trend is pointing in that direction, and I think that is why, as Matt said, it's so important to distinguish what software can't we do without? We're going to still go to the software provider and what is AI going to replace?

Tyler Crowe: I found myself landing in a very similar place the mission critical versus the relatively easy switching costs. When I think of mission critical, I think, like banking software Fiserv Fidelity National Jack Henry or companies that I don't really see getting affected by AI nearly as much as just to get I'm not going to name any names here, but working here at the foul past several years, we've swapped out productivity SaaS vendors like two to three times, and life seems to have gone on with relatively not a whole lot of bumps in the. With that in mind, I mentioned Fiserv Fidelity National Jack Henry. I want to put you two on the spot here. I want you to highlight one stock in the software industry where you're not nearly worried about AI disruption.

Jon Quast: For me, that is CrowdStrike, ticker symbol CRWD. This is a cloud based AI cybersecurity company. I don't think that this is a business that you want to have some internal tech geniuses vibe coding, cybersecurity product to replace it. I don't see that happening. Businesses need cybersecurity. The threats are always increasing. Look, CrowdStrike is a fast growing, hugely profitable business. It does have plenty of resources at its disposal to defend itself. If you look, shares are flat over the past year down 25% from 52 week high. Maybe still a little bit pricey from a valuation perspective, but if this SaaS sell off intensifies, maybe 2026 will hand investors a very good bargain for CrowdStrike stock.

Matt Frankel: I love the cybersecurity space here. I like that you brought that up. The one I was going to highlight is Toast, TOST. It just hit a 52 week low today, and it's ridiculous that it's sold off so much. It's a business that is so entrenched in its customers businesses. It provides an entire restaurant ecosystem, payroll, ordering, delivery, payments, mobile apps, many other things that restaurants have historically had to pay dozens of different vendors for. A lot of those they're not disruptible by just coding. You're not going to code a new delivery platform that's that ingrained in a business. You're just not. I just don't see each of the things it does like altogether as being completely disruptible. I think that's one that people shouldn't have to worry about.

Tyler Crowe: I think we got some really good ideas here. Coming up after the break, we're going to talk about maybe some not great news as well. We're going to talk about job productivity and current job numbers after the break.

ADVERTISEMENT: The world moves fast. You workday, even faster, pitching products, drafting reports, analyzing data. Microsoft 365 copilot is your AI assistant for work, built into Word, Excel, PowerPoint, and other Microsoft 365 apps you use, helping you quickly write, analyze, create, and summarize. You can cut through clutter and clear a path to your best work. Learn more at microsoft.com/M365copilot.

Tyler Crowe: Unfortunately, today is not the most positive news day for this podcast because we got some jobs numbers that were to quote one of my favorite 1990s movies, Office Space. Not great, Bob. Job openings were the lowest since 2020, and January layoff numbers were the highest since we saw in January of 2009. Now, I don't know about you, but I'm struggling to put these numbers in perspective because thinking about the past five or six years of hiring and firing trends, we had some massive hiring rounds in 2021, 2022, as we were coming out of COVID. Even though some companies admitted they may have overshot their needs for labor, they were hesitant to lay off because of various reasons. I'm struggling with this concept. Is this just part of the natural ups and downs of the hiring cycle where we overshot early and now we're correcting? Is this related to AI productivity that we were just talking about? I'm really of many minds on this topic, and I'd love to get you guys' input because I haven't come down on one side or the other.

Jon Quast: I think yes and yes, Tyler. You look at some of the places where jobs are pretty good. Healthcare looks like it's still generally adding some workers, leisure and hospitality, not doing bad. But we are seeing decreases is right where you expect them to be, and that is entry level tech jobs. I think that AI does have something to do with that, for sure. But I do think that some perspective is important here. Unemployment rates remain well within the historical average for the last 20 years, so I don't want to make light of anyone losing their job, and I don't want to just wave my hands at the significant spike in layoffs in January. But nothing yet screams to me that the economy is in trouble. It would take a few more months like January for me to really start to say, Okay, there's a trend that we really need to pay attention to here.

Matt Frankel: I know that I'm definitely, especially out of me and Tyler, I know I'm the glass is half full type of guy. But if we're going to see elevated layoffs here, it's more common in the first quarter, although this is still a pretty high number. Companies anticipate the needs for the busy holiday quarter, and then in the first quarter there's just that trend. Although the headline number of about 108,000 announced layoffs sounds like a lot, and it is. A lot of it is single company announcements, not just an AI. Jon correctly mentioned that a lot of this is entry level tech jobs, but UPS announced over 30,000 layoffs. That was included in that 108,000 number. Amazon announced 16,000, which is some of the entry level tech jobs, but a lot of it is single company. Between those two, that's almost half of that big headline number. Not that the news isn't scary, but it is important to add context like this to it. Some of the job reductions seem to be natural, companies focusing more on efficiency. Some definitely seems to be AI driven, and not just because of AI fears, but because companies are ramping up spending in AI infrastructure and have to get the money to pay for it somewhere. But I do agree with Jon, one month's job stata does not frighten me. But if this trend continues, that could change.

Tyler Crowe: To your point on the UPS numbers, I think that's also expected, too, because they have been trying to wind down their e commerce delivery a little bit much to focus on small, medium business healthcare stuff, a little bit more value over volume. That one comes in line with what UPS has been thinking about wanting to do. Guys, we're a podcast from the Motley fool, and some of the core tenets of our investing philosophy here at the Motley fool is to buy companies over the long term and not let a short term thing or two really lead to rash decisions. But as investors and when we're making our decisions, what to you guys, constitutes enough bad news to alter your thesis? Take these jobs numbers. What trend in macro numbers would you need to see to either one drastically alter your current investment in something or when you have wanting to put new money into an investment?

Jon Quast: Yeah, it's a good question, Tyler. I think it would have to be case by case. As fFools. I think there's good reason to be perennially optimistic about the stock market in general. We are almost 100% of the time, if not 100%, we are looking for? What can we invest in today? What's a good opportunity right now? But individual stocks, I could flip to Bearish on some economic data. It's possible. I try to build an investment thesis that takes into account that the economy does regularly go up and it does regularly contract. I want to build an investment thesis that looks through the economic cycles and isn't going to break just because the economy goes through its normal contractions or its normal slowdowns. But it is possible that I would build a thesis that is a little bit more dependent on the economy. I hate to single out a single company by name, but I think a company like Polaris, this is Ticker symbol, PII, they make four wheelers and stuff like that. Listen, it can struggle in a recession. This is a company that is dependent on product sales. It really requires a strong consumer with plenty of discretionary income. There is a scenario where this net debt company could go through a prolonged economic downturn and really, really struggle. But there is a scenario where Polaris could be a very cheap stock. Maybe we're toward the bottom of the economic cycle, and maybe I can make a case for investing in it at that time for the next three years or something like that as the economy heats up. But normally I would build an investment thesis that is not dependent on an economic cycle.

Matt Frankel: I'll almost never stop investing entirely because of any type of macro concerns. Even during the initial COVID crash when the sky was falling, Tyler and I lost hours of productivity just game planning what stocks we wanted to buy. But depending on the nature of the bad news, I can alter my investment focus, and that's what we did back then. But so, for example, if Jobs data stays this bad for several more months, I might stop putting money into some of the cyclical areas like banking, where even though I like some of the businesses there a lot and focus on more evergreen industries like say, insurance, because no matter what the jobs and market's doing, people still need to pay their car insurance and things like that. In a speculative sell off, that's what I consider the current software sell off to be. I use it as a time to selectively look for opportunities, like we discussed in the first segment. I will start paying close attention to company earnings reports, I will say, when macro data is banned, just take a little bit of an extra microscope and see where cracks are forming. But I don't stop investing.

Tyler Crowe: Matt, I think you and I would be embarrassed to tell our wives how much we were looking at debt confidence of Tanger during the COVID breakdown. Yes, I can fully attest to some of the things that Matt's talking about. Speaking of crazy stocks and looking at debt covenants, after the break, we're gonna do stocks on our radar.

ADVERTISEMENT: Could AI help you do more of what you love? Workday is the next gen ERP powered by AI that actually knows your business. We help you handle the have to dos, so you can focus on the can't wait to does. It's a new workday.

Tyler Crowe: Just a quick aside before we get to stocks on our radar here, we joked last week when we were discussing Meta, that it was like a freaky Friday moment. Third quarter, they reported they were going to spend a ton of money. The stock dropped, and then this quarter, they said they were going to spend a ton of money, and then the stock popped. We were joking. It was the opposite of what happened at alphabet in the third quarter. Guess what? This most recent quarter they announced today. They announced massive capital spending, and I think the stock is down about 3%, 4% as we're recording today. Another freaky Friday moment, insert whatever investing trope that you have about Mr. Market or Be greedy when it's fearful. There's a whole bunch. Pick your favorite one and add it right there. For stocks on the radar, I'm going to go first today. The one that I've been looking at is Powell Industries.

Now, I've been known to pick sleepy businesses from time to time. Most of the time Powell Industries, I almost forgot the ticker, POWL, that would fall into that basket of those sleepy businesses, circuit breakers, switchbacks, and other electrical equipment for industrial or municipal facilities, AI data centers, maybe, LNG export terminals the big stuff. But, man, was the most recent earnings anything but sleepy. Net new orders for the most recent quarter were up 63% compared to this time last year. It's book to bill ratio, which basically means the amount of orders that it brought in versus the amount that they sent out the door as completed equipment was 1.7 times, which means way more stuff's coming in than out the door. I wouldn't even call Powell Industries a picks and shovels investment in AI infrastructure. This is like the Blacksmith making the steel components of the picks and shovels to make them to sell them. Companies like Powell, and this is actually to Jon, I think it was your statement on those bottlenecks in AI infrastructure, that physical stuff and needing to find those efficiencies, companies like Powell are going to be where the pain points of AI build out are going to happen. Relatively smaller companies that are facing massive demand for things that are often a much more sleepy business. I think the companies that are able to meet that growing demand are going to do spectacularly well in the coming years. Certainly, based on the quarterly numbers at Powell, there's an opportunity for them to make that happen. Matt, you go next.

Matt Frankel: I'm going to piggyback on what Jon mentioned earlier because I think cybersecurity is such a great call in the current environment. I'm going to go with Zscaler, though, ZS. They provide secure access to all their enterprises, apps, their data. In full disclosure, I used three different apps provided by the Motley Fool today, and I logged in once. It was super easy. I got into all of them. The stock just hit a 52 week low. The surge in AI technology that we've been talking about, it is going to increase the need for cybersecurity, not decrease it. It's going to be a growing market for years to come, and I just can't say enough good things about how great of an opportunity I see in cybersecurity right now.

Jon Quast: I'm going to go with GoDaddy, ticker symbol GDDY. This business is not new. It's a company that allows you to buy a domain name, host a website, and implement some e-commerce tools. There are aspects of this business that I do think would be replaceable with AI in theory, particularly the e-commerce tools. But then there are other aspects of the business that really aren't. For example, web hosting, GoDaddy provides its own web hosting with its own data centers. There's something physical here. It's not just software, and so that does give GoDaddy something defensible, in my opinion. You look at the business growing by double digits. It's getting more profitable as it's embraced AI in its own workflow. Now it trades at just nine times its forward earnings. That looks really just too cheap for me. It just repurchased 1.4 billion in its own shares for the first three quarters of the year, which is good for more than 10% of its market cap right now. I think this business is important, it's profitable, and the stock is darn cheap right now.

Tyler Crowe: That gives us GoDaddy, Zscaler, Powell Industries. If we go back through the episode, I think there was a lot more companies that we mentioned along the way. As always, people on the program may have interest in the stocks they talk about, and the Motley Fool may have formal recommendations for or against, so don't buy or sell stocks based solely on what you hear. All personal finance content follows Motley Fool editorial standards and is not approved by advertisers. Advertisements are sponsored content and provided for informational purposes only. To see our full advertising disclosure, please check out our notes. Thanks for producer Dan Boyd and the rest of the Motley Fool team for Matt, Jon and myself, thanks for listening, and we'll chat again soon.

Jon Quast has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. Matt Frankel, CFP has positions in Amazon and Shopify and has the following options: short January 2027 $170 calls on Shopify. Tyler Crowe has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool has positions in and recommends Alphabet, Amazon, Atlassian, Bill Holdings, CrowdStrike, Fastly, HubSpot, Meta Platforms, Monday.com, Shopify, Toast, United Parcel Service, and Zscaler. The Motley Fool recommends GoDaddy. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.